EIGHTH ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 23, Art. 8]

Whether Charity Is the Form of the Virtues?

Objection 1: It would seem that charity is not the true form of the

virtues. Because the form of a thing is either exemplar or essential.

Now charity is not the exemplar form of the other virtues, since it

would follow that the other virtues are of the same species as

charity: nor is it the essential form of the other virtues, since

then it would not be distinct from them. Therefore it is in no way

the form of the virtues.

Obj. 2: Further, charity is compared to the other virtues as their

root and foundation, according to Eph. 3:17: "Rooted and founded in

charity." Now a root or foundation is not the form, but rather the

matter of a thing, since it is the first part in the making.

Therefore charity is not the form of the virtues.

Obj. 3: Further, formal, final, and efficient causes do not coincide

with one another (Phys. ii, 7). Now charity is called the end and the

mother of the virtues. Therefore it should not be called their form.

_On the contrary,_ Ambrose [*Lombard, Sent. iii, D, 23] says that

charity is the form of the virtues.

_I answer that,_ In morals the form of an act is taken chiefly from

the end. The reason of this is that the principal of moral acts is

the will, whose object and form, so to speak, are the end. Now the

form of an act always follows from a form of the agent. Consequently,

in morals, that which gives an act its order to the end, must needs

give the act its form. Now it is evident, in accordance with what has

been said (A. 7), that it is charity which directs the acts of all

other virtues to the last end, and which, consequently, also gives

the form to all other acts of virtue: and it is precisely in this

sense that charity is called the form of the virtues, for these are

called virtues in relation to "informed" acts.

Reply Obj. 1: Charity is called the form of the other virtues not as

being their exemplar or their essential form, but rather by way of

efficient cause, in so far as it sets the form on all, in the

aforesaid manner.

Reply Obj. 2: Charity is compared to the foundation or root in so far

as all other virtues draw their sustenance and nourishment therefrom,

and not in the sense that the foundation and root have the character

of a material cause.

Reply Obj. 3: Charity is said to be the end of other virtues, because

it directs all other virtues to its own end. And since a mother is

one who conceives within herself and by another, charity is called

the mother of the other virtues, because, by commanding them, it

conceives the acts of the other virtues, by the desire of the last

end.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 158 / 1128 题