STORY OF REMBRANDT.

At a short distance from Leyden may still be seen a flour-mill with

a quaint old dwelling-house attached, which bears, on a brick in a

corner of the wide chimney, the date 1550. Here, in 1606, was born

Paul Rembrandt. At an early age he manifested a stubborn,

independent will, which his father tried in vain to subdue. He

caused his son to work in the mill, intending that he should succeed

him in its management; but the boy shewed so decided a distaste for

the employment, that his father resolved to make him a priest, and

sent him to study at Leyden. Every one knows, however, that few lads

of fifteen, endowed with great muscular vigour and abundance of

animal spirits, will take naturally and without compulsion to the

study of Latin grammar. Rembrandt certainly did not; and his

obstinacy proving an overmatch for his teachers' patience, he was

sent back to the mill, when his father beat him so severely, that

next morning he ran off to Leyden, without in the least knowing how

he should live there. Fortunately he sought refuge in the house of

an honest artist, Van Zwaanenberg, who was acquainted with his

father.

'Tell me, Paul,' asked his friend, 'what do you mean to do with

yourself, if you will not be either a priest or a miller? They are

both honourable professions: one gives food to the soul, the other

prepares it for the body.'

'Very likely,' replied the boy; 'but I don't fancy either; for in

order to be a priest, one must learn Latin; and to be a miller, one

must bear to be beaten. How do _you_ earn your bread?'

'You know very well I am a painter.'

'Then I will be one too, Herr Zwaanenberg; and if you will go

to-morrow and tell my father so, you will do me a great service.'

The good-natured artist willingly undertook the mission, and

acquainted the old miller with his son's resolution.

'I want to know one thing,' said Master Rembrandt; 'will he be able

to gain a livelihood by painting?'

'Certainly, and perhaps make a fortune.'

'Then if you will teach him, I consent.'

Thus Paul became the pupil of Van Zwaanenberg, and made rapid

progress in the elementary parts of his profession. Impatient to

produce some finished work, he did not give himself time to acquire

purity of style, but astonished his master by his precocious skill

in grouping figures, and producing marvellous effects of light and

shade. The first lessons which he took in perspective having wearied

him, he thought of a shorter method, and _invented_ perspective for

himself.

One of his first rude sketches happened to fall into the hands of a

citizen of Leyden who understood painting. Despite of its evident

defects, the germs of rare talent which it evinced struck the

burgomaster; and sending for the young artist, he offered to give

him a recommendation to a celebrated painter living at Amsterdam,

under whom he would have far more opportunity of improvement than

with his present instructor.

Rembrandt accepted the offer, and during the following year toiled

incessantly. Meantime his finances were dreadfully straitened; for

his father, finding that the expected profits were very tardy,

refused to give money to support his son, as he said, in idleness.

Paul, however, was not discouraged. Although far from possessing an

amiable or estimable disposition, he held a firm and just opinion of

his own powers, and resolved to make these subservient first to

fortune and then to fame. Thus while some of his companions, having

finished their preliminary studies, repaired to Florence, to

Bologna, or to Rome, Paul, determined, as he said, not to lose his

own style by becoming an imitator of even the mightiest masters,

betook himself to his paternal mill. At first his return resembled

that of the Prodigal Son. His father believed that he had come to

resume his miller's work; and bitter was his disappointment at

finding his son resolved not to renounce painting.

With a very bad grace he allowed Paul to displace the flour-sacks on

an upper loft, in order to make a sort of studio, lighted by only

one narrow window in the roof. There Paul painted his first finished

picture. It was a _portrait_ of the mill. There, on the canvas, was

seen the old miller, lighted by a lantern which he carried in his

hand, giving directions to his men, occupied in ranging sacks in the

dark recesses of the granary. One ray falls on the fresh, comely

countenance of his mother, who has her foot on the last step of a

wooden staircase.[3] Rembrandt took this painting to the Hague, and

sold it for 100 florins. In order to return with more speed, he took

his place in the public coach. When the passengers stopped to dine,

Rembrandt, fearing to lose his treasure, remained in the carriage.

The careless stable-boy who brought the horses their corn forgot to

unharness them, and as soon as they had finished eating, excited

probably by Rembrandt, who cared not for his fellow-passengers, the

animals started off for Leyden, and quietly halted at their

accustomed inn. Our painter then got out, and repaired with his

money to the mill.

Great was his father's joy. At length these silly daubs, which had

so often excited his angry contempt, seemed likely to be transmuted

into gold, and the old man's imagination took a rapturous flight.

'Neither he nor his old horse,' he said, 'need now work any longer;

they might both enjoy quiet during the remainder of their lives.

Paul would paint pictures, and support the whole household in

affluence.'

Such was the old man's castle in the air; his clever, selfish son

soon demolished it. 'This sum of money,' he said, 'is only a lucky

windfall. If you indeed wish it to become the foundation of my

fortune, give me one hundred florins besides, and let me return to

Amsterdam: there I must work and study hard.'

It would be difficult to describe old Rembrandt's disappointment.

Slowly, reluctantly, and one by one, he drew forth the 100 florins

from his strong-box. Paul took them, and with small show of

gratitude, returned to Amsterdam. In a short time his fame became

established as the greatest and most original of living artists. He

had a host of imitators, but all failed miserably in their attempts

at reproducing his marvellous effects of light and shade. Yet

Rembrandt prized the gold which flowed into him far more than the

glory. While mingling the colours which were to flash out on his

canvas in real living light, he thought but of his dingy coffers.

When in possession of a yearly income equal to L.2000 sterling, he

would not permit the agent who collected his rents to bring them in

from the country to Amsterdam, lest he should be obliged to invite

him to dinner. He preferred setting out on a fine day, and going

himself to the agent's house. In this way he saved two dinners--the

one which he got, and the one, he avoided giving. 'So that's well

managed!' he used to say.

This sordid disposition often exposed him to practical jokes from

his pupils; but he possessed a quiet temper, and was not easily

annoyed. One day a rich citizen came in, and asked him the price of

a certain picture.

'Two hundred florins,' said Rembrandt.

'Agreed,' said his visitor. 'I will pay you to-morrow, when I send

for the picture.'

About an hour afterwards a letter was handed to the painter. Its

contents were as follow: 'MASTER REMBRANDT--During your absence a

few days since, I saw in your studio a picture representing an old

woman churning butter. I was enchanted with it; and if you will let

me purchase it for 300 florins, I pray you to bring it to my house,

and be my guest for the day.' The letter was signed with some

fictitious name, and bore the address of a village several leagues

distant from Amsterdam.

Tempted by the additional 100 florins, and caring little for

breaking his engagement, Rembrandt set out early next morning with

his picture. He walked for four hours without finding his obliging

correspondent, and at length, worn out with fatigue, he returned

home. He found the citizen in his studio, waiting for the picture.

As Rembrandt, however, did not despair of finding the man of the 300

florins, and as a falsehood troubled but little his blunted

conscience, he said: 'Alas! an accident has happened to the picture;

the canvas was injured, and I felt so vexed that I threw it into the

fire. Two hundred florins gone! However, it will be my loss, not

yours, for I will paint another precisely similar, and it shall be

ready for you by this time to-morrow.'

'I am sorry,' replied the amateur, 'but it was the picture you have

burned which I wished to have; and as that is gone, I shall not

trouble you to paint another.'

So he departed, and Rembrandt shortly afterwards received a second

letter to the following effect: 'MASTER REMBRANDT--You have broken

your engagement, told a falsehood, wearied yourself to death, and

lost the sale of your picture--all by listening to the dictates of

avarice. Let this lesson be a warning to you in future.'

'So,' said the painter, looking round at his pupils, 'one of you

must have played me this pretty trick. Well, well, I forgive it. You

young varlets do not know the value of a florin as I know it.'

Sometimes the students nailed small copper coins on the floor, for

the mischievous pleasure of seeing their master, who suffered much

from rheumatism in the back, stoop with pain and difficulty, and try

in vain to pick them up.

Rembrandt married an ignorant peasant who had served him as cook,

thinking this a more economical alliance than one with a person of

refined mind and habits. He and his wife usually dined on brown

bread, salt herrings, and small beer. He occasionally took portraits

at a high price, and in this way became acquainted with the

Burgomaster Six, a man of enlarged mind and unblemished character,

who yet continued faithfully attached to the avaricious painter. His

friendship was sometimes put to a severe test by such occurrences as

the following:--

Rembrandt remarked one day that the price of his engravings had

fallen.

'You are insatiable,' said the burgomaster.

'Perhaps so. I cannot help thirsting for gold.'

'You are a miser.'

'True: and I shall be one all my life.'

''Tis really a pity,' remarked his friend, 'that you will not be

able after death to act as your own treasurer, for whenever that

event occurs, all your works will rise to treble their present

value.'

A bright idea struck Rembrandt. He returned home, went to bed,

desired his wife and his son Titus to scatter straw before the door,

and give out, first, that he was dangerously ill, and then

dead--while the simulated fever was to be of so dreadfully

infectious a nature that none of the neighbours were to be admitted

near the sick-room. These instructions were followed to the letter;

and the disconsolate widow proclaimed that, in order to procure

money for her husband's interment, she must sell all his works, any

property that he left not being available on so short a notice.

The unworthy trick succeeded. The sale, including every trivial

scrap of painting or engraving, realised an enormous sum, and

Rembrandt was in ecstasy. The honest burgomaster, however, was

nearly frightened into a fit of apoplexy at seeing the man whose

death he had sincerely mourned standing alive and well at the door

of his studio. Meinherr Six obliged him to promise that he would in

future abstain from such abominable deceptions. One day he was

employed in painting in a group the likenesses of the whole family

of a rich citizen. He had nearly finished it, when intelligence was

brought him of the death of a tame ape which he greatly loved. The

creature had fallen off the roof of the house into the street.

Without interrupting his work, Rembrandt burst into loud

lamentations, and after some time announced that the piece was

finished. The whole family advanced to look at it, and what was

their horror to see introduced between the heads of the eldest son

and daughter an exact likeness of the dear departed ape. With one

voice they all exclaimed against this singular relative which it had

pleased the painter to introduce amongst them, and insisted on his

effacing it.

'What!' exclaimed Rembrandt, 'efface the finest figure in the

picture? No, indeed; I prefer keeping the piece for myself.' Which

he did, and carried off the painting.

Of Rembrandt's style it may be said that he painted with light, for

frequently an object was indicated merely by the projection of a

shadow on a wall. Often a luminous spot suggested, rather than

defined, a hand or a head. Yet there is nothing vague in his

paintings: the mind seizes the design immediately. His studio was a

circular room, lighted by several narrow slits, so contrived that

rays of sunshine entered through only one at a time, and thus

produced strange effects of light and shade. The room was filled

with old-world furniture, which made it resemble an antiquary's

museum. There were heaped up in the most picturesque confusion

curious old furniture, antique armour, gorgeously-tinted stuffs; and

these Rembrandt arranged in different forms and positions, so as to

vary the effects of light and colour. This he called 'making his

models sit to him.' And in this close adherence to reality consisted

the great secret of his art. It is strange that his favourite

amongst all his pupils was the one whose style least resembled his

own--Gerard Douw--he who aimed at the most excessive minuteness of

delineation, who stopped key-holes lest a particle of dust should

fall on his palette, who gloried in representing the effects of

fresh scouring on the side of a kettle.

Rembrandt died in 1674, at the age of sixty-eight. He passed all his

life at Amsterdam. Some of his biographers have told erroneously

that he once visited Italy: they were deceived by the word

_Venetiis_ placed at the bottom of several of his engravings. He

wrote it there with the intention of deluding his countrymen into

the belief that he was absent, and about to settle in Italy--an

impression which would materially raise the price of his

productions. Strange and sad it is to see so much genius united with

so much meanness--the head of fine gold with the feet of clay.[4]

* * * * *

[Footnote 3: This picture is believed to be no longer in existence. I have

found its description in the work of the historian Decamps.]

[Footnote 4: Abridged from the French of J. de Chatillon.]

Chambers's Edinburgh Journal, No. 420 Volume 17, New Series, January 17, 1852 · 第 7 / 13 题