Representative FORD. Mr. Chairman----

Mr. DULLES. Could we have some indication of what that letter is, for

the record.

The CHAIRMAN. Referring back to Exhibit No. 912, where I was acting

apparently under some misapprehension I read the first three lines and

it said "Nov. 3, 1959. I, Lee Harvey Oswald, do hereby request that my

present United States citizenship be revoked." Well, that is consistent

with what was said.

Representative FORD. I think that is a pretty categorical statement.

The CHAIRMAN. Yes; it is.

Representative FORD. He subsequently, in Exhibit No. 912, makes a

protest about the fact that he was not accorded that right previously.

But I don't see how we could come to any other conclusion but the first

three lines are a specific request for the right to revoke his American

citizenship.

The CHAIRMAN. Yes; but I had misread that first sentence, and I had

asked if it wasn't a revocation of his original request. I was in error

when I said that. You are correct, absolutely, on your interpretation

of it.

Mr. COLEMAN. As a result of receiving Commission Exhibit No. 912, you

wrote Mr. Oswald a letter which has been--a copy of which has been

marked and identified as Commission Exhibit No. 919, is that correct?

Mr. SNYDER. Yes, sir.

Mr. COLEMAN. Earlier in your testimony, when asked about what a citizen

has to do to renounce his citizenship, you referred to section 349(a)

(6).

I would like to call your attention to the fact there is also another

provision--section 349(a) (2)--which provides that an American citizen

shall lose his nationality by "taking an oath or making an affirmation

or other formal declaration of allegiance to a foreign state or a

political subdivision thereof."

Did you consider whether the Oswald letter, marked as Commission

Exhibit No. 912, was such an affirmation or other formal declaration?

Mr. SNYDER. There is a considerable body of law, I believe,

interpreting this provision of law as to what constitutes an

affirmation or other formal declaration. I believe that I was quite

aware at the time that a mere statement did not constitute a formal

declaration within the meaning of the law.

Warren Commission (05 of 26): Hearings Vol. V (of 15) · 第 185 / 470 题