But seeing astonishment on Aniela's face, I went on quickly:--

"What can there be more barbarous or unnatural than to ask a woman to

sacrifice the man she loves to the man she does not love? Religious

beliefs may be in contradiction with one another, but they all agree

upon the same ethics, that marriage is based upon love. What then is

matrimony? It is either something inviolable and essentially holy

when resting upon such a basis, or if otherwise, only a contract

in contradiction to religion and morality, and as such ought to be

dissolved. Otherwise speaking, a woman's duties spring from her

feelings, and not from a number of more or less solemn ceremonies,

which in themselves are only so many forms. I say this because I am a

man who puts truth above mere forms. I know the word 'faithlessness'

sounds very terrible. But do not delude yourselves with the notion

that a woman is faithless at the moment she leaves her husband. She

is faithless the very moment she feels that her love for him is gone.

What follows after is only a question of her capacity to bring things

to a logical conclusion, of her courage and her heart that knows, or

does not know, the meaning of love. Pani Korytzka loved the man for

whom she divorces her husband before she was married; the marriage

was contracted in a moment of misunderstanding, she mistaking an

exhibition of jealousy for indifference. This was her only mistake;

which she wants to correct now that she understands that it was not

right to sacrifice the man she loved to the man she looked upon with

indifference; nobody but those who will not see can call her bad or a

hypocrite."

There was as much fiction as truth in what I was saying. I knew my

aunt would never agree to the theory that the will ends when love

steps in; but I said it to impress Aniela with the idea that there was

no doubt about it. That first lover was also an invention of my own,

to make the story more to the point. But I was perfectly sincere when

speaking about the rights and duties springing from feeling. It is

quite another thing that I might not stand up for this theory if it

did not suit me just then; but man is always subjective, especially

the man who has doubted all objective truths.

I stood up for myself, and should have been foolish to speak against

my own interest. I counted that this kind of reasoning would hasten

the evolution of her soul, encourage her, and finally justify her in

her own eyes. Considering her great sensitiveness, I thought some of

it would take root. She understood me perfectly, and I could see that

every word thrilled her nerves; her color came and went; she put her

hands to her burning face to cool it. At last, when I had ceased

speaking, she replied:--

"Everything may be proved in some way or other; but when we do wrong

our conscience tells us, 'It is wrong, wrong!' and nothing can

convince it to the contrary."

Young Chwastowski must have thought Aniela wanting in philosophical

development, and as to myself I had a sensation like that, for

instance, when a weapon comes into contact with a stone wall. Aniela's

reply, in its simplicity and dogmatism, brought to naught all my

arguments. For if the principle that the will ends where love steps in

might be open to doubt, there is no doubt whatever that where dogma

begins reasoning ceases. Women generally, and Polish women especially,

agree with logic as long as it does not bring them into danger. At the

approach of danger they shelter themselves behind the fortifications

of simple faith and catechismal truth, which strong feeling might

force to surrender, but reasoning, never. It is their weakness, and at

the same time their strength. In consequence of this their power of

reasoning is weaker than man's, but their saintliness in certain

conditions becomes unassailable. The devil can lead a woman astray

only when he inspires her with love; by way of reasoning he can do

nothing, even if for once he has the right on his side.

In presence of these reflections I feel disheartened. I am thinking

that any structure, however cleverly and artfully raised by me, will

be pulled down by the simple words: "It is wrong; conscience does not

permit it."

In presence of that I am powerless. I must be very careful so as

not to estrange or frighten her by the boldness of ideas I try to

acclimatize in her mind. And yet I cannot give up all endeavors of

this kind. Though they do not occupy the first place in the plan of

subduing her, they may hasten the solution. They would be of no use

whatever if it were true that she did not love me. If I had made a

mistake,--but even then there would be some kind of solution.

Without Dogma: A Novel of Modern Poland · 第 102 / 211 题