FOURTH ARTICLE [II-II, Q. 9, Art. 4]

Whether the Third Beatitude, "Blessed Are They That Mourn," etc.

Corresponds to the Gift of Knowledge?

Objection 1: It would seem that the third beatitude, "Blessed are they

that mourn," does not correspond to the gift of knowledge. For, even

as evil is the cause of sorrow and grief, so is good the cause of joy.

Now knowledge brings good to light rather than evil, since the latter

is known through evil: for "the straight line rules both itself and

the crooked line" (De Anima i, 5). Therefore the aforesaid beatitude

does not suitably correspond to the gift of knowledge.

Obj. 2: Further, consideration of truth is an act of knowledge. Now

there is no sorrow in the consideration of truth; rather is there

joy, since it is written (Wis. 8:16): "Her conversation hath no

bitterness, nor her company any tediousness, but joy and gladness."

Therefore the aforesaid beatitude does not suitably correspond with

the gift of knowledge.

Obj. 3: Further, the gift of knowledge consists in speculation,

before operation. Now, in so far as it consists in speculation,

sorrow does not correspond to it, since "the speculative intellect is

not concerned about things to be sought or avoided" (De Anima iii,

9). Therefore the aforesaid beatitude is not suitably reckoned to

correspond with the gift of knowledge.

_On the contrary,_ Augustine says (De Serm. Dom. in Monte iv):

"Knowledge befits the mourner, who has discovered that he has been

mastered by the evil which he coveted as though it were good."

_I answer that,_ Right judgment about creatures belongs properly to

knowledge. Now it is through creatures that man's aversion from God

is occasioned, according to Wis. 14:11: "Creatures . . . are turned

to an abomination . . . and a snare to the feet of the unwise," of

those, namely, who do not judge aright about creatures, since they

deem the perfect good to consist in them. Hence they sin by placing

their last end in them, and lose the true good. It is by forming a

right judgment of creatures that man becomes aware of the loss (of

which they may be the occasion), which judgment he exercises through

the gift of knowledge.

Hence the beatitude of sorrow is said to correspond to the gift of

knowledge.

Reply Obj. 1: Created goods do not cause spiritual joy, except in

so far as they are referred to the Divine good, which is the proper

cause of spiritual joy. Hence spiritual peace and the resulting joy

correspond directly to the gift of wisdom: but to the gift of

knowledge there corresponds, in the first place, sorrow for past

errors, and, in consequence, consolation, since, by his right

judgment, man directs creatures to the Divine good. For this reason

sorrow is set forth in this beatitude, as the merit, and the

resulting consolation, as the reward; which is begun in this life,

and is perfected in the life to come.

Reply Obj. 2: Man rejoices in the very consideration of truth; yet he

may sometimes grieve for the thing, the truth of which he considers:

it is thus that sorrow is ascribed to knowledge.

Reply Obj. 3: No beatitude corresponds to knowledge, in so far as it

consists in speculation, because man's beatitude consists, not in

considering creatures, but in contemplating God. But man's beatitude

does consist somewhat in the right use of creatures, and in

well-ordered love of them: and this I say with regard to the

beatitude of a wayfarer. Hence beatitude relating to contemplation is

not ascribed to knowledge, but to understanding and wisdom, which are

about Divine things.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part II-II (Secunda Secundae) Translated by Fathers of the English Dominican Province · 第 71 / 1128 题