FOURTH ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 32, Art. 4]

Whether Corporal Almsdeeds Have a Spiritual Effect?

Objection 1: It would seem that corporal almsdeeds have not a

spiritual effect. For no effect exceeds its cause. But spiritual

goods exceed corporal goods. Therefore corporal almsdeeds have no

spiritual effect.

Obj. 2: Further, the sin of simony consists in giving the corporal

for the spiritual, and it is to be utterly avoided. Therefore one

ought not to give alms in order to receive a spiritual effect.

Obj. 3: Further, to multiply the cause is to multiply the effect. If

therefore corporal almsdeeds cause a spiritual effect, the greater

the alms, the greater the spiritual profit, which is contrary to what

we read (Luke 21:3) of the widow who cast two brass mites into the

treasury, and in Our Lord's own words "cast in more than . . . all."

Therefore bodily almsdeeds have no spiritual effect.

_On the contrary,_ It is written (Ecclus. 17:18): "The alms of a man

. . . shall preserve the grace of a man as the apple of the eye."

_I answer that,_ Corporal almsdeeds may be considered in three ways.

First, with regard to their substance, and in this way they have

merely a corporal effect, inasmuch as they supply our neighbor's

corporal needs. Secondly, they may be considered with regard to their

cause, in so far as a man gives a corporal alms out of love for God

and his neighbor, and in this respect they bring forth a spiritual

fruit, according to Ecclus. 29:13, 14: "Lose thy money for thy

brother . . . place thy treasure in the commandments of the Most

High, and it shall bring thee more profit than gold."

Thirdly, with regard to the effect, and in this way again, they have

a spiritual fruit, inasmuch as our neighbor, who is succored by a

corporal alms, is moved to pray for his benefactor; wherefore the

above text goes on (Ecclus. 29:15): "Shut up alms in the heart of the

poor, and it shall obtain help for thee from all evil."

Reply Obj. 1: This argument considers corporal almsdeeds as to their

substance.

Reply Obj. 2: He who gives an alms does not intend to buy a spiritual

thing with a corporal thing, for he knows that spiritual things

infinitely surpass corporal things, but he intends to merit a

spiritual fruit through the love of charity.

Reply Obj. 3: The widow who gave less in quantity, gave more in

proportion; and thus we gather that the fervor of her charity, whence

corporal almsdeeds derive their spiritual efficacy, was greater.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 235 / 1128 题