I imagine entries like the following:--

"Peter Thomson said on Thursday that it was Lloyd George who said

'Father, I cannot tell a lie,' and he was caned by the master who, by

the way, has just been appointed President of the Conservative

Association."

"Mary Brown was late every morning this week."

"John Mackenzie is at present gathering potatoes at Mr. Skinnem's farm,

and is being paid a shilling a day of ten hours. Mr. Skinnem has been

made an elder of the Parish Kirk."

Someone has said that the most arresting piece of literature is your own

name in print. That is true, although I suppose that the thrill wears

off when you become as public as Winston Churchill or Charlie Chaplin.

Why shouldn't the bairns experience this thrill? When I write the report

of a local concert for the local papers I always give prominence to the

children who performed. Incidentally, when I have sung at a concert I

omit all reference to my part; I hate to remind the audience that I

sang. I am a true altruist in both cases.

Publicity is the most pleasing thing in life, and that's why patent

medicines retain their popularity. At present the village cobbler is

figuring in the local paper as a "Cured by Bunkum's Bilious Backache

Bunion Beans" example, and beneath his photograph (taken at the age of

nineteen; he is fifty-four now) is a glowing testimonial which begins

with these words:--"For over a decade I have suffered from an excess of

Uric Acid, from Neurotic Dyspepsia, and from Optical Derangements. Until

I discovered that marvellous panacea...."

I marvel at his improved literary style; it is only a month since he

wrote me as follows:--"Sir, i will be oblidged if you will let peter

away at three oclock tonight hoping that you are well as this leaves me

i am your obidt servent peter Macannish."

The magazine would also contain interesting editorials for the parents.

Art would have a prominent place; if a bairn made a good sketch or a

bonny design it would be reproduced.

Of course, the idea cannot be carried out for lack of funds. Yet I fancy

that the money now spent on hounds and pet dogs would easily run a

magazine for every school in Scotland.

The technical difficulties could easily be overcome. The bigger bairns

could read the proofs and paste up the magazine, and the teachers would

revise it before sending it to the printers.

I must get estimates from the printers, and if they are moderate I

shall try to raise funds by giving a school concert.

* * *

I see that the Educational Institute is advertising for a man who will

combine the post of Editor of _The Educational News_ with the office of

Secretary to the Institute. The salary is £450 per annum.

This combining of the offices seems to me a great mistake. For an editor

should be a literary man with ideas on education, while a good secretary

should be an organizer. Because a man can write columns on education,

that is no proof that he is the best man to write to the office

washerwoman telling her not to come on Monday because it is a holiday.

I could edit the paper (I would take on the job for a hundred a year and

the sport of telling the other fellow that his notions of education were

all wrong), but I couldn't organise a party of boys scouts. Kitchener is

a great organiser, but I shouldn't care for the editorials of _The New

Statesman_ if he were editor.

I think that the Institute does not want a man with ideas. It wants a

man who will mirror the opinions of the Institute. To do this is a work

of genius, for the Institute has no opinions. No man can represent a

body of men. Suppose the Institute decides by a majority that it will

support the introduction of "Love" as a subject of the curriculum. The

editor may be a misogynist, or he may have been married eight times, yet

the poor devil has to sit down and write an editorial beginning: "Love

has too long been absent from our schools. Who does not remember with

holy tenderness his first kiss?..."

A paper can be a force only when it is edited by a man of force and

personality. A man who writes at the dictation of another is a

tenth-rater. That, of course, is why our press says nothing.

* * *

Little Mary Brown was stung by a wasp the other day as she sat in the

class.

"Henceforward," I said, "the wasp that enters this room is to be slain.

Tom Macintosh I appoint you commander in chief."

I begin to think that I prefer the wasp to the campaign against it.

To-day I was in the midst of a dissertation on Trusts when Tom started

up.

"Come on lads, there's a wasp!"

They broke a window and two pens; then they slew the wasp.

The less studious boys keep one eye on the window all day, and I found

Dave Thomson chasing an imaginary wasp all round the room at Arithmetic

time. Dave detests Arithmetic. But when I found that Tom Macintosh was

smearing the inside window-sill with black currant jam, I disbanded the

anti-wasp army.

* * *

The Inspectors refuse to allow teachers to use slates nowadays on the

ground that they are insanitary.

To-day I reintroduced slates to all classes. My one reason was that my

bairns were missing one of the most delightful pastimes of youth--the

joy of making a spittle run down the slate and back again. I always look

back with tenderness to my old slate. It was such a serviceable article.

By running my slate-pencil up it I got all the beats of a drum; its

wooden sides were the acknowledged tests for a new knife, as a hammer

it had few rivals. Then you could play at X-es and O-ies with impunity;

you simply licked your palm and rubbed the whole game out when the

teacher approached.

In the afternoon half a dozen bairns brought sponges, and I sighed for

the good old days when sanitary authorities were plumbers on promotion.

* * *

I have given my bairns two songs--_Screw-Guns_ and _Follow Me Home_,

both by Kipling. I prefer them to the usual "patriotic" song that is

published for school use. I don't see the force of teaching children to

be patriotic; the man who imagines that a dominie can teach a bairn to

love his neighbour or his country is fatuous. Flag-waving is the last

futility of noble minds. The queer thing is that all these titled men

who spout about Imperialism and Patriotism, and "Make the Foreigner Pay"

are enemies of the worker. They don't particularly want to see a State

where slums and slavery will be no more; they are so busy thinking out a

scheme to extend the Empire abroad that they haven't time to think about

the Empire at home. What is the use of an India or a South Africa if

East Ham is to remain?

No, I refuse to teach my bairns to sing, "Britons never, never, never

shall be slaves." My sense of humour won't allow me to introduce that

song.

Although I like Kipling's verses I abominate Kipling's philosophy and

politics. He is always to be found on the same platform with the Curzons

and Milners and Roosevelts. He believes in "the big stick"; to him

Britain is great because of her financiers, her viceroys, her engineers.

He glories in enterprise and big ships. He believes with the late Lord

Roberts that the Englishman is the salt of the earth. I should define

Kipling as a Grown-up Public School Boy.

I always think that the "Patriot's" main contention is that a man ought

to be ready to die for his country. I freely grant that it is a great

thing to die for your country, but I contend that it is still greater to

live for your country; and the man who tries to live for his country

usually earns the epithet "Traitor."

"What do they know of England who only England know?" Kipling says

this, or words to this effect. That's the worst of these travelled

Johnnies; they go out to India or Africa, and two months after their

arrival they pity the narrow vision of the people at home. After having

talked much to travelled men I have come to the conclusion that travel

is the most narrowing thing on earth.

"If I went out to India," I remarked one day to an Anglo-Indian friend

at College, "and if I started to talk about Socialism in a drawing-room,

what would happen?"

"Oh," he said with a smile, "they would listen to you very politely,

but, of course, you wouldn't be asked again."

When I went down to Tilbury to see this friend off to India I looked at

the crowd on the first-class deck.

"Dick," I said, "these people are awful. Look at their smugness, their

eagerness to be correct at any expense. They are saying good-bye to

wives and mothers and sweethearts, and the whole blessed crowd of 'em

haven't an obvious emotion among 'em. I'll bet my hat that they won't

even wave their hands when the tender goes off."

As I left the boat the first-class passengers stood like statues, but

one fat woman, with a delightfully plebeian face cried: "So long, old

sport!" to a man beside me.

"Good!" cried Dick to me with a laugh.

"Lovely!" I called, and waved my hat frantically to the fat woman. Poor

soul, I fear that society out East will be making her suffer for her

lapse into bad form.

Travel is like a school-history reader; it forces you to study mere

incident. The travelled man is an encyclopædia of information; but I

don't want to know what a man has seen; I want to know what he has

thought. I am certain that if I went to live in Calcutta I should cease

to think. I should marvel at the colour and life of the streets; I

should find great pleasure in learning the lore of the native. But in a

year I should very probably be talking of "damned niggers," and cursing

the India Office as a crowd of asses who know nothing about India and

its problems.

I once lent _Ann Veronica_ to a clever young lady. Her father, an

engineer who had been all over the world, picked up the book. Two days

later he returned it with a final note dismissing me as a dangerous

character for his daughter to know. The lady was clever, and had

mentality enough to read anything with impunity.

No, travel doesn't broaden a man's outlook.

My writing is like my teaching, it is an irresponsible ramble. I meant

to write about songs all the time to-night.

I curse my luck in not being a pianist. I want to give my bairns that

loveliest of tenor solos--the _Preislied_ from _The Meistersingers_. I

want to give them Lawrence Hope's _Slave's Song_ from her _Indian Love

Lyrics_--"_Less than the Dust beneath thy Chariot Wheel_." And there are

one or two catchy bits in _Gipsy Love_ and _The Quaker Girl_ that I

should like them to know. I am sure that they would enjoy _Mr. Jeremiah,

Esquire_, and _The Gipsy's Song_.

A Dominie's Log · 第 45 / 77 题