Though in his maturity Philo renounced the ascetic life, his ideal

throughout was a mystical union with the Divine Being. To a certain

school of Judaism, which loves to make everything rational and

moderate, mysticism is alien; it was alien indeed to the Sadducee

realist and the Karaite literalist; it was alien to the systematic

Aristotelianism of Maimonides, and it is alien alike to Western

orthodox and Reform Judaism. But though often obscured and crushed by

formal systems, mysticism is deeply seated in the religious feelings,

and the race which has developed the Cabbalah and Hasidism cannot be

accused of lack of it. Every great religion fosters man's aspiration

to have direct communion with God in some super-rational way.

Particularly should this be the case with a religion which recognizes

no intermediary. The Talmudic conceptions of [Hebrew: nb'a], prophecy,

[Hebrew: shkyna], the Divine Presence, and [Hebrew: rua hkdsh], the

holy spirit, which was vouchsafed to the saint, certainly are mystic, and

at Alexandria similar ideas inspired a striking development. Once again we

can trace the fertilizing influence of Greek ideas. Even when the old

naturalistic cults had flourished in Greece, and political life had

provided a worthy goal for man, mystical beliefs and ceremonies had a

powerful attraction for the Hellene; and, when the belief in the old

gods had been shattered, and with the national greatness the liberal

life of the State had passed away, he turned more and more to those

rites which professed to provide healing and rest for the sickening

soul. Many of the Alexandrian Jews must have been initiated into these

Greek mysteries, for Philo introduces into his exegesis of the law of

Moses an ordinance forbidding the practice.[66] He himself advocates a

more spiritual mysticism, and it is a cardinal principle of his

philosophy to treat the human soul as a god within and its absorption

in the universal Godhead as supreme bliss, the end of all endeavor. He

claimed to have attained, himself, to this union, and to have received

direct inspiration. Giving a Greek coloring to the Hebrew notion of

prophecy, "My soul," he says, "is wont to be affected with a Divine

trance and to prophesy about things of which it has no knowledge"[67]....

"Many a time have I come with the intention of writing, and knowing

exactly what I ought to set down, but I have found my mind barren and

fruitless, and I have gone away with nothing done, but at times I have

come empty, and suddenly been full, for ideas were invisibly rained

down upon me from above, so that I was seized by a Divine frenzy, and

was lost to everything, place, people, self, speech, and thought. I

had gotten a stream of interpretation, a gift of light, a clear survey

of things, the clearest that eye can give."[68]

In his "Guide of the Perplexed,"[69] Maimonides describes the various

degrees of the [Hebrew: rua hkdsh], or what we call religious "genius,"

with which man may be blessed. He distinguishes between the man who

possesses it only for his own exaltation, and the man who feels

himself compelled to impart it to others for their happiness. To this

higher order of genius Philo advanced in his maturity. He consciously

regarded himself as a follower of Moses, who was the perfect

interpreter of God's thought. So he, though in a lesser degree, was an

inspired interpreter, a hierophant (as he expressed it in the language

of the Greek mystics) who expounded the Divine Word to his own

generation by the gift of the Divine wisdom. When he had fled from

Alexandria, to secure virtue by contemplation, he had as his final

goal the attainment of the true knowledge of God, and as he advanced

in age, he advanced in decision and authority. He was conscious of his

philosophic grasp of the Torah, and the diffidence with which he

allegorized in his early works gave place to a serene confidence that

he had a lesson for his own and for future generations. Hoping for the

time when Judaism should be a world-religion, he spoke his message for

Jew and Gentile. We can imagine him preaching on Sabbaths to the great

congregation which filled the synagogue at Alexandria, and on other

days of the week expounding his philosophical ideas to a smaller

circle which he collected around him.

Essentially, then, he was a philosopher and a teacher, but he was

called upon to play a part in the world of action. Following the

passage already quoted, wherein Philo speaks of the blessings of the

life of contemplation that he had led in the past,[70] he goes on to

relate how that "envy, the most grievous of all evils, attacked me,

and threw me into the vast sea of public affairs, in which I am still

tossed about without being able to make my way out." A French

scholar[71] conjectures that this is only a metaphorical way of saying

that he was forced into some public office, probably, a seat in the

Alexandrian Sanhedrin; and he ascribes the language to the bitter

disappointment of one who was devoted to philosophical pursuits and

found himself diverted from them. Philo's language points rather to

duties which he was compelled to undertake less congenial than those

of a member of the Sanhedrin would have been; and probably must refer

to the polemical activity which he was called upon to exert in

defending his people against misrepresentation and persecution. During

the reign of Augustus and the early years of Tiberius (30 B.C.E.-20

C.E.) the Roman provinces were firmly ruled, and the governors were as

firmly controlled by the emperor. To Rectus, who was the prefect of

Egypt till 14 C.E., and who was removed for attempted extortion,

Tiberius addressed the rebuke, "I want my sheep to be shorn, not

strangled." But when Tiberius fell under the influence of Sejanus, and

left to his hated minister the active control of the empire, harder

times began for the provincials, and especially for the Jews. Sejanus

was an upstart, and like most upstarts a tyrant; and for some

reason--it may be jealousy of the power of the Jews at Rome--he hated

the Jewish race and persecuted it. The great opponent of Sejanus was

Antonia, the ward of Philo's brother, and a loyal friend to his

people; and this, too, may have incited Sejanus' ill-feeling. Whatever

the reason, the Alexandrian Jews felt the heavy hand, and when Philo

came to write the story of his people in his own times, he devoted one

book to the persecution by Sejanus. Unfortunately it has not survived,

but veiled hints of the period of stress through which the people

passed are not wanting in the commentary on the law.

There were always anti-Semites spoiling for a fight at Alexandria, and

there was always inflammable material which they could stir up. The

Egyptian populace were by nature, says Philo, "jealous and envious,

and were filled moreover with an ancient and inveterate enmity towards

the Jews,"[72] and of the degenerate Greek population, many were

anxious from motives of private gain as well as from religious enmity

to incite an outbreak; since the Jews were wealthy and the booty would

be great. Among the cultured, too, there was one philosophical school

powerful at Alexandria, which maintained a persistent attitude of

hostility towards the Jews. The chief literary anti-Semites of whom we

have record at this period were Stoics, and it is probably their

"envy" to which Philo refers when he complains of being drawn into the

sea of politics. In writings and in speeches the Stoic leaders Apion

and Chæremon carried on a campaign of misrepresentation, and sought to

give their attacks a fine humanitarian justification by drawing fancy

pictures of the Jewish religion and Jewish laws. The Jews worshipped

the head of an ass,[73] they hated the Gentiles, and would have no

communication with them, they killed Gentile children at the Passover,

and their law allowed them to commit any offences against all but

their own people, and inculcated a low morality. When it was not

morally bad, it was degraded and superstitious. Whereas the modern

anti-Semite usually complains about Jewish success and dangerous

cleverness, Apion accused them of having produced no original ideas

and no great men, and no citizen as worthy of Alexandria as himself!

Against these charges Philo, the most philosophical Jew of the time

and the most distinguished member of the Alexandrian community, was

called upon to defend his people, and that part of his works which

Eusebius calls [Greek: Hypotheticha]; _i.e._ apologetics, was probably

written in reply to the Stoic attacks. The hatred of the Stoics was a

religious hatred, which is the bitterest of all; the Stoics were the

propagators of a rival religious system, which had originally been

founded by Hellenized Semites and borrowed much from Semitic sources.

They had their missionaries everywhere and aspired to found a

universal philosophical religion. In their proselytizing activity they

tried to assimilate to their pantheism the mythological religion of

the masses, and thus they became the philosophical supporters of

idolatry. Their greatest religious opponents were the Jews, who not

only refused to accept their teachings, but preached to the nations a

transcendental monotheism against their impersonal and accommodating

pantheism, and a divinely-revealed law of conduct against their vague

natural reason. In the Stoic pantheism the first stand of the pagan

national deities was made against the God of Israel, and at Alexandria

during the first century the fight waxed fierce. It was a fight of

ideas in which persons only were victims, but at the back of the

intermittent persecutions of which we have record we may always

surmise the influence of the Stoic anti-Semites. The war of words

translated itself from time to time into the breaking of heads.

Philo, indeed, never mentions Apion by name, but he refers covertly in

many places to his insolence and unscrupulousness.[74] Josephus wrote

a famous reply to his attacks, refuting "his vulgar abuse, gross

ignorance and demagogic claptrap,"[75] and the fact that a Palestinian

Jew thought this apology necessary, proves the wide dissemination of

the poison. The disgrace and death of Sejanus seem to have brought a

relief from actual persecution to the Alexandrian Jews; but the

ill-will between the two races in the city smouldered on, and it only

required a weakening of the controlling hand at Rome to set the

passions aflame again. Right through Philo's treatise "On the

Confusion of Tongues," we can trace the tension. As soon as Gaius,

surnamed Caligula, came to the imperial chair, the opportunity of the

anti-Semites returned. Gaius, after reigning well a few months, fell

ill, was seized with madness, and proved how much evil can be done in

a short space by an imbecile autocrat. Flaccus, the governor of Egypt,

who had hitherto ruled fairly, hoping to ingratiate himself by

misrule, allowed himself to be led by worthless minions, who, from

motives of private greed, desired a riot at Alexandria; he was won

over by the anti-Semites and gave the mob a free hand in their attacks

upon the "alien Jews."[76] The arrival of Agrippa, the grandson of

Herod, who was on his way to his kingdom of Palestine, which the

capricious emperor had just conferred upon him, excited the ill-will

of the Alexandrian mob. Flaccus looked on while the people attacked

the Jewish quarters, sacked the houses, and assailed everyone that

came within their reach. The most distinguished Jews were not spared,

and thirty members of the Council of Elders were dragged to the

marketplace and scourged. Philo's account gives a picture strikingly

similar to that of a modern pogrom. The brutal indifference of Flaccus

did not indeed avail to ingratiate him with the emperor, and he was

recalled to Italy, exiled, and afterwards executed.

The recall of Flaccus did not, however, put an end to the troubles;

the mob had got out of hand, the anti-Semitic demagogues were elated,

and a fresh opportunity for outrage soon presented itself. The mad

emperor, having exhausted ordinary human follies, went on to imagine

himself first a god and then the Supreme God, and finally ordered his

image to be set up in every temple throughout his dominion. The Jews

could not obey the order, and the mob rushed into fresh excesses upon

them, defiled the synagogues with images of the lunatic, and in the

great synagogue itself set up a bronze statue of him, inscribed with

the name of Jupiter. With bitterness Philo points out that it was easy

enough for the vile Egyptians, who worshipped reptiles and beasts, to

erect a statue of the emperor in their temples; for the Jews, with

their lofty idea of God, it was impossible. Against the attack upon

their liberty of conscience they appealed directly to Gaius. An

embassy was sent to lay their case before him, and Philo went to Italy

at the head of the embassy. "He who is learned, gentle, and modest,

and who is beloved of men, he shall be leader in the city." So said

one of the rabbis of old, and the maxim is especially appropriate to

Philo, who in name and deed was "beloved of men." Philo has left us a

very full account of his mission, so that this incident of his life is

a patch of bright light, which stands out almost glaringly from the

general shadow. The account is not merely, nor, indeed, entirely

history. Looking always for a sermon or a subject for a philosophical

lesson, Philo has tricked out the record of the facts with much

moralizing observation on the general lot of mankind, and elaborated

the part of Providence more in the spirit of religious romance than of

scientific history. Yet the main facts are clear. Philo prepared a

long philosophical "apologia" for the Jews and set out with five

colleagues for Italy. Nor were the enemies of the Jews remiss; and

Apion, the Alexandrian anti-Semite, was sent at the head of a hostile

deputation. The emperor, Gaius, was in one of his most flippant moods

and little inclined to listen to philosophical or literary

disquisitions. At first he received the Jewish deputation in a

friendly way, and led them to think that he was favorable; but when

they came to plead their cause, they had a rude awakening. Philo, who

was not likely to appreciate the bitter humor of the situation,

tells[77] with gravity that he expected that the emperor would hear

the two contending parties in all proper judicial form, but that in

fact he behaved like an insolent, overbearing tyrant. The audience--if

it can be so called--took place in the gardens of the palace, and the

emperor dragged the unfortunate deputation after him about the place,

while he gave orders to his gardeners, builders, and workmen. Whenever

they tried to put forward their arguments, he would rush ahead,

enjoying the fright and dismay of his helpless victims. At times he

would stop to make some ribald and jeering remark, as, "Why don't you

eat pork, you fools?" at which the Egyptians following loudly

applauded. Philo and his comrades, half-dead with agony, could only

pray; and in response to the prayer, says our moralizing chronicler,

the emperor's heart was turned to pity, so that he dismissed them

without giving any hostile answer. According to Josephus, he drove

them away in a passion, and Philo had to cheer his companions by

assuring them of the Divine aid.[78]

The affair was a pathetic farce, and the Jewish actors in it had a

sorry time. The people about the palace, taking their lead from the

emperor, treated them as clowns, and hissed and mocked them, and even

beat them. The scene is somewhat revolting when one conjures up the

picture of the aged Jewish philosopher being roughly handled by the

set of ruffians and impudent slaves who surrounded a Roman emperor.

Happily Gaius jeered once too often in his mad life. One Chaerea, a

Roman of position, nursed an insult of the emperor, and stabbed him

shortly after these events; and the world had the respite of a

tolerably sane emperor before the crowning horror of Nero was let

loose upon it.

The murder of the capricious tyrant released not only the Jews of

Alexandria, but also the Jews of Palestine, from the burden of fear

for their religion. The order had been given to set up a bronze statue

of the emperor in the temple; the Roman governor Petronius was averse

to obeying the edict, but the emperor insisted. King Agrippa, who had

been but lately advanced by him to the kingdom of Judæa, interceded

zealously on behalf of his people. Philo gives us an account of this

appeal by the Jewish king,[79] which recalls at every turn the scenes

of the book of Esther. We have again the fasting, the banquet, the

emperor's request, the appeal of the royal favorite for his people.

One higher critic, indeed, has been found to suggest that the Biblical

book really relates Agrippa's intercession at Rome disguised in the

setting of a Persian story. Agrippa secured for a short time the

rescission of the fateful decree, but the capricious madman soon

returned to his old frame of mind, and ordered his image to be set up

immediately. Had not his death intervened, there would certainly have

been rebellion in Palestine. As it was, the great revolt was postponed

for thirty years. For a little the Jews prevailed over their

adversaries; the anti-Semitic influences were put down in Judæa and

in Alexandria, and in both places "there was light and joy and

gladness for the Jews." Their political privileges were reaffirmed by

imperial decree, and Philo's brother Alexander, who had been

imprisoned, was restored to honor.[80] "It is fitting," ran the

rescript of Claudius, "to permit the Jews everywhere under our sway to

observe their ancient customs without hindrance. And I charge them to

use my indulgence with moderation, and not to show contempt for the

religious rites of other peoples."

The note of triumph rings through the political references to be found

in the last parts of Philo's allegorical commentary, and no doubt it

was accentuated in the lost book which he added as an epilogue, or

palinode, to his history of the embassy. God had again preserved his

people, and discomfited their foes; recently-discovered papyri have

revealed that the arch anti-Semites, Isidorus and Lampon, were tried

at Rome and executed. Claudius was well-disposed to the Jewish race,

and before the final storm there was a calm. Howbeit, after the death

of Agrippa, in 44 C.E., Judæa became a Roman province, and under the

rapacious governorship of Felix Florus and Cestius Gallus, the

hostility of the people to the Romans grew more and more bitter. But

in Alexandria there was tranquillity, or at least we know of no

disquieting events during the next decade.

"Old age," said Philo, "is an unruffled harbor,"[81] and the saying

refers possibly to his own experience. For he must have died full of

years and full of honors. Through his life he was the spiritual and

philosophical guide, and finally he had become the champion of his

people against their persecutors, giving dignity to their cause and

inspiring respect even in their enemies. He was happy in the time of

his death, for he did not live to see the destruction of the national

home of his people and of that temple which he had loved to

contemplate as the future centre of a universal religion. The

disintegration of his own community at Alexandria followed full soon

on the greater disaster; the temple of Onias was dismantled and

interdicted against Jewish worship by Vespasian in the year 73 C.E.,

and though, as has been noted, this was not in itself of great

importance, it is symbolic of the uprooting of national life in the

Diaspora as well as in Palestine itself. On the downfall of Jerusalem

in 70 C.E. many of the extreme anti-Roman party, known as the Zealots,

fled to Alexandria and stirred up rebellion and dissension. Nothing

but disaster could have attended the outbreak, but it is a sad

reflection that the governor who put it down and ruthlessly

exterminated the rebels was none other than Tiberius Alexander, the

nephew of Philo, who was in turn procurator of Judæa and Egypt. By

another irony of history he had in the previous year been largely

instrumental in securing for Vespasian, who was besieging Jerusalem,

the imperial throne of Rome.[82] With him ends our knowledge of

Philo's family, and it ends significantly with one who has ceased to

be a Jew. The ruin of the Jewish-Alexandrian community was completed

by a desperate revolt in the reign of Trajan, 114-117 C.E., after

which they were deprived of their chief political privileges; and

finally, after incessant conflicts with the Christians, they were

expelled from the city by the all-powerful Bishop Cyril (415 C.E.).

Philo himself passed out of Jewish tradition within a short time, to

become a Christian worthy. The destruction of the nation and the

gradual severance of the Christian heresy from the main community

compelled the abandonment of missionary activity and distrust of the

work of its exponents. The dangerous aspect of the Alexandrian

development was revealed. Its philosophical allegorizing might attract

the Gentile to the Jewish Scriptures, but it also led the Jew away

from his special conduct of life. The Alexandrian Church, which

claimed to continue the tradition of Philo, departed further and

further from the Jewish standpoint, and formulated a dogmatic creed

that was utterly opposed to Jewish monotheism. A philosophical Judaism

for the whole world was a splendid ideal, but unfortunately in Philo's

time it was incapable of accomplishment. The result of the attempt to

found it was the establishment of a religion in which, together with

the adoption of Hebraic teachings about God, certain ideas of

Alexandrian mysticism became stereotyped as dogmas, and Jewish law was

abrogated. When Babylon replaced Palestine as the centre of Jewish

intellect, the works of Philo, like the rest of the Hellenistic-Jewish

literature, written as they were in a strange tongue, fell into

disuse, and before long were entirely forgotten. The Christians, on

the other hand, found in Philo a notable evidence for many of their

beliefs and a philosophical testimony for the dogmas of their creed.

They claimed him as their own, and the Church Fathers, to bind him

more closely to their tradition, invented fables of his meeting with

Peter at Rome and Mark at Alexandria, They traced, in the treatise "On

the Contemplative Life," a record of early Christian monastic

communities, and on account of this book especially regarded Philo

almost with the reverence of an apostle. To the Christian theologians

of Alexandria we owe it that the interpretation of Judaism to the

Hellenic world in the light of Hellenic philosophy has been preserved.

Of the two Jewish philosophers who have made a great contribution to

the world's intellectual development, Spinoza was excommunicated in

his lifetime, and Philo suffered moral excommunication after his

death. The writings of both exercised their chief influence outside

the community; but the emancipated Jewry of our own day can in either

case recognize the worth of the thinker, and point with pride to the

saintliness of the man.

* * * * *

III

PHILO'S WORKS AND METHOD

The first thing that strikes a reader of Philo is the great volume of

his work: he is the first Jewish writer to produce a large and

systematic body of writings, the first to develop anything in the

nature of a complete Jewish philosophy. He had essentially the

literary gift, the capacity of giving lasting expression to his own

thought and the thought of his generation. Treating him merely as a

man of letters, he is one of the chief figures in Greek literature of

the first century. We have extant over forty books of his composition,

and nearly as many again have disappeared. His works are one and all

expositions of Judaism, but they fall into six distinct classes of

exegesis:

I. The allegorical commentary, or "Allegories of the Laws," which is a

series of philosophical treatises based upon continuous texts in

Genesis, from the first to the eighteenth chapter. Together with this,

the best authorities place the two remaining books on the "Dreams of

the Bible," which are a portion of a larger work, and deal

allegorically with the dreams of Jacob and Joseph.

II. The Midrashic commentary on the Five Books of Moses, for which we

have no single name, but which was clearly intended to be an ethical

and philosophical treatise upon the whole law.

III. A commentary in the form of "Questions and Answers to Genesis and

Exodus," which is incomplete now, and save for detached fragments

exists only in a Latin translation. In its original form it provided a

short running exegesis, verse by verse, to the whole of the first

three books of the Pentateuch, and was contained in twelve parts.

IV. A popular and missionizing presentation of the Jewish system in

the form of a "Life of Moses," and three appended tractates on the

virtues "Courage," "Humanity," and "Repentance." Scholars[83] are of

opinion that there are gaps in the extant "Life of Moses," but the

general plan of the work is clear. It is at once an abstract and an

interpretation of Jewish law for the Greek world, and also an ideal

biography of the Jewish lawgiver.

V. Philosophical monographs, not so intimately connected with the

Bible as the preceding works; but in the nature of rhetorical

exercises upon the stock subjects of the schools, which receive a

Jewish coloring by reason of Biblical illustrations.

VI. Historical and apologetic works that set out the case of the

contemporary Jews against their persecutors and traducers. Of these

writings the larger part has disappeared, and of a portion of those

which remain the genuineness has been doubted.

Lastly, there is a miscellaneous number of works ascribed to Philo,

which all good scholars[84] now admit to be spurious: "On the

Incorruptibility of the World," "On the Universe," "On Samson," and

"On Jonah," etc.

Philo-Judæus of Alexandria · 第 3 / 16 段