Now for the final touches. If we now connect the lamp to the battery

wires it will give a brilliant light the moment we make the last

connection, and continue to burn until the current is broken, which may

be done by lifting the elements (as the zincs and carbons are called)

out of the fluid. After a while, if the current is kept on for some

time, the light will begin to diminish in brilliancy. This is due to

exhaustion of the liquid in the tumblers, and when the light gets dim

the solution should be renewed.

In connecting your lamp with the battery wires simply twist the lamp and

battery wires together firmly but gently. All of the connections are

shown very clearly in Fig. 2.

When the light is not desired it is best to remove the elements from the

tumblers, so as to save the zinc. The acid in the solution dissolves the

zinc.

An outfit of this sort costs about as follows: one Leclanche zinc (sawed

in two), 8 cents; two plain electric-light carbons, 20 cents; one pound

sulphuric acid (about one-half pint), 15 cents; one pound bichromate

potash, 25 cents; twenty-five feet No. 18 wire, 15 cents; one-half

candle-power lamp, $1; total cost, $1.83.

I have not included in this estimate the cost of the two tumblers or the

wooden holders, because tumblers can always be had around the house, and

no boy needs to be told where he can find wood. But to be on the safe

side we will assume that tumblers and all have to be bought; then $2

will cover the cost easily.

Such an outfit as this is very interesting and instructive to every

boy--and girl, too, for that matter--and what can be more fascinating

than to be able to produce a beautiful electric light so easily?

[Illustration: INTERSCHOLASTIC SPORT]

[Illustration: REGINALD FINCKE.

Interscholastic Tennis champion 1896.]

The sixth National Interscholastic Tennis Tournament was played last

week at Newport, and resulted in a victory for Reginald Fincke, of the

Hotchkiss School, winner of the Yale Interscholastic Tournament. His

victory was more or less of a foregone conclusion on the form he had

displayed in his early spring work; and the opponents he had to meet

were none of them very formidable, the strongest, Beggs of

Lawrenceville, not being present. This gave Walton of Colombia, the

weakest man of the lot, a chance to get into the semi-finals, where he

succumbed to the Harvard interscholastic representative in three

straight and uninteresting sets.

INTERSCHOLASTIC TENNIS CHAMPIONSHIP SERIES.

Year. Played at. Winner. School.

1891. Cambridge. R. D. Wrenn. Cambridge Latin.

1892. Cambridge. M. G. Chace. Univ. Grammar, Prov.

1893. Newport. C. R. Budlong. High, Providence.

1894. Newport. W. G. Parker. Tutor, New York,

1895. Newport. L. E. Ware. Roxbury Latin.

1896. Newport. R. Fincke. Hotchkiss.

Fincke drew Turner of Chicago in the preliminaries, and defeated him,

6-4, 6-2, 6-8, 6-3. He then defeated Willing, the U. of P.

interscholastic champion, 6-2, 6-1, 5-7, 6-4. His hardest match was with

Edwards of English High-School. Edwards made a good brace in the third

set, taking it 6-2, but he was unable to maintain this form, and

although he did good work in the last set, he was unable to end better

than 4-6. This gave the championship for 1896 to Fincke, 6-2, 6-4, 2-6,

6-4. A full summary of the play will be found on the next page; and the

championship list now stands as shown in the table given above.

SIXTH ANNUAL NATIONAL INTERSCHOLASTIC TENNIS TOURNAMENT, NEWPORT, AUGUST

20, 21, 22, 1896.

Preliminary Round. Semi-Final Round.

J. K. Willing (U. of Pa.),

R. Fincke (Yale), } Fincke, 6-4, 6-2, 6-8, 6-3.

L. H. Turner (Univ. of Chicago). }

C. W. Beggs (Princeton), }

J. McL. Walton (Columbia). } Walton, by default.

Y. M. Edwards (Harvard).

Final Round. Interscholastic Champion.

Fincke, 6-2, 6-1, 5-7, 6-4. } Fincke, 6-2, 6-4, 2-6, 6-4.

Edwards, 6-1, 6-0, 6-3. }

It is sincerely to be hoped that the unfortunate differences between

those stanch old rivals and worthy opponents, Exeter and Andover, will

be brought to a friendly close this year. Since 1893 these two schools,

who used to meet annually in football, baseball, and tennis, have not

had any athletic intercourse whatever with one another, and all because,

in their great rivalry and desire to beat one another, one of them

certainly (and possibly both) overstepped the bounds of athletic ethics,

and was guilty of practices which, by a little consideration and

forethought, might have been avoided.

It is improbable that any good can be accomplished by going over the

causes which brought about this rupture between the two schools, for

stirring up mud and opening old wounds are of small benefit. Those who

know what the causes were can do nothing better than to forget, and

those who do not know what the trouble was will certainly find that here

is a case where ignorance is bliss.

For the past year or more I have been in correspondence more or less

actively with Exeter and Andover men, graduates and students and members

of the two Faculties, and the general opinion among all seems to be that

it would be a good thing to have the games renewed; and while both sides

seem willing to meet again, neither side seems anxious to make the first

advances. Both schools have, or think they have, grievances; and each

thinks the other should lay aside its pride or stubbornness and make the

friendly advances.

This situation might remain for an indefinite period if some

strong-minded individual or individuals did not step in and say, "Let

bygones be bygones, and let us start in on a new basis, wiping out all

old scores, and henceforth sticking to the true spirit of amateur

sport!" The difficult problem is to find the individual or individuals

who may have enough influence in both camps to bring about this greatly

to be desired termination. This might possibly be accomplished through

the alumni associations of the two schools at Harvard and at Yale.

Andover and Exeter men, after they get to college, usually become great

friends, because they feel, as graduates of these large schools, a sort

of superiority over their less-fortunate classmates who did not get

their schooling in such great and well-known institutions. This gives

them a common ground to meet upon, and they soon forget the petty

differences they may have had before they became college-men, and their

reminiscences become bonds of friendship rather than sources of

disturbance. But if the alumni in the colleges are to do anything, they

must first find out definitely from the men in the two schools that the

body scholastic is willing to wipe away old scores and go into a new era

of interscholastic contest, otherwise the same unfortunate comedy will

be played that was enacted a year or so ago, when some graduates

arranged for a reunion of athletic interests.

These arrangements could not have been very well laid out, for, at the

school meetings held the same hour, the same day, at Exeter and Andover,

different votes were reached. One school voted to resume friendly

relations, and the other school, unfortunately, voted to maintain the

same attitude that had caused the unpleasantness for the past two or

three years. The school that held out the hand of friendship naturally

felt hurt at this, and also naturally vowed that it would never take any

steps toward making up again. But that time has passed, and let us hope

those who were at the meeting have forgotten how they felt, and let us

also hope that the other school has seen by this time that it is not

well to refuse to shake the hand that is held out in good-fellowship.

So much is to be gained by both Exeter and Andover from the contests as

they used to be ten or fifteen years ago that it would seem that both

schools must yearn for the old order of things. Andover now seeks

Lawrenceville as its rival, and although Lawrenceville is decidedly a

strong opponent, and Andover-Lawrenceville games should never be

discontinued, yet Lawrenceville is not Andover's natural rival. Exeter

has sought Worcester Academy, and tries to make itself believe that it

holds a great interest in the Exeter-Worcester games; but there is no

doubt that there is not half the enthusiasm in the school over a

Worcester victory as there used to be, and would be now, over an Andover

victory. The same might justly be said concerning Andover and

Lawrenceville.

It is for this reason that I so sincerely hope that the graduates will

take some steps this fall, and open the new era of friendship with a

football game. Let each school be willing to make concessions, and in

the end they will find that they have gained tenfold in self-respect and

self-satisfaction for each concession they made.

The seniors at these schools, and the men who graduated from them last

year and are now entering Freshman year at college, can combine in this

movement, and I feel sure that if they are careful and thoughtful in

their methods, they can heal this breach which has been a painful one

for every Exeter and Andover graduate, and an unexplainable one for

outsiders who have looked upon these two schools as strong exponents of

the healthy spirit of scholastic sport in America.

[Illustration: Beers. O'Rourke. Moore. Washburne. Hipple.

Bedford.

THE N.Y.I.S.A.A. TEAM AT THE NATIONAL GAMES.]

The new football rules for 1896 have at last appeared in book form. It

is pleasant to know that they are a great improvement on anything of the

kind we have ever had before in America. The thanks of all sportsmen are

due to the University Athletic Club's committee for the work they have

performed, and, as the season grows older, every football-player will

realize more and more how much the reform of the code was needed.

There probably never was a more critical period in the history of

football than last year, when there were three sets of rules, and when a

certain number of colleges were playing under one set, an equally large

number were playing under another set, and perhaps a larger number still

were using the rules of the year before or a compromise between the

factional codes.

The principal changes to be observed in the 1896 code are in the rules

governing the fair catch and the scrimmage. The committee have thought

it wise to bring back the fair catch to the old ruling, which requires

that a mark be made with the heel; the old penalty of fifteen yards for

holding has been retained. There were those in the committee on revision

who thought that there should be a penalty of twenty-five yards for

holding a man who had made a fair catch, but the general opinion seemed

to be that few umpires would have the courage to enforce this rule, and

a compromise on fifteen yards was consequently adopted. Therefore, in so

far as the fair catch is concerned, the situation is about the same as

it was three years ago, except that the player making the catch is well

protected by the severe penalty against interference or being thrown.

As to the scrimmage, the committee felt that there had been too great

concentration of men in recent years, and they have attempted to hold in

check the momentum plays. They have ruled that no player may take more

than a single step before the ball is put in play--except one man, who

may be in motion toward his own goal; this will bar out all forms of

momentum play, and is a step in the right direction.

There is also a rule forbidding five men to bunch inside of tackles;

this will serve to hold back mass plays, although, doubtless, the

inventive minds of college football-players will be able to make up

plays that can evade the spirit of this law. But the makers of the rules

have hoped that the good judgment of captains and coaches may be relied

upon to see that there is fully as much to be gained in open play as in

the recently developed concentrated push work.

Among the minor changes to be noticed, in a cursory glance through the

rules, is that on a fair catch the opponents must retire ten yards from

the mark made by the catcher; this is a good ruling, for it places some

value upon a fair catch. It is pleasant to note that the rule concerning

interference with the centre rushers' snapping back of the ball has been

made more stringent, and the officials must see that the ball is fairly

put in play, and they must, according to the rule, insist that the

opposing team do not interfere either with the ball or the man.

A number of years ago it used to be a favorite trick of the opposing

centre to do all he could, by kicking or toeing or fingering the ball,

to annoy the man who was snapping back. This was then put a stop to, and

the opposing centres and guards began to shove and jostle their

opponents, much to the delay of the game. These new rules concerning

interference with centre play will prevent all of this nonsense, and

will tend toward making scrimmage play more rapid and snappy.

On account of the development of quarter-back kicking, it has been found

necessary to establish some rule that would make clear what kind of a

kick must be made to give the opponents a fair chance at the ball. The

rule has it that the ball when kicked by the quarter-back must pass

beyond the line of the scrimmage.

One of the most complete and noticeable changes in the rules, however,

although it is one that does not affect the game itself, is the

common-sense arrangement of the paragraphs. The code begins by stating

that "the game shall be played upon a rectangular field," etc. The old

rules began with the statement that "a drop kick is made by letting the

ball fall from the hands, and kicking it at the very instant it rises

from the ground."

There is nothing in the old rules to show on what kind of a field the

game should be played, or what the game was, or what kind of a ball it

should be played with. There was nothing in the old rules forbidding a

man to play the game with a cocked hat or a rubber boot if he chose; and

if a team had come on a field with a baseball, and had insisted on

running with that, there was absolutely no provision in the old rules by

which the referee could forbid the playing of the game with a baseball.

Now, however, this absurd defect has been entirely done away with, and

the new regulations, after describing the field and the teams, state

that "the football used shall be of heavy leather, enclosing an inflated

rubber bladder, and the ball shall have the shape of a prolate

spheroid." Furthermore, no term is used in the new rules which has not

first been fully defined. The first part of the code, therefore, is made

up largely of definitions, and this is of great assistance, for it will

prevent many a discussion and dispute on the field.

A few more remarks in conclusion of what was said in the Department last

week concerning preliminary football work: Remember that by practice

alone can a team perfect itself; and consequently every manager should

try to arrange as many practice games as possible for the eleven under

his care. After the school season has fairly begun, and the neighboring

schools have their elevens somewhat organized, it is always possible to

arrange games with outsiders. Thus when the championship contests come

along the players will be accustomed to games with strangers. Too much

practice with a scrub team breeds slack play and indifference. If it is

possible to schedule practice games with other schools for Wednesdays

and Saturdays--playing some teams two or three times, perhaps, in one

season--the manager should make such arrangements. In or near large

cities this is almost always possible, and perhaps that is why the

football elevens of New York and Boston are usually so well trained and

developed.

The reason is very clear. When you play a team from a distance, you are

bound to learn something of that team's methods, and it usually has some

points which had not yet occurred to you. If you play that same team

again two or three weeks later, it has learned from others, and puts its

newly acquired knowledge in practice against you, and you again have the

advantage of the other fellows' work. Of course your opponents are

benefited in the same way through playing with you; but that is only

right, and is much to be desired.

If it is possible for a school team to have the services of a

coach--some graduate or some ex-football-player living in the

neighborhood--it should avail itself greedily of the privilege, for it

is too much to expect a young captain to handle his men well and do all

the coaching besides. And when an older player has been invited to

coach, his commands should be obeyed to the letter; for if the players

had enough confidence in him in the beginning to desire or accept his

services, they can do no less than carry out his instructions if he

gives up his time to coach them in their sport.

Furthermore, it should be remembered that the coach has had greater

experience than any of the players, and he can also--as an

outsider--tell much better what the proper course of action for a team

is than any member of that team, who may be influenced by a great many

conditions that do not affect the coach, and so do not weaken his

judgment.

"TRACK ATHLETICS IN DETAIL."--ILLUSTRATED.--8VO, CLOTH, ORNAMENTAL,

$1.25.

THE GRADUATE.

[Illustration: STAMPS]

This Department is conducted in the interest of stamp and coin

collectors, and the Editor will be pleased to answer any question

on these subjects so far as possible. Correspondents should address

Editor Stamp Department.

I was misled by the telegraphic report of the A.P.A. convention. The

annual dues are $1.80, not $1.08, as mentioned in last week's paper.

One of the weaknesses of human nature is a desire to get something for

nothing. Many stamp-collectors are constantly on the lookout for a "big

bargain" in rare stamps. Now bargains of this kind are never offered by

first-class dealers, as they know the real value of their wares, but

unprincipled persons take advantage of this weakness of humanity, and

many a new collector finds reason to repent of having bought such

"bargains."

A French journal, _Le Collectionneur des Timbres-Poste_, in a late

number gives an amusing instance. Baron de M---- purchased a collection

of rare stamps for 25,000 francs, which would have been a big bargain if

appearances had not been deceitful. With the assistance of a well-known

collector, the Baron discovered his stamps to be a marvellous collection

of counterfeit, fake, and patched-up stamps.

The following are some of the varieties of tricks practised by

unscrupulous persons:

1. Ordinary perforated stamps with exceptionally wide margins have their

perforations trimmed off, and such stamps are offered as rare

unperforated stamps.

2. Ordinary perforated stamps with wide margins are re-perforated with

the rare perforations. This is frequently done by means of an ordinary

hand punch.

3. Where stamps are printed in the same color with slight changes in

lettering, the rare varieties are made by piecing. For instance, the

one-franc French Empire is made by taking the 80 centimes, dark carmine,

with the bottom label from the one franc of the Republic.

4. Bicolored stamps with the centre reversed, which are extremely rare,

are made by cutting out the centre and reversing it on another copy of

the same stamp. For instance, the 1869 U.S. 15c., 24c., and 90c. have

been made by this process.

5. By chemical means the color is changed. For instance, the 10r. blue

of Brazil is changed into the 10r. black.

6. Stamps which have been cancelled by pen and ink have their

cancellation marks removed by chemical means, and these stamps are then

sold as unused.

7. Counterfeit cancellations are frequently made on genuine stamps which

have been surcharged "reprint" or "specimen."

8. Counterfeit surcharges are extremely common. They can be made on an

ordinary printing press.

9. False water-marks are sometimes made by printing the stamps with

wood-cuts, using a certain kind of oil, or they are made by pressing the

design of the water-mark on the stamp, and then removing a portion of

the paper by rubbing with pumice stone.

10. Very rare stamps of which a portion has disappeared have had these

portions added.

11. Are the ordinary counterfeits. Sometimes these counterfeits are of a

higher order of work than the originals. One of the great European

houses made fac-simile copies of all the U.S. periodical stamps, and

advertised the same as fac-similes. Each stamp bore the word

"fac-simile" or "falsch." These copies have frequently had a heavy

cancellation applied to them immediately over the word "fac-simile" or

"falsch." These stamps were then sold as genuine cancelled stamps.

The moral is a very simple one. Rare stamps should be bought from

responsible dealers or responsible persons only.

MISS CECILE G. ROGERS, 118 B Bluff, Yokohama, Japan, wishes to

exchange Japanese stamps for those of other countries.

H. W. K.--No special value.

PHILATUS.

ADVERTISEMENTS.

[Illustration: ROYAL BAKING POWDER]

A cream-of-tartar baking powder. Highest of all in leavening

strength.--_Latest United States Government Food Report._

ROYAL BAKING POWDER CO., NEW YORK.

[Illustration: THOMPSON'S EYE WATER]

[Illustration: BICYCLING]

This Department is conducted in the interest of Bicyclers, and the

Editor will be pleased to answer any question on the subject. Our

maps and tours contain many valuable data kindly supplied from the

official maps and road-books of the League of American Wheelmen.

Recognizing the value of the work being done by the L.A.W., the

Editor will be pleased to furnish subscribers with membership

blanks and information so far as possible.

[Illustration: Copyright, 1896, by Harper & Brothers.]

Several weeks ago we mentioned in this column another way of getting

from Chicago to Waukesha. This was by taking steamer from Chicago to

Milwaukee, and riding thence to Waukesha. The sail is a beautiful one,

and makes one of the most interesting and varied pleasure trips near

Chicago. On arrival in Milwaukee you will find yourself near the

C. and N. W. Railroad depot, and the start awheel should be made from

this point. Ride out Grand Avenue direct, crossing the river. This is a

run of two and three-quarter miles, and when you are within about half a

mile of the toll-house at the end of Grand Avenue, turn to the right and

run up to it, keeping to the left on reaching it, and running thence out

over the Watertown Plank-road. It is two and a half miles to Wauwatosa,

and on entering the centre of the town turn left and cross the track.

Thence run out up a steep hill, leaving Homewood on the south, and

running into Elm Grove. On crossing the two tracks at Elm Grove, the

road is clear to Brookfield, four and three-quarter miles away, and in

good condition, except just as you leave Elm Grove, where there is a bit

of hilly country. At Brookfield take the left hand of the three roads,

and run thence direct to Waukesha. This three miles or more of road is

in parts hilly, though at no point in the whole run is there any very

bad hilly road. The road-bed itself is in very good condition for the

whole sixteen or seventeen miles.

We have now covered this particular vicinity of Illinois pretty

thoroughly. It is by far the best for bicycling on account not only of

the good roads, but of the variety of scenery that presents itself to

the wheelman. He can either ride by train from Chicago to Waukesha, or

by boat and wheel, or by wheel. A very good week's trip would be to make

the two days' bicycle trip from Chicago to Waukesha, as already

described, stopping the night at Lippencott's. On the third day, or

after a day's rest, to make the run to Oconomowoc and return to

Waukesha, and then, with another day in the vicinity, to finally ride by

wheel to Milwaukee over the road described this week, and return to

Chicago from the latter place by boat. Or the trip could be reversed,

and begun with the sail to Milwaukee, thence proceeding to Waukesha, and

returning by the two days' trip to Chicago.

Harper's Round Table, September 1, 1896 · 第 4 / 6 段