Then under date of February 8, 1870, Mr. Perry reports again:--

“President Baez daily remarks that the United States Government

has not kept its promises to send men-of-war to the coast. He

seems very timid and lacks energy.”[28]

The truth becomes still more apparent in the dispatch of February 20,

1870,--nearly three months after the signature of the treaties, and

while they were still pending before the Senate,--where it is openly

reported:--

_“If the United States ships were withdrawn, he [Baez] could

not hold the reins of this Government._ I have told him

this.”[29]

Nothing can be plainer. In other words, the usurper was maintained in

power by our guns. Such was the official communication of the very

agent who had signed the treaties, and who was himself an ardent

annexionist. Desiring annexion, he confesses the means employed to

accomplish it. How the President did not at once abandon, unfinished,

treaties maintained by violence, how the Secretary of State did not

at once resign rather than be a party to this transaction, is beyond

comprehension.

Nor was the State Department left uninformed with regard to the

distribution of this naval force. Here is the report, under date of San

Domingo, March 12, 1870, while the vote was proceeding:--

“The Severn lies at this port; the Swatara left for Samana

the 9th; the Nantasket goes to Puerto Plata to-morrow, the

13th; the Yantic lies in the river in this city. Admiral Poor,

on board the Severn, is expected to remain at this port for

some time. Everything is very quiet at present throughout the

country.”[30]

Thus under the guns of our Navy was quiet maintained, while Baez, like

another usurper, exclaimed, “Now, by St. Paul, the work goes bravely

on!”

What this same official reported to the State Department he afterward

reaffirmed under oath, in his testimony before the committee of the

Senate on the case of Mr. Hatch. The words were few, but decisive,

touching the acts of our Navy,--“committed since we had been there,

_protecting Baez from the citizens of San Domingo_.”[31]

Then, again, in a private letter to myself, under date of Bristol,

Rhode Island, February 10, 1871, after stating that he had reported

what the record shows to be true, “that Baez was sustained and held in

power by the United States Navy,” he adds, “This fact Baez acknowledged

to me.”

So that we have the confession of the Secretary of State, also the

confession of his agent at San Domingo, and the confession of Baez

himself, that the usurper depended for support on our Navy.

Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 19 (of 20) · 第 33 / 128 题