Might or Right

By John Grier Hibben.

President of Princeton University; author of works on logic

and philosophy.

_The address printed below was delivered by President Hibben at the

opening of the Laymen's Efficiency Convention in New York City, Oct. 16,

1914._

We are all of us sadly conscious of our failure to realize in any

adequate measure the standards of right conduct which we set for

ourselves. Attainment falls far short of purpose and desire. Through

want of courage, or it may be of inclination, or of sheer inertia, we

fail to obey perfectly the law of duty which we recognize as

imperatively binding upon us. There is, however, a more subtle kind of

failure as regards our moral endeavor and achievement which is due to

the unconscious shifting of these standards of right and wrong

themselves. It is not merely that we fail to do that which we know to be

right, but at times the very idea of right itself is strangely altered.

The good insensibly assimilates to itself certain elements of evil which

we allow and accept without full realization of the significance of this

moral alchemy to which the most fundamental of our ideas are often times

subjected. The idea of right no longer stands in its integrity, but is

compromised and even neutralized by conflicting thoughts and sentiments.

The things which at one time held first place in our estimate of life

become secondary. Our attitude toward men, and manners, and affairs

experiences a radical change. This in most cases takes place

unconsciously, or if conscious of it, we refrain from confessing it even

to ourselves.

There are some, however, who are both frank enough and bold enough to

announce their belief in the radical doctrine which demands a complete

transformation of essential values. For them, good is evil and evil

good, and they seem not ashamed to avow it. The conspicuous German

philosopher of later years, Nietzsche, with a naïve simplicity insists

that the great need of our modern civilization is that which he

designates as "the transvaluation of all values." By this he means the

complete transformation of certain ideas of supreme value into their

direct opposites. He declares, for instance, that the central virtues of

Christianity, such as those of self-sacrifice, pity, mercy, indicate an

inherent weakness of the human race, and that the strong man dissipates

his energies through the offices of kindness and helpfulness. Thus the

law which commands us to bear one another's burdens must be regarded as

obsolete. Every man should be strong enough to bear his own burdens. If

not, he is a drag to the onward progress of humanity, and to assist him

is to do evil and not good. If you help the weak, you so far forth

assist in perpetuating an inferior type of manhood.

The New York Times Current History of the European War, Vol. 1, January 9, 1915 What Americans Say to Europe · 第 69 / 146 题