CHAPTER IX.

MILITARY movements in the Southern department attracted little notice,

but were not the less important. The Southern people entered into

the war in the hope of obtaining the Floridas. President Madison,

like President Jefferson, gave all the support in his power to the

scheme. Throughout the year 1812 United States troops still occupied

Amelia Island and the St. Mary’s River, notwithstanding the refusal of

Congress to authorize the occupation. The President expected Congress

at the session of 1812–1813 to approve the seizure of both Floridas,

and took measures in advance for that purpose.

October 12, 1812, Secretary Eustis wrote to the Governor of Tennessee

calling out fifteen hundred militia for the defence of the “lower

country.” The force was not intended for defence but for conquest; it

was to support the seizure of Mobile, Pensacola, and St. Augustine by

the regular troops. For that object every man in Tennessee was ready

to serve; and of all Tennesseeans, Andrew Jackson was the most ardent.

Governor Blount immediately authorized Jackson, as major-general of

the State militia, to call out two thousand volunteers. The call was

issued November 14; the volunteers collected at Nashville December 10;

and Jan. 7, 1813, the infantry embarked in boats to descend the river,

while the mounted men rode through the Indian country to Natchez.

“I have the pleasure to inform you,” wrote Jackson to Eustis in

departing,[293] “that I am now at the head of two thousand and

seventy volunteers, the choicest of our citizens, who go at the

call of their country to execute the will of the Government; who

have no Constitutional scruples, and if the Government orders, will

rejoice at the opportunity of placing the American eagle on the

ramparts of Mobile, Pensacola, and Fort St. Augustine.”

The Tennessee army reached Natchez, February 15, and went into camp to

wait orders from Washington, which were expected to direct an advance

on Mobile and Pensacola.

While Jackson descended the Mississippi, Monroe, then acting Secretary

of War, wrote, January 13, to Major-General Pinckney,[294] whose

military department included Georgia: “It is intended to place under

your command an adequate force for the reduction of St. Augustine

should it be decided on by Congress, before whom the subject will be

in a few days.” A fortnight later, January 30, Monroe wrote also to

Wilkinson,[295] then commanding at New Orleans: “The subject of taking

possession of West Florida is now before Congress, and will probably

pass. You will be prepared to carry into effect this measure should it

be decided on.”

Neither Madison nor Monroe raised objection to the seizure of territory

belonging to a friendly power; but Congress showed no such readiness

to act. Senator Anderson of Tennessee, as early as Dec. 10, 1812,

moved,[296] in secret session of the Senate, that a committee be

appointed to consider the expediency of authorizing the President

“to occupy and hold the whole or any part of East Florida, including

Amelia Island, and also those parts of West Florida which are not now

in the possession and under the jurisdiction of the United States.”

After much debate the Senate, December 22, adopted the resolution by

eighteen votes to twelve, and the committee, consisting of Anderson,

Samuel Smith, Tait of Georgia, Varnum of Massachusetts, and Goodrich

of Connecticut, reported a bill,[297] January 19, authorizing the

President to occupy both Floridas, and to exercise government there,

“provided ... that the section of country herein designated that is

situated to the eastward of the river Perdido may be the subject of

future negotiation.”

The bill met opposition from the President’s personal enemies, Giles,

Leib, and Samuel Smith, as well as from the Federalists and some of

the Northern Democrats. January 26, Samuel Smith moved to strike

out the second section, which authorized the seizure of Florida east

of the Perdido; and the Senate, February 2, by a vote of nineteen

to sixteen, adopted Smith’s motion. The vote was sectional. North

and South Carolina, Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana supported the

bill; Maryland, Delaware, Pennsylvania, New York, Connecticut, and

Rhode Island opposed it; Virginia, Kentucky, Ohio, Massachusetts, New

Hampshire, and Vermont were divided; New Jersey threw one vote in its

favor, the second senator being absent. Had Leib not changed sides the

next day, the whole bill would have been indefinitely postponed; but

the majority rallied, February 5, and by a vote of twenty-one to eleven

authorized the President to seize Florida west of the Perdido, or, in

other words, to occupy Mobile. The House passed the bill in secret

session February 9, and the President signed it February 12.[298]

In refusing to seize East Florida, the Senate greatly disarranged

Madison’s plans. Three days afterward, February 5, Armstrong took

charge of the War Department, and his first orders were sent to Andrew

Jackson directing him to dismiss his force, “the causes of embodying

and marching to New Orleans the corps under your command having ceased

to exist.”[299] Jackson, ignorant that the Administration was not to

blame, and indignant at his curt dismissal, marched his men back to

Tennessee, making himself responsible for their pay and rations. On

learning these circumstances, Armstrong wrote, March 22, a friendly

letter thanking him for the important services his corps would have

rendered “had the Executive policy of occupying the two Floridas been

adopted by the national legislature.”[300]

After the Senate had so persistently refused to support Madison’s

occupation of East Florida, he could hardly maintain longer the illegal

possession he had held during the past year of Amelia Island. February

15, Armstrong wrote to Major-General Pinckney,[301] “The late private

proceedings of Congress have resulted in a decision not to invade

East Florida at present;” but not until March 7, did the secretary

order Pinckney to withdraw the troops from Amelia Island and Spanish

territory.[302]

The troops were accordingly withdrawn from Amelia Island, May 16;

but nothing could restore East Florida to its former repose, and the

anarchy which had been introduced from the United States could never

be mastered except by the power that created it. Perhaps Madison

would have retained possession, as the least of evils, in spite of

the Senate’s vote of February 3, had not another cause, independent

of legislative will, overcome his repugnance to the evacuation. The

Russian offer of mediation arrived while the President was still in

doubt. The occupation of Florida, being an act of war against Spain,

could not fail to excite the anger of England, and in that feeling of

displeasure the Czar must inevitably share. From the moment their cause

against Napoleon was common, Russia, England, and Spain were more than

likely to act together in resistance to any territorial aggression upon

any member of their alliance, the evacuation of East Florida by the

United States evaded a serious diplomatic difficulty; and probably not

by mere coincidence, Armstrong’s order to evacuate Amelia Island was

dated March 7, while Daschkoff’s letter offering the Czar’s mediation

was dated March 8.

The Cabinet was so little united in support of the Executive policy

that Madison and Monroe ordered the seizure of Mobile without

consulting Gallatin, whose persistent hostility to the Florida

intrigues was notorious. When Monroe in April gave to Gallatin and

Bayard the President’s instructions[303] for the peace negotiations,

among the rest he directed them to assert “a right to West Florida

by cession from France, and a claim to East Florida as an indemnity

for spoliations.” On receiving these instructions, Gallatin wrote to

Monroe, May 2, asking,[304]--

“Where is the importance of taking possession of Mobile this

summer? We may do this whenever we please, and is it not better to

delay every operation of minor importance which may have a tendency

to impede our negotiations with Great Britain and Russia? You know

that to take by force any place in possession of another nation,

whatever our claim to that place may be, is war; and you must be

aware that both Russia and Great Britain will feel disposed, if not

to support the pretensions of Spain against us, at least to take

part against the aggressor.”

Monroe quickly replied:[305] “With respect to West Florida, possession

will be taken of it before you get far on your voyage. That is a

question settled.” In fact, possession had been taken of it three weeks

before he wrote, in pursuance of orders sent in February, apparently

without Gallatin’s knowledge. Monroe added views of his own, singularly

opposed to Gallatin’s convictions.

“On the subject of East Florida,” wrote Monroe to Gallatin, May

6,[306] “I think I intimated to you in my last that Colonel

Lear was under the most perfect conviction, on the authority of

information from respectable sources at Cadiz, that the Spanish

regency had sold that and the other province to the British

government, and that it had done so under a belief that we had,

or should soon get, possession of it. My firm belief is that if

we were possessed of both, it would facilitate your negotiations

in favor of impressment and every other object, especially if it

was distinctly seen by the British ministers or minister that,

instead of yielding them or any part of either, we would push our

fortunes in that direction, and in Canada, if they did not hasten

to accommodate.”

Gallatin, on the eve of sailing for Russia, replied with good temper,

expressing opinions contrary to those of the President and Secretary of

State.

“On the subject of Florida,” Gallatin said,[307] “I have always

differed in opinion with you, and am rejoiced to have it in our

power to announce the evacuation of the province. Let it alone

until you shall, by the introduction of British troops, have a

proof of the supposed cession. In this I do not believe. It can be

nothing more than a permission to occupy it in order to defend it

for Spain. By withdrawing our troops, we withdraw the pretence;

but the impolitic occupancy of Mobile will, I fear, renew our

difficulties. The object is at present of very minor importance,

swelled into consequence by the representations from that quarter,

and which I would not at this moment have attempted, among other

reasons, because it was a Southern one, and will, should it involve

us in a war with Spain, disgust every man north of Washington. You

will pardon the freedom with which, on the eve of parting with you,

I speak on this subject. It is intended as a general caution, which

I think important, because I know and see every day the extent of

geographical feeling, and the necessity of prudence if we mean to

preserve and invigorate the Union.”

No sooner did the Act of February 12 become law than Armstrong wrote,

February 16, to Wilkinson at New Orleans, enclosing a copy of the

Act, and ordering him immediately to take possession of Mobile and the

country as far as the Perdido.[308] Wilkinson, who had for years looked

forward to that step, hastened to obey the instruction. When Gallatin

remonstrated, the measure had been already taken and could not be

recalled.

Since July 9, 1812, Wilkinson had again commanded at New Orleans. No

immediate attack was to be feared, nor could a competent British force

be collected there without warning; but in case such an attack should

be made, Wilkinson had reason to fear the result, for his regular

force consisted of only sixteen hundred effectives, ill equipped

and without defences.[309] The War Department ordered him to depend

on movable ordnance and temporary works rather than on permanent

fortifications;[310] but with his usual disregard of orders he began

the construction or the completion of extensive works at various points

on the river and coast, at a cost which the government could ill afford.

While engaged in this task Wilkinson received, March 14, Armstrong’s

order of February 16 for the invasion of West Florida. When the

government’s orders were agreeable to Wilkinson, they reached him

promptly and were executed with rapidity. Within three weeks he

collected at Pass Christian a force of about six hundred men, supported

by gunboats, and entered the Bay of Mobile on the night of April 10,

while at the same time the garrison at Fort Stoddert descended the

Tensaw River, and cut the communication by land between Mobile and

Pensacola. At that time Mobile Point was undefended. The only Spanish

fortress was Fort Charlotte at Mobile, garrisoned by one hundred and

fifty combatants. Wilkinson summoned the fort to surrender, and the

commandant had no choice but to obey, for the place was untenable and

without supplies. The surrender took place April 15. Wilkinson then

took possession of the country as far as the Perdido, and began the

construction of a fort, to be called Fort Bowyer, on Mobile Point at

the entrance of the Bay, some sixty miles below the town.[311]

This conquest, the only permanent gain of territory made during the

war, being effected without bloodshed, attracted less attention than it

deserved. Wilkinson committed no errors, and won the President’s warm

approval.[312] Wilkinson was greatly pleased by his own success, and

wished to remain at New Orleans to carry out his projected defences;

but Armstrong had written as early as March 10, ordering him to the

Lakes. As so often happened with orders that displeased the general,

Armstrong’s letter, though dated March 10, and doubtless arriving

in New Orleans before April 10, was received by Wilkinson only on

his return, May 19. After another delay of three weeks, he started

northward, and travelled by way of Mobile through the Creek country to

Washington.

Wilkinson’s departure, June 10, and the evacuation of Amelia Island

by General Pinckney May 16, closed the first chapter of the war in

the South. Armstrong wrote to Wilkinson, May 27:[313] “The mission

to Petersburg and the instructions to our envoys will put a barrier

between you and Pensacola for some time to come at least, and

permanently in case of peace.” The sudden stop thus put by the Senate

and the Russian mediation to the campaign against Pensacola and St.

Augustine deranged the plans of Georgia and Tennessee, arrested the

career of Andrew Jackson, and caused the transfer of Wilkinson from New

Orleans to the Lakes. The government expected no other difficulties in

the Southern country, and had no reason to fear them. If new perils

suddenly arose, they were due less to England, Spain, or the United

States than to the chance that gave energy and influence to Tecumthe.

[Illustration:

MAP OF THE

Seat of War among the

Creek Indians.

_From the Original Drawing_

IN THE

WAR DEPARTMENT.

PUBLISHED BY JOHN MELISH,

1815.

]

The Southern Indians were more docile and less warlike than the Indians

of the Lakes. The Chickasaws and Choctaws, who occupied the whole

extent of country on the east bank of the Mississippi River from

the Ohio to the Gulf, gave little trouble or anxiety; and even the

great confederacy of Muskogees, or Creeks, who occupied the territory

afterward called the State of Alabama and part of Georgia, fell in some

degree into a mode of life which seemed likely to make them tillers

of the soil. In 1800 the Creeks held, or claimed, about three hundred

miles square from the Tennessee River to the Gulf, and from the middle

of Georgia nearly to the line which afterward marked the State of

Mississippi. The Seminoles, or wild men, of Florida were a branch of

the Muskogees, and the Creek warriors themselves were in the habit of

visiting Pensacola and Mobile, where they expected to receive presents

from the Spanish governor.

Two thirds of the Creek towns were on the Coosa and Tallapoosa rivers

in the heart of Alabama. Their inhabitants were called Upper Creeks.

The Lower Creeks lived in towns on the Chattahooche River, the modern

boundary between Alabama and Georgia. The United States government,

following a different policy in 1799 from that of Jefferson toward

the Northwestern Indians, induced the Creeks to adopt a national

organization for police purposes; it also helped them to introduce

ploughs, to learn cotton-spinning, and to raise crops. The success of

these experiments was not at first great, for the larger number of

Indians saw no advantage in becoming laborers, and preferred sitting

in the squares of the towns, or hunting; but here and there chiefs or

half-breeds had farms, slaves, stock, orchards, and spinning-wheels.

Large as the Creek country was, and wild as it had ever been, it did

not abound in game. A good hunter, passing in any direction through

the three hundred miles of Alabama and Georgia, found difficulty

in obtaining game enough for his support.[314] For that reason the

Seminoles left their old towns and became wild people, as their name

implied, making irregular settlements in Florida, where game and food

were more plenty. The mass of the Creek nation, fixed in the villages

in the interior, clung to their habits of hunting even when obliged to

cultivate the soil, and their semi-civilization rendered them a more

perplexing obstacle to the whites than though they had obstinately

resisted white influence.

Had the Indian problem been left to the people of Georgia and

Tennessee, the Indians would soon have disappeared; but the national

government established under President Washington in 1789 put a sharp

curb on Georgia, and interposed decisively between the Georgians and

the Creeks.[315] President Washington in 1796 appointed Benjamin

Hawkins of North Carolina as Indian agent among the Creeks, and Hawkins

protected and governed them with devotion; but the result of his

friendliness was the same as that of others’ greed. The Indians slowly

lost ground.

The Creeks complained of grievances similar to those of the

Northwestern Indians, and their position was even more helpless.

They had no other outlet than Pensacola and Mobile. Except from the

Spaniards they could expect no aid in case of trouble, and the Spanish

governors of Florida, after the abdication of Carlos IV. in 1807, could

scarcely maintain their own position, much less supply the Creeks with

arms or gunpowder. While the Northwestern Indians could buy at Malden

all the weapons and ammunition they wanted, the Creeks possessed few

firearms, and these in bad condition; nor were they skilful in using

guns.

The United States government prevented the Georgians from compelling

the Indians to sell their lands, but nothing could prevent them from

trespass; and the Indian woods along the frontier were filled with

cattle, horses, and hogs belonging to the whites, while white men

destroyed the game, hunting the deer by firelight, and scaring the

Indian hunters from their hunting-grounds. “Every cane-swamp where they

go to look for a bear--which is part of their support--is near eat out

by the stocks put over by the citizens of Georgia.”[316] This complaint

was made in 1796, and as time went on the Indian hunting-grounds were

more rapidly narrowed. Not only from Georgia but also from Fort

Stoddert, along the course of the Tombigbee River, above Mobile,

intruders pressed into the Creek country. The Indians had no choice but

to sell their lands for annuities, and under this pressure the Creeks,

in 1802 and 1803, were induced to part with the district between the

Oconee and Ocmulgee in the centre of Georgia. They retained their towns

on the Chattahoochee, where Hawkins’s agency was established in the

town of Coweta, on the edge of the Creek country.

Hawkins was satisfied with their behavior, and believed the chiefs

to be well disposed. They showed none of the restlessness which

characterized the Northwestern Indians, until Tecumthe conceived

the idea of bringing them into his general league to check the

encroachments of the whites. After Tecumthe’s interview with Governor

Harrison at Vincennes, in July, 1811, he made a long journey through

the Chickasaw and Choctaw country, and arrived among the Creeks in

October, bringing with him a score of Indian warriors. The annual

council of the Creeks was held in that month at the village of

Tuckaubatchee,--an ancient town of the Upper Creeks on the Tallapoosa.

The rumor that Tecumthe would be present brought great numbers of

Indians, even Cherokees and Choctaws, to the place, while Hawkins

attended the council in his character as agent.

Tecumthe and his warriors marched into the centre of the square and

took their places in silence. That night “they danced the dance of the

Indians of the Lakes,” which became thenceforward a political symbol of

their party among the Creeks. Some nights afterward Tecumthe addressed

the council. Versions more or less untrustworthy have been given of the

speech;[317] but the only official allusion to it by a person entitled

to credit seemed to show that it was in substance the address made by

Tecumthe at Vincennes. Hawkins, recalling to the Creek chiefs in 1814

the course of events which had caused their troubles, reminded them

how “Tecumseh, in the square of Tuckaubatchee, ... told the Creeks

not to do any injury to the Americans; to be in peace and friendship

with them; not to steal even a bell from any one of any color. Let the

white people on this continent manage their affairs their own way. Let

the red people manage their affairs their own way.”[318] Hawkins and

the old chiefs would have certainly interfered had Tecumthe incited

the Creeks to war or violence; but according to Hawkins the speech was

a pacific “talk,” delivered by Tecumthe in the name of the British.

Indian tradition preserved another form of Tecumthe’s rhetoric, which

seemed to complete the identity with the Vincennes address. Unable

to express himself in the Muskogee language, Tecumthe used pantomime

familiar to Indians. Holding his war-club with outstretched arm, he

opened first the little finger, then the next and the next, till the

club fell from his hand.

Indian union was unquestionably the chief theme of all Tecumthe’s

public addresses. Whether in private he taught other doctrines must

be matter of surmise; but he certainly brought into the Creek nation

a religious fanaticism of a peculiar and dangerous kind. Prophets

soon appeared, chiefly among the Alabamas, a remnant of an ancient

race, not of Creek blood, but members of the Creek confederacy.[319]

The prophets, with the usual phenomena of hysteria, claimed powers

of magic, and promised to bring earthquakes to destroy an invading

army. They preached the total destruction of everything, animate and

inanimate, that pertained to civilization. As the nation generally was

badly armed, and relied chiefly on their bows, arrows, and war-clubs

for battle,[320] the moral support of magic was needed to give them

confidence.

So secret was the influence of Tecumthe’s friends that no suspicion of

the excitement reached Hawkins even when the war with England began;

and the old chiefs of the nation--known to be devoted to peace and

to the white alliance--were kept in ignorance of all that was done

among the young warriors. The Alabamas, or Coosadas, lived below the

junction of the Coosa and Tallapoosa, on the west bank of the Alabama

River, about eight miles above the modern town of Montgomery; they

were considered by Hawkins the most industrious and best behaved of

all the Creeks, whose fields were the granaries of the upper towns and

furnished supplies even to Mobile. Their town was the last place in

which Hawkins expected to see conspiracy, violence, or fanaticism. The

young men “sang the song of the Indians of the Lakes, and danced the

dance” in secret for eighteen months after Tecumthe’s visit, without

public alarm, and probably would have continued to do so except for an

outbreak committed by some of their nation three hundred miles away.

In 1812 a band of six Indians led by the Little Warrior of Wewocau, a

Creek town on the Coosa, was sent by the nation on a public mission to

the Chickasaws.[321] Instead of delivering their “talks” and returning,

they continued their journey to the northern Lakes and joined Tecumthe

at Malden. They took part in the massacre at the river Raisin, Jan. 22,

1813, and soon afterward began their return, bringing talks from the

Shawanese and British and also a letter from some British officer at

Malden to the Spanish officials at Pensacola, from whom they hoped to

obtain weapons and powder. According to common report, Tecumthe told

the Little Warrior that he was about to aid the British in capturing

Fort Meigs, and as soon as the fort was taken he would come to join the

Creeks.[322] Until then his friends were to increase their party by the

secret means and magic that had proved so successful, but were not to

begin open war.[323]

The Little Warrior and his party, including a warrior from Tuskegee,

a Creek town at the fork of the Coosa and Tallapoosa, after crossing

Indiana in the month of February reached the north bank of the Ohio

River about seven miles above its mouth, where were two cabins occupied

by white families.[324] Unable to resist the temptation to spill blood,

the band murdered the two families with the usual Indian horrors. This

outrage was committed February 9; and the band, crossing the Ohio,

passed southward through the Chickasaw country, avowing the deed and

its motive.[325]

The Little Warrior arrived at home about the middle of March, and

reported that he brought talks from the Shawanese and British. The

old chiefs of the Upper Creeks immediately held a council March 25,

and after listening to the talks, reprimanded the Little Warrior and

ordered him to leave the Council House.[326] On the same day Hawkins

wrote to them from Coweta, demanding delivery of the Little Warrior

and his six companions to answer for the murders they had committed.

On hearing this demand, the old chiefs at Tuckaubatchee under the lead

of the Big Warrior held another council, while the Little Warrior, the

Tuskegee Warrior, and the murderers took to the woods. The old chiefs

in council decided to execute the murderers, and sent out parties to

do it. The Little Warrior was found in the swamp, well armed, but was

decoyed out and killed by treachery; “the first and second man’s gun

snapped at him, but the third man’s gun fired and killed; ... four men

that had on pouches kept them shaking following after him, so that he

could not hear the gun snap; if he had found out that, he would have

wounded a good many with his arrows.”[327]

The Tuskegee warrior and four others were found in a house on the

Hickory Ground at the fork of the rivers. As long as they had

ammunition, they held the attack at a distance, but at last the house

was fired. The Tuskegee Warrior being wounded, was burned in the house,

while his two young brothers were taken out and tomahawked. One warrior

broke away, but was caught and killed; two more were killed elsewhere.

One escaped, and “set out the morning after to kill white people.”

Warriors were sent after him.

“He made battle, firing at the warriors, and was near killing

one; the bullet passed near his ear. He then drew his knife and

tomahawk, defended himself, and the warriors shot three balls

through him. He fell, retained the power of speech till next day,

and died. He said he had been to the Shawanese helping of them, and

had got fat eating white people’s flesh. Every one to the very last

called on the Shawanese general, Tecumseh.”[328]

Such political executions, in the stifled excitement of the moment,

could not but rouse violent emotion throughout the Creek nation. The

old chiefs, having given life for life, felt the stronger for their

assertion of authority; but they knew nothing of the true situation.

For several weeks no open outbreak occurred, but the prophets were more

active than ever. About June 4 the old chiefs at Tuckaubatchee, hearing

that the prophets “kept as usual their fooleries,” sent a runner to the

Alabamas with a message:[329]--

“You are but a few Alabama people. You say that the Great Spirit

visits you frequently; that he comes in the sun and speaks to you;

that the sun comes down just above your heads. Now we want to see

and hear what you say you have seen and heard. Let us have the

same proof you have had, and we will believe what we see and hear.

You have nothing to fear; the people who committed murders have

suffered for their crimes, and there is an end of it.”

The runner who carried this message was one of the warriors who had

aided in killing the seven murderers. The Alabamas instantly put him to

death, and sent his scalp to their friends at the forks of the river.

Then began a general uprising, and every warrior who had aided in

killing the murderers was himself killed or hunted from the Upper Creek

country. The chiefs of Tuckaubatchee with difficulty escaped to the

agency at Coweta, where they were under the protection of Georgia.

The Lower Creek towns did not join the outbreak; but of the Upper

Creek towns twenty-nine declared for war, and only five for peace. At

least two thousand warriors were believed to have taken the war-club

by August 1, and got the name of Red Clubs, or Red Sticks, for that

reason. Everywhere they destroyed farms, stock, and all objects of

white civilization, and killed or drove away their opponents.[330]

With all this the Spaniards had nothing to do. The outbreak was caused

by the Indian War in the Northwest, and immediately by the incompetence

of General Winchester and by the massacre at the river Raisin. The

Creeks were totally unprepared for war, except so far as they trusted

to magic; they had neither guns, powder, nor balls. For that reason

they turned to the Spaniards, who could alone supply them. When the

Little Warrior was put to death, the British letter which he carried

from Malden for the Spanish officials at Pensacola came into the

charge of another Creek warrior, Peter McQueen, a half-breed. In July,

McQueen, with a large party of warriors started for Pensacola, with the

letter and four hundred dollars, to get powder.[331] On arriving there

they saw the Spanish governor, who treated them civilly, and in fear

of violence gave them, according to McQueen’s account,[332] “a small

bag of powder each for ten towns, and five bullets to each man.” With

this supply, which the governor represented as a friendly present for

hunting purposes, they were obliged to content themselves, and started

on their return journey.

News that McQueen’s party was at Pensacola instantly reached the

American settlements above Mobile, where the inhabitants were already

taking refuge in stockades.[333] A large number of Americans, without

military organization, under several leaders, one of whom was a

half-breed named Dixon Bailey, started July 26 to intercept McQueen,

and succeeded in surprising the Indians July 27 at a place called

Burnt Corn, about eighty miles north of Pensacola. The whites at first

routed the Indians, and captured the pack-mules with the ammunition;

but the Indians quickly rallied, and in their turn routed the whites,

with a loss of two killed and fifteen wounded,--although they failed to

recover the greater part of the pack-animals. With the small amount of

powder left to him, McQueen then returned to his people.

Angry at the attack and eager to revenge the death of his warriors,

McQueen summoned the warriors of thirteen towns, some eight hundred

in number, and about August 20 started in search of his enemies.

The Creek war differed from that on the Lakes in being partly a war

of half-breeds. McQueen’s strongest ally was William Weatherford, a

half-breed, well known throughout the country as a man of property and

ability, as nearly civilized as Indian blood permitted, and equally at

home among Indians and whites. McQueen and Weatherford were bitterly

hostile to the half-breeds Bailey and Beasley, who were engaged in

the affair of Burnt Corn.[334] Both Beasley and Bailey were at a

stockade called Fort Mims, some thirty-five miles above Mobile, on

the eastern side of the Alabama River, where about five hundred and

fifty persons were collected,--a motley crowd of whites, half-breeds,

Indians, and negroes, old and young, women and children, protected

only by a picket wall, pierced by five hundred loop-holes three and a

half feet from the ground, and two rude gates.[335] Beasley commanded,

and wrote, August 80, that he could “maintain the post against any

number of Indians.”[336] To Fort Mims the Creek warriors turned, for

the reason that Beasley and Bailey were there, and they arrived in the

neighborhood, August 29, without giving alarm. Twice, negroes tending

cattle outside rushed back to the fort reporting that painted warriors

were hovering about; but the horsemen when sent out discovered no sign

of an enemy, and Beasley tied up and flogged the second negro for

giving a false alarm.

At noon, August 30, when the drum beat for dinner no patrols were out,

the gates were open, and sand had drifted against that on the eastern

side so that it could not quickly be closed. Suddenly a swarm of

Indians raising the warwhoop rushed toward the fort. Beasley had time

to reach the gate, but could not close it, and was tomahawked on the

spot. The Indians got possession of the loop-holes outside, and of one

inclosure. The whites, under Dixon Bailey, held the inner inclosure and

fought with desperation; but at last the Indians succeeded in setting

fire to the house in the centre, and the fire spread to the whole

stockade. The Indians then effected an entrance, and massacred most

of the inmates. Fifteen persons escaped, and among these was Dixon

Bailey mortally wounded. Most of the negroes were spared to be slaves.

Two hundred and fifty scalps became trophies of the Creek warriors,--a

number such as had been seldom taken by Indians from the white people

on a single day.

History of the United States of America, Volume 7 (of 9) · 第 9 / 16 章