FOURTH ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 36, Art. 4]

Whether Envy Is a Capital Vice?

Objection 1: It would seem that envy is not a capital vice. For the

capital vices are distinct from their daughters. Now envy is the

daughter of vainglory; for the Philosopher says (Rhet. ii, 10) that

"those who love honor and glory are more envious." Therefore envy is

not a capital vice.

Obj. 2: Further, the capital vices seem to be less grave than the

other vices which arise from them. For Gregory says (Moral. xxxi,

45): "The leading vices seem to worm their way into the deceived mind

under some kind of pretext, but those which follow them provoke the

soul to all kinds of outrage, and confuse the mind with their wild

outcry." Now envy is seemingly a most grave sin, for Gregory says

(Moral. v, 46): "Though in every evil thing that is done, the venom

of our old enemy is infused into the heart of man, yet in this

wickedness the serpent stirs his whole bowels and discharges the bane

of spite fitted to enter deep into the mind." Therefore envy is not a

capital sin.

Obj. 3: Further, it seems that its daughters are unfittingly assigned

by Gregory (Moral. xxxi, 45), who says that from envy arise "hatred,

tale-bearing, detraction, joy at our neighbor's misfortunes, and

grief for his prosperity." For joy at our neighbor's misfortunes and

grief for his prosperity seem to be the same as envy, as appears from

what has been said above (A. 3). Therefore these should not be

assigned as daughters of envy.

On the contrary stands the authority of Gregory (Moral. xxxi, 45) who

states that envy is a capital sin and assigns the aforesaid daughters

thereto.

_I answer that,_ Just as sloth is grief for a Divine spiritual good,

so envy is grief for our neighbor's good. Now it has been stated

above (Q. 35, A. 4) that sloth is a capital vice for the reason that

it incites man to do certain things, with the purpose either of

avoiding sorrow or of satisfying its demands. Wherefore envy is

accounted a capital vice for the same reason.

Reply Obj. 1: As Gregory says (Moral. xxxi, 45), "the capital vices

are so closely akin to one another that one springs from the other.

For the first offspring of pride is vainglory, which by corrupting

the mind it occupies begets envy, since while it craves for the power

of an empty name, it repines for fear lest another should acquire

that power." Consequently the notion of a capital vice does not

exclude its originating from another vice, but it demands that it

should have some principal reason for being itself the origin of

several kinds of sin. However it is perhaps because envy manifestly

arises from vainglory, that it is not reckoned a capital sin, either

by Isidore (De Summo Bono) or by Cassian (De Instit. Caenob. v, 1).

Reply Obj. 2: It does not follow from the passage quoted that envy is

the greatest of sins, but that when the devil tempts us to envy, he

is enticing us to that which has its chief place in his heart, for as

quoted further on in the same passage, "by the envy of the devil,

death came into the world" (Wis. 2:24).

There is, however, a kind of envy which is accounted among the most

grievous sins, viz. envy of another's spiritual good, which envy is a

sorrow for the increase of God's grace, and not merely for our

neighbor's good. Hence it is accounted a sin against the Holy Ghost,

because thereby a man envies, as it were, the Holy Ghost Himself, Who

is glorified in His works.

Reply Obj. 3: The number of envy's daughters may be understood for

the reason that in the struggle aroused by envy there is something by

way of beginning, something by way of middle, and something by way of

term. The beginning is that a man strives to lower another's

reputation, and this either secretly, and then we have

_tale-bearing,_ or openly, and then we have _detraction._ The middle

consists in the fact that when a man aims at defaming another, he is

either able to do so, and then we have _joy at another's misfortune,_

or he is unable, and then we have _grief at another's prosperity._

The term is hatred itself, because just as good which delights causes

love, so does sorrow cause hatred, as stated above (Q. 34, A. 6).

Grief at another's prosperity is in one way the very same as envy,

when, to Wit, a man grieves over another's prosperity, in so far as

it gives the latter a good name, but in another way it is a daughter

of envy, in so far as the envious man sees his neighbor prosper

notwithstanding his efforts to prevent it. On the other hand, _joy at

another's misfortune_ is not directly the same as envy, but is a

result thereof, because grief over our neighbor's good which is envy,

gives rise to joy in his evil.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 268 / 1128 题