I was never more impressed with the absolute line of demarcation between

the imitative and the inventive, even in the lighter processes of art,

than when examining the graphic series of illustrations of _The Wandering

Jew_. Nature is represented under all forms--the woods, the desert, the

ocean, caves, meadows, and skies; and these fixed elemental features might

be well reflected by mechanical aids, photographed or reproduced through

chemical and optical means; but the true meaning of each picture consisted

in the ever-present shadow pursuing the Wanderer--the form of the Holy One

bowed under his cross: it glimmered in the water, was stamped on the rock,

outlined in the gnarled forest branches, pencilled in the floating vapour,

reflected in the ice-mirrored lake, with a latent and inevitable yet

unobtrusive and apparently accidental omni-presence, as if wrought into

the texture of nature through the creative anguish of conscience--which

emphatically announced an intelligence far beyond all mechanical art, and

interfused the material with the abstract, the imaginative, and the human,

as only genius can. The same thing is evinced by comparing the best

photographs of architecture, figures, or landscapes with the sketch-book

of a genuine artist; in certain points there will be found a special

intelligence and feeling which transcend the most remarkable imitative

truth. How much of this is suggested, for instance, by the mere catalogue

of an album on the table at a Parisian _soirée_: fleurs de Redonté,

chevaux de Carl Vernet, Bedouins d'Horace, aquarelles de Ciceri, petit

paysages de Géniole, caricatures de Grandville et de Monnier, beaux

brigands de Schnetz--'tous chéfs d'oeuvre au petit pied.'

A portrait of little Fritz drumming, in the Berlin Gallery, Carlyle hails,

in his _Life of Frederick the Great_, as 'one tiny islet of reality amid

the shoreless sea of fantasms, Flaying of Bartholomews, Rape of Europas,'

&c. Napoleon was delighted to remember that his mother reclined on

tapestry representing the heroes of the _Iliad_, when she brought him into

the world.

For how long and with what vividness are certain pictures associated with

localities. Gainsborough's 'Blue Boy,' and Reynolds's 'Strawberry Girl,'

are among the salient retrospective images of the English school at the

Manchester Exhibition. We think of Correggio with Parma, Perugino with

Perugia, Fra Angelico with Florence, Da Vinci's 'Last Supper' and

Guercino's 'Hagar' with Milan, Murillo with Seville, Vandyke with Madrid,

Rubens with Antwerp, Watteau with Paris, and Paul Potter's 'Bull' with the

Hague.

The Dutch school, in a philosophical estimate, is but the compensation

afforded by the romance of art for its deficiency in nature; the element

of the picturesque not found in mountains, forests, and cataracts, the

lowland painters wrought from flowers and firesides; the radiant tulips

and exquisite interiors, the humble but characteristic in life and

manners. To seize upon individuality is the conservative tact of both

painter and poet; whoever does this effectively contributes to the world's

gallery of historical portraits, and keeps before the living the faces,

costume, and actions of bygone races and heroes. Catlin's aboriginal

portraits introduced the American native tribes to Europe; a naturalist

abroad has but to turn over Audubon's portfolio to become intimately

acquainted with every bird whose plumage or song makes beautiful our

woodlands and seashore; the traveller who rests an hour at Perugia may

trace on the walls of a church the original, crude, yet pious expression

which Raphael developed into angelic beauty. Vernet has, by the very

multiplicity of his battle-pieces, signalized on canvas the military

genius of the French nation; the faith which so distinguishes the

fifteenth from the speculation of the eighteenth century is manifest to us

most eloquently in the masterpieces of religious art which yet remain in

peerless beauty to attest the holy convictions that inspired them; and all

that is peculiar in Grecian culture has found no exponent like the statues

of her divinities. Hogarth preceded Crabbe and Dickens in making palpable

the shadows of want, crime, and luxury. The Italian satirist, who endowed

animals with speech and made them represent the absurdities of humanity,

hinted their possible significance less than Landseer who individualized

their most salient traits, or Kaulbach who revealed the brute creation in

the highest intuitive expression. There is a piquant rustic beauty by

Greuze, which embodies and embalms, in its exquisite suggestiveness, the

special claim of naïve brightness and grace that belongs almost

exclusively to French lovable women; and there is a portrait of an

American matronly belle of the days of Washington, by Stuart, which

represents the type of mingled self-reliance and womanly loveliness that

has made the ladies of our Republican court so memorably attractive.

DOCTORS.

'Throw physic to the dogs.'--MACBETH.

'Friend of my life, which did not you prolong,

The world had wanted many an idle song.'--POPE.

In the moving panoramas of cities are to be seen certain vehicles of all

degrees of locomotive beauty and convenience, from the glossy and

silver-knobbed carriage with its prancing grays, to the bacheloric-looking

sulky with its one gaunt horse, in which are seated gentlemen of a learned

and professional aspect, usually wearing spectacles, and always an air of

intense respectability, or of contemplation and seriousness. They

recognize numerous acquaintances as they pass with a peculiar smile and

nod, and are usually accompanied by 'a little man-boy to hold the horse,'

as the French cook in the play defines a _tigre_. These mysterious

personages rejoice in the title of Doctor--once a very distinctive

appellation, but now as common as authorship and travelling. A moralist,

watching them gliding by amid fashionable equipages, crowded omnibuses,

hasty pedestrians, and all the phenomena of life in a metropolis, would

find a striking contrast between the rushing tide around and the hushed

rooms they enter. To how many their visit is the one daily event that

breaks in upon the monotony of illness and confinement; how many eyes

watch them with eager suspense, and listen to their opinion as the fiat

of destiny; how many feverishly expect their coming, shrink from their

polished steel, rejoice in their cheering ministrations, or dread their

long bills! 'The Doctor!'--a word that stirs the extremest moods, despair

and jollity!

There is no profession which depends so much for its efficiency on

personal traits as that of medicine; for the utility of technical

knowledge here is derived from individual judgment, tact, and sympathy. In

other words, the physician has to deal with an unknown element. Between

the specific ailment and the remedy there are peculiarities of

constitution, the influence of circumstances, and the laws of nature to be

considered; so that although the medical adviser may be thoroughly versed

in physiology, the materia medica, and the symptoms of disease, if he

possess not the discrimination, the observant skill, and the reflective

power to apply his learning wisely, it is comparatively unavailing. The

aim of the divine and the attorney, however impeded by obstacles, is

reached by a more direct course; logic, eloquence, and zeal, united to

professional attainment, will insure success in law and divinity; but in

physic, certain other qualities in the man are requisite to give scope to

the professor. Hence we associate a certain originality with the idea of a

doctor; are apt to regard the vocation at the two extremes of superiority

and pretension, and justly estimate the individuals of the class according

to their capacity of insight and their principles of action, rather than

by their mere acquisitions or rank as teachers. The uncertainty of

medicine, as a practical art, thus induces a stronger reliance on

individual endowments than is the case in any other liberal pursuit.

A philosophical history of the art of healing would be not less curious

than suggestive. The absurd theories which checked its progress for

centuries, the secrets hoarded by Egyptian priests, the union of medical

knowledge with ancient systems of philosophy, the epoch of Galen, the

Arabian and Salerno schools, the reformation of Paracelsus, the brilliant

discoveries which, at long intervals, illumined the track of the science,

and the enlightened principles now realized--if fully discussed--would

form an extraordinary chapter in the biography of man. Herein, as with

other vocations, modern division of labour has concentrated professional

aptitudes. 'L' affluence des postulants,' says Balzac, 'a forcé la

médecine a se diviser en catégories; il y a le médecin qui professe, le

médecin politique et le médecin militant et la cinquième divisions, celle

des docteurs qui vendent des remèdes.'

St. Luke and the Good Samaritan are yet the favourite signs of

apothecaries, confirming the original charity of the art; and in the south

of Europe may still be seen over the barbers' shops the effigy of a human

arm spouting blood from an open vein--an indication of the once universal

custom of periodical depletion. It is now acknowledged that diverse

climates require modified treatment of the same disease; that nervous

susceptibility is far greater in one latitude than another, and that

habits of life essentially individualize the constitution. Indeed, the

widest difference exists in the relation of persons to the doctor; some

never see him, and others must have a consultation upon the most trifling

ailment,--so great is the dependence which can be had upon nature, and so

extreme both the faith and the scepticism which exist in regard to

curative science.

Popular literature is full of hits at the profession. 'Le barbier fait

plus de la moitié d' un médecin,' says Molière, who, in _La Malade

Imaginaire_, has so acutely given the current philosophy of the subject by

satirizing the pedantry and charlatanism of the doctors of his day; 'Nous

voyons que, dans la maladie tout le monde a recours aux médecins;--c'est

une marque de la faiblesse humaine et non pas de la vérité de leur art;'

and of all ailments the hardest to cure is 'la maladie des médecins.'

Imagination has been called by a German philosopher 'the mediatrix, the

nurse, the mover of all the several parts of our spiritual organism.' 'I

have the worst luck of any physician under the cope of heaven,' complains

Sancho Panza; 'other doctors kill their patients, and are paid for it too,

and yet they are at no further trouble than scrawling two or three cramp

words for some physical slip-slop, which the apothecaries are at all the

pains to make up.'

It would seem, indeed, as if the advance of science improved medical

practice negatively--that is, by inducing what in politics has been called

a masterly inactivity; and there is no doubt that no small degree of the

success attending Hahnemann's theory is to be attributed to the

comparative abstinence it inculcates in the use of remedial agents. The

fact is a significant one, as indicative of the want of positive science

in the healing art; and the consequent wisdom of leaving to nature, as far

as possible, the restorative process. Indeed, to assist nature is

acknowledged, by just observers, to be the only wise course; and this

brings us to the inference that a good physician is necessarily a

philosopher; it is incumbent on him, of all men, to exercise the inductive

faculty; he must possess good causality, not only to reason justly on

individual cases, but to apply the progress of science to the exigencies

of disease. It is related of Bixio that such was his zeal for science,

having long wished to ascertain whether a man instinctively turns when

wounded in a vital part, asked his adversary in a duel to aim at one, and,

although fatally hurt, exclaimed with ardour, as he involuntarily spun

round--'It is true, they do turn!'

The comparatively slow accumulation of scientific truth in regard to the

treatment of disease, is illustrated by the fact that not until the lapse

of two thousand years after medicine had assumed the rank of a science,

under the auspices of Hippocrates, was the circulation of the blood

discovered--an era in its history. The fiery discussion of the efficacy of

inoculation, and its gradual introduction, is another significant

evidence of the same general truth. But in our own day the rapid and

valuable developments of chemistry have, in a measure, reversed the

picture. Numerous alleviating and curative agents have been discovered;

the gas of poisonous acids is found to eradicate, in many cases, the most

fatal diseases of the eye; heat, more penetrating than can be created by

other means, is eliminated from carbon in an aëriform state, passes

through the cuticle without leaving a mark on its surface, and restores

aching nerves or exhausted vitality. Vegetable and mineral substances are

refined, analyzed, and combined with a skill never before imagined; opium

yields morphine, and Peruvian bark quinine, and all the known salubrious

elements are thus rendered infinitely subservient to the healing art.

Chloroform is one of the most beneficent of these new agents; and has

exorcised the demon of physical pain by a magical charm, without

violating, in judicious hands, the integrity of nature.

There is a secret of curative art in which consists the genius of healing;

it is that union of sympathy with intelligence, and of moral energy with

magnetic gifts, whereby the tides of life are swayed, and one 'can

minister to a mind diseased.' Fortunate is the patient who is attended by

one thus endowed; but such are usually found out of the professional

circle;--they are referees ordained by nature to settle the difficulties

of inferior spirits; the arbiters recognized by instinct who soothe anger,

reconcile doubt, amuse, elevate, and console, by a kind of moral alchemy;

and potent coadjutors are they to the material aids of merely technical

physicians. 'Who dare say,' asks Rénan, in allusion to the calming and

purifying influence of Jesus, 'that in many cases, and apart from injuries

of a dreaded character, the contact of an exquisite person is not worth

all the resources of pharmacy?' 'It was agony to me,' wrote Hahnemann, 'to

walk in darkness, with no other light than could be derived from books.'

One of his opponents, from this confession, infers the fallacy of his

system; 'the conviction,' he observes, 'is irresistibly forced upon us

that he was not a _born physician_.' If our ancestors were less

enlightened in regard to _hygiène_, and if their physicians were less

scrupulous in tampering with the functions of nature, they had one signal

advantage over us in escaping the inhuman comments, made after every fatal

issue, on the practice and the treatment adopted--no matter with how much

conscientious intelligence. We not only suffer the pangs of bereavement,

but the reproaches of devotees of each school of medicine and of rival

doctors, of having by an unwise choice sacrificed the life for which we

would have cheerfully resigned our own! Somewhat of this occult healing

force might have been read in the serene countenance of Dr. Physic, of

Philadelphia; it predominated in the benevolent founder of the Insane

Asylum of Palermo, who learned from an attack of mental disorder how to

feel for, and minister to, those thus afflicted. The late Preissnitz, of

Graefenberg, seems to have enjoyed the gift which is as truly Nature's

indication of an aptitude for the art, as a sense of beauty in the poet.

But this principle is 'caviare to the general.'

Medicine has lost much of its inherent dignity by the same element, in

modern times, that has degraded art, letters, and society--the spirit of

trade. This agency encourages motives, justifies means, and leads to ends

wholly at variance with high tone and with truth. The gentleman, the

philosopher, the man of honour, and with them that keystone in the arch of

character--self-respect, are wholly compromised in the process of sinking

a liberal art into a common trade. In the economy of modern society,

however, the physician has acquired a new influence; he has gained upon

the monopoly of the priest: for while the spirit of inquiry, by trenching

on the mysterious prerogatives which superstition once accorded, has

retrenched the latter's functions, the same agency, by extending the

domain of science and rendering its claims popular, has enlarged the

sphere of the other profession. To an extent, therefore, never before

known, the doctor fills the office of confessor; his visits yield

agreeable excitement to women with whom he gossips and sympathizes;

admitted by the very exigency of the case to entire confidence, often

revered as a counsellor and friend, as well as relied on as a healer, not

infrequently he becomes the oracle of a household. Privileges like these,

when used with benevolence and integrity, are doubtless honourable to both

parties, and become occasions for the exercise of the noblest service and

the highest sentiments of our nature; while, on the other hand, they are

liable to the grossest abuse, where elevation of character and gentlemanly

instincts are wanting. Accordingly there has sprung into existence, in our

day, a personage best designated as the medical Jesuit; whose real

vocation, as well as the process by which he acquires supremacy, fully

justifies the appellation. Like his religious prototype, he operates

through the female branches, who, in their turn, control the heads of

families; and the extent to which the domestic arrangements, the social

relations, and even the opinions of individuals are thus regulated, is

truly surprising. 'Women,' says Mrs. Jameson, 'are inclined to fall in

love with priests and physicians, because of the help and comfort they

derive from both in perilous moral and physical maladies. They believe in

the presence of real pity, real sympathy, where the look and tone of each

have become merely habitual and conventional, I may say professional.' Yet

a popular novelist, in his ideal portrait of the physician, justly claims

superiority to impulse and casual sympathy as an essential requisite to

success. 'He must enter the room a calm intelligencer. He is disabled for

his mission if he suffer aught to obscure the keen glance of his

science.'[12]

The natural history of the doctor has not yet been written, but the

classes are easily nomenclated; we have all known the humorous, the

urbane, the oracular, the facetious, the brusque, the elegant, the shrewd,

the exquisite, the burly, the bold, and the fastidious; and the character

of people may be inferred by their choice of each species. Those in whom

taste predominates over intellect, will select a physician, for his

agreeable personal qualities; while such as value essential traits, will

compromise with the roughest exterior and the least flattering address for

the sake of genuine skill and a vigorous and honest mind. As a general

rule, in large cities, vanity seems to rule the selection; and it is a

lamentable view of human nature to see the blind preference given to

plausible but shallow men, whose smooth tongues or gallant air win them

suffrages denied to good sense and candid intercourse. The most detestable

genus is that we have described under the name of medical Jesuits; next in

annoyance are the precisians; the most harmless of the weaker order are

the gossips; and there is often little to choose in point of risk to 'the

house of life' between the very timid and the dare-devils; in a great

exigency the former, and in an ordinary case the latter are equally to be

shunned. In the _Horæ Subsecivæ_ of Dr. John Brown, we find some apt and

needed counsel to the aspirants for medical success:--'The young doctor

must have for his main faculty, _sense_; but all will not do if Genius is

not there; such a special therapeutic gift had Hippocrates, Sydenham,

Pott, Purcell, John Hunter, Delpech, Dupuytren, Kellie, Cheyne, Baillie,

and Abercrombie. Moreover, let me tell you, my young doctor friends, that

a cheerful face and step and neckcloth and buttonhole, and an occasional

hearty and kindly joke, and the power of executing and setting a-going a

good laugh, are stock in our trade not to be despised.' Brillat Savarin

declares, doctors easily become gourmands because so well received.

In Paris, Edinburgh, and Philadelphia, all the world over, the medical

student is an exceptional character. Their pranks are patent: the rough

ones like to kick up rows, and the more quiet are unique at practical

jokes. Bob Sawyer is a typical hero. If, like the portrait-painter,

doctors are often the playthings of fortune in cities, where the arbitrary

whims of fashion decree success; in the country their true worth is more

apt to find appreciation, and the individualities of character having free

scope, quite original children of Apollo are the result. The name of

Hopkins is still memorable in the region where he practised, as one of the

literary clique of which Humphries, Dwight, and Barlow were members. Dr.

Osborn, of Sandwich, Mass., wrote the popular whaling-song yet in vogue

among Nantucketers. Dr. Holyoke, of Salem, is renowned as a beautiful

instance of longevity; and the wit of Dr. Spring was proverbial in Boston.

The best example of a medical philosopher, in our annals, is that of Dr.

Rush, of Philadelphia; he reformed the system of practice; first treated

yellow fever successfully, made climate a special study, and, like Burke,

laid every one he encountered under contribution for facts. His life of

seventy years was passed in ardent investigation. It is remarkable that

the first martyr to American liberty was a physician; and, before he fell,

Warren eloquently avowed his principles, like Körner in Germany, rousing

the spirit of his countrymen, and then consecrating his sentiments with

his blood. Boylston, the ancestral portraits of whose family are among the

best of Copley's American works, nearly fell a victim to public

indignation for his zealous and intelligent advocacy of inoculation, and

natural science owes a debt to Barton, Morton, and De Kay, which is

acknowledged both at home and abroad. A French doctor has noted the

historical importance of his _confrères_, and tells us Hamond was Racine's

master, Lestocq helped to elevate Catharine to the Russian throne, Haller

was a poet and romancer, Cuvier was the greatest naturalist of his age,

and Murat was a doctor. French _médecins_ have figured in the Chamber and

on the Boulevards.

The Collector Essays on Books, Newspapers, Pictures, Inns, Authors, Doctors, Holidays, Actors, Preachers · 第 9 / 28 段