Reply to Prof. Burgess

_To the Editor of The New York Times:_

Prof. Burgess's amazing communication on Belgian neutrality omits an

essential piece of evidence. Granting, for the sake of argument, that

the German Empire might repudiate all treaty obligations of the earlier

German confederations, (very odd law, this;) granting also the still

more novel plea that Belgium had outgrown the need, and the privilege of

neutralization, Germany had agreed to treat all neutral powers under the

following provisions of The Hague Conventions of 1907 concerning the

rights and duties of neutral powers:

The New York Times Current History of the European War, Vol. 1, January 9, 1915 What Americans Say to Europe · 第 78 / 146 题