BELLIGERENT INTERVENTION CONTRARY TO INTERNATIONAL LAW.

From one violation of International Law I pass to another. The

proceedings already detailed show belligerent intervention, contrary to

International Law. Here my statement will be brief.

According to all the best authorities, in harmony with reason, no

nation has a right to interfere by belligerent intervention in

the internal affairs of another, and especially to take part in a

civil feud, except under conditions which are wanting here; nor has

it a right to interfere by belligerent intervention between two

independent nations. The general rule imposed by modern civilization

is _Non-Intervention_; but this rule is little more than a scientific

expression of that saying of Philip de Comines, the famous minister of

Louis the Eleventh, “Our Lord God does not wish that one nation should

play the devil with another.” Not to occupy time with authorities,

I content myself with some of our own country, which are clear and

explicit, and I begin with George Washington, who wrote to Lafayette,

under date of December 25, 1798:--

“No Government ought to interfere with the internal concerns

of another, _except for the security of what is due to

themselves_.”[74]

Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 19 (of 20) · 第 43 / 128 题