TWELFTH ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 26, Art. 12]

Whether a Man Ought to Love More His Benefactor Than One He Has

Benefited?

Objection 1: It would seem that a man ought to love his benefactor

more than one he has benefited. For Augustine says (De Catech. Rud.

iv): "Nothing will incite another more to love you than that you love

him first: for he must have a hard heart indeed, who not only refuses

to love, but declines to return love already given." Now a man's

benefactor forestalls him in the kindly deeds of charity. Therefore

we ought to love our benefactors above all.

Obj. 2: Further, the more grievously we sin by ceasing to love a man

or by working against him, the more ought we to love him. Now it is a

more grievous sin to cease loving a benefactor or to work against

him, than to cease loving one to whom one has hitherto done kindly

actions. Therefore we ought to love our benefactors more than those

to whom we are kind.

Obj. 3: Further, of all things lovable, God is to be loved most, and

then one's father, as Jerome says [*Comment. in Ezechiel xliv, 25].

Now these are our greatest benefactors. Therefore a benefactor should

be loved above all others.

_On the contrary,_ The Philosopher says (Ethic. ix, 7), that

"benefactors seem to love recipients of their benefactions, rather

than vice versa."

_I answer that,_ As stated above (AA. 9, 11), a thing is loved more

in two ways: first because it has the character of a more excellent

good, secondly by reason of a closer connection. In the first way we

ought to love our benefactor most, because, since he is a principle

of good to the man he has benefited, he has the character of a more

excellent good, as stated above with regard to one's father (A. 9).

In the second way, however, we love those more who have received

benefactions from us, as the Philosopher proves (Ethic. ix, 7) by

four arguments. First because the recipient of benefactions is the

handiwork of the benefactor, so that we are wont to say of a man: "He

was made by so and so." Now it is natural to a man to love his own

work (thus it is to be observed that poets love their own poems): and

the reason is that we love _to be_ and _to live,_ and these are made

manifest in our _action._ Secondly, because we all naturally love

that in which we see our own good. Now it is true that the benefactor

has some good of his in the recipient of his benefaction, and the

recipient some good in the benefactor; but the benefactor sees his

virtuous good in the recipient, while the recipient sees his useful

good in the benefactor. Now it gives more pleasure to see one's

virtuous good than one's useful good, both because it is more

enduring,--for usefulness quickly flits by, and the pleasure of

calling a thing to mind is not like the pleasure of having it

present--and because it is more pleasant to recall virtuous goods

than the profit we have derived from others. Thirdly, because is it

the lover's part to act, since he wills and works the good of the

beloved, while the beloved takes a passive part in receiving good, so

that to love surpasses being loved, for which reason the greater love

is on the part of the benefactor. Fourthly because it is more

difficult to give than to receive favors: and we are most fond of

things which have cost us most trouble, while we almost despise what

comes easy to us.

Reply Obj. 1: It is some thing in the benefactor that incites the

recipient to love him: whereas the benefactor loves the recipient,

not through being incited by him, but through being moved thereto of

his own accord: and what we do of our own accord surpasses what we do

through another.

Reply Obj. 2: The love of the beneficiary for the benefactor is more

of a duty, wherefore the contrary is the greater sin. On the other

hand, the love of the benefactor for the beneficiary is more

spontaneous, wherefore it is quicker to act.

Reply Obj. 3: God also loves us more than we love Him, and parents

love their children more than these love them. Yet it does not follow

that we love all who have received good from us, more than any of our

benefactors. For we prefer such benefactors as God and our parents,

from whom we have received the greatest favors, to those on whom we

have bestowed lesser benefits.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 198 / 1128 题