Twiss follows Phillimore, but gives to the rule a fresh statement:--

“The independence of a nation is absolute, and not subject to

qualification; so that nations, in respect of their intercourse

under the Common Law, are peers or equals.… Power and weakness

do not in this respect give rise to any distinction.… It

results from this equality, that whatever is lawful for

one nation is equally lawful for another, and whatever is

unjustifiable in the one is equally unjustifiable in the

other.”[71]

In our own country, Chancellor Kent, a great authority, gives the rule

with perfect clearness and simplicity:--

“Nations are equal in respect to each other, and entitled to

claim equal consideration for their rights, whatever may be

their relative dimensions or strength, or however greatly they

may differ in government, religion, or manners. This perfect

equality and entire independence of all distinct states is a

fundamental principle of Public Law.”[72]

General Halleck, whose work is not surpassed by any other in practical

value, while quoting especially Vattel and Sir William Scott, says with

much sententiousness:--

“All sovereign states, without respect to their relative power,

are, in the eye of International Law, equal, being endowed with

the same natural rights, bound by the same duties, and subject

to the same obligations.”[73]

Thus does each authority reflect the others, while the whole together

present the Equality of Nations as a guiding principle not to be

neglected or dishonored.

The record already considered shows how this principle has been

openly defied by our Government in the treatment of the Black

Republic,--first, in the menace of war by Rear-Admiral Poor, and,

secondly, in the manner of the menace,--being in substance and in form.

In both respects the Admiral did what he would not have done to a

powerful nation, what he would not have done to any white nation, and

what we should never allow any nation to do to us.

Hayti was weak, and the gallant Admiral, rowing ashore, pushed to the

Executive Mansion, where, after what he called “a friendly visit,”

he struck at the independence of the Black Republic, pointing from

the windows of the Executive Mansion to his powerful armament, and

threatening to employ it against the Haytian capital or in sinking

Haytian ships. For the present I consider this unprecedented insolence

only so far as it was an offence against the Equality of Nations, and

here it may be tried easily. Think you that we should have done this

thing to England, France, or Spain? Think you that any foreign power

could have done it to us? But if right in us toward Hayti, it would be

right in us toward England, France, or Spain; and it would be right

in any foreign power toward us. If it were right in us toward Hayti,

then might England, France, Spain, or Hayti herself do the same to us.

Imagine a foreign fleet anchored off Alexandria, while the admiral,

pulling ashore in his boat, hurries to the Executive Mansion, and then,

after announcing a friendly visit, points to his war-ships visible from

the windows, and menaces their thunder. Or to be more precise, suppose

the Haytian Navy to return the compliment here in the Potomac. But just

in proportion as we condemn any foreign fleet, including the Haytian

Navy, doing this thing, do we condemn ourselves. The case is clear. We

did not treat Hayti as our peer. The great principle of the Equality of

Nations was openly set at nought.

To extenuate this plain outrage, I have heard it said, that, in our

relations with Hayti, we are not bound by the same rules of conduct

applicable to other nations. So I have heard; and this, indeed, is

the only possible defence for the outrage. As in other days it was

proclaimed that a black man had no rights which a white man was bound

to respect, so this defence assumes the same thing of the Black

Republic. But at last the black man has obtained Equal Rights; and so,

I insist, has the Black Republic. As well deny the one as the other. By

an Act of Congress, drawn by myself and approved by Abraham Lincoln in

the session of 1862, diplomatic relations were established between the

United States and Hayti, and the President was expressly authorized to

appoint diplomatic representatives there. At first we were represented

by a Commissioner and Consul-General; now it is by a Minister Resident

and Consul-General. Thus, by Act of Congress and the appointment of a

Minister, have we recognized the Equal Rights of Hayti in the Family

of Nations, and placed the Black Republic under the safeguard of that

great axiom of International Law which makes it impossible for us to do

unto her what we would not allow her to do unto us. In harmony with the

United States, the “Almanach de Gotha,” where is the authentic, if not

official, list of nations entitled to Equal Rights, contains the name

of Hayti. Thus is the Black Republic enrolled as an equal; and yet have

we struck at this equality. How often have I pleaded that all men are

equal before the Law! And now I plead that all nations are equal before

the Law, without distinction of color.

Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 19 (of 20) · 第 42 / 128 题