FOURTH ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 25, Art. 4]

Whether a Man Ought to Love Himself Out of Charity?

Objection 1: It would seem that a man is [not] bound to love himself

out of charity. For Gregory says in a homily (In Evang. xvii) that

there "can be no charity between less than two." Therefore no man has

charity towards himself.

Obj. 2: Further, friendship, by its very nature, implies mutual love

and equality (Ethic. viii, 2, 7), which cannot be of one man towards

himself. But charity is a kind of friendship, as stated above (Q. 23,

A. 1). Therefore a man cannot have charity towards himself.

Obj. 3: Further, anything relating to charity cannot be blameworthy,

since charity "dealeth not perversely" (1 Cor. 23:4). Now a man

deserves to be blamed for loving himself, since it is written (2 Tim.

3:1, 2): "In the last days shall come dangerous times, men shall be

lovers of themselves." Therefore a man cannot love himself out of

charity.

_On the contrary,_ It is written (Lev. 19:18): "Thou shalt love thy

friend as thyself." Now we love our friends out of charity. Therefore

we should love ourselves too out of charity.

_I answer that,_ Since charity is a kind of friendship, as stated

above (Q. 23, A. 1), we may consider charity from two standpoints:

first, under the general notion of friendship, and in this way we

must hold that, properly speaking, a man is not a friend to himself,

but something more than a friend, since friendship implies union, for

Dionysius says (Div. Nom. iv) that "love is a unitive force," whereas

a man is one with himself which is more than being united to another.

Hence, just as unity is the principle of union, so the love with

which a man loves himself is the form and root of friendship. For if

we have friendship with others it is because we do unto them as we do

unto ourselves, hence we read in _Ethic._ ix, 4, 8, that "the origin

of friendly relations with others lies in our relations to

ourselves." Thus too with regard to principles we have something

greater than science, namely understanding.

Secondly, we may speak of charity in respect of its specific nature,

namely as denoting man's friendship with God in the first place, and,

consequently, with the things of God, among which things is man

himself who has charity. Hence, among these other things which he

loves out of charity because they pertain to God, he loves also

himself out of charity.

Reply Obj. 1: Gregory speaks there of charity under the general

notion of friendship: and the Second Objection is to be taken in the

same sense.

Reply Obj. 3: Those who love themselves are to be blamed, in so far

as they love themselves as regards their sensitive nature, which they

humor. This is not to love oneself truly according to one's rational

nature, so as to desire for oneself the good things which pertain to

the perfection of reason: and in this way chiefly it is through

charity that a man loves himself.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 177 / 1128 题