1. The territory of neutral powers is inviolable.

2. Belligerents are forbidden to move troops or either

munitions of war or supplies across the territory of a neutral

power.

* * * * *

5. A neutral power must not allow any of the acts referred to

in Articles 2 to 4 to occur on its territory.

This pledge the German Empire had solemnly made only seven years ago. It

would seem that Prof. Burgess may accept the distinction ably made by

Prof. Münsterberg between "pledges of national honor" and mere "routine

agreements," placing Hague treaties in the latter category.

The allegation that France and England secretly did unneutral acts in

Belgium is as yet without proof of any sort, and must be interpreted by

the commonsense consideration that a neutral Belgium was a defensive

bulwark for France and England. To have tampered with her neutrality

would have been motiveless folly. How much more decent and moral than

Prof. Burgess's meticulous weighing of national reincorporation as a

means of evading national obligations is Chancellor Hollweg's robust

plea of national necessity! Prof. Burgess's whole moral and mental

attitude in this case seems to be that of a corporation lawyer getting a

trust out of a hole under the Statute of Limitations or by some

reorganizing dodge.

FRANK JEWETT MATHER, Jr.

Princeton, N.J., Nov. 4, 1914.

The New York Times Current History of the European War, Vol. 1, January 9, 1915 What Americans Say to Europe · 第 79 / 146 题