CHAP. V.

The Knights Templars of Scotland.

The Knights of the Temple were introduced into Scotland before 1153

by King David the First, who established them at Temple on the

Southesk,[38] and who was so attached to the brotherhood, that we are

told by an old historian "Sanctus David de prœclara Militia Templi

optimos fratres secum retinens, eos diebus et noctibus morum suorum

fecit esse custodes."[39] Malcolm, the grandson of David, conferred

on the brethren "in liberam et puram Elymosynam unum plenarium Toftum

in quolibet Burgo totius terræ," which foundation was enlarged by his

successors, William the Lion and Alexander the Second. The charter of

the latter is still in the possession of Lord Torphichen, whereby he

grants and confirms "Deo et fratribus Templi Salomonis de Jerusalem

omnes illas rectitudines, libertatis et consuetudines quas Rex DAVID

et Rex Malcolm et decessus pater meus Rex Willielmus eis dederunt et

concesserunt, sicut scripta eorum authentica attestant." This curious

document, after enumerating certain of these rights and liberties,

scilicet,--the king's sure peace; the privilege of buying, selling, and

trading with all his subjects; freedom from all tribute and toll, &c.

proceeds "Et nullus eis injuriam faciat, vel fieri consentiat super

meam defensionem, Et ubicunque in tota terra mea ad judiorum (_q.

judicium_) venerint, causa eorum primum tractata, et prius rectum suum

habeant, et postea faciant. Et nullus ponat hominem predictorum fratrum

nostrorum ad foram judicii si noluerint, &c. Et omnes libertates et

consuetudines quas ipsi per alias regiones habent in terra mea ubique

habeant."

These general privileges, throughout Europe, were very extensive.

The Templars were freed from all tythes to the church, and their

priests were entitled to celebrate mass, and to absolve from sins to

the same extent as bishops, a privilege which was strongly objected

to by the latter. Their houses possessed the right of sanctuary or

asylum for criminals. They could be witnesses in their own cause,

and were exempted from giving testimony in the cause of others. They

were relieved by the papal bulls from all taxes, and from subjection

and obedience to any secular power. By these great immunities, the

Order was rendered in a manner independent, but it would appear,

nevertheless, that both the Templars and Hospitallers considered

themselves subjects of the countries to which they belonged, and took

part in the national wars, for we find by the Ragman Roll, "Freere

Johan de Sautre, Mestre de la Chevalier del Temple en Ecoce," and

another Brother, swearing fealty to Edward I. in 1296; and the author

of the Annals of Scotland, taking notice of the Battle of Falkirk,

12th July 1298, informs us, that the only persons of note who fell

were Brian le Jay, Master of the English Templars, and the Prior

of Torphichen in Scotland, a Knight of another Order of religious

soldiery. The former of these Chevaliers met his death by the hand

of the redoubted Sir William Wallace, who advanced alone from the

midst of his little band, and slew him with a single blow, although

the historian adds, that Sir Brian le Jay was a Knight Templar of

high military renown, who had shewn himself most active against the

Scots.[40]

Little is known of the farther History of the Knights Templars in

Scotland from the time of Alexander II. down to the beginning of the

14th century, excepting that their privileges were continued to them by

succeeding Kings, whose bounty and piety were in those ages continually

directed towards the religious Orders. By their endowments, and the

bequests of the nobles, the possessions of the Order came to be so

extensive, that their lands were scattered "per totum regnum Scotiæ,

a limitibus versus Angliam, et sic discendo per totum regnum usque

ad Orchades." Besides the House of the Temple in Mid-Lothian, the

following Establishments or Priories of the Order may be enumerated,

viz. St. Germains, in East Lothian; Inchynan, in Renfrewshire;

Maryculter, in Kincardineshire; Aggerstone, in Stirlingshire; Aboyne,

in Aberdeenshire; Derville or Derval, in Ayrshire; Dinwoodie, in

Dumfriesshire; Red-abbey-stedd, in Roxburghshire, and Temple Liston, in

West-Lothian.

The date of the spoliation of the Templars of Scotland, corresponds of

course with that of the persecution of the Order in other countries,

and it is to the credit of our forefathers that we can obtain no

account of any Member of the Brotherhood having been subjected to

personal torture or suffering amongst them; their estates, however,

appear to have been duly transferred to the possession of their rivals,

the Knights Hospitallers; into which Order it is not improbable that,

like their Brethren in England, a number of the Templars entered.

In November 1309, John de Soleure, the Papal Legate, and William,

Bishop of St. Andrews, held an Inquisitorial Court at the Abbey of

Holyrood to investigate the charges against the Templars, but Walter

de Clifton, Grand Preceptor of the Order in North Britain,[41] and

William de Middleton, were the only two Knights who appeared before

the Tribunal, the proceedings of which, as recorded at length in

Wilkins' Consilia, make no allusion to any punishment being inflicted,

so that we may fairly conclude they were soon set at liberty. The

Preceptor, in his examination, readily confessed that the rest of

the Brethren had fled, and dispersed themselves _propter scandalium

exortum contra ordinem_, and we are told by a learned French writer,

that having deserted the Temple, they had ranged themselves under the

banners of Robert Bruce, by whom they were formed into a new Order,

the observances of which were based on those of the Templars, and

became, according to him, the source of Scottish Free Masonry.[42]

This statement corresponds with the celebrated Charter of Larmenius

already referred to, in which the Scottish Templars are excommunicated

as _Templi desertores, anathemate percussos_; and along with the

Knights of St. John, _dominiorum Militiæ spoliatores_, placed for

ever beyond the pale of the Temple, _extra gyrum Templi nunc, et in

futurum_; and it is likewise supported in some measure by the authority

of the accurate historian of Free Masonry, M. Thory, who, in his "Acta

Latomorum," states that Robert Bruce founded the Masonic Order of

Heredom de Kilwinning, after the Battle of Bannockburn, reserving to

himself and his successors on the Throne of Scotland, the office and

title of Grand Master. Scottish tradition has, moreover, always been

in favour of this origin of the Ancient Mother Kilwinning Lodge, which

certainly at one time possessed other degrees of Masonry besides those

of St. John; and it is well known to our Masonic readers, that there

are even in our own days at Edinburgh, a few individuals claiming to

be the representatives of the Royal Order established by Bruce, which,

though now nearly extinct in this country,[43] still flourishes in

France, where it was established by Charter from Scotland, and even

by the Pretender himself, in the course of last century, and is now

conferred as the highest and most distinguished grade of Masonry,

sanctioned by the Grand Orient, under the title of the _Rose Croix

de Heredom de Kilwinning_. It may be interesting to add, that the

introduction on the Continent of this ancient branch of our national

Masonry, has been commemorated by a splendid medal struck at Paris,

bearing, amongst other devices, the Royal Arms and Motto of Scotland;

and that the Brethren of the Lodge of Constancy at Arras, still

preserve with reverence an original charter of the Order, granted to

their Chapter in 1747, by Charles Edward Stuart, and signed by that

unfortunate Prince himself as the representative of the Scottish

Kings.[44] Nor can any thing indicate more strongly the high estimation

in which the chivalry of the Rosy Cross of Kilwinning is held in

France, than the fact that the Prince Cambaceres, Arch-chancellor of

the Empire, presided over it as Provincial Grand Master, (the office of

supreme head being inherent in the Crown of Scotland,) for many years;

and that he was succeeded in his dignity, if we mistake not, by the

head of the illustrious family of Choiseul.

But whether the Scottish Templars really joined the victorious

standard of Robert Bruce, and with him, as our countrymen would fain

hope, fought and conquered at Bannockburn, or whether the majority of

them transferred themselves along with the possessions of the Order,

to the Knights of St. John of Jerusalem, certain it is, that from the

time of the persecution, the Order of the Temple, together with all its

wealth, became merged in that of the Hospitallers, though certainly

not to such a degree as to obliterate all distinct traces of the Red

Cross Knights. On the contrary, we find by a public document recorded

entire in the Register of the Great Seal of Scotland, and dated _two

centuries_ after the incorporation of the Orders, that King James the

Fourth confirmed all former grants _sancto Hospitali de Jerusalem, et

fratribus ejusdem militiæ Templi Salomonis_,--a satisfactory proof

that the Order, although proscribed by the Pope, was still retained

conjointly with that of the Hospital, in law papers at least.[45]

The Knights of St. John had also been introduced into Scotland by

King David the First, and had a charter granted to them by Alexander

the Second, two years after that to the Templars. The Preceptory

of Torphichen, in West Lothian, was their first, and continued to

be their chief residence, and by the accession of the Temple lands

and other additions, their property at the time of the Reformation

came to be immense. When that event took place, the chief dignitary

or Grand Preceptor of the Order in Scotland, with a seat as a Peer

in Parliament, was Sir James Sandilands, a cadet of the family of

Calder, whose head, as is well known to readers of Scottish History,

was the private friend of John Knox, and one of the first persons of

distinction to embrace the reformed religion. We might suspect, that

even before the promulgation of the statute 1560, prohibiting all

allegiance within the realm to the See of Rome, the former personage

had become indifferent to the charge confided to him by the Order; for

a rescript from the Grand Master and Chapter at Malta, dated so early

as the 1st of October 1557, and addressed to him, is still on record,

wherein they complain "that many of the possessions, jurisdictions,

&c. were conveyed or taken away from them contrary to the statutes

and oaths, and to the damnation of the souls, as well of those who

possessed them, as of those who, without sufficient authority, yielded

them up; producing thereby great detriment to religion and the said

Commandery;" but be this as it may, we are certain that the conversion

of Sir James Sandilands, or as he was termed, the Lord of St. John of

Jerusalem in Scotland, was followed by his surrender to the Crown of

the whole possessions of the combined Templars and Hospitallers, which

having been declared forfeited to the State on the ground that "the

principal cause of the foundation of the Preceptory of Torphichen,

_Fratribus Hospitalis Hierosolimitani, Militibus Templi Salomonis_, was

the service enjoined to the Preceptor on oath to defend and advance the

Roman Catholic Religion," were by a process of transformation well

understood by the Scottish Parliament of those days, converted into a

Temporal Lordship, which the unfortunate Queen Mary, then only twenty

years of age, and newly established amongst her Scottish subjects, in

consideration of a payment of ten thousand crowns of the Sun, and of

his _fidele, nobile, et gratuitum, servitium, nobis nostrisque patri

et matri bonæ memoriæ_, conferred on, or rather retransferred to the

Ex Grand Preceptor himself and his heirs with the title of Torphichen,

which, although the estate is much dilapidated, still remains in his

family.[46] All this was transacted acted on the petition of Sir

James Sandilands himself, with the formal approbation of the National

Legislature; and after renouncing the profession of a soldier-monk, we

find that the last of Scottish Preceptors of St. John became married

and lived to a good old age, having died so late as 1596 without issue,

when the title of Torphichen passed to his grand nephew, the lineal

descendant of his elder brother, Sir John Sandilands of Calder.

We shall not pause to consider whether a body of Masonic Templars

unconnected with the Hospitallers, and representing the Royal Order

which Bruce is said to have instituted from the relict of the

Ancient Knights, has been perpetuated in Scotland since the days of

Bannockburn, having no means of illustrating so obscure a subject; but,

with all due respect to the learned French writer, whose authority we

have already quoted, we may observe, that the Masonic Tradition of

the country does not connect the Templars with Bruce's Order in any

way whatever, but, on the contrary, invariably conjoins those Knights

with the Hospitallers, and consequently points to the period of the

renunciation of Popery, as the time when they first sought refuge, and

a continuance of their Chivalry among the "Brethren of the Mystic Tie."

The Chevaliers also of the Rosy Cross of Kilwinning in France, own no

alliance with Masonic Templary, which they consider a comparatively

modern invention; nor do there exist, so far as we know, any authentic

records anterior to the Reformation, to prove a connection between the

Knights Templars and Freemasons in any part of the world, though we

must not omit to mention, that a formal document in the Latin language

is said to be deposited in a Lodge at Namur on the Meuse, purporting

to be a proclamation by the Freemasons of Europe, "of the Venerable

Society sacred to John," assembled by representatives from London,

Edinburgh, Vienna, Amsterdam, Paris, Madrid, Venice, Brussels, and

almost every other Capital City, at Cologne on the Rhine in 1535;

and signed, amongst others, by the famous Melancthon, in which,

after declaring that "to be more effectually vilified and devoted to

public execration, they had been accused of reviving the Order of the

Templars," they solemnly affirm, that "the Freemasons of St. John

derive not their origin from the Templars, nor from any other Order of

Knights; neither have they any, or the least communication with them

directly, or through any manner of intermediate tie, being far more

ancient," &c.--all of which would imply, that some sort of connection

was understood in those days to exist between certain of the Masonic

Fraternities and the Knights Templars. A Copy of this document was

sent to Edinburgh in 1826, by M. de Marchot, an Advocate at Nivelles,

and a translation of it has been inserted under the attestation of a

Notary Public in the Records of the Ancient Lodge of Edinburgh, (Mary's

Chapel); but we have little faith in German documents on Free Masonry,

unless supported by other testimony; and as no Historian of the Craft

makes the slightest allusion to the great Convocation of the Brethren

at Cologne, in the sixteenth century, rather than ask the reader to

believe that it ever took place, we shall presume that M. de Marchot

may have been deceived.[47]

From the era of the Reformation, the combined Order appears in Scotland

only as a Masonic body; but there are some records to indicate that,

so early as 1590, a few of the brethren had become mingled with the

Architectural Fraternities, and that a Lodge at Stirling, patronised by

King James, had a Chapter of Templars attached to it, who were termed

cross-legged Masons; and whose initiatory ceremonies were performed

not in a room, but in the Old Abbey, the ruins of which are still to

be seen in the neighbourhood. The next authentic notice we can find

on this subject, is in M. Thory's excellent Chronology of Masonry,

wherein it is recorded, that about 1728, Sir John Mitchell Ramsay,

the well-known author of Cyrus, appeared in London, with a system of

Scottish Masonry, up to that date, perfectly unknown in the metropolis,

tracing its origin from the Crusades, and consisting of three degrees,

the _Ecossais_, the _Novice_, and the _Knight Templar_. The English

Grand Lodge rejected the system of Ramsay, who, as is well known,

along with the other adherents of the Stuart Family, transferred it to

the Continent, where it became the corner-stone of the _hauts grades_,

and the foundation of those innumerable ramifications into which an

excellent and naturally simple institution has been very uselessly

extended in France, Germany, and other countries abroad.[48]

In pursuing the very curious subject of the _hauts grades_, we may

observe, however, that they never obtained much consideration during

the lifetime of Ramsay, although they are invariably traced to him

and to Scotland, the fairy land of Foreign Masonry,[49] but gathered

their chief impulse from the disgraceful dissentions in the Masonic

Lodges at Paris, about the middle of last century, which induced the

Chevalier de Bonneville, and other distinguished persons at the Court

of France, to form themselves into a separate institution, named the

Chapitre de Clermont, in honour of one of the Princes of the Blood,

Louis de Bourbon, Prince de Clermont, then presiding over the Masonic

Fraternities. In this Chapter they established, amongst other degrees,

Ramsay's system of the Masonic Templars, which, along with other high

grades, was soon conveyed into the Northern Kingdoms of Europe, by the

Officers of the French Army, but especially, by the Marquis de Bernez,

and the Baron de Hund, the latter of whom made it the ground-work

of his Templar _Regime de la Stricte Observance_, which occupied,

for several years, so prominent a place in the Secret Societies of

Germany. This adventurer appeared in that country with a patent,

under the sign-manual of Prince Charles Edward Stuart, appointing him

Grand Master of the seventh province; but although he had invented a

plausible tale in support of his title and authority,--both of which

he affirmed had been made over to him by the Earl Marischal on his

death-bed,--and of the antiquity of his order, which he derived,

of course, from Scotland, where the chief seat of the Templars was

Aberdeen,[50]--the imposture was soon detected, and it was even

discovered that he had himself enticed and initiated the ill-fated

Pretender into his fabulous order of Chivalry. The delusions on this

subject, however, had taken such a hold in Germany, that they were

not altogether dispelled, until a deputation had actually visited

Aberdeen, and found amongst the worthy and astonished brethren there,

no trace either of very ancient Templars or Freemasonry.[51] From some

of the Continental States, it is conjectured that Masonic Templary

was transplanted into England and Ireland, in both of which countries

it has continued to draw a languid existence, unconnected with any

remnant of the Knights of St. John, whose incorporation in the Scottish

Order, is one of the most remarkable features of that Institution. We

are happy to add, nevertheless, that the most fraternal feelings and

intercourse subsist between the Scottish brethren and the Templars of

the sister kingdoms, and we can ourselves testify to the cordiality

with which the former are received in the encampments of London.

During the whole of the eighteenth century the combined Order of the

Temple and Hospital in Scotland can be but faintly traced, though I

have the assurance of well-informed Masons that thirty or forty years

ago they knew old men who had been members of it for sixty years, and

it had sunk so low at the time of the French Revolution, that the

sentence which the Grand Lodge of Scotland fulminated in 1792 against

all degrees of Masonry except those of St. John, was expected to put

a period to its existence. Soon after this, however, some active

individuals revived it, and with the view of obtaining documentary

authority for their chapters, as well as of avoiding any infringement

of the statutes then recently enacted against secret societies, adopted

the precaution of accepting charters of constitution from a body of

Masonic Templars, named the Early Grand Encampment, in Dublin, of

whose origin we can find no account, and whose legitimacy, to say

the least, was quite as questionable as their own. Several charters

of this description were granted to different Lodges of Templars in

Scotland about the beginning of the present century, but these bodies

maintained little concert or intercourse with each other, and were

certainly not much esteemed in the country. Affairs were in this state

when, about 1808, Mr. Alexander Deuchar was elected Commander, or Chief

of the Edinburgh Encampment of Templars, and his brother, Major David

Deuchar, along with other Officers of the Royal Regiment, was initiated

into the Order. This infusion of persons of higher station and better

information gave an immediate impulse to the Institution, and a General

Convocation of all the Templars of Scotland, by representatives, having

taken place at the Capital, they unanimously resolved to discard the

Irish Charters, and to rest their claims, as the representatives of

the Knights of old, on the general belief of the country in their

favour, and the well-accredited traditions handed down from their

forefathers. They further determined to entreat the Duke of Kent,

who was a Chevalier du Temple, as well as the chief of the Masonic

Templars in England, to become the Patron Protector of the Order in

North Britain, offering to submit themselves to His Royal Highness in

that capacity, and to accept from him a formal Charter of Constitution,

erecting them into a regular Conclave of Knights Templars, and Knights

of St. John of Jerusalem. The Duke of Kent lost no time in complying

with their request, and his Charter bears date 19th of June 1811. By a

provision in it, Mr. Deuchar, who had been nominated by the Brethren,

was appointed Grand Master for life.

These wise and vigorous measures rescued the Order from obscurity;

and in its improved condition, we find that it continued rapidly to

flourish, numbering, in the course of a few years, no less than forty

encampments or lodges in different parts of the British dominions

holding of its Conclave. In 1828, the Order seemed to have received

a fresh impulse, and assumed a novel and interesting aspect by the

judicious introduction of the ancient chivalric costume and forms.

Dissentions, however, unfortunately occurred, from 1830 to 1835,

tending to impede the further progress of the Order; and for a while it

may be said to have again almost fallen into abeyance. In the end of

the latter year, a committee of ten gentlemen was appointed to settle

all differences, as well as to frame proper regulations for the future

government of the Order. Under their arrangement and arbitration,

the present statutes were established, and a reconciliation effected

between the contending parties. In January 1836, Admiral Sir David

Milne, K. C. B. was unanimously elected Grand Master, and at a general

election in the same month, Lord Ramsay (now Earl of Dalhousie) was

appointed his Depute, the various other offices in the Order being

filled by gentlemen, generally well known, and of a respectable station

in society. In the course of three months after the re-union, not

fewer than a hundred persons, chiefly men of fortune, officers, and

members of the learned professions, had been received into the Order in

the Edinburgh Canongate Kilwinning Priory or Encampment alone. Since

then, other Priories have been established in the country, and the

Institution has assumed an importance and dignity worthy of the highest

class of gentlemen connected with the Masonic Institutions of Scotland.

[Illustration]

[Illustration: APPENDIX.]

[Illustration]

Bull of Pope Clement V.

Ordinis statum habitum atque nomen, Non Sine Cordis Amaritudine et

Dolore sacro approbante concilio, Non Per Modum Definitivæ Sententiæ,

cum eam super hoc secundum inquisitiones et processus super his

habitos, Non possumus Ferre, de Jure, Sed Per viam Provisionis, seu

ordinationis apostolicæ, irrefragabili et Perpetuo Valitura sustulimus

sanctione, ipsum prohibitione Perpetuæ supponentes, distinctius

inhibendo ne quis dictum Ordinem de cœtero intrare, vel ejus habitum

suscipere aut portare, vel pro Templario gerere se præsumeret; quod

si quis contra faceret, excommunicationis incurreret sententiam, ipso

facto. Datum Viennæ, vi. non. Maii, pont. nostrianno vii. (ii. Maii

MCCCIII.)

[Illustration: CLEMENTUS PP. V]

Charter of Transmission.

[Illustration: V.D. S.A.]

Ego Frater Johannes-Marcus Larmenius, Hierosolymitanus, Dei gratia et

Secretissimo Venerandi sanctissimique Martyris, Supremi Templi Militiæ

Magistri (cui honos et gloria) decreto, communi Fratrum Consilio

confirmato, super universum Templi Ordinem Summo et Supremo Magisterio

insignitus, singulis has decretales litteras visuris salutem, salutem,

salutem.

Notum sit omnibus tam præsentibus quam futuris, quod, deficientibus,

propter extremam ætatem, viribus, rerum angustia et gubernaculi

gravitate prepensis, ad majorem Dei gloriam, Ordinis, Fratrum et

Statutorum tutelam et salutem ego, supra dictus, humilis Magister

Militiæ Templi, inter validiores manus Supremum statuerim deponere

Magisterium.

Idcirco, Deo juvante, unoque Supremi Conventus Equitum

consensu, apud eminentem Commendatorem et carissimum Fratrem,

Franciscum-Thomam-Theobaldum Alexandrinum, Supremum Ordinis Templi

Magisterium, auctoritatem et privilegia contuli, et hoc præsenti

decreto pro vita confero, cum potestate, secundum temporis et rerum

leges, Fratri alteri, institutionis et ingenii nobilitate morumque

honestate præstantissimo, Summum et Supremum Ordinis Templi Magisterium

summamque auctoritatem conferendi. Quod sic, ad perpetuitatem

Magisterii, successorum non intersectam seriem et Statutorum

integritatem tuendas. Jubeo tamen ut non transmitti possit Magisterium,

sine commilitonum Templi Conventus Generalis consensu, quoties colligi

valuerit Supremus iste Conventus; et, rebus ita sese habentibus,

successor ad nutum Equitum eligatur.

Ne autem Languescant Supremi Officii munera, sint nunc et perenniter

quatuor Supremi Magistri Vicarii, supremam potestatem, eminentiam et

auctoritatem, super universum Ordinem, salvo jure Supremi Magistri,

habentes; qui Vicarii Magistri apud seniores secundum professionis

seriem, eligantur. Quod Statutum e commendato mihi et Fratribus voto

sacrosancti supra dicti Venerandi Beatissimique Magistri nostri,

Martyris (cui honos et gloria) Amen.

Ego denique, Fratrum Supremi Conventus decreto, e suprema mihi

commissa auctoritate, Scotos Templarios Ordinis desertores, anathemate

percussos, illosque et Fratres Sancti Johannis Hierosolymæ, dominiorum

Militiæ spoliatores (quibus apud Deum misericordia) extra girum Templi,

nunc et in futurum, volo, dico et jubeo.

Signa, ideo, pseudo-Fratribus ignota et ignoscenda constitui, ore

commilitonibus tradenda, et quo, in Supremo Conventu, jam tradere modo

placuit.

Quæ vero signa tantummodo pateant post debitam professionem et

equestrem consecrationem, secundum Templi commilitonum Statuta, ritus

et usus, supra dicto eminenti Commendatori a me transmissa, sicut a

Venerando et Sanctissimo Martyre Magistro (cui honos et gloria) in meas

manus habui tradita. Fiat sicut dixi. Fiat. Amen.

Ego Johannes-Marcus Larmenius dedi, die decima tertia februarii 1324.

Ego Franciscus-Thomas-Theobaldus Alexandrinus, Deo juvante, Supremum

Magisterium acceptum habeo, 1324.

Ego Arnulphus De Braque, Deo juvante, Supremum Magisterium acceptum

habeo, 1340.

Ego Johannes Claromontanus, Deo juvante, Supremum Magisterium acceptum

habeo, 1349.

Ego Bertrandus Duguesclin, Deo juvante, Supremum Magisterium acceptum

habeo, 1357.

Ego Johannes Arminiacus, Deo juvante, Supremum Magisterium acceptum

habeo, 1381.

Ego Bernardus Arminiacus, Deo juvante, Supremum Magisterium acceptum

habeo, 1392.

Ego Johannes Arminiacus, Deo juvante, Supremum Magisterium acceptum

habeo, 1419.

Ego Johannes Croyus, Deo juvante, Supremum Magisterium acceptum habeo,

1451.

Ego Robertus Lenoncurtius, Deo juvante, Supremum Magisterium acceptum

habeo, 1478.

Ego Galeatius de Salazar, Deo juvante, Supremum Magisterium acceptum

habeo, 1497.

Ego Philippus Chabotius, Deo juvante, Supremum Magisterium acceptum

habeo, 1516.

Ego Gaspardus De Salciaco, Tavannensis, Deo juvante, Supremum

Magisterium acceptum habeo, 1544.

Ego Henricus De Monte Morenciaco, Deo juvante, Supremum Magisterium

acceptum habeo, 1574.

Ego Carolus Valesius, Deo juvante, Supremum Magisterium acceptum habeo,

1615.

Ego Jacobus Ruxellius de Grancio, Deo juvante, Supremum Magisterium

acceptum habeo, 1651.

Ego Jacobus-Henricus De Duro Forti, dux de Duras, Deo juvante,

Supremum Magisterium acceptum habeo, 1681.

Ego Philippus, dux Aurelianensis, Deo juvante, Supremum Magisterium

acceptum habeo, 1705.

Ego Ludovicus-Augustus Borbonius, dux du Maine, Deo juvante, Supremum

Magisterium acceptum habeo, 1724.

Ego Ludovicus-Henricus Borbonius-Condœus, Deo juvante, Supremum

Magisterium acceptum habeo, 1737.

Ego Ludovicus-Franciscus Borbonius-Conty, Deo juvante, Supremum

Magisterium acceptum habeo, 1741.

Ego Ludovicus-Hercules-Timoleo de Cosse-Brissac, Deo juvante, Supremum

Magisterium acceptum habeo, 1776.

Ego Claudius-Mathæus Radix de Chevillon, Templi senior Vicarius

Magistri, adstantibus Fratribus Prospero-Maria-Petro-Michaele

Charpentier de Saintot, Bernardo-Raymundo Fabre-Palaprat, Templi

Vicariis Magistris, et Johnne-Baptista-Augusto de Courchant, Supremo

Præceptore, hasce litteras decretales a Ludovico-Hercule-Timoleone

de Cosse-Brissac, supremo Magistro, in temporibus infaustis mihi

depositas, Fratri Jacobo-Philippo Ledru, Templi seniori Vicario

Magistro tradidi, ut istæ litteræ, in tempore opportuno, ad perpetuam

Ordinis nostri memoriam, juxta ritum (voyez le Rituel levitique)

Orientalem, vigeant: Die decima junii 1804.

Ego Bernardus-Raymundus Fabre-Palaprat, Deo juvante, Supremum

Magisterium acceptum habeo: Die quarta novembris 1804.

[Illustration: SIGILLVM MILITVM XPISTI]

BOISGELIN, himself a Knight of Malta, gives the following authentic

copy of the Oath of Profession, from the original text, which every

Candidate took at his reception into the Order:--

Vow of the Knights of St. John.

"Io N. faccio voto e prometto a Dio Omnipotente, ed alla Beata Maria

sempre Vergine, Madre di Dio, ed a San Giovanni Battista d'osservare

perpetuamente, con l'ajuta di Dio, vera obedienza a qualunque superiore

che mi sera data da Dio e dalla nostra religione, e di più vivere senza

proprio e d'osservare castità."

[Illustration]

[Illustration]

Militia Templi.

Die} Lunae Anno Ordinis

} Mensis Anno D.N.J.C.

Votum,

In nomine Dei Patris + et Filii + et Spiritus Sancti.

Ego,

Ordinis Templi Militiae Sanctae memetipsum ad praesens et in oevum

devovens, libere solemniterque Obedientiae, Paupertatis, et Castitatis,

sicut et Fraternitatis, Hospitalitatis et Praeliationis Votum suscipere

profiteor;

Quo voto firmam et non quassabilem edico voluntatem, ad Religionis

Christianae, Ordinis Templi, Commilitonumque causam, tutelam et

honorem, maximamque illustrationem, et ad Templi Sepulchrique Domini

Nostri Jesu Christi Palestinae, Orientisque terrae et Patrum dominiorum

recuperationem, gladium, vires, vitamque et singula alia mea impendendi,

Regulae S. P. Bernardi, Chartae transmissionis, regulis, legibus,

decretis, singulisque aliis actis, secundum Ordinis Statuta emissis

me submittendi: nullos Equites creaturus, nullosve titulos aut gradus

ritusque et usus Ordinis proditurus, nisi patuerit ex Statutis

licentia: omni denique modo, sive in Ordinis domibus sive foras et in

quocumque vitae, statu Supremo Magistro, omnibusque et singulis in

Militia superioribus absolute obediturus.

Sic Fratres meos Equites Templi, Sororesque Equitissas in charitate

habendi, ut ipsos, Fratrumque Viduas et liberos, sicut et Sororum

liberos, gladio, concilio, copiis, opibus, auctoritate, singulisque

rebus meis adjuvem, illosque semper et ubique, nullo casu excepto,

cuivis Commilitonum Templi non consorti praeferam;

Pios peregrinos tuendi; captivorum propter crucem, infirmorumque et

pauperum subsidio simul et solatio inserviendi:

Infideles et incredulos, exemplo, virtute, bonis operibus, alloquiisque

suasoriis oppugnandi: in Infideles autem et incredulos gladio Crucem

aggredientes, propter Crucem gladio praeliandi:

Ab omni impudicitia abhorrendi, et ad nullam carnis operam, nisi

debitam, et tantum cum uxore legitima accedendi:

Tandem apud singulas quas adibo Gentes, ipsarum, salvo Religionis

Ordinisque jure, legibus et moribus obtemperandi: Gentibus vero

Hospitalitate et amicitia Ordinem colentibus, Cuis et Equitis

fidelissimi sacra officia praestandi.

Haec sic, coram Equitibus (huicce Conventui adstantibus) Voveo, alta

voce Dico, et Vovere Profiteor. Quod Votum Sanguine meo subsigno et

confirmo, atque in tabulas (conventuales) iterum scribo et subsigno,

subsignantibus supra dictis testibus.

Gloria Patri + et Filio + et Spritui Sancto, + Amen.

N.B.--The above Vow is always signed with the interpretation explained

in the text annexed to it.

[Illustration]

Le Trésor.

_Inventaire des Chartre, Statuts, Reliques et Insignes composant

le Trésor sacré de l'Ordre du Temple, extrait de la minute du

procès-verbal qui en a été dressé le 14e. jour de la lune de Tab.,

l'an de l'Ordre 692, du Magister le 6e._ (18 mai 1810.)

Ire. PIÈCE DU TRÉSOR.

La chartre de transmission (par J. M. _Larmenius_), écrite en deux

colonnes et demie sur une très-grande feuille de parchemin, ornée,

suivant le goût du temps, de dessins gothiques architecturaux, de

lettres fleuronnées, coloriées, dorées et argentées, dont la première

offre un chevalier appuyé sur un bouclier armorie de la croix de

l'Ordre.

Au haut, en tête, est peinte la croix conventuelle dans la forme

aulique.

Au bas est le sceau de la milice, suspendu par des lacs de parchemin.

Les acceptations par les Grands-Maîtres commencent vers le milieu de la

troisième colonne, se continuant à la troisième, et finissant aux deux

tiers inférieurs de la marge à droite.

IIe. PIÈCE.

L'archétype des Statuts de l'an de l'Ordre (587,) transcrits à la

main sur vingt-sept feuilles de papier, reliés en un volume petit

in-folio, couvert en velours cramoisi, doublé en satin _idem_, doré sur

tranche.--Cette pièce signée Philippus (_d'Orléans_.)

IIIe. PIÈCE.

Un petit reliquaire de cuivre, en forme d'église gothique, contenant,

dans un suaire de lin, quatre fragmens d'os brulés, extraits du bûcher

des martyrs de l'Ordre.

IVe. PIÈCE.

Une épée de fer (cruciforme) surmontée d'une boule, et présumée avoir

servi au G.-M. J. _Molay_.

Ve. PIÈCE.

Un casque de fer, à visière, armorié de dauphins et damastiqué en or,

présumé être celui de _Guy_, dauphin d'Auvergne.

VIe. PIÈCE.

Un ancien éperon de cuivre doré.

VIIe. PIÈCE.

Une patène de bronze, dans l'interieur de laquelle est gravée une main

étendue, dont le petit doigt et l'annulaire sont repliés dans la paume.

VIIIe. PIÈCE.

Une paix en bronze doré, représentant Saint-Jean sous une arcade

gothique.

IXe. PIÈCE.

Trois sceaux gothiques de bronze en forme ovale pointue, et de grandeur

différente, désignés dans les Statuts sous les noms de _sceau du G.-M.

Jean, sceau du chevalier croisé, et sceau de Saint-Jean_.

Xe. PIÈCE.

Un haut de crosse d'ivoire et trois mitres d'étoffe, l'une en or,

brodée en soie, et deux en argent, brodées en perles, ayant servi aux

cérémonies de l'Ordre.

XIe. PIÈCE.

Le baucéant en laine blanche, à la croix de l'Ordre.

XIIe. et dernière PIÈCE.

Le drapeau de guerre, en laine blanche, à quatre raies noires.

[Illustration]

[Illustration]

Ordre du Temple.

A la plus Grande Gloire de Dieu.

Guillaume-Sidney,

Par la Grace de Dieu, et la désignation Testamentaire du dernier

Grand-Maître.

Prince Magistral, Régent de l'Ordre du Temple;

A Tous Ceux qui ces Présentes, Verront:

Salut.

Vu, l'Article 38 des Statuts de l'Ordre du Temple, et le 3me paragraphe

de la Charte de transmission;

Vu, les Articles 13, 15, 16 et suivans desdits Status;

Considérant, que l'etat de haute civilisation des diverses Nations

Européennes et principalement de la France, ou se trouve le siège

Magistral, permet toute Réunion du Convent Général, sans qu'il puisse

en resulter le moindre danger pour les Chevaliers;

Considérant, que les tems sont venus de rendre au Convent général

tous les droits dont il a joui jusques au G. M. Jacques de Molay, (à

qui scient honneur et gloire), et de faire rentrer dans de sages et

constitutionnelles limites la puissance du Magistère;

Considérant, qu'une reforme prudente et réfléchie des Statuts, dans les

parties qui ne sont plus en harmonie avec la Charte de transmission,

les moeurs du siècle et la règle, est le moyen le plus efficace de

rendre possible l'accomplissement des hautes destinées auxquelles

l'Ordre du Temple est appellé;

Le conseil privé entendu;

Nous avons décrété et décrétons ce qui suit:

Article Premier.

Le Convent Général de l'Ordre du Temple est Convoqué pour le dix

Novembre, 1838.

Article II.

Immédiatemement après sa réunion, le Convent général devra se prononcer

sur la présentation du Prince Magistral Régent, désigné par Bernard

Raymond (à qui soient honneur et gloire) pour lui succéder en qualité

de Grand Maître de l'Ordre du Temple.

Article III.

En tête du Commentarium sera placé la revision du Chapitre IV et de

tous les Articles des Statuts qui ont des connexions avec ce Chapitre.

Article IV.

Il sera ouvert à la Sécretairerie Magistrale un Registre destiné à

l'inscription des propositions faites pour être présentées au Convent

général, et qui seront insérées au Commentarium, conformément aux

Statuts.

Soit, le présent décret, expédié, enregistré et scellé par qui et a

qui de droit; adressé spécialement au Grand Connétable, au Gouverneur

général et au Grand Maître des Dépêches, qui sont chargés de son

exécution;

Soit aussi, ledit Décret, envoyé par lettres communicatoires, 1º, au

Prieur de chaque Convent, pour être porté à la connaissance de tous les

Chevaliers de son obédience, 2º, et personnellement, aux Chevaliers qui

ne feraient partie d'aucune Maison de l'Ordre.

_Donné à Paris, en notre résidence Magistrale, le 1er du mois de Mai,

de l'an de N. S. J. C. 1838, 720e. de l'Ordre.

[Transcriber's note: The signature symbols following consisted of

crosses with 1, 2 and 3 bars. These have no text equivalents, so they

have been replaced with + signs corresponding to the number of bars.]

Signé +++ F. ++ Guillaume Sidney

De par S. A. le Prince Magistral, Régent de l'Ordre.

Le Grand Précepteur, Ministre Secrétaire Magistral,

Signé ++ F. + Réné Léon De Sud-Europe.

Enregistré en la grande Sénéchaussée, le 3 Mai 1838.

Le Ministre Grand Sénéchal,

Signé, ++ F. + Eugène De France.

Scellé en la grande Chancellerie, le même jour,

Le Grand-Précepteur, Ministre Grand Chancelier,

Signé, ++ F. + Felix De Nord-Afrique.

Vu par le Grand-Connétable; Signé ++ F. Sébastien Louis De Bauvais.

Vu par le Gouverneur Général; Signé F. ++ Fréchot.

Vu par le Grand Maître des Dépêches, Signé ++ F. E. Loubert +.

Pour copie conforme:

Le Grand Précepteur, Ministre Secrétaire Magistral.

++ F. + Réné Léon De Sud-Europe._

DISCOURS DE L'AMIRAL SIR SIDNEY SMITH, AU CONVENT GENERAL LE 27 JANVIER

1837.

_S. A. le Lieutenant-Général d'Asie_ demande la parole. Ce vénérable

frère s'exprime ainsi qu'il suit.

"Sérénisme Grand-Maître, et vous tous mes nobles frères:

"Justement et infiniment sensible à l'honneur qui m'a été conféré,

par suite de ma nomination, à la haute dignité de Lieutenant-Général

d'Asie, je dois vous en témoigner toute ma reconnaissance.

"A mon âge avancé, je puis prétendre à être considéré comme exempt

d'ambition: je vois par conséquent dans cet acte de la haute confiance

du Grand-Maître, une charge onéreuse et un lourd fardeau, plutôt qu'un

avantage: mais, je l'accepte avec respect. Mes soins et mes efforts

constans seront toujours employés pour prouver que je n'ai pas fait en

vain le serment de fidélité et de soumission à l'ordre et à son chef

suprême.

"Je vois dans cette nomination une preuve de la vraie libéralité du

Grand-Maître éclairé de cet ordre, essentiellement cosmopolite, où

toutes les nations chrétiennes se confondent et co-opèrent ensemble

pour le maintien de la paix du monde et de l'harmonie entre les sectes

religieuses, par la tolérance, la charité et la protection pour les

pélerins en Terre Sainte, contre les pirates et brigands; premier

but de sa fondation, qui précéda les autres ordres de la chevalerie

moderne, ordres qui _n'ont été_ et ne _sont_ que ses _imitateurs_: car

le notre ne demande que l'occasion de remplir son devoir sacré. Aussi

est-ce avec une vive satisfaction que je vois enfin un Grand-Maître

apprécier l'importance de l'ordre, _et pour la premiére fois, appeler

pour un de ses lieutenans, je ne dis pas un anglais, mais un templier

de la langue d'Angleterre_. _Honneur au Grand-Maître qui a fait un

tel acte, et qui montre ainsi à toutes les nations, que toutes ont

des droits égaux à remplir les diverses charges du Temple_: Honneur

à ce chef qui a si longtemps et si loyalement conservé le feu sacré,

et les traditions, malgré les orages et les persécutions, suite d'une

révolution dont l'origine remonte pour nous, a _Philippe-le-Bel_ et au

_Pape Clement V._ Mais espérons qu'enfin nous rentrerons dans tous nos

droits; et qu'au lieu de dresser la tente magistrale dans une langue

excentrique, un jour nous la dresserons au lieu de notre crèation,

dans la ville qui nous appartient, dans la _sainte Jérusalem_!

"_Honneur aux très nobles chevaliers qui se sont montrés penétrés

du sentiment de leurs devoirs, et ont donné constamment des preuves

qu'ils sont incapables d'oublier leur serment de fidélité et

d'obéissance!......_

"J'ai déjà communiqué verbalement à S. A. E., devant témoins, ce

que j'ai consigné dans mon testament, la disposition formelle, pour

la restitution au chef du Temple, d'une croix de l'ordre qui est

très ancienne, à en juger par sa forme et la monture des pierres,

laquelle croix a appartenu à un de ses Grand-Maîtres, et fut du temps

des croisades portée dans la guerre sainte par le roi d'Angleterre

_Richard_ Ier, dit _Cœur-de-Lion_. Ce roi l'a laissée en dépôt entre

les mains de l'archevêque de Chypre lors de son départ de cette ile,

dont il était Souverain par conquête. J'ai été personnellement décoré

de cette croix en 1799, par les mains du dixhuitième archevêque,

successeur du dépositaire, qui l'a plaçé sur ma poitrine, en

reconnaissance de la réussite de mes efforts, pour rétablir la paix

et la protection due à la population chrétienne de l'île, contre

l'insurrection des troupes Asiatiques qui avaient assassiné leur chef,

appelé le _Patrona Bey_, et commençaient déjà à se livrer au pillage et

au massacre des habitans: désastres que j'ai empêchés par ma présence

au milieu de ces furieux, sans armes, le firman du Sultan _Selim_ en

main, et par la nomination d'un successeur _a Patrona Bey_, en vertu de

l'autorité supréme qui m'avait été déléguée dans le temps par la Porte

Ottomane, sur les forces combinées de terre et de mer dans le Levant.

"L'autorité qui maintenant m'est déléguée par le sérénissime

grand-maitre sur le continent d'Asie, pourra en temps et lieu être

employée utilement pour protéger la population chrétienne de ces

contrées, et le maintien de la hiérarchie de l'ordre. Croyez, que pour

la plus grande gloire du Temple, je me ferai un devoir d'employer

l'influence que les antécédens m'ont donnée. _Les templiers fidèles

peuvent compter sur moi._"

Le grand-maitre exprime au lieutenant-général d'Asie, les sentimens

dont lui et ses frères sont animés pour un Chevalier qui a conquis

l'admiration du monde par ses hauts faits maritimes, et a mérité par

ses vertus sociales et templières, l'estime et l'affection de tous

ses frères. Le grand-maitre lui donne au nom de l'ordre l'accolade

fraternelle.

Le Convent Général ordonne que le discours de l'Amiral _Sir Sidney

Smith_ soit inséré textuellement au procès-verbal.

[Illustration]

The following account from the pen of the learned

Biographer of the gallant Admiral, of the

Investiture of Sir Sidney Smith, as a Knight

Commander of the Bath, by his contemporary and

brother in arms, the great and illustrious

Wellington, and the "very extraordinary" document

which follows, will, no doubt, be read with much

interest:

Towards the termination of this year, 1815, our officer was honoured,

in a most particular manner, by his Sovereign.

His Grace the Duke of Wellington having received the gracious commands

of his Royal Highness the Prince Regent of the United Kingdoms,

through his Royal Highness the Duke of York, Grand-master of the most

honourable order of the Bath, to invest Vice-Admiral Sir William

Sidney Smith, Knight-commander-grand-cross of the Royal Military

Order of the Sword, with the insignia of commander of the aforesaid,

his Grace fixed on the 29th of December for the performance of the

ceremony, which took place accordingly at the Palace Elisée-Bourbon,

the Knights-grand-crosses, Knights-commanders, and Companions

being present, as also his Grace the Duke of Richmond and the Right

Honourable the Earl of Hardwick, both Knights of the most noble Order

of the Garter.

At six o'clock the Commander elect arrived at the palace, and

being conducted and supported into the presence of the noble Duke

representing the Sovereign on the occasion, by the two junior

grand-crosses, Sir James Kempt and Sir Henry Colville, after the usual

reverences in advancing, (the Commander elect being already a Knight,

the usual ceremony of dubbing him as such was formally dispensed with,)

his Grace proceeded, according to the order of his Royal Highness the

Grand-Master, which he first read, and invested the Commander with

the insignia of the Order: after which his Grace embraced Sir Sidney

Smith twice most cordially, with every demonstration of the feelings

of esteem and regard, feelings which the Knights, Grand-crosses,

and Commanders, many of whom had served in Egypt as his juniors in

rank, also testified; and it certainly may be said to be a proud day

for England when such a scene took place in the evacuated palace of

Buonaparte, between these two British officers of the two services, one

of whom first checked, and the other of whom finally closed, the career

of that ambitious chieftain.

The banquet being announced, his Grace desired his Excellency the

British ambassador, Sir Charles Stuart, G.C.B., to conduct the new

Knight Commander to the hall of the same, where the members of the

Order, including some foreigners of distinction, amongst whom were Don

Michael Alava, General Muffling, and Count Demetrius Valsamachi, a

nobleman of the Ionian Islands, were entertained most sumptuously in

the usual style of the Duke's elegant hospitality.

After the health of the King and Prince Regent had been drunk, the Duke

gave the health of "Sir Sidney Smith:" the company hereupon rose, and

followed his Grace's example in greeting the new Commander with the

most cordial acclamations. When silence was restored, Sir Sidney Smith

rose, and addressed the company nearly as follows:--

"My Lords, noble Knights, Grand Crosses, Commanders, and Companions!--I

should not do justice to my feelings, were I not to endeavour to

express them in returning you my thanks for the honour you have done me

by this reception: at the same time, I feel I cannot do justice to them

by any mode of expression I can make use of.

"The language of _compliment_ must die on the lips of any man in the

presence of the Duke of Wellington; first, from the inadequacy of all

language to express what every man must feel when speaking of such a

highly distinguished chief; next, from the recollection of the noble

simplicity of his character which disdains it. It will, I trust, be

readily believed, that I must be most truly gratified to be invested

by a knight of such high renown and glorious achievements; and the

more so in this _particular place_, and in an assembly of so many

illustrious and highly distinguished Knights-Commanders and Companions.

A combination of circumstances, which could only happen in the present

times, and are mainly owing to the successful result of the battle

of Waterloo. Noble and illustrious Knights, I beg you to accept the

expression of my humble thanks for the honour you have done me."

The Duke of Wellington having acceded to Sir Sidney Smith's request to

be allowed to propose a toast to the company, he proceeded to say--"I

beg leave to call to remembrance that this day (the 29th of December)

is the anniversary of a re-union of illustrious knights of various

orders, which took place at Vienna, where many Sovereigns were present,

and when the toast I shall have the honour to propose to you was drunk

by them with a manifestation of their conviction, that the object of it

intimately concerned knighthood as such, in all nations. I beg leave to

propose the health and deliverance of the _white Slaves in the Barbary

States_."

The toast was received with the most marked approbation, and drunk

with the usual demonstrations thereof, by three times three regular

and hearty cheers, when the company adjourned to the ball-room,

preceded, on the indication of the Duke of Wellington, by the new

Knight-Commander, supported by his Britannic Majesty's ambassador, in

the same order as on entrance, where a brilliant assembly of ladies,

English, French, Spanish, Russian, &c. &c. continued to increase till

a late hour; his Royal Highness the Duke of Berry, the French, and

the foreign ministers, were also present, and all joined in cordial

congratulations of, and compliments to, the cosmopolite chieftain,

President of the Knights Liberators of the white slaves in Africa;

who, we observed, was decorated with the various orders of the

nations he has contributed by his endeavours to release from the yoke

of the former inhabitants of the palace where this extraordinary

assembly was held; then a prisoner on the top of a rock in the

Southern Atlantic. These circumstances reminded the Parisians of the

prophetic inscriptions left by Sidney Smith on the window shutter of

the Temple prison, when he escaped, of which many copies were taken

and are now again in circulation, and read with great interest since

the accomplishment has taken place: we have been favoured with a

translation, of which we give our readers a copy, the original having

been in French, and respected by various successive guardians of the

tower, till the Prince de Rohan, afterwards Duke de Rohan, subsequently

a prisoner in that tower, removed it for its preservation, and we are

assured he now possesses it.

"SIDNEY SMITH TO BUONAPARTE."

"Fortune's wheel makes strange revolutions, it must be confessed; but

for the term revolution to be applicable, the term should be a complete

one, for a half turn is not a revolution; (see the Dictionary of the

Academy;) you are at present as high as you can mount. Well! I don't

envy you your fortunate situation, for I am better off than you; I am

as low in the career of ambition as a man can descend; so that let

fortune turn her wheel ever so little, and as she is capricious, turn

it she will, I must necessarily mount, and you as necessarily must

descend. I do not make this remark to you to cause you any chagrin;

on the contrary, with the intent to bring you the same consolation I

have at present when you shall arrive at the same point where I am;

yes! the same point; you will inhabit this prison, why not as well as

I? I did not think of such a thing any more than you do at present,

before I found myself brought hither. In party wars 'tis a crime in the

eyes of opponents for a man to do his duty well; you do yours now, and

consequently you by so much irritate your enemies; you will answer me.

"'I fear not their combined hatred, the voice of the people is declared

for me, I serve them well:' that is all very good talking; sleep in

quiet, you'll very soon learn what one gains by serving such a master,

whose inconstancy will perhaps punish you _for all the good_ you do

him. 'Whoever,' (says an ancient author, Pausanias Atticus,) 'puts his

entire confidence in public favour, never passes his life without pain

and trouble, and seldom comes to a good end.'

"Finis coronat opus."

"In fact, I need not prove to you that you will come here and read

these lines, because here you must be to read them. You will certainly

have this chamber, because it is the best, and the keeper, who is a

very civil good sort of man, will, of course, treat you as well as he

does me."

N. B.--These lines having appeared in the Parisian papers in 1799, and

having been put into Buonaparte's hands at Cairo, on his return from

his unsuccessful Syrian expedition, where he was foiled and worsted by

the writer of them, he exclaimed, '_It is very extraordinary_;' and

on his return to Paris, fearing the accomplishment of the remainder

of the prediction, after having procured through Regnauld de St. Jean

d'Angely the sight of a copy in the hands of Baruel Beauvert, he

forthwith ordered the building to be levelled to the ground.

After this display of his country's gratitude to Sir Sidney Smith,

which became so much the more enhanced, as it may be said to have

taken place almost in the presence of so many Sovereigns, Sir Sidney

had little else to do but to enjoy his richly-merited rewards, the

universal admiration, and the approbation of his own mind, ever active

in doing good, not only for his country, but for the whole human race.

He prosecuted with ardour his plans for the abolition of white slavery,

even after the destruction of the pirates' nest in Algiers.

[Illustration]

[Illustration]

DEATH AND FUNERAL OF ADMIRAL SIR WILLIAM SIDNEY SMITH, G.C.B. &c. &c.

&c.

Sir William Sidney Smith died on Friday Morning, the 26th May 1840, at

his residence, No. 9, Rue d'Aguisseau, in the 76th year of his age.

Honoured by his Sovereign, and decorated with the Orders of almost

every State in Europe, he was, in private life, beloved and respected

by all who had the pleasure of his friendship or acquaintance.

His chivalrous and lofty bearing, his cheerful and animated

conversation, his unbounded fund of anecdote, suavity of temper, and

invariable benevolence, rendered him a most welcome and instructive

companion.--It has been truly written by his Biographer,

"Than Sir Sidney Smith, no one ever inscribed on the pages of History,

and even of Romance, more emphatically deserved the title of Hero."

The mortal remains of this Gallant and Illustrious Admiral were

interred, May 29, in the Cimetiére de l' Est, or Eastern Division

of the Great Cemetery of Pére la Chaise. The body was taken from

his late residence in the Rue d'Aguisseau to the English Episcopal

Church in the same street, followed by his relatives, William and

Herbert Smith, Esquires, Nephews, Captain Arabin, and ---- St. Clair,

Esquire, Sons-in-law of the deceased, with Vice Admiral Sir Charles

Rowley, Bart. Lieut.-General Lord Aylmer, General Count Excelmans,

Peer of France, and the French Admiral Bergeret, as supporters of the

Pall, besides many of the principal English residents in Paris, among

whom were several officers of high rank in the British Navy.--The

introductory part of the service was performed in the Church by the

Right Reverend Bishop Luscombe, and two assistants, and the body was

then borne to the Cemetery, attended by a long cortége of mourning and

private carriages. On the Coffin was placed the Hat, Sword, and Uniform

of the deceased, and on a cushion his epaulettes and numerous orders.

Over the foot of the coffin was spread the British Union Jack. At the

conclusion of the burial service, which was most impressively read by

Bishop Luscombe, three orations were delivered--the first by Monsieur

Jullien, of Paris, who gave a short but comprehensive recapitulation

of the services of Sir Sidney, from his first entering the British

Navy at the age of 13, and also expatiated largely on his amiable and

philanthrophic qualities. The next speaker, M. Caille, Advocate of the

Cour Royale of Paris, after pronouncing a general panegyric on the

character of the deceased as a warrior, proceeded to eulogise him for

his active and generous exertion in promoting the objects of several

philanthropic societies of which he was a member, and to which his

advice, his practical and scientific acquirements, and his inventions,

were so invaluable. Both speakers were loud in their praise of Sir

Sidney, for his having been almost the first to interfere for the

suppression of European slavery in Africa, and for his indefatigable

and strenuous exertions in that humane cause. The third gentleman, M.

Raoul, Advocat of the Court of Cassation, spoke in a similar strain of

eulogium of the character of Sir Sidney as a citizen of the world, ever

ready to aid the cause of humanity. No stronger testimony to his worth

could, however, have been shewn, than to hear his eulogium pronounced

solely by members of a Nation against which, in his career of arms, he

had so successfully and gloriously fought. Sir Sidney Smith was Prince

Magistral and Regent of the Order of the Temple, and a Member of the

Legion of Honour.

The following two Discourses pronounced upon the melancholy occasion,

were, in the kindest and most handsome manner, contributed by M.

Jullien, the learned author of many valuable works.--

DISCOURS PRONONCE AUX FUNERAILLES DE L'AMIRAL SIR SIDNEY SMITH, PAR M.

JULLIEN, DE PARIS,

Son ancien ami et son Collègue, comme membre et

président honoraire de plusieurs Sociétés Savantes ou

Philantropiques, le 29 Mai 1840.

Sketch of the History of the Knights Templars Second Edition · 第 14 / 21 题