Such a spirit is sometimes evoked by a great national crisis which

thrills all hearts. This happened to England or at least to a large

part of the people of England, in the seventeenth century. It happened

to Germany in the days of the War of Liberation, and to Italy when

she was striving to expel the Austrians and the petty princes who

ruled by Austria’s help. You here felt it during the War of Secession.

Sometimes, and usually at one of these crises, a great man stands out

who helps to raise the feeling of his people and inspire them with his

own lofty thoughts and aims. Such a man was Mazzini, seventy years

ago in Italy. Such were Washington and Lincoln, the former more by his

example than by his words, the latter by both, yet most by the quiet

patience, dignity, and hopefulness which he showed in the darkest

hours. Nations respond to the appeal which such a man makes to their

best instincts. He typifies for the moment whatever is highest in them.

Unhappily, with nations as with individuals, there is apt to be a

relapse from these loftier moods into the old common ways when selfish

interest and trivial pleasures resume their sway. There comes a sort

of reaction from the stress of virtue and strenuous high-soaring

effort. Everything looks gray and dull. The divine light has died out

of the sky. This, too, is an oft-repeated lesson of European history.

Yet the reaction and decline are not inevitable. When an individual

man has been raised above himself by some spiritual impulse, he is

sometimes able to hold the ground he has won. His will may have been

strengthened. He has learnt to control the meaner desires. The impulse

that stirred him is not wholly spent, because the nobler thoughts and

acts which it prompted have become a habit with him. So, too, with

a nation. What habits are to the individual man, that, to a nation,

are its Traditions. They are the memories of the Past turned into

the standards of the Present. High traditions go to form a code of

honour, which speaks with authority to the sense of honour. Whoever

transgresses that code is felt to be unworthy of the nation, unfit to

hold that place in its respect and confidence which the great ones

of the days of old have held. Pride in the glorious foretime of the

race and in its heroes sustains in the individual man who is called

to public duty, the personal pride which makes him feel that all his

affections and all his emotions stand rooted in the sense of honour,

which is, for the man and for the nation, the foundation of all virtue.

We have seen in our own time, in the people of Japan, a striking

example of what the passionate attachment to a national ideal can do

in war to intensify the sense of duty and self-sacrifice. A similar

example is held up to us by those who have recorded the earlier annals

of Rome. The deepest moral they teach is the splendid power which the

love of Rome and the idea of what her children owed to her exercised

over her great citizens, enabling them to set shining examples of

devotion to the city which the world has admired ever since. Each

example evoked later examples in later generations, till at last in

a changed community, its upper class demoralized by wealth and power

even more than it was torn by discord, its lower classes corrupted

by the upper and looking on their suffrage as a means of gain, the

ancient traditions died out. Whoever, studying the conditions of modern

European democracies, sees the infinite fatalities which popular

government in large countries full of rich men and of opportunities for

acquiring riches, offers for the perversion of government to private

selfish ends, will often feel that those European States which have

maintained the highest standard of civic purity have done it in respect

of their Traditions. Were these to be weakened, the fabric might

crumble into dust.

Every new generation as it comes up can make the traditions which it

finds better or worse. If its imagination is touched and its emotions

stirred by all that is finest in the history of its country, it learns

to live up to the ideals set before it, and thus it strengthens the

best standards of conduct it has inherited and prolongs the reverence

felt for them.

The responsibility for forming ideals and fixing standards does not

belong to statesmen alone. It belongs, and now perhaps more largely

than ever before, to the intellectual leaders of the nation, and

especially to those who address the people in the universities and

through the press. Teachers, writers, journalists, are forming the

mind of modern nations to an extent previously unknown. Here they

have opportunities such as have existed never before, nor in any

other country, for trying to inspire the nation with a love of truth

and honour, with a sense of the high obligations of citizenship, and

especially of those who hold public office.

Of the power which the daily press exerts upon the thought and the

tastes of the people through the matter it scatters among them, and

of the grave import of the choice it has always and everywhere to make

between the serious treatment of public issues and that cheap cynicism

which so many readers find amusing, there is no need to speak here. You

know better than I do how far those who direct the press realize and

try to discharge the responsibilities which attach to their power.

The observer who seeks to discern and estimate the forces working for

good or evil that mark the spirit and tendencies of an age, finds it

easiest to do this by noting the changes which have occurred within

his own memory. To-day everyone seems to dwell upon the growth not

only of luxury, but of the passion for amusement, and most of those

who can look back thirty or forty years find in this growth grounds

for discouragement. I deny neither the fact nor the significance of

the auguries that it suggests. But let us also note a hopeful sign

manifest during the last twenty years both here and in England. It

is the diffusion among the educated and richer classes of a warmer

feeling of sympathy and a stronger feeling of responsibility for the

less fortunate sections of the community. There is more of a sense

of brotherhood, more of a desire to help, more of a discontent with

those arrangements of society which press hardly on the common man

than there was forty years ago. This altruistic spirit which is now

everywhere visible in the field of private philanthropic work, seems

likely to spread into the field of civic action also, and may there

become a new motive power. It has already become a more efficient force

in legislation than it ever was before. We may well hope that it will

draw more and more of those who love and seek to help their fellow-men

into that legislative and administrative work whose opportunities for

grappling with economic and social problems become every day greater.

Here in America I am told in nearly every city I visit that the young

men are more and more caring for and bestirring themselves to discharge

their civic duties. That is the best news one can hear. Surely no

country makes so clear a call upon her citizens to work for her as

yours does. Think of the wide-spreading results which good solid work

produces on so vast a community, where everything achieved for good

in one place is quickly known and may be quickly imitated in another.

Think of the advantages for the development of the highest civilization

which the boundless resources of your territory provide. Think of that

principle of the Sovereignty of the People which you have carried

further than it was ever carried before and which requires and inspires

and, indeed, compels you to endeavour to make the whole people fit to

bear a weight and discharge a task such as no other multitude of men

ever yet undertook. Think of the sense of fraternity, also without

precedent in any other great nation, which binds all Americans together

and makes it easier here than elsewhere for each citizen to meet every

other citizen as an equal upon a common ground. One who, coming from

the Old World, remembers the greater difficulties the Old World has

to face, rejoices to think how much, with all these advantages, the

youth of America, such youth as I see here to-night in this venerable

university, may accomplish for the future of your country. Nature

has done her best to provide a foundation whereon the fabric of an

enlightened and steadily advancing civilization may be reared. It is

for you to build upon that foundation. Free from many of the dangers

that surround the States of Europe, you have unequalled opportunities

for showing what a high spirit of citizenship--zealous, intelligent,

disinterested--may do for the happiness and dignity of a mighty nation,

enabling it to become what its founders hoped it might be--a model for

other peoples more lately emerged into the sunlight of freedom.

Transcriber’s Note

Page 48: “Americans” was printed as “Ameritans”, and changed here,

presuming it was a typographical error.

Promoting good citizenship · 第 3 / 3 段