CHAPTER V

Fishing, With And Without Flies--Some Tackle And Lures--Discursive

Remarks On The Gentle Art--The Headlight--Frogging

THERE is probably no subject connected with outdoor sport so

thoroughly and exhaustively written up as Fly-fishing and all that

pertains thereto. Fly-fishing for speckled trout always, and

deservedly, takes the lead. Bass fishing usually comes next, though

some writers accord second place to the lake trout, salmon trout or

land-locked salmon. The mascalonge, as a game fish, is scarcely behind

the small-mouthed bass and is certainly more gamy than the lake trout.

The large-mouthed bass and pickerel are usually ranked about with the

yellow perch, I don't know why: they are certainly gamy enough. Perhaps

it is because they do not leap out of water when hooked. Both are good

on the table.

A dozen able and interesting authors have written books wherein trout,

flies and fly-fishing are treated in a manner that leaves an old

backwoodsman little to say. Rods, reels, casting lines, flies and fish

are described and descanted on in a way and in a language, the reading

whereof reduces me to temporary insanity. And yet I seem to recollect

some bygone incidents concerning fish and fishing. I have a

well-defined notion that I once stood on Flat Rock, in Big Pine Creek

and caught over 350 fine trout in a short day's fishing. Also that many

times I left home on a bright May or June morning, walked eight miles,

caught a twelve-pound creel of trout and walked home before bedtime.

I remember that once, in Michigan, on the advice of local fishermen, I

dragged a spoon around High Bank Lake two days, with little result save

half a dozen blisters on my hands; and that on the next morning, taking

a long tamarack pole and my own way of fishing, I caught, before 10

A.M., fifty pounds of bass and pickerel, weighing from two to ten pounds

each.

Gibson, whose spoon, line and skiff I had been using and who was the

fishing oracle of that region, could hardly believe his eyes. I kept

that country inn, and the neighborhood as well, supplied with fish for

the next two weeks.

It is truth to say that I have never struck salt or fresh waters,

where edible fish were at all plentiful, without being able to take, in

some way, all that I needed. Notably and preferably with the fly if

that might be; if not, then with worms, grubs, minnows, grasshoppers,

crickets, or any sort of doodle bug their highnesses might affect. When

a plump, two-pound trout refuses to eat a tinseled, feathered fraud, I

am not the man to refuse him something more edible.

That I may not be misunderstood, let me say that I recognized the

speckled brook trout as the very emperor of all game fish, and angling

for him with the fly as the neatest, most fascinating sport attainable

by the angler. But there are thousands of outers who, from choice or

necessity, take their summer vacations where Salmo fontinalis is not to

be had. They would prefer him, either on the leader or the table; but

he is not there; "And a man has got a stomach and we live by what we

eat."

Wherefore, they go a-fishing for other fish. So that they are

successful and sufficiently fed, the difference is not so material. I

have enjoyed myself hugely catching catties on a dark night from a

skiff with a hand-line.

I can add nothing in a scientific way to the literature of fly-fishing;

but I can give a few hints that may be conducive to practical

success, as well with trout as with less noble fish, In fly-fishing,

one serviceable four-ounce rod is enough; and a plain click reel, of

small size, is just as satisfactory as a more costly affair. Twenty

yards of tapered, waterproof line, with a six-foot leader, and a cost

of two flies, complete the rig, and will be found sufficient. In common

with most fly-fishers, I have mostly thrown a cast of three flies, but

have found two just as effective, and handier.

We all carry too many flies, Some of my friends have more than sixty

dozen and will never use a tenth of them. In the summer of '88, finding

I had more than seemed needful, I left all but four dozen behind me. I

wet only fifteen of them in a seven weeks' outing. And they filled the

bill. I have no time or space for a dissertation on the hundreds of

different flies made and sold at the present day. Abler pens have done

that. I will, however, name a few that I have found good in widely

different localities, i.e., the Northern Wilderness of New York and the

upper waters of Northern Pennsylvania. For the Northern Wilderness:

Scarlet ibis, split ibis, Romeyn, white-winged coachman, royal

coachman, red hackle, red-bodied ashy and gray-bodied ashy. The ashies

were good for black bass also. For Northern Pennsylvania: Queen of the

waters, professor, red fox, coachman, black may, white-winged coachman,

wasp, brown hackle, Seth Green. Ibis flies are worthless here. Using

the dark flies in bright water and clear weather and the brighter

colors for evening, the list was long enough.

At the commencement of the open season and until the young maple

leaves are half grown, bait will be found far more successful than the

fly. At this time the trout are pretty evenly distributed along lake

shores and streams, choosing to lie quietly in rather deep pools and

avoiding swift water. A few may rise to the fly in a logy, indifferent

way; but the best way to take them is bait-fishing with well-cleansed

angle-worms or white grubs, the latter being the best bait I have ever

tried. They take the bait sluggishly at this season, but, on feeling

the hook, wake up to their normal activity and fight gamely to the

last. When young, newborn insects begin to drop freely on the water

about the 20th of May, trout leave the pools and take to the riffles.

And from this time until the latter part of June the fly-fisherman is

in his glory. It may be true that the skillful bait-fisherman will

rather beat his creel. He cares not for that. He can take enough; and

he had rather take ten trout with the fly, than a score with bait. As

for the man who goes a-fishing simply to catch fish, the fly-fisher

does not recognize him as an angler at all.

When the sun is hot and the weather grows warm, trout leave the

ripples and take to cold springs and spring-holes; the largest fish, of

course, monopolizing the deepest and coolest places, while the smaller

ones hover around, or content themselves with shallower water. As the

weather gets hotter, the fly-fishing falls off badly. A few trout of

four to eight ounces in weight may still be raised, but the larger ones

are lying on the bottom and are not to be fooled with feathers. They

will take a tempting bait when held before their noses--sometimes; at

other times, not. As to raising them with a fly--as well attempt to

raise a sick Indian with the temperance pledge. And yet, they may be

taken in bright daylight by a ruse that I learned long ago, of a

youngster less than half my age, a little, freckled, thin-visaged young

man, whose health was evidently affected by a daily struggle with a

pair of tow-colored side whiskers and a light mustache. There was

hardly enough of the whole affair to make a door mat for a bee hive.

But he seemed so proud of the plant, that I forebore to rig him. He was

better than he looked--as often happens. The landlord said, "He brings

in large trout every day, when our best fly-fishermen fail." One night,

around an outdoor fire, we got acquainted and I found him a witty,

pleasant companion. Before turning in I ventured to ask him how he

succeeded in taking large trout, while the experts only caught small

ones, or failed altogether.

"Go with me tomorrow morning to a spring-hole three miles up the river

and I'll show you," he said.

Of course, we went. He, rowing a light skiff and I paddling a still

lighter canoe. The spring-hole was in a narrow bay that set back from

the river and at the mouth of a cold, clear brook; it was ten to twelve

feet deep and at the lower end a large balsam had fallen in with the

top in just the right place for getting away with large fish, or

tangling lines and leaders. We moored some twenty feet above the

spring-hole and commenced fishing, I with my favorite cast of flies, my

friend with the tail of a minnow, He caught a 1 1/2 pound trout almost

at the outset, but I got no rise; did not expect it. Then I went above,

where the water was shallower and raised a couple of half-pounders, but

could get no more, I thought he had better go to the hotel with what he

had, but my friend said "wait"; he went ashore and picked up a long pole

with a bushy tip; it had evidently been used before. Dropping down to

the spring-hole, he thrust the tip to the bottom and slashed it around

in a way to scare and scatter every trout within a hundred feet.

"And what does all that mean?" I asked.

"Well," he said, "every trout will be back in less than an hour; and

when they first come back, they take the bait greedily. Better take off

your leader and try bait."

Which I did. Dropping our hooks to the bottom, we waited some twenty

minutes, when he had a bite, and having strong tackle, soon took in a

trout that turned the scale at 2 1/4 pounds. Then my turn came and I

saved one weighing 1 1/2 pounds. He caught another of 1 1/4 pounds and

I took one of 1 pound. Then they ceased biting altogether.

"And now," said my friend, "if you will work your canoe carefully

around to that old balsam top and get the light where you can see the

bottom, you may see some large trout."

I did as directed, and making a telescope of my hand, looked intently

for the bottom of the spring-hole. At first I could see nothing but

water; then I made out some dead sticks and finally began to dimly

trace the outlines of large fish. There they were, more than forty of

them, lying quietly on the bottom like suckers, but genuine brook

trout, every one of them.

"This," said he, "makes the fifth time I have brushed them out of here

and I have never missed taking from two to five large trout. I have two

other places where I always get one or two, but this is the best."

At the hotel we found two fly-fishers who had been out all the

morning. They each had three or four small trout. During the next week

we worked the spring-holes daily in the same way and always with

success. I have also had good success by building a bright fire on the

bank and fishing a spring-hole by the light--a mode of fishing

especially successful with catties and perch.

A bright, bull's-eye headlight, strapped on a stiff hat, so that the

light can be thrown where it is wanted, is an excellent device for

night fishing. And during the heated term, when fish are slow and

sluggish, I have found the following plan works well: Bake a hard, well

salted, water Johnnycake, break it into pieces the size at a hen's egg

and drop the pieces into a spring-hole. This calls a host of minnows

and the larger fish follow the minnows. It will prove more successful

on perch, catties, chubs, etc., than on trout, however. By this plan, I

have kept a camp of five men well supplied with fish when their best

flies failed--as they mostly do in very hot weather.

Fishing for mascalonge, pickerel and bass, is quite another thing,

though by many valued as a sport scarcely inferior to fly-fishing for

trout. I claim no especial skill with the fly-rod. It is a good day

when I get my tail fly more than fifteen yards beyond the reel, with

any degree of accuracy.

My success lies mainly with the tribes of Esox and Micropterus. Among

these, I have seldom or never failed during the last thirty-six years,

when the water was free of ice; and I have had just as good luck when

big-mouthed bass and pickerel were in the "off season," as at any time.

For in many waters there comes a time--in late August and September

when neither bass nor pickerel will notice the spoon, be it handled

never so wisely. Even the mascalonge looks on the flashing cheat with

indifference; though a very hungry specimen may occasionally immolate

himself. It was at such a season that I fished High Bank Lake--as

before mentioned--catching from twenty to fifty pounds of fine fish

every morning for nearly two weeks, after the best local fishermen had

assured me that not a decent sized fish could be taken at that season.

Perhaps a brief description of the modes and means that have proved

invariably successful for many years may afford a few useful hints,

even to old anglers.

To begin with, I utterly discard all modern "gangs" and "trains,"

carrying from seven to thirteen hooks each. They are all too small and

all too many; better calculated to scratch and tear, than to catch and

hold, Three hooks are enough at the end of any line and better than

more. These should be fined or honed to a perfect point and the abrupt

part of the barb filed down one-half. All hooks, as usually made, have

twice as much barb as they should have; and the sharp bend of the barb

prevents the entering of the hook in hard bony structures, wherefore

the fish only stays hooked so long as there is a taut pull on the line.

A little loosening of the line and shake of the head sets him free. But

no fish can shake out a hook well sunken in mouth or gills, though

two-thirds of the barb be filed away.

For mascalonge or pickerel I invariably use wire snells made as

follows: Lay off four or more strands of fine brass wire 13 inches

long; turn one end of the wires smoothly over a No. 1 iron wire and

work the ends in between the strands below. Now, with a pair of pincers

hold the ends, and using No. 1 as a handle, twist the ends and body of

the snell firmly together; this gives the loop; next, twist the snell

evenly and strongly from end to end. Wax the end of the snell

thoroughly for two or three inches and wax the tapers of two strong

Sproat or O'Shaughnessy hooks and wind the lower hook on with strong,

waxed silk, to the end of the taper; then lay the second hook at right

angles with the first and one inch above it; wind this as the other and

then fasten a third and smaller hook above that for a lip hook. This

gives the snell about one foot in length, with the two lower hooks

standing at right angles, one above the other and a third and smaller

hook in line with the second.

The bait is the element of success; it is made as follows: Slice off a

clean, white pork rind, four or five inches long by an inch and a half

wide; lay it on a board and with a sharp knife cut it as nearly to the

shape of a frog as your ingenuity permits. Prick a slight gash in the

head to admit the lip hook, which should be an inch and a half above

the second one and see that the back of the bait rests securely in the

barb of the middle hook.

Use a stout bait-rod and a strong line. Fish from a boat, with a

second man to handle the oars, if convenient. Let the oarsman lay the

boat ten feet inside the edge of the lily-pads and make your cast, say,

with thirty feet of line; land the bait neatly to the right, at the

edge of the lily-pads, let it sink a few inches, and then with the tip

well lowered, bring the bait around on a slight curve by a quick

succession of draws, with a momentary pause between each; the object

being to imitate as nearly as possible a swimming frog. If this be

neatly done and if the bait be made as it should be, at every short

halt the legs will spread naturally and the imitation is perfect enough

to deceive the most experienced bass or pickerel. When half a dozen

casts to right and left have been made without success, it is best to

move on, still keeping inside and casting outside the lily-pads.

A pickerel of three pounds or more will take in all three hooks at the

first snap; and, as he closes his mouth tightly and starts for the

bottom, strike quickly, but not too hard, and let the boatman put you

out into deep water at once, where you are safe from the strong roots

of the yellow lily.

It is logically certain your fish is well hooked. You cannot pull two

strong, sharp hooks through that tightly closed mouth without fastening

at least one of them where it will do most good. Oftener both will

catch and it frequently happens that one hook will catch each lip,

holding the mouth nearly closed and shortening the struggles of a large

fish very materially. On taking off a fish and before casting again,

see that the two lower hooks stand at right angles. If they have got

turned in the struggle you can turn them at any angle you like; the

twisted wire is stiff enough to hold them in place. Every angler knows

the bold, determined manner in which the mascalonge strikes his prey.

He will take in bait and hooks at the first dash, and if the rod be

held stiffly usually hooks himself. Barring large trout, he is the king

of game fish. The big-mouthed bass is less savage in his attacks, but

is a free biter. He is apt to come up behind and seize the bait about

two-thirds of its length, turn and bore down for the bottom. He will

mostly take in the lower hooks however, and is certain to get fastened.

His large mouth is excellent for retaining the hook. As for the

small-mouthed (Micropterus dolomieu, if you want to be scientific), I

have found him more capricious than any game fish on the list. One day

he will take only dobsons, or crawfish; the next, he may prefer minnows,

and again, he will rise to the fly or a bucktail spinner.

On the whole, I have found the pork frog the most successful lure in

his case; but the hooks and bait must be arranged differently. Three

strands of fine wire will make a snell strong enough and the hooks

should be strong, sharp and rather small, the lower hooks placed only

half an inch apart and a small lip hook two and a quarter inches above

the middle one. As the fork of the bait will not reach the bend of the

middle hook, it must be fastened to the snell by a few stitches taken

with stout thread and the lower end of the bait should not reach more

than a quarter of an inch beyond the bottom of the hook, because the

small-mouth has a villainous trick of giving his prey a stern chase,

nipping constantly and viciously at the tail, and the above arrangement

will be apt to hook him at the first snap. Owing to this trait, some

artificial minnows with one or two hooks at the caudal end, are very

killing--when he will take them.

Lake, or salmon trout, may be trolled for successfully with the above

lure; but I do not much affect fishing for them. Excellent sport may be

had with them, however, early in the season, when they are working near

the shore, but they soon retire to water from fifty to seventy feet

deep and can only be caught by deep trolling or buoy-fishing. I have no

fancy for sitting in a slow-moving boat for hours, dragging three or

four hundred feet of line in deep water, a four pound sinker tied by

six feet of lighter line some twenty feet above the hooks. The sinker

is supposed to go bumping along the bottom, while the bait follows

three or four feet above it. The drag of the line and the constant

joggling of the sinker on rocks and snags, make it difficult to tell

when one has a strike--and it is always too long between bites.

Sitting for hours at a baited buoy with a hand-line and without taking

a fish, is still worse, as more than once I have been compelled to

acknowledge in very weariness of soul. There are enthusiastic anglers,

however, whose specialty is trolling for lake trout. A gentleman by the

name of Thatcher, who has a fine residence on Raquette Lake--which he

calls a camp makes this his leading sport and keeps a log of his

fishing, putting nothing on record of less than ten pounds weight. His

largest fish was booked at twenty-eight pounds, and he added that a

well-conditioned salmon trout was superior to a brook trout on the

table; in which I quite agree with him. But he seemed quite disgusted

when I ventured to suggest that a well-conditioned cattie or bullhead,

caught in the same waters was better than either.

"Do you call the cattie a game fish?" he asked.

Yes; I call any fish a "game fish" that is taken for sport with hook

and line. I can no more explain the common prejudice against the

catfish and eel than I can tell why an experienced angler should drag a

gang of thirteen hooks through the water--ten of them being wane than

superfluous. Frank Forester gives five hooks as the number for a

trolling gang. We mostly use hooks too small and do not look after

points and barbs closely enough. A pair of No. 1 O'Shaughnessy, or 1

1/2 Sproat, or five tapered blackfish hooks, will make a killing rig

for small-mouthed bass using No. 4 Sproat for lip hook. Larger hooks

are better for the big-mouthed, a four-pound specimen of which will

easily take in one's fist. A pair of 5-0 O'Shaughnessy's, or Sproat's

will be found none too large; and as for the mascalonge and pickerel,

if I must err, let it be on the side of large hooks and strong lines.

It is idle to talk of playing the fish in water where the giving of a

few yards insures a hopeless tangle among roots, tree-tops, etc. I was

once fishing in Western waters where the pickerel ran very large, and I

used a pair of the largest salmon hooks with tackle strong enough to

hold a fish of fifteen pounds, without any playing; notwithstanding

which, I had five trains of three hooks each taken off in as many

days by monster pickerel. An expert mascalonge fisherman--Davis by

name--happened to take board at the farm house where I was staying, and

he had a notion that he could "beat some of them big fellows;" and he

did it; with three large cod hooks, a bit of fine, strong chain, twelve

yards of cod-line, an eighteen-foot tamarack pole and a twelve inch

sucker for bait. I thought it the most outlandish rig I had ever seen,

but went with him in the early gray of the morning to see it tried,

just where I had lost my hooks and fish.

Raising the heavy bait in the air, he would give it a whirl to gather

headway and launch it forty feet away with a splash that might have

been heard thirty rods. It looked more likely to scare than catch, but

was a success. At the third or fourth cast we plainly saw a huge

pickerel rise, shut his immense mouth over bait, hooks and a few inches

of chain, turn lazily and head for the bottom, where Mr. D. let him

rest a minute, and then struck steadily but strongly. The subsequent

struggle depended largely on main strength, though there was a good

deal of skill and cool judgment shown in the handling and landing of

the fish. A pickerel of forty pounds or more is not to be snatched out

of the water on his first mad rush: something must be yielded--and with

no reel there is little chance of giving line. It struck me my friend

managed his fish remarkably well, towing him back and forth with a

strong pull, never giving him a rest and finally sliding him out on a

low muddy bank, as though he were a smooth log. We took him up to the

house and tested the size of his mouth by putting a quart cup in it,

which went in easily. Then we weighed him and he turned the scales at

forty-four pounds. It was some consolation to find three of my hooks

sticking in his mouth. Lastly, we had a large section of him stuffed

and baked. It was good; but a ten-pound fish would have been better,

The moral of all this--if it has any moral--is, use hooks according to

the size of fish you expect to catch.

And, when you are in a permanent camp, and fishing is very poor, try

frogging. It is not a sport of a high order, though it may be called

angling--and it can be made amusing, with hook and line. I have seen

educated ladies in the wilderness, fishing for frogs with all eagerness

and enthusiasm not surpassed by the most devoted angler with his

favorite cast of flies.

There are several modes of taking the festive batrachian. He is

speared with a frog-spear; caught under the chin with snatch-hooks;

taken with hook and line, or picked up from a canoe with the aid of a

headlight, or jack-lamp. The two latter modes are best.

To take him with hook and line: a light rod, six to eight feet of

line, a snell of single gut with a 1-0 Sproat or O'Shaughnessy hook and

a bit of bright scarlet flannel for bait; this is the rig. To use it,

paddle up behind him silently and drop the rag just in front of his

nose. He is pretty certain to take it on the instant. Knock him on the

head before cutting off his legs. It is unpleasant to see him squirm

and hear him cry like a child while you are sawing at his thigh joints.

By far the most effective manner of frogging is by the headlight on

dark nights. To do this most successfully, one man in a light canoe, a

good headlight and a light, one-handed paddle are the requirements. The

frog is easily located, either by his croaking, or by his peculiar

shape. Paddle up to him silently and throw the light in his eyes; you

may then pick him up as you would a potato. I have known a North Woods

guide to pick up a five-quart pail of frogs in an hour, on a dark

evening. On the table, frogs' legs are usually conceded first place for

delicacy and flavor, For an appetizing breakfast in camp, they have no

equal, in my judgment. The high price they bring at the best hotels,

and their growing scarcity, attest the value placed on them by men who

know how and what to eat. And, not many years ago, an old pork-gobbling

backwoodsman threw his frying pan into the river because I had cooked

frogs' legs in it. While another, equally intelligent, refused to use

my frying pan, because I had cooked eels in it; remarking

sententiously, "Eels is snakes, an' I know it."

It may be well, just here and now, to say a word on the importance of

the headlight. I know of no more pleasant and satisfactory adjunct of a

camp than a good light that can be adjusted to the head, used as a jack

in floating, carried in the hand, or fastened up inside the shanty.

Once fairly tried, it will never be ignored or forgotten. Not that it

will show a deer's head seventeen rods distant with sufficient

clearness for a shot--or your sights with distinctness enough to make

it. (See Murray's Adirondacks, page 174.)

A headlight that will show a deer plainly at six rods, while lighting

the sights of a rifle with clearness, is an exceptionally good light.

More deer are killed in floating under than over four rods. There are

various styles of headlights, jack-lamps, etc. in use. They are bright,

easily adjusted and will show rifle sights, or a deer, up to 100

feet--which is enough. They are also convenient in camp and better than

a lantern on a dim forest path.

Before leaving the subject of bait-fishing, I have a point or two I

wish to make. I have attempted to explain the frog-bait and the manner

of using it, and I shall probably never have occasion to change my

belief that it is, all the whole, the most killing lure for the entire

tribes of bass and pickerel. There is however, another, which, if

properly handled, is almost as good. It is as follows:

Take a bass, pickerel, or yellow perch, of one pound or less; scrape

the scales clean on the under side from the caudal fin to a point just

forward of the vent.

Next, with a sharp knife, cut up toward the backbone, commencing just

behind the vent with a slant toward the tail. Run the knife smoothly

along just under the backbone and out through the caudal fin, taking

about one-third of the latter and making a clean, white bait, with the

anal and part of the caudal by way of fins. It looks very like a white

minnow in the water; but is better, in that it is more showy and

infinitely tougher. A minnow soon drags to pieces. To use it, two

strong hooks are tied on a wire snell at right angles, the upper one an

inch above the lower, and the upper hook is passed through the bait,

leaving it to draw without turning or spinning. The casting and

handling is the same as with the frog-bait and is very killing for

bass, pickerel and mascalonge, It is a good lure for salmon trout also;

but, for him it was found better to fasten the bait with the lower hook

in a way to give it a spinning motion; and this necessitates the use of

a swivel, which I do not like; because, "a rope is as strong as its

weakest part"; and I have more than once found that weakest part the

swivel. If, however, a swivel has been tested by a dead lift of twenty

to twenty-five pounds, it will do to trust.

I have spoken only of brass or copper wire for snells, and for

pickerel or mascalonge of large size nothing else is to be depended on.

But for trout and bass; strong gut or gimp is safe enough. The

possibilities as to size of the mascalonge and Northern pickerel no man

knows. Frank Forester thinks it probable that the former attains to the

weight of sixty to eighty pounds, while he only accords the pickerel a

weight of seventeen to eighteen pounds. I have seen several pickerel of

over forty pounds and one that turned the scale at fifty-three. And I

saw a mascalonge on Georgian Bay that was longer than the Canuck guide

who was toting the fish over his shoulder by a stick thrust in the

mouth and gills. The snout reached to the top of the guide's head,

while the caudal fin dragged on the ground. There was no chance for

weighing the fish, but I hefted him several times, carefully, and am

certain he weighed more than a bushel of wheat. Just what tackle would

be proper for such a powerful fellow I am not prepared to say, having

lost the largest specimens I ever hooked. My best mascalonge weighed

less than twenty pounds. My largest pickerel still less.

I will close this discursive chapter by offering a bit of advice.

Do not go into the woods on a fishing tour without a stock of well

cleansed angle-worms. Keep them in a tin can partly filled with damp

moss and in a cool moist place. There is no one variety of bait that

the angler finds so constantly useful as the worm. Izaak Walton by no

means despised worm or bait-fishing.

Woodcraft(#24579) · 第 5 / 10 章