CHAPTER XI

_Period of Political Grandeur--Queen Christine_

Christine was six years old when she succeeded her father. Her armies

stood scattered through foreign lands, surrounded by enemies and

faithless allies. Her country was covered with glory, but in direst

distress. The most remarkable aspect of her father’s greatness now was

to become apparent. Gustavus Adolphus had left behind men whom he had

educated as statesmen, and generals capable of bringing his work to a

successful end. First among the former was the state chancellor, _Axel

Oxenstierna_, the friend and adviser of the hero king. He managed to

keep the Swedish allies together and to establish harmony and unity of

action between the Swedish commanders, supplying funds to carry on the

war and strengthening the government at home with his courage and his

wisdom. Oxenstierna was a statesman of considerable power before the

death of the king; after it he grows in grandeur to carry the burden

of unlimited responsibility placed on his shoulders. His coolness and

dignity were a source of constant irritation to Richelieu, who said

there was “something Gothic and a good deal of Finnish” about his

proceedings in diplomatic affairs, while Mazarin said that if all the

statesmen of his time were to be put aboard of one vessel, Oxenstierna

should be placed at the helm. The great chancellor always upheld the

dignity of his country. When French diplomatists forgot themselves thus

far as to use, in correspondence, their own language, instead of Latin,

the recognized language of diplomacy in that day, Axel Oxenstierna gave

instructions that they should be answered in Swedish.

After the death of Gustavus Adolphus, the war in Germany lost more

and more of its original aspect. The cause of Protestantism was

dropped out of sight for political interests. The battles of Sweden

were, to a great extent, and sometimes altogether, fought by foreign

troops; but Swedish were the generals and statesmen who led the

operations of the armies and the diplomatic deliberations. The success

of Sweden, at first, seemed to have passed away with her great hero

king. The imperialists won a great victory at Nœrdlingen in 1634.

The young archduke, Ferdinand, had succeeded Wallenstein as their

commander-general, the latter having been murdered at the request of

the emperor. Ferdinand marched on the town of Nœrdlingen with an army

of German and Spanish troops, the experienced Piccolomini being at

his side. Duke Bernhard, who with an army had been taking possession

of Franconia in his own personal interests, hastened to support

the town and was joined by Gustavus Horn, who, with another army,

had been stationed in Elsass. Count Horn gave the advice to await

reinforcements, but the excitable Duke Bernhard opened an attack on

the enemy, which necessitated an immediate battle. After eight hours

of hard fighting, the imperialists, who were 30,000 strong, entirely

routed the Swedish army of 18,000 men, not a single Swedish regiment

being among them. Horn was made a prisoner. Duke Bernhard, who soon

afterward with his troops entered French service, acknowledged his

fault, saying: “I was a fool, but Horn a wise man.” Sweden lost through

this terrible defeat an army and two able generals. The Swedish

conquests in South Germany were lost, and the German allies were

scattered, the elector of Saxony joining the cause of the emperor. The

armistice with Poland came to an end in 1635, and it was renewed for

twenty-six years, at the cost of the Prussian seaports, with their

lucrative revenues, which had paid for the expenses of the German war.

Oxenstierna returned to Sweden to gather means wherewith to continue

the war. The ordinary resources of Sweden were drained, and great

sacrifices were needed. The Riksdag declared itself willing to “risk

life, blood and means, until God grants a peace equal to the dignity of

Sweden.”

John Banér was the man who re-established the success of the Swedish

arms. He resembled Gustavus Adolphus in greatness of mind and ability

in war, paying back the execution of his father under Charles IX.,

by loyalty to the illustrious son of the latter. Banér was a typical

soldier of the Thirty Years’ War, amiable, but licentious, and cruel

to his enemies. An able tactician and strategist of inexhaustible

resources, he had distinguished himself in the Polish war and later

held many important commands. The death of Gustavus Adolphus stirred

this strong man to the very depths of his soul. He left his army in

Bavaria and arrived at Wolgast, resolved to leave the army. At the

sight of the body of his beloved king, he was overcome by a paroxysm of

grief. Axel Oxenstierna persuaded him to resume his command in order to

bring the work of their dead master to completion. He marched with his

army through Silesia to Bohemia, encamping before Prague. After the

battle of Nœrdlingen he retreated to Saxony, whose deceitful elector

he reproached with harsh words. Intrigues by the latter to bring the

German troops in Swedish service to mutiny were frustrated by Banér,

who had only 2,000 Swedes and Livonians with him. The Saxon army

followed Banér into Mecklenburg, but suffered a defeat at Dœmitz. Banér

marched eastward and joined the Swedish force, which met him, from

Prussia, commanded by Lennart Torstensson. The elector of Brandenburg

also declared war on Sweden, Banér answering by invading his country.

From the vicinity of Berlin, Banér continued his way through Saxony

back to Mecklenburg, his German troops marauding with such cruelty that

they were sharply remonstrated with by Banér, who said he found it

strange that God did not instantly punish them.

Banér was followed by the united armies of Austria and Saxony, but,

having received reinforcements of Swedish troops, he turned on his

tracks and met the enemy at Wittstock, in Brandenburg, September 24,

1636. The Swedish army consisted of 20,000 men, while the opposing

force was much larger and occupied a favorable position on a hill.

Banér won a glorious victory, thanks to a skilfully executed manœuvre.

It grew dark, and the right wing of the Swedes was leading an almost

forlorn hope against the overwhelming forces, when their left wing,

after a difficult roundabout move, attacked the enemy from behind. Of

the hostile armies every man was killed except a detachment less than

1,000 strong. The baggage, artillery and banners were taken, even the

table silver of the elector and the imperial generals falling into the

hands of the Swedes, who by this victory had regained their supremacy

on German soil.

Banér had commenced the siege of Leipsic, when, upon news of an

approaching army of the imperial allies, he was forced to undertake the

famous “Retreat from Torgau,” which made him more celebrated than any

of his great battles. He with his army was near being surrounded at

the river Oder, but saved himself through a series of movements of the

highest strategic skill. Cardinal Richelieu wrote that “this retreat,

by means of which Banér saved 14,000 men, less a few fugitives and

wounded, with cannon and baggage, against an army 60,000 strong, is to

be compared to the most glorious deeds in history.” The enemy prided

itself on having “caught Banér in a bag.” “Yes,” said Banér later,

“surely they had me there, but they forgot to tie the string around.”

In Pomerania, Banér received the reinforcements from Sweden which

he had awaited, and once more invaded Saxony, where he won a grand

victory at Chemnitz, in 1639. The Swedish army invaded Bohemia, cruelly

devastating the country. Banér made a daring attack upon Regensburg

in order to make the emperor and the whole German diet his prisoners.

Sudden thaws frustrated the plans, making it impossible for the Swedes

to cross the Danube. A superior force was sent to meet Banér, who saved

his army by another famous retreat back to Saxony. On the way Banér

was attacked by a fever and died at Halberstadt, in 1641. When the

imperialists learned of the death of the Swedish Leonidas, they thought

they could easily defeat his army. The Swedes saw the approaching enemy

and collected around the coffin of their dead hero, offering solemn

pledges to fight for the glory of his name. They then made a sudden

attack upon the imperial army, which suffered a thorough defeat at

Wolfenbuttel. John Banér, triumphant in death like his great master,

was buried in the Swedish Pantheon of the Riddarholm.

Banér had expressed the wish that Lennart Torstensson should succeed

him as commander-general of the Swedish armies. Lennart Torstensson was

a greater warrior even than John Banér; no Swedish general, Gustavus

Adolphus not excepted, ever reaching higher skill or perfection in the

science of war than this crippled hero. Torstensson was of a noble

although not influential family. He entered the service of Gustavus

Adolphus as a body page to the king, later distinguishing himself as an

artillery commander. Torstensson took an honorable part in the battle

of Breitenfeld, but made a prisoner at Nuremberg, he lost his health,

during one year’s captivity, in a miserable dungeon. During his later

brilliant career he suffered greatly from rheumatism, and was mostly

carried around in a litter throughout the battles which covered his

name with undying fame. He was a pious man of a gentle and cheerful

disposition, who tried his utmost to reintroduce among his troops the

excellent moral behavior and severe discipline which had been lost

after the death of Gustavus Adolphus.

Torstensson with rigor suppressed the intrigues against Sweden which

were secretly carried on within the army. Brandenburg received a new

elector in Frederic William, who, ambitious and far-seeing, entered an

alliance with the victorious power of the North. Torstensson now was

enabled to invade the imperial crown lands, commencing with Silesia;

but finding it necessary to force a battle he met the imperialists

at Breitenfeld. October 23, 1642, the second great victory of

Breitenfeld was won by Swedish arms. Archduke Leopold and Piccolomini

led the imperial army, the latter general fighting as a common

soldier to inspire courage by his example, but with no effect. The

Swedes captured the baggage, cannon and banners of the enemy, taking

5,000 prisoners and leaving as many dead imperialists on the field.

Torstensson conquered Leipsic on the following day.

Torstensson marched through Bohemia and Moravia with the rapidity which

characterized all his military movements, and penetrated to the very

gates of Vienna, the emperor with difficulty saving himself from being

made his prisoner. But suddenly he left and marched through Silesia

to North Germany. He had received an order from the state council to

attack Denmark. The great chancellor was out of patience with the

perfidy and intrigues of Christian IV., who stood in secret connection

with every one of Sweden’s enemies. No previous declaration of war was

made. Torstensson captured the Danish duchies of Schleswig and Holstein

before any one could prevent it, his army then taking possession of all

Jutland. Gustavus Horn invaded Scania, almost completely capturing the

whole province in spite of bands of freebooters among the peasants,

called _Snaphaner_.

Denmark was in danger of its very existence, but King Christian IV.

did not forget his old wish to destroy the town of Gothenburg, whose

growing prosperity caused him envy. He approached Gothenburg with

a fleet, and viewed the town from the overlooking mountain of the

Ramberg. His demands for a surrender were refused. Patriotic Louis de

Geer had ordered from Holland a fleet at his own expense, which was

to go to the support of Gothenburg. It did not arrive in time, but

King Christian left to meet it, and it later proved of great value in

the Swedish movements at sea, joining the Swedish fleet in the Sound.

The latter, consisting of twenty-two ships under the command of Clas

Fleming, sailed to the Danish waters, capturing the island of Femern,

supported by Torstensson. An invasion of the island of Funen was

planned, but could not be effected. A great naval battle between the

Swedish and Danish fleets was fought July 6th. It caused great loss on

either side, without being decisive. King Christian, who commanded his

naval forces, lost one eye and received over twenty different wounds.

The Swedes kept the place of battle, but sought the Bay of Skiel for

repairs, where they were hedged in by the Danish fleet. Clas Fleming

encouraged his followers to cut through the line, in which they were

successful. A month later he was killed by a shot from the coast of

Holstein, where the Danes had erected a fort. The Swedes avenged the

death of their valiant commander by destroying the fort and killing

its defenders. Fleming was succeeded by Charles Gustavus Wrangel, who

saved the fleet to Sweden, returning to Femern in the autumn, joined

by the Dutch fleet of Louis de Geer. The Danish fleet was met with

October 13th, and at once scattered. The swift-sailing Dutch ships went

in pursuit and destroyed all the seventeen Danish ships but two, which

brought the news of the disaster to Copenhagen.

King Christian, who had in vain expected support from the emperor,

found himself defeated on every point, and had no other choice than

to make peace. The treaty was signed August 13, 1645, at Brœmsebro,

Denmark ceding the provinces of Jemtland and Herjedal and the islands

of Gothland and Œsel. The province of Halland was to remain for thirty

years in the possession of Sweden, which country was exempt from duties

of toll for the traffic in the Sound. Denmark disavowed all claims of

supremacy over Holstein, the duke of said country two years later

formally placing himself under Swedish protection.

Lennart Torstensson had fulfilled his task in Denmark and returned

to Germany. At Jueterbogk, in Brandenburg, he met the imperial army,

which had been sent to cut off his retreat from Denmark, and entirely

routed it. After this victory Torstensson hastened to Bohemia, resolved

to “attack the emperor in his heart and force him to make peace.” At

Jankowitz, in Bohemia, Torstensson administered a new and crushing

defeat to the imperialists, in 1645. The emperor, who himself had

ordered his army to battle, had arrived in Prague to witness the defeat

of the Swedes, which the Holy Virgin had promised him in a dream. He

soon learned the news, which was quite different from that expected.

The imperial commander-general, five generals and eight colonels were

made prisoners by the Swedes, who captured the artillery and baggage of

the enemy. The health of Torstensson was at that moment so good that he

was able to lead the movements on horseback. He said that such a bloody

battle would not be seen for a long time.

Torstensson invaded Moravia, the fortresses surrendering and the

inhabitants fleeing in terror. For a second time he stood at the walls

of Vienna. The very fortifications which protected the bridge across

the Danube were captured by the Swedes. The enemy, whom the elector

of Saxony had promised to chase out of Germany, was now knocking at

the gate of the emperor, who heard the report with consternation. But

Lennart Torstensson was forced to surrender to a perfidious enemy, who

came to his door without knocking. His rheumatic ailment returned with

such violence that he was obliged to renounce his command and return

from the fields where he had led none but victorious armies. He was

succeeded by Charles Gustavus Wrangel. The latter had to give up the

siege of Vienna, but maintained, in connection with the French, the

supremacy in Germany until an honorable peace was won. Upon his return

to Sweden, Lennart Torstensson was covered with distinctions, being

made a baron and a count on one and the same day. He was appointed

governor-general of West Gothland, Vermland, and the lately conquered

Halland, with his seat at Gothenburg, where he built himself a palace

(still the official residence of the governor of Gothenburg and

Bohuslæn). Lennart Torstensson died in 1651, leaving behind the fame of

one of the greatest warriors known to history, and a spotless memory.

The treaty of peace of Westphalia was signed in October, 1648. The

representatives of Sweden were John Oxenstierna, a son of the great

chancellor, and Adler Salvius. Sweden received, as a reward for her

decisive and glorious part in the Thirty Years’ War, the following

possessions: West Pomerania, with the islands of Rugen and Usedom;

the western part of East Pomerania, with the island of Wollin; the

town of Wismar, with surrounding territory, and the bishoprics of

Bremen and Verden. With these German possessions followed three votes

at the German Diet. The Swedish government was to receive a sum of

several millions to defray the army expenses, of which Queen Christine

recklessly ceded the larger part.

Through these glorious conditions of peace Sweden rose to the rank

of one of the mightiest of European empires, which held the balance

of power in Northern Europe. Her possessions made the Baltic almost

an “inland lake of Sweden,” and efforts soon followed to make it

completely so. Sweden exerted a beneficent influence throughout her

large possessions, which, from a cultural point of view, hardly can

be overestimated. Her methods of planting the seeds of culture, by

establishing Swedish and German universities, and by abolishing serfdom

in the conquered lands, are worthy of the highest respect. But with

her new political grandeur Sweden acquired formidable enemies; she had

not the resources to sustain or defend her great possessions, and the

development of the mother country was for a time misdirected by dreams

of vain glory.

The government of Sweden during Christine’s minority, according to the

directions left by her father, consisted of the five highest officials

of the realm. Among these the chancellor, through his experience and

his former intimacy with Gustavus Adolphus, was the leading spirit,

king in all except the name, and deserving the honorable surname of

“our greatest civilian,” given him by Swedish historians. Unlike the

majority of other uncrowned or crowned rulers, he did not use his power

to secure wealth or distinction for himself and his family until upon

his retirement. Offers to make him a ruling prince of Germany, and the

young queen his son’s consort, were coldly refused. While the war was

going on he strengthened the foundations of the centralization of the

state by the government regulations of 1634. At the side of the supreme

court of Stockholm another was established at Jœnkœping, for Gothaland,

with a state councillor as president. The system of various government

departments was enlarged upon.[2] The most important of these was the

chancery, in which all business to come before the government was

prepared. Departments for commerce and for mining were established.

Sweden was divided into eleven administrative districts, _læn_,

later increased to sixteen, each of these having a governor. Finland

was divided into five districts. Count Peter Brahe the Younger, as

governor-general of Finland, did more for this neglected country than

was ever done before to right wrongs and foster prosperity. Livonia and

Ingermanland received each their governor-general, the latter province,

by repeated wars brought into a devastated condition, serving as a

place of deportation. This system of administration won the admiration

of the Continent and was in many instances copied as a pattern of

perfection. The Swedish army was considered the finest in the world,

and troops better trained or more victorious did not exist. At the end

of the Thirty Years’ War about 100,000 men were under Swedish command.

The majority of these were foreigners, who afterward were enlisted

for continual service. Their officers were raised in great numbers to

the rank of nobles and endowed with dignities and estates. The army

was divided into twenty regiments, seven of which were Finnish. The

town and coast population regularly furnished able men for the navy.

Much was done to improve the interior communications by means of new

roads and canals. A postal route was established between Stockholm and

Gothenburg, and others followed. A Swedish postmaster in Hamburg had

charge of the foreign mails. Newspapers were published, the government

shaping for itself an organ for official announcement which is yet

published.

Great improvements were made in the mining industry, thanks principally

to the efforts of the noble immigrant, Louis de Geer and his Walloons,

who made the mines of Dannemora a source of riches. Weapons and cannon

were manufactured not only for the army, but for exportation also. The

brass foundries were excellent. The towns began to flourish, especially

Stockholm and Gothenburg, through commerce with Holland and the Baltic

States. A Swedish colony, planned by Gustavus Adolphus through the

South Company, created by him in Gothenburg, was founded in North

America. In 1638 two ships, “Kalmar Nyckel” and “Fogel Grip,” arrived

at the mouth of the Delaware River, where territory was procured

through honest purchase from the Indians. The Dutch in neighboring

colonies tried to persuade the Indians to oust the newcomers, but the

Swedish governor, Peter Menuet, won their goodwill by fair dealing. The

members of the colony of New Sweden were honest, upright people, who

dwelt in peace with the natives. They accepted a governor appointed

by the government, in the person of John Printz, but refused to

tolerate among themselves criminals who later were despatched to their

colony, and these had to be taken back. New Sweden after a few decades

became the prey of the Dutch, but many American families point with

justifiable pride to their descent from these honest and industrious

Swedish settlers. A Swedish colony on the coast of African Guinea

existed between 1650 and 1663, but was through treacherous dealings

turned over to the Dutch.

Much was done to build up the educational system, several new

colleges were established, and regulations made to instruct the

peasants. Peter Brahe founded the University of Abo, in 1640, while

in Finland, and the German University of Greifswald, in Swedish

Pomerania, was re-established. Swedish men of learning began to

attract attention, such as John Skytte, who was considered the most

brilliant Latin scholar of Europe in his day, Stiernhœk, the jurist,

Bureus and Messenius, the historians, and Georg Stiernhielm, poet and

antiquarian. The old Icelandic literature was discovered and began to

exert a strong influence on literature and science, to a great extent

strengthening their chauvinistic spirit. The Swedish poets Stiernhielm,

Runius, Holmstrœm, Lucidor and the poetess Brenner, from the Eddic

songs, which contain some of the oldest humorous poems in existence,

learned how to write in a humorous vein, something entirely unknown in

the German and French literatures of that day.

The excellent government, of which Axel Oxenstierna was the leading

spirit, had its defects. In its perfect system of administration, which

in the main features stands unshaken to this day, there appeared to be

no room for the people themselves to be governed. On account of the

great allowances made to the nobles it was necessary to increase the

taxes of the peasants. Many had to leave their homes and farms for

want of resources to pay their taxes; others were forced away from

their property by the nobles. There was danger of the destruction of

the free, self-dependent yeomanry. A hatred against the nobility grew

up. The great lords returned from the wars laden with booty, erected

fine castles, and continued the high living to which they had become

accustomed while abroad. The power of the nobility was increased by

lavish donations from Queen Christine and by the appropriation of

other crown lands which the government was forced to sell or mortgage

on account of the wars. The clergy were the spokesmen of the peasant

class at the Riksdag, every year demanding with greater emphasis a

restitution to the crown of its property, which was held by the nobles.

Queen Christine herself took the reins of government, in 1644, at the

age of eighteen. She had inherited from her illustrious father some

of his genius, and from her mother, Marie Eleonore of Brandenburg, a

peculiar nervous disposition. Her mother took no interest in her until

the death of Gustavus Adolphus, when a flood of exalted tenderness

suddenly was let loose over her. Count Jacob de la Gardie took the

lead in opposing the undesirable and unstable character of this

relation, Christine being separated from her mother and educated by

the Countess-Palatine Catherine, a pious and noble woman, the older

sister of Gustavus Adolphus. Greatly offended, Marie Eleonore left the

country never to return. Queen Christine showed a remarkable faculty

of absorbing knowledge. Well versed in a great number of languages,

and well read in various sciences, particularly mathematics, she soon

acquired fame as the most learned woman of her time. She was of frank

countenance, slept little, cared little for dress, and was passionately

fond of hunting and riding on horseback. Queen Christine possessed

a sharp intellect, was daring and resolute, but headstrong, fickle,

extravagant, and but little particular in her choice of favorites. Her

vanity and egotism knew no bounds. At the beginning of her reign she

took pains to give serious attention to the affairs of state. The great

chancellor had been her instructor in economics and statecraft, but

she repaid him by open coldness and secret antagonism. Her ambition to

surround herself with scientists of note, particularly foreigners who

flattered her vanity by blowing her fame to the four corners of the

earth, killed her interest for politics. Later she was seized by the

evil spirit of frivolity, abandoning herself to empty pleasures and to

excesses of extravagance when her learned admirers were forgotten for

unworthy favorites. Among the latter, Count Magnus Gabriel de la Gardie

was for a long time all-powerful. The grandson of General Pontus and

a daughter of John III., he was the son of Count Jacob de la Gardie

and Ebba Brahe, and one of the most brilliant noblemen of Europe. In

his youth he formed an intimate friendship with the dauphin of France,

later Louis XIV., who throughout his life honored him with the title

of “Mon Cousin,” or “Mon cher Cousin.” His ambition to become Queen

Christine’s consort was never satisfied, nor was he allowed to accept

the rank of a prince from the German emperor, but the queen made him

the richest man in her realm. Magnus de la Gardie did not possess the

sterling qualities of his ancestors, but was of great patriotism and

lavishly liberal toward educational institutions, in this respect

without a peer in Swedish history. In 1666 he founded the Academy of

Antiquities, which was the first archæological institution in Europe,

the Swedish antiquarians of the day, principal among them Bureus and

Stiernhielm, doing valuable antiquarian research. In 1664, Count de la

Gardie donated to the University Library of Upsala a highly valuable

collection of manuscripts and books, chiefly from Iceland. In the

collection was also the Gothic Bible translation of Bishop Wulfila

in the only copy extant. Liberal with his silver, Count de la Gardie

gave to the precious book a silver binding, as he had in earlier years

presented to Queen Christine a silver throne (which is still in use).

This book has an interesting history of its own.

Codex Argenteus, the silver book, thus called on account of its

silver binding, contains fragments of the four Gospels in the Gothic

language. The translation was made from the Greek original by Bishop

Wulfila (b. 318-d. 388), the apostle of the Goths. The writing is done

in so-called encaustum (printing with heated stamps) of gold and

silver letters on vellum of scarlet color. This copy is considered to

have been made toward the end of the fifth or in the beginning of the

sixth century, when the East Goths still held sway in Italy. Its early

fortunes are unknown, but it is supposed that the book was found in

the possession of the Visigoths (or West Goths) when their empire was

seized by the Franks, and donated to the monastery of Verden by some

munificent Frankish chief. Here, in the Benedictine abbey of Verden,

on the river Ruhr, in Westphalia, the book was discovered at least as

early as 1554, when the scholars Cassander and Gualther of Cologne are

known to have had copies which can have been made from no other source.

After the outbreak of the Thirty Years’ War, the Codex was transmitted

to Prague for safety. In the year of 1648, Prague, or rather the older

portion of the town, was captured by the Swedish general, Count Hans

Christopher Kœnigsmark, who, among the vast treasures of the Bohemian

capital, found also the Codex Argenteus which he presented to Queen

Christine. All the books and manuscripts of the queen were in the care

of her librarian, Isaac Vossius, a learned but eccentric scholar of

Dutch parentage. Vossius was at first Queen Christine’s teacher of

Greek, not a very agreeable position, for the queen called him to the

castle at three o’clock in the morning for her first hour. In 1650 he

had to leave court and country on account of a quarrel with that light

of learning, Claude de Saumaise (Salmasius), another one of the foreign

scholars in favor with the queen. In 1653 he was called back, and again

took charge of the books of the queen, but soon returned to Holland.

Before his departure he gathered several costly books and manuscripts,

among which Codex Argenteus, with or without the queen’s private

permission, taking them with him. In 1670, Vossius came to England,

where he died, in 1688, as court chaplain at Windsor. King Charles II.

of England said of him: “Vossius believes in anything but the Bible.”

When in Holland, the Codex Argenteus passed out of the hands of Vossius

after his uncle Franziskus Junius had made a complete copy of it.

Junius, called the “grandfather of modern philology,” published the

first edition of Codex Argenteus at Dortrecht, in 1665, providing the

beautiful fac-simile with parallel Old English texts and a Gothic

glossary. In Holland the Codex changed hands repeatedly until found

in Brabant by Samuel Pufendorff, in 1661, who, in the following year,

bought it for Count de la Gardie, paying a sum of something like $1,200

for it.

Once more in Sweden the Codex Argenteus was made the subject of close

attention, a new edition of it being published, in 1671, by Georg

Stiernhielm, the innovator of Swedish language and literature.[3]

That Bishop Wulfila’s Bible should ultimately harbor in Sweden does

not seem out of place, for of all languages now spoken the Swedish

comes closest to the language of the Goths as crystallized during its

classical epoch. The interest taken by Swedish scholars in the book has

always been great and fruitful of results, in times when it was thought

to be written in the mother tongue of all the Teutonic languages, as

well as later, when Gothic was found to be, not the mother, but the

oldest sister in the family.

At the Riksdag of 1649 considerable dissatisfaction was directed

against the nobility and the extravagance of the queen in deeding over

to favorites all the possessions of the crown, in form of counties and

baronies. The nobility sided against the queen, desirous of reducing

her power. But Queen Christine received gracefully the complaints

made, and promised to institute a reduction of taxes and payments. In

the following year the commotion increased when the same taxes were

asked as in time of war. The queen continued her policy of earnestly

considering the requests of the lower Estates, thus gaining the

controlling power. The nobility, suffering strife between its various

classes, was forced to seek a shelter in the royal power it desired

to crush, and humiliated itself before the queen. Christine received

a joint appeal from the lower Estates for a restitution to the crown

of all property illegally turned over to the nobility, but she managed

to have the reform postponed upon promise of some minor privileges and

a reduction of taxes. She refused the appeals of the nobility to have

the clergymen and others punished who had used hard language against

the aristocrats. But the discontent was spreading and turned against

the queen personally. The ministers preached against the wrongs and

violence of the mighty ones; the nobles and the peasants threatened

each other. Peasants in Finland refused to work for aristocratic

masters, and a general rebellion seemed imminent. In the meantime

Queen Christine was crowned at Upsala amid great display and elaborate

festivities, the count-palatine Charles Gustavus, her cousin, being

installed as heir-apparent to the throne.

But Queen Christine was not able to still the storm around her. The

finances of the crown were utterly ruined by her extravagance, and

she dared not take by violence from the nobility what she had given

by grace. In 1651 she declared it to be her intention to leave the

government, but was persuaded to remain. Her cousin was placed in a

very difficult position, apparently taking no interest in what was

going on, but following everything with the keenest attention. The

son of John Casimir, count of Palatinate-Zweibrucken, and Princess

Catherine, he was born at Nykœping in Sweden, in 1622, and designated

as the future consort of Queen Christine. Charles Gustavus was

educated in simplicity and rigor, and was, as his father before him,

utterly neglected by Axel Oxenstierna and the government. He slept in

a room without wallpaper, and when through with his lessons he sawed

wood with his teacher, Professor Lenæus. Burning with ambition, and

perhaps also in love with his brilliant cousin, he proposed to her

repeatedly, but in vain. After several years of extensive travel he

joined Lennart Torstensson, refusing a command and working himself up

through the military degrees. He took an honorable part in the victory

at Jankowitz, and was appointed supreme commander of the Swedish armies

shortly before the close of the German war. When the opposition against

Christine reached its climax a good deal was expected from Charles

Gustavus, which he, on account of his singular position, could not

undertake to do. A petition replete with abusive language about the

queen was sent him, asking him to take hold of the government. Charles

turned the document over to the queen. Its author, the promising young

Arnold Messenius, and his father, an able historian, suspected as

having inspired his son, were accused of high treason, condemned to

death and executed.

This act of force produced an impression, and the new taxes demanded

at the next Riksdag were granted without opposition. But the queen

felt that the discontent was only subdued, not suppressed, and, having

no further means to keep up a luxurious court, she did the wisest act

of her reign, that of resigning, at Upsala, in June, 1654, Charles

Gustavus being crowned the same day. The scene of her abdication was

very impressive, Queen Christine carrying herself with noble and lofty

dignity, an inheritance from her father which she made use of when she

saw fit. Leaving the crown and the royal emblems, one by one, to the

Riksdrotset, she descended the throne, from the lowest steps of which

she spoke an eloquent and touching farewell to the four Estates of the

Riksdag. She suddenly left the country after having secured for herself

a princely income. At Innsbruck, the daughter of Gustavus Adolphus

joined the Catholic church, thereby, and by her fame as a learned

woman, creating a sensation. She died in Rome in 1689, after having

made two unsuccessful attempts to regain her Swedish throne, and one

equally unsuccessful to succeed the last king of the Polish line of the

Vasa dynasty, and was buried in the church of St. Peter.

Among the many learned men who at one time surrounded Christine were

Vossius, Heinsius, Salmasius, Huet, Freinshemius, Loccenius, Meibom,

Bœclerus, Ravius, Schefferus, and others. The greatest of them all, the

philosopher Cartesius (René Descartes), died in Stockholm, in 1650.

After the love-story of Gustavus Adolphus had come to an end, he long

felt a disinclination to marry. His sister Catherine is said to have

tried to rouse him to the necessity of choosing a consort. His answer

was always: “Never mind, dear sister, you shall yourself bring up a

son to inherit the crown and continue my work.” This son of Catherine

became Queen Christine’s successor.

Sweden(#44624) · 第 11 / 18 章