It is alike instructive and amusing to trace the dramatic element, so

instinctive and versatile, from the natural language of races and

individuals, through social manners to its organized culmination in art;

and thus to realize its historical significance. The Greek drama has

afforded philosophical scholars the most inspiring theme whereby to

illustrate the culture of classic antiquity. In the mellifluous verses of

Metastasio, the stern emphasis of Alfieri, and the comedies of Goldoni, we

have a perfect reflection of the lyrical taste, the free aspiration, and

the colloquial geniality of the Italians. From Molière to Scribe, what

vivid and true pictures of human life and nature as modified by French

character; while the essential facts of the origin and development of the

British stage, so fully recorded by Dr. Doran, brings it into intimate and

sympathetic contact with all the phases and crises of literature, society,

and politics. In the days of the first Charles the stage 'suffered with

the throne and the church.' Around Blackfriars, Whitefriars, the Globe,

the Rose, Drury Lane, Covent Garden, and the Haymarket, crystallize the

most salient associations of court and authorship; on this vantage-ground

Puritan and Cavalier alternately triumphed; and the genius of England bore

its consummate flower in Shakspeare. Now denounced and now cherished,

to-day patronized by kings, and to-morrow denounced by clergy, the memoirs

and annals of each epoch include the fortunes and the fame of the drama as

one of the most suggestive tests of social transitions. Queen Henrietta

was 'well-affected towards plays,' while South vigorously assailed, and

Bossuet consigned their personators to the infernal regions. The

playhouses, declared a public nuisance by the Middlesex grand jury of

1700, at an earlier and later period were shrines of fashion, nurseries of

talent, and haunts of courtiers. The representative men and women of the

day were dramatic authors, actors, and actresses; each succeeding

generation of poets essayed in this arena, so that a familiar designation

of the ages is borrowed from their leading playwrights, whose works

faithfully mirror the moral tone, the social spirit, and the public

taste. In Alphra Behn's _Oronooko_, Mrs. Centlivres' _Busybody_, Addison's

_Cato_, Steele's _Tender Husband_, Dr. Young's _Revenge_, Gay's _Beggar's

Opera_, Sheridan's _School for Scandal_, Goldsmith's _She Stoops to

Conquer_, Rowe's _Jane Shore_, Farquhar's _Beaux' Stratagem_, and many

other popular plays, we have, as it were, the living voice of ideas,

passions, and sentiments which agitated or charmed the town; and the

robust, earnest individuality of the English race for ever lives in the

profound, impassioned utterance of the old dramatists, as its emasculated

tone is embodied in the comic muse of the Restoration. How vivid the

glimpses of stage influence in the memoirs and correspondence of each era,

in the art and the annals of the nation. Evelyn and Pepys note Betterton's

triumphs; Tillotson learned from him his effective elocution; Kneller

painted, and Pope loved him. The _Tatler_ comments on 'haughty George

Powell;' Jack Lacy still lives in his portrait at Hampton Court. 'The

great Mrs. Barry' is buried in Westminster cloisters; and Mrs. Pritchard's

bust looms up from among those of poets and statesmen in the Abbey, and

recalls Churchill's metrical tribute. Burke, Johnson, Walpole, and

Chesterfield, expatiate on Garrick with critical zest or personal

sympathy. Each great performer creates an epoch of taste or fashion,

feeling or fame. Betterton, Quin, Barry, Foote, Cibber, Garrick, Kemble,

Cooke, and Kean, are names whose mention brings to mind not a transient

histrionic reputation, but a reign,--a social, literary, or national

period, crowded with interesting characters, remarkable achievements, or

special traits of life and manners. Each theatre has its memorable

traditions; each school its great illustrators; audiences, criticisms, the

court, the coffee-house, the journal, derive from and impart to the

theatre a specific influence. The gallantry, the wit, the local manners,

the style of writing, the fashion, that prevail at a given period, are

associated with the stage, the annals whereof, whether in Paris, London,

or Vienna, are therefore invaluable as a reference to historian,

novelist, and artist. 'The Garrick fever,' we are told, 'extended to St.

Petersburg;' 'a dissenting, one-eyed jeweller,' in _George Barnwell_,

brought the domestic drama into vogue; the _Beggar's Opera_ 'made

highwaymen fashionable;' and Ross is still remembered in Edinburgh 'as the

founder of the legal stage.'

There is this great difference between the British and the French stage,

that while the former has achieved the grandest triumphs of tragic genius,

both literary and histrionic, the comedy of the latter has proved a

permanent school of manners, of language, and of art. The patronage of the

government, and the most strict artistic methods and discipline, have

established a standard of acting through the Théâtre Français.

Accordingly, instead of one superlatively clever and a score of

inefficient performers, all the French actors and actresses work together

for a harmonious result; unity of art and of effect, exquisite finish,

scientific aptitude, graces of manner, of utterance, and of expression,

often combine to make the modern French drama the perfection of artificial

triumphs.

The lyric drama has greatly diminished the influence and modified the

character of the stage; and its personal records and associations abound

in romantic and artistic triumphs. The rare and delicate gift of a voice

adapted to this sphere, the temperament, talent, and beauty of the queens

of song, the individuality and power of musical composition, the vast

expense and varied attractions of the Italian opera, its fashionable sway,

and the genius and social interest identified with its history, all

combine to throw a special and significant charm around its votaries and

its record. What a world of emotional and artistic meaning the very names

of Purcell, Pergolesi, Bach, Cherubini, Mozart, and Rossini, Bellini,

Donizetti, Verdi, Beethoven, Mercandante, and other eminent composers,

awakens; and how the memory of their great interpreters haunts the

imagination! Perhaps, in our material age, there is no sphere where fancy

and feeling have found such scope. From the memoirs of Alfieri to those

of our own Irving, it is evident that the most available of inspiring

recreations, for men of thought and sensibility, is the lyric drama; and

from the days of Metastasio at the court of Vienna to those of Felice

Romani's libretto of _La Norma_, words and melody have reproduced, in

vivid and vital grace, the tragic and the naïve in history, sentiment, and

life. Even around imperial careers flit the vocal victors of the hour.

Joseph of Austria, the great Frederic, and the first Napoleon, had their

authoritative or conciliatory skirmishes with a _prima donna_, or an

_impresario_; operatic alternate with diplomatic episodes. Nor is the

social charm and _prestige_ of the lyric drama less apparent in the annals

of kindred genius. At Sophia Arnould's _salon_ the illustrious writers and

statesmen of Paris gladly convened. Goëthe celebrated in verse the

eighty-third birthday of Mara. Sir Joshua painted Mrs. Billington as St.

Cecilia; and Catalani made English tars, rowing her to a frigate, weep as

she warbled the national anthem. The amours, rivalries, luxury, disasters,

adventures, courtly favour, social influence, conjugal quarrels, noble

charities, and artistic triumphs of vocalists, add a new and marvellous

chapter to the annals of dramatic character and fortunes. Lavinia Fanton's

'Polly Peachum' secured the triumph of Gay's _Beggar's Opera_, and the

heart of a duke; of kindred significance is that scene, so exceptional in

English conventional life, and well described by Dr. Burney, where

Anastasia Robinson was acknowledged by Lord Peterborough as his wife. A

cardinal and a cook were the parents of Gabrielli; Pasta's _Medea_ was an

epoch in histrionic art; Malibran's brief and brilliant career revealed

the most versatile woman, as well as original _cantatrice_ of her day;

Sontag's death was a public calamity; Catalani's marvellous vocalization

lacked pathos, because 'she had not suffered;' while Mrs. Woods gained the

same quality from a contrary experience. Madame Devrient was called the

Siddons of Germany; Jenny Lind's _naïve_ song won thousands for the

indigent; and Braham's triumphant tones in singing the triumphs of Israel,

made the audience appear to Lamb as Egyptians over whose necks the Hebrew

chanter rode.

From the time Burbage was lessee of the Globe Theatre, and Shakspeare

performed in his own characters, the morality of an actor's profession and

the stage have been discussed; but that there is no inevitable degradation

in the theatre, is evident from the late wholly successful though

temporary revival of its glory under the auspices of Macready. By

magnificent and complete scenic arrangements, the restoration of mutilated

Shakspearian dramas, efficient companies, the reformation of the house

itself, and especially by combining with the best dramatic authors of the

day, and rigidly maintaining his own self-respect as a member of society,

Macready once more brought together the scattered elements upon which the

character and utility of the stage is based, invested it with the highest

interest, and raised it above the cavils both of severe intellectual taste

and of pure morality. For a brief period it was the centre of graceful

ministries, a high school of art, the handmaid of literature, and the

means of elevating public sentiment and refreshing the most toilsome

minds; works of real dramatic genius were elicited; latent artistic

resources suggested; and the noblest drama in the world adequately

represented. Financial difficulties, incident to the monopoly enjoyed by

patentees, soon put a stop to the laudable enterprise; but the experiment

is as memorable as it was satisfactory. Ronzi shed tears of pleasure when

she found herself the only guest at a nobleman's villa near Florence, to

which she had been invited to a _fête_ sumptuously and tastefully

arranged; it was so rare an exception to the rule of making professional

vocalists contribute to, instead of receiving private entertainment; and

it is a curious fact in the social history of theatrical characters that

the English, notwithstanding their prudery and exclusiveness, first

recognized actors and actresses of merit as companions. Miss Farren is

not the only performer married to one of the nobility. The Earl of Craven

espoused Miss Bromton; Lord Peterborough, Anastasia Robinson; a nephew of

Lord Thurlow, Miss Bolton; and Sir William Becher, Miss O'Neil. One can

readily understand how an intellectual bachelor like James Smith,

accustomed to solace himself for domestic privations by cultivating a

sympathy for the heroines of the mimic world, should lament, as he did, in

apt verse, their appropriation even by noble lovers. He closes a pathetic

record of the kind with this allusion to the union between his prime

favourite, Miss Stevens, and Lord Essex, who seems to have acted on the

advice of the author of _Matrimonial Maxims_, who says, 'If you marry an

actress, the singing-girls are the best:'

'Last of the dear, delightful list,

Most followed, wonder'd at, and miss'd

In Hymen's odds and evens;--

Old Essex caged our nightingale,

And finished thy dramatic tale,

Enchanting Kitty Stevens!'

Boswell's reason for his partiality to players and soldiers was that they

excelled 'in animation and relish of existence.' There is a striking

illustration of the personal sympathy awakened by the profession in

conflict with the judgment that condemns it, as a career, in the life of

Scott. On one of the last days of Sir Walter's life, when, in a bath-chair

at Abbotsford, he was wheeled to a shady place by Lockhart and Laidlaw, he

asked the former to read him something from Crabbe. Lockhart read the

description of the arrival of the Players at the Borough. Sir Walter

cried, 'Capital!' at the poet's sarcasms on that way of life; but asked

penitently, 'How will poor Terry endure those cuts?' and when Lockhart

reached the summing up--

'Sad, happy race! soon raised and soon depressed,

Your days all past in jeopardy and jest;

Poor without prudence, with afflictions, vain,

Nor warned by misery, nor enriched by gain----'

'Shut the book,' said Scott; 'I can't stand more of this: it will touch

Terry to the quick.' A different but significant tribute to the actual

personal worth of the profession occurs in one of those genial 'imaginary

conversations,' vital with reality of reminiscence and rhapsody, wherein

Christopher North and the Ettrick Shepherd discourse so memorably. The

conduct of Kean in appearing on the stage immediately after a scandalous

intrigue had become public, is reprobated by 'Tickler' as 'an insult to

humanity.' To which the Shepherd replies: 'What can ye expec' frae a

playactor?' 'What can I expect, James?' is the reply; 'why, look at Terry,

Young, Matthews, Charles Kemble, and your friend Vandenhoff; and then I

say that you expect good players to be good men as men go, and likewise

gentlemen.'

This sympathy with the profession, and vivid interest in some phase or

period of the drama, is an almost universal fact in the experience of

intelligent and sensitive persons. Thackeray's picture of Pendennis

enamoured of an actress in boyhood, is typical of a common episode of

youth; if not in this form, it takes the shape of enthusiasm for a certain

actor or class of plays, or a mania defined as the condition of being

'stage-struck;' while to the philosophical as well as sympathetic of these

early votaries the literature of the drama is a perennial storehouse of

psychological data, and the most vital connecting link between written

lore and actual life--the source of the highest poetry and the most

universal human truth.

In literary biography, the accounts of the manner in which the plays of

Goldsmith, Sheridan, Byron, Mrs. Hemans, Joanna Baillie, Procter,

Talfourd, Hunt, Lamb, and other poets, were brought on the stage,--the

reciprocal good offices of actors and authors, mutually acknowledged,--the

array of intellectual friends convened to grace the occasion, and the

anecdotes and criticism thence resulting,--form some of the most agreeable

episodes in literary biography. Farquhar, Holcraft, Mrs. Inchbald,

Knowles, and others, combined the author and actor; and it was a genial

and noble custom for distinguished writers to contribute prologues and

epilogues;--the interchange of such kindly offices gave, as we have said,

a wide and elevated social interest to the theatre, which had, in a great

measure, passed away before the advent of Kean. Besides the comparative

indifference of the public, he was obliged to contend against both the

prejudices and the refinements of taste--the one opposing all innovation

as to style, and the other repudiating the intensity and boldness of his

conceptions.

The Spagnoletto style of Sandford, and the 'cordage' visible in old

Macklin's face, are traditional. The inimitable pathos of Miss O'Neil, the

tragic beauty of Pasta, the heroic manner of Siddons, the irresistible

humour of Matthews, and Liston's comic genius, had each their distinctive

character; they respectively individualized the art, and, if we range over

the entire gallery of histrionic celebrities, we shall find their fame

based upon as peculiar traits of excellence as that of renowned authors

and painters; and their genius consisting in some quality emphatically

their own--where imitation and art became subservient to, or illustrative

of, an idiosyncrasy.

Impulsive genius seldom receives the credit of artistic study, and its

most effective points are often ascribed to chance inspiration. This is an

error of frequent occurrence in judging of actors; and it is one almost

perversely indulged by the bigoted opponents of the romantic or natural

school. The most effective touches, however, in Garrick, Kean, and other

eminent performers, are easily traced to careful observation or a personal

idiosyncrasy or association. In the very first instruction the latter

received in his art, recourse was had to natural sympathy in order to

perfect his imitative skill. The pathetic intonation with which, even as a

boy, he exclaimed, 'Alas, poor Yorick!' in _Hamlet_, was derived from the

manner in which he habitually spoke of an unfortunate relative who

constantly excited his commiseration; he was instructed to transfer the

tone awakened by real, to the expression of imaginary grief: his manner of

falling on his face was derived from the figure on Abercrombie's monument,

and his fighting with a weaponless arm in Richard was borrowed from the

death-scene of an officer in Spain. The play of _Bertram_, by Maturin, he

is said to have rendered memorable by a single touching benison: all who

once heard his 'God bless the child!' recall it with emotion; it was a

favourite mode of uttering his paternal tenderness at home; hence its

reality. Garrick made a study of an old crazy friend of his in order to

enact _Lear_ with truth to nature; and when Kean was playing in New York,

he accompanied his physician to Bloomingdale asylum for the express

purpose of obtaining hints for the same part, from the manner and

expression of the insane patients. Indeed, those most intimate with Kean,

in his best days, unite in the opinion that he was never surpassed for the

intense and original study of his characters; he brooded over them in the

quiet fields, observed life and nature, conversed with discerning men, and

acutely examined books and his own consciousness, for the purpose of

attaining an harmonious and artistic conception; he tried experiments in

elocution before his wife, and was in the habit of rehearsing, for hours,

without any auditor. So elaborate were his studies, that, having once

decided on a course, he never modified it without great

self-dissatisfaction; and on one occasion, when he yielded his judgment on

a special point, to please Mrs. Garrick, the inharmonious effect was

obvious to all.

'What the bank is to the credit of the nation,' said Steele, 'the

playhouse is to its politeness and good manners.' And although this maxim

is scarcely applicable now, the instinct and the sympathy by virtue of

which the stage instructs and refines for ever obtain in humanity. Among

recent illustrations, is the genial influence of dramatic pastimes upon

the isolated and dark sojourn of ice-bound Arctic voyagers, as described

by the intrepid and philosophic Kane and his predecessors. The gallery of

human portraits, conserved even by the minor English drama, are among the

most genuine illustrations of life and character; Sir Peter Teazle and

Joseph Surface, Sir Pertinax and Tony Lumpkin, Sylvester Daggerwood and

Mawworm, are emphatic types with which we could ill dispense. One of the

remarkable intellectual phenomena of the age in which we live, however, is

the gradual encroachment of literature upon dramatic art. The best modern

characters which genius has created exist in masterpieces of fiction and

poetry; in a measure they have superseded in popular favour dramatic

ideals, except the highest and most endeared. Scott, Dickens, and their

contemporaries or successors, have given the world a new gallery of living

portraits such as of old were only to be found in the drama. Well said

Wilson, in the _Noctes_: 'I think the good novels that are published come

in place of new dramas.' The Italian opera has, by its affluent artistic

attractions, overshadowed, and in a great measure superseded, the

'legitimate drama.' Even in Italy the opportunity is comparatively rare to

enjoy fine acting apart from music and the ballet; yet there is no better

lesson for the novice in that 'soft bastard Latin' that Byron loved, than

to listen to one of Goldoni's old-fashioned colloquial plays, as, clearly

and with admirable emphasis, recited by such a company as that of which

Internari was so long the ornament; by melodious emphasis alone

commonplace maxims seemed to attain the sparkle of wit, and the mere tone

of voice is fraught with infectious merriment. From Arlechino's broad

jokes to Ristori's majestic pathos, the natural dramatic instinct and

endowments of the Italians awaken every shade and subtlety of sympathetic

feeling.

Philosophically examined, the stage will be found a compensatory

institution, and its actual relation to society intimate or conventional,

according to the predominance of real or ideal satisfaction. Thus the free

enterprise and speculative range in America make it merely recreative; the

best Italian dramatist wrote when his country's civic life was paralyzed.

The sentiment, checked by caste and absolutism in Elizabeth's day, burst

forth in the old dramatists, and culminated, for all time, in Shakspeare;

while the memoirs of Goëthe, Schiller, and Korner indicate how near and

dear to the popular heart of their country was the art, in all its phases

and forms, wherein baffled aspirations found scope. The histrionic artists

of Germany, and the actresses of Paris, are or have been a vital element

of the social economy, impracticable and almost inconceivable to English

and Americans. _Wilhelm Meister_ is the legitimate romance of its country

and era. 'L' artiste aimée du public,' says Madame Dudevant, 'est comme un

enfant a qui l' univers est la famille;' while the affinity of the

dramatic instinct with literary culture and capability is not only evident

in the friendships between authors and actors, but in the facility with

which the former become amateur performers. Montaigne says, 'I played the

chief part in the Latin tragedies of Buchanan, Guerente, and Moret, that

were acted in our college of Guienne.' Dickens is a capital actor and

dramatic reader of his own stories; and Washington Irving, when sojourning

at Dresden, delectably enacted, in a genial family circle, Sir Charles

Rackett.

One proof of the essential individuality of histrionic genius is, that in

every celebrated part each renowned actor seems to have excelled in a

different phrase. Garrick's Hamlet was inimitable in the words, 'I have

that within that passeth show;' while the most affecting touch of the

elder Wallack was, 'That undiscovered country, from whose bourne no

traveller returns.' Kean's first soliloquy in _Richard the Third_ is

perhaps the best preserved traditional recitation of the English stage;

and the power of contrasted intonation in the expression of feeling,

never forgotten by those who listened, was evinced in the memorable

passage in _Othello_--

'Perdition catch my soul, but _I do love thee_,

And when I love thee _not_, chaos is come again.'

His conceptions were remarkable for bold earnestness. His discordant

voice, insignificant figure, and slightly-misshaped feet, seemed to pass

miraculously away before the glowing energy of his spirit; to the

imaginative spectator he visibly expanded, and filled the stage, and

towered over the inferior actors of larger physical dimensions; his

action, expression of countenance, intelligent emphasis, and vigour of

utterance, lifted, kindled, and glorified, as it were, his merely human

attributes, and bore him, and those who gazed and listened, triumphantly

onward in a whirl of passion, a concentration of will, or a chaos of

emotion.

As far as contemporary memoirs elucidate the subject, it is evident that

gross violations of elocutionary taste were habitual both prior to and

succeeding the time of Betterton. This actor, with remarkable physical

disadvantages, appears to have had the most decided genius--especially for

tragedy. We have no accounts of the effects of tragic personation

exceeding those recorded of Betterton; so truly did he feel the emotion

represented, that it is said his colour, breathing, accent, and looks

betrayed an incessant and absolute sympathy with the part; as Hamlet he

turned deadly pale at the sight of the ghost; and Cibber emphatically

declares that his tone, accentuation, and the whole management of his

voice were faultlessly adapted to each passage he recited. Garrick seems

first to have established a taste for the refinements of the art; his

style, compared to what had been in vogue, was singularly chaste; he

embodied the great idea of unity; and when he first appeared, his manner,

expression of countenance, inflection of voice, and whole air, instantly

revealed the character, of which he did not lose sight for a moment. The

Kemble school has been traced to Quin; but its individuality was trenched

upon vitally by Kean, although it has been, in many essential features,

renewed by the elder Vandenhoff and Macready. It is contended by its

ardent votaries that Kean sacrificed the dignity of his art--so ably

sustained by John Kemble and his renowned sister--to mere effect; that he

substituted impulse for science, and excited sympathy by powerful but

illegitimate appeals to emotion. This, however, is a narrow statement, and

like the old dispute about Racine and Shakspeare, the classic and

romantic, the natural and the artistic, resolves itself into the fact that

the principle of a division of labour is applicable to art as well as

social economy. In Cato and Coriolanus and Wolsey, the traits of Kemble

were perfectly assimilated; in the more complex part of Richard, and the

still more impetuous one of Othello, the energy, quickness, intense

expression, and infectious action of Kean were not only electrical in

their immediate effect, but appropriate in the highest degree in the view

of reflection and taste. Thus, too, Cooke as Sir Pertinax McSycophant,

Mrs. Siddons as Lady Macbeth, Cooper as Virginius, Kean as Shylock,

Macready as Werner, and Booth as Iago, made indelible, because highly

characteristic, impressions. The actor, like the author and artist, has

his _forte_--a sphere peculiarly fitted to elicit his powers and give

scope and inspiration to his genius; and it is here that we should

estimate him, and not according to a comparative and irrelevant standard.

The Collector Essays on Books, Newspapers, Pictures, Inns, Authors, Doctors, Holidays, Actors, Preachers · 第 18 / 28 段