VIII

A government that does not protect life is a flat failure, no matter

what else it may do. Life being almost universally regarded as the

most precious possession, its security is the first and highest

essential—not the life of him who takes life, but the life which

is exposed defenceless to his hateful hand. In no country in the

world, civilized or savage, is life so insecure as in this. In no

country in the world is murder held in so light reprobation. In no

battle of modern times have so many lives been taken as are lost

annually in the United States through public indifference to the

crime of homicide—through disregard of law, through bad government.

If American self-government with its ten thousand homicides a year

is good government there is no such thing as bad. Self-government?

What monstrous nonsense! Who governs himself needs no government,

has no governor, is not governed. If government has any meaning it

means the restraint of the many by the few—the subordination of

numbers to brains. It means denial to the masses of the right to cut

their own throats and ours. It means grasp and control of all social

forces and material enginery—a vigilant censorship of the press, a

firm hand upon the churches, keen supervision of public meetings and

public amusements, command of the railroads, telegraph and all means

of communication. It means, in short, ability to make use of all

beneficent influences of enlightenment for the general good, and to

array all the powers of civilization against civilization’s natural

enemies—“the masses.” Government like this has a thousand defects, but

it has one merit: it is government.

Despotism? Yes. It is the despotisms of the world that have been the

conservators of civilization. It is the despot who, most powerful for

mischief, is alone powerful for good. It is conceded that government is

necessary—even by the “fierce democracies” that madly renounce it. But

in so far as government is not despotic it is not government. In Europe

for the last one hundred years, the trend of government has been toward

liberalization. Sovereign after sovereign has surrendered prerogative

after prerogative; the nobility, privilege after privilege. Mark

the result: society honeycombed with treason; property menaced with

partition; assassination studied as a science and practiced as an art;

everywhere powerful secret organizations sworn to demolish the social

fabric that the slow centuries have but just erected, and unmindful

that themselves will perish in the wreck. No heart can beat tranquilly

under clean linen. Such is the gratitude, such is the wisdom, such the

virtue of “The Masses.”

That ancient and various device, “a republican form of government,”

appears to be too good for all the peoples of the earth excepting

one. It is partly successful in Switzerland; in France and America,

where the majority is composed of persons having dark understandings

and criminal instincts, it has broken down. In our case, as in every

case, the momentum of successful revolution carried us too far. We

rebelled against tyranny and having overthrown it, overthrew also the

governmental form in which it had happened to be manifest. In their

anger and their triumph our good grandfathers acted somewhat in the

spirit of the Irishman who cudgeled the dead snake until nothing of

it was left, in order to make it “sinsible of its desthruction.” They

meant it all, too, honest souls! For a long time after the setting up

of the republic the republic meant active hatred to kings, nobles,

aristocracies. It was held, and rightly held, that a nobleman could

not breathe in America—that he left his title and his privileges on

the ship that brought him over. Do we observe anything of that in this

generation? On the landing of a foreign king, prince or nobleman—even

a miserable “knight”—do we not execute sycophantic genuflexions?

Are not our newspapers full of flamboyant descriptions and qualming

adulation? Nay, does not our president himself—successor to Washington

and Jefferson!—greet and entertain the “nation’s guest”? Is not the

American young woman crazy to mate with a male of title? Does all

this represent no retrogression?—is it not the backward movement of

the shadow on the dial? Doubtless the republican idea has struck

strong roots into the soil of the two Americas, but he who rightly

considers the tendencies of events, the causes that bring them about

and the consequences that flow from them, will not be hot to affirm

the perpetuity of republican institutions in the Western Hemisphere.

Between their inception and their present stage of development there

is scarcely the beat of a pendulum; and already, by corruption and

lawlessness, the people of both continents, with all their diversities

of race and character, have shown themselves about equally unfit.

To become a nation of scoundrels all that any people needs is

opportunity; and what we are pleased to call by the impossible name of

“self-government” supplies it.

The capital defect of republican government is inability to repress

internal forces tending to disintegration. It does not take long for a

“self-governed” people to learn that it is not really governed—that an

agreement enforcible by nobody but the parties to it is not binding.

We are learning this very rapidly: we set aside our laws whenever we

please. The sovereign power—the tribunal of ultimate jurisdiction—is

a mob. If the mob is large enough (it need not be very large), even

if composed of vicious tramps, it may do as it will. It may destroy

property and life. It may without proof of guilt inflict upon

individuals torments unthinkable by fire and flaying, mutilations

that are nameless. It may call men, women and children from their

beds and beat them to death with cudgels. In the light of day it may

assail the very strongholds of law in the heart of a populous city,

and assassinate prisoners of whose guilt it knows nothing. And these

things—observe, O victims of kings—are habitually done. One would as

well be at the mercy of one’s sovereign as of one’s neighbor.

The anarchist himself is persuaded of the superiority of our plan of

dealing with him; he likes it and “comes over” in quantity, impesting

the political atmosphere with the “sweltered venom” engendered by

centuries of “oppression”—comes over here, where he is not oppressed,

and sets up as oppressor. His preferred field of malefaction is the

country that is most nearly anarchical. He comes here, partly to better

himself under our milder institutions, partly to secure immunity

while conspiring to destroy them. There is thunder in Europe, but if

the storm ever break it is in America that the lightning will first

fall. Here is a great vortex into which the decivilizing agencies are

pouring without obstruction. Here gather the eagles to the feast,

for the quarry is defenceless. Here is no power in government,

no government. Here an enemy of order is thought to be the least

dangerous when most free. And here is nothing between him and his

task of subversion—no pampered soldiery to repress his rising, no

iron authority to lay him by the heels. The militia is fraternal, the

magistracy elective. Europe may hold out a little longer. The great

powers may make what stage-play they will, but they are not maintaining

their incalculable armaments solely for aggression upon one another

and protection from one another, nor for fun. These vast forces are

mainly constabular—creatures and creators of discontent—phenomena of

decivilization. Eventually they will fraternize with Disorder or become

themselves Praetorian Guards more dangerous than the perils that have

called them into existence.

It is easy to forecast the first stages of the End’s approach: Rioting.

Disaffection of constabulary and troops. Subversion of the Government.

A policy of decapitation. Parliament of the people. Divided counsels.

Pandemonium. The man on horseback. Gusts of grape. ——?

The gods kept their secrets by telling them to Cassandra, whom nobody

believed. I am entrusted with the secret that the shadow on the dial

of civilization is moving backward. Believe or disbelieve—what matter?

Revelers with wine-dipped wreaths upon their heads do not care to know

the hour. Yet there are signs and portents—whispers and cries in the

air; stealthy tread of invisible feet along the ground; sudden clamor

of startled fowls at dead o’ the night; crimson dew-drops on the

roadside grass of a morning. But pray do not disturb yourselves: eat,

drink and be merry, for to-morrow comes Logical Democracy.

The Collected Works of Ambrose Bierce, Volume 11 Antepenultimata · 第 14 / 92 题