CHAPTER IV

Campfires And Their Importance--The Wasteful Wrong Way They Are

Usually Made, And The Right Way To Make Them

HARDLY second in importance to a warm, dry camp, is the campfire. In

point of fact, the warmth, dryness and healthfulness of a forest camp

are mainly dependent on the way the fire is managed and kept up. No

asthmatic or consumptive patient ever regained health by dwelling in a

close, damp tent. I once camped for a week in a wall tent, with a

Philadelphia party, and in cold weather. We had a little sheet iron

fiend, called a camp-stove. When well fed with bark, knots and chips,

it would get red hot and, heaven knows, give out heat enough. By the

time we were sound asleep, it would subside; and we would presently

awake with chattering teeth to kindle her up again, take a smoke and a

nip, turn in for another nap--to awaken again half frozen. It was a

poor substitute for the open camp and bright fire. An experience of

fifty years convinces me that a large percentage of the benefit

obtained by invalids from camp life is attributable to the open camp

and well-managed campfire. And the latter is usually handled in a way

that is too sad, too wasteful; in short, badly botched. For instance:

It happened in the summer of '81 that I was making a canoe trip in the

Northern Wilderness, and as Raquette Lake is the largest and about the

most interesting lake in the North Woods, I spent about a week

paddling, fishing, etc. I made my headquarters at Ed Bennett's woodland

hostelry, "Under the Hemlocks." As the hotel was filled with men, women

and crying children, bitten to agony by punkies and mosquitoes, I chose

to spread my blanket in a well-made bark shanty, which a signboard in

black and white said was the "Guides' Camp."

And this camp was a very popular institution. Here it was that every

evening, when night had settled down on forest and lake, the guests of

the hotel would gather to lounge on the bed of fresh balsam browse,

chat, sing and enjoy the huge campfire.

No woodland hotel will long remain popular that does not keep up a

bright, cheery, out o'door fire. And the fun of it--to an old

woodsman--is in noting how like a lot of school children they all act

about the fire. Ed Bennett had a man, a North Woods trapper, in his

employ, whose chief business was to furnish plenty of wood for the

guides' camp and start a good fire every evening by sundown. As it grew

dark and the blaze shone high and bright, the guests would begin to

straggle in; and every man, woman and child seemed to view it as a

religious duty to pause by the fire and add a stick or two, before

passing into camp. The wood was thrown on endwise, crosswise, or any

way, so that it would burn, precisely as a crowd of boys make a bonfire

on the village green. The object being, apparently, to get rid of the

wood in the shortest possible time.

When the fire burnt low, toward midnight, the guests would saunter off

to the hotel; and the guides, who had been waiting impatiently, would

organize what was left of the fire, roll themselves in their blankets

and turn in. I suggested to the trapper that he and I make one fire as

it should be and maybe they would follow suit--which would save half

the fuel, with a better fire. But he said, "No; they like to build

bonfires and Ed can stand the wood, because it is best to let them have

their own way. Time seems to hang heavy on their hands--and they pay

well." Summer boarders, tourists and sportsmen, are not the only men

who know how to build a campfire all wrong.

When I first came to Northern Pennsylvania, thirty-five years ago, I

found game fairly abundant; and, as I wanted to learn the country where

deer most abounded, I naturally cottoned to the local hunters. Good

fellows enough, and conceited, as all local hunters and anglers are apt

to be. Strong, good hunters and axe-men, to the manner born and prone

to look on any outsider as a tenderfoot. Their mode of building

campfires was a constant vexation to me. They made it a point to always

have a heavy sharp axe in camp, and toward night some sturdy chopper

would cut eight or ten logs as heavy as the whole party could lug to

camp with hand-spikes. The size of the logs was proportioned to the

muscular force in camp. If there was a party of six or eight, the logs

would be twice as heavy as when we were three or four. Just at dark,

there would be a log heap built in front of the camp, well chinked with

bark, knots and small sticks; and, for the next two hours, one could

hardly get at the fire to light a pipe. But the fire was sure though

slow. By 10 or 11 P.M. it would work its way to the front and the camp

would be warm and light. The party would turn in and deep sleep would

fall on a lot of tired hunters--for two or three hours. By which time

some fellow near the middle was sure to throw his blanket off with a

spiteful jerk and dash out of camp with, "Holly Moses! I can't stand

this; it's an oven."

Another Snorer (partially waking).--"N-r-r-rm, gu-r-r, ugh. Can't

you--deaden--fire--a little?"

First Speaker.--"Deaden hell. If you want the fire deadened, get up

and help throw off some of these logs."

Another (in coldest corner of shanty)--"What's 'er matter with a-you

fellows? Better dig out--an' cool off in the snow. Shanty's comfor'ble

enough."

His minority report goes unheeded. The camp is roasted out. Strong

hands and hand-spikes pry a couple of glowing logs from the front and

replace them with two cold, green logs; the camp cools off and the

party takes to blankets once more--to turn out again at 5 A.M. and

inaugurate breakfast.

The fire is not in favorable shape for culinary operations, the heat

is mainly on the back side, just where it isn't wanted. The few places

level enough to set a pot or pan are too hot; and, in short, where

there is any fire, there is too much. One man sees, with intense

disgust, the nozzle of his coffeepot drop into the fire. He makes a

rash grab to save his coffee and gets away--with the handle, which

hangs on just enough to upset the pot.

"Old Al," who is frying a slice of pork over a bed of coals that would

melt a gun barrel, starts a hoarse laugh, that is cut short by a blue

flash and an explosion of pork fat, which nearly blinds him. And the

writer, taking in these mishaps in the very spirit of fun and frolic,

is suddenly sobered and silenced by seeing his venison steak drop from

the end of the "frizzling stick," and disappear between two glowing

logs. The party manages, however, to get off on the hunt at daylight,

with full stomachs; and perhaps the hearty fun and laughter more than

compensate for these little mishaps.

This is a digression. But I am led to it by the recollection of many

nights spent in camps and around campfires, pretty much as described

above. I can smile today at the remembrance of the calm, superior way

in which the old hunters of that day would look down on me, as from the

upper branches of a tall hemlock, when I ventured to suggest that a

better fire could be made with half the fuel and less than half the

labor. They would kindly remark, "Oh, you are a Boston boy. You are

used to paying $8.00 a cord for wood. We have no call to save wood

here. We can afford to burn it by the acre." Which was more true than

logical. Most of these men had commenced life with a stern declaration

of war against the forest; and, although the men usually won at last,

the battle was a long and hard one. Small wonder that they came to look

upon a forest tree as a natural enemy. The campfire question came to a

crisis, however, with two or three of these old settlers. And, as the

story well illustrates my point, I will venture to tell it.

It was in the "dark days before Christmas" that a party of four

started from W., bound for a camp on Second Fork, in the deepest part

of the wilderness that lies between Wellsboro and the Block House. The

party consisted of Sile J., Old Al, Eli J. and the writer. The two

first were gray-haired men, the others past thirty; all the same, they

called us "the boys." The weather was not inviting and there was small

danger of our camp being invaded by summer outers or tenderfeet. It

cost twelve miles of hard travel to reach that camp; and, though we

started at daylight, it was past noon when we arrived. The first seven

miles could be made on wheels, the balance by hard tramping. The road

was execrable; no one cared to ride; but it was necessary to have our

loads carried as far as possible. The clearings looked dreary enough

and the woods forbidding to a degree, but our old camp was the picture

of desolation. There was six inches of damp snow on the leafless brush

roof, the blackened brands of our last fire were sticking their charred

ends out of the snow, the hemlocks were bending sadly under their loads

of wet snow and the entire surroundings had a cold, cheerless, slushy

look, very little like the ideal hunter's camp. We placed our knapsacks

in the shanty, Eli got out his nail hatchet, I drew my little pocket-axe

and we proceeded to start a fire, while the two older men went up

stream a few rods to unearth a full-grown axe and a bottle of old rye,

which they had cached under a log three months before. They never

fooled with pocket-axes. They were gone so long that we sauntered up

the band, thinking it might be the rye that detained them. We found

them with their coats off, working like beavers, each with a stout,

sharpened stick. There had been an October freshet and a flood-jam at

the bend had sent the mad stream over its banks, washing the log out of

position and piling a gravel bar two feet deep over the spot where the

axe and flask should have been. About the only thing left to do was to

cut a couple of stout sticks, organize a mining company, limited and go

in; which they did. Sile was drifting into the side of the sandbar

savagely, trying to strike the axe-helve and Old Al was sinking

numberless miniature shafts from the surface in a vain attempt to

strike whisky. The company failed in about half an hour. Sile resumed

his coat and sat down on a log--which was one of his best holds, by the

way. He looked at Al; Al looked at him; then both looked at us and Sile

remarked that, if one of the boys wanted to go out to the clearings and

"borry" an axe and come back in the morning, he thought the others

could pick up wood enough to tough it out one night. Of course nobody

could stay in an open winter camp without an axe.

It was my time to come to the front. I said: "You two just go at the

camp; clean the snow off and slick up the inside. Put my shelter-cloth

with Eli's and cover the roof with them; and if you don't have just as

good a fire tonight as you ever had, you can tie me to a beech and

leave me here. Come on, Eli." And Eli did come on. And this is how we

did it: We first felled a thrifty butternut tree ten inches in

diameter, cut off three lengths at five feet each and carried them to

camp. These were the back logs. Two stout stakes were driven at the

back of the fire and the logs, on top of each other, were laid firmly

against the stakes. The latter were slanted a little back and the

largest log placed at bottom, the smallest on top, to prevent tipping

forward. A couple of short, thick sticks were laid with the ends

against the bottom log by way of fire dogs; a fore stick, five feet

long and five inches in diameter; a well built pyramid of bark, knots

and small logs completed the campfire, which sent a pleasant glow of

warmth and heat to the furthest corner of the shanty. For "night-wood,"

we cut a dozen birch and ash poles from four to six inches across,

trimmed them to the tips and dragged them to camp. Then we denuded a

dry hemlock of its bark; and, by the aid of ten foot poles, flattened

at one end, packed the bark to camp. We had a bright, cheery fire from

the early evening until morning, and four tired hunters never slept

more soundly.

We stayed in that camp a week; and, though the weather was rough and

cold, the little pocket-axes kept us well in firewood. We selected

butternut for backlogs, because, when green, it burns very slowly and

lasts a long time. And we dragged our smaller wood to camp in lengths

of twenty to thirty feet, because it was easier to lay them on the fire

and burn them in two than to cut them shorter with light hatchets. With

a heavy axe, we should have cut them to lengths of five or six feet.

Our luck, I may mention, was good--as good as we desired. Not that

four smallish deer are anything to brag about for a week's hunt by four

men and two dogs. I have known a pot-hunter to kill nine in a single

day. But we had enough.

As it was, we were obliged to "double trip it" in order to get our

deer and duffle down to "Babb's." And we gave away more than half our

venison. For the rest, the illustration shows the campfire--all but the

fire--as it should be made.

Woodcraft(#24579) · 第 4 / 10 章