Before his eyes there is a being called Serge Petrovich for whom all

that makes existence happy or bitter, deep and human, remains a

closed book. Neither religion nor morality, neither science nor art,

exists for him. Instead of a real and ardent faith, he feels in

himself a motley array of feelings. His habitual veneration of

religious rites mingles with mean superstitions. He is not

courageous enough to deny God, not strong enough to believe in Him.

He does not love his fellow-men, and cannot feel the intense

happiness of devoting himself to his fellow-creatures and even dying

for them. But neither does he experience that hate for others which

gives a man a terrible joy in his struggle with his fellow-men. Not

being capable of elevating himself high enough or falling low enough

to reign over the lives of men, he lives or rather vegetates with a

keen feeling of his mediocrity, which makes him despair. And the

pitiless words of Zarathustra ring in his ears: "If your life is not

successful, if a venomous worm is gnawing at your heart, know that

death will succeed." And Serge Petrovich, desperate, commits

suicide.

The hero of "At the Window" is quite different. This man has

succeeded in building for himself a sort of fortress, "in which he

retires, sheltered from life." Like Serge Petrovich, although not as

often, he is tormented by restless thoughts, and, from time to time,

he is obliged to defend his "fortress." But usually he is contented

with watching life, that is to say, that part which he can see from

his window. Nothing troubles the tranquillity of his mind, not even

the desire to live like other men. One day, he speaks of his

theories to a simple, uneducated young girl whom he thinks of

marrying. She is astonished and stupefied by them. She perceives

that he leads an insipid and morose life. Andrey Nikolayevich does

not take into account or understand the stupefaction of the young

girl.

"This then is your life?" she asks, incredulously.

"This is it. What more could you want?"

"But it must be terribly monotonous to live in that way, apart from

the world."

"What good does one find in mankind? Nothing but tedium. When I am

alone, I am my own master, but among men you never know what

attitude to take to please them. They drag you into drunkenness,

into gambling; then they denounce you to your superiors. I, however,

love calmness and frankness. Some of them accept bribes and allow

themselves to become corrupt; I do not like that.... I adore

tranquillity."

Moreover, he does not marry the young girl. He gives her up because

he is afraid of the incumbrances that housekeeping will bring.

In "The Grand Slam" four provincial "intellectuals" are locked up in

the same fortress, and, by playing cards, they escape the terrible

problems of a life which is inimical to them. Their existence has

been passed among these cards, which, by a mysterious phenomenon,

have become real living creatures to them. One of the players has

dreamed all through his life of getting a grand slam, when, one

evening, he sees he has the necessary cards in his hand. He has but

to take one more card, the ace of spades, and his dream will be

realized. But at the very moment when he is stretching forth his

hand to take it, he falls down dead. His partners are terrified. One

of them, a timorous and exact old man, named Jacob Ivanovich, is

particularly struck. A thought comes to him; he quickly rises, after

making sure that it was the ace of spades that the dead man was

going to take, and cries:

"But he will never know that he was going to get the ace of spades

and a grand slam! Never.... Never...."

"Then it appeared to Jacob Ivanovich that, up to this moment, he had

never understood what death was. Now he understood, and what he saw

was senseless, horrible, and irreparable!... The dead man would

never know!"

The poignant irony of this story is not unusual with Andreyev.

It is again found in the short and symbolic story "The Laugh." A

student, profiting by the fact that it is carnival time, disguises

himself as a Chinaman and goes to the house of the girl he loves.

The mute, immobile, and stupidly calm mask, and the whole "get-up"

are so funny, that the unfortunate man rouses irresistible laughter

wherever he goes. The young girl cannot help herself, and, while

listening to his very touching and sincere declaration, which, at

any other time, would have brought tears to her eyes, she bursts out

laughing and cannot again become serious, although she realizes that

a living and unhappy being is hidden under this impassive and

foolish Chinaman's mask.

* * * * *

In "The Lie" we see a man who, by isolating himself from life, has

lost the feeling of reality, and all capacity of discerning the true

from the false. He suffers terribly from the feeling that something

unknown is happening around him. This man, who would be ready to

sacrifice everything, even his life, in order to know truth, guesses

the lie that comes between him and the person who is dearest to him.

He falls into a despair that soon turns to fury. In order to recover

his calm, he begs the girl he loves, whom he suspects of having

deceived him, to reveal the whole truth to him. But he cannot

believe her protestations of innocence. One word bursts from his

being, breaks forth from the depths of his soul: "Lies! Lies! Lies

everywhere!"

"In looking at her beautiful pure forehead," he writes, "I dreamed

that truth was there, on the other side of that thin barrier, and I

felt a senseless desire to break that barrier and at least to see

the truth. Lower down, beneath her white breast, I heard the beating

of her heart, and I had a mad desire to open her breast so that I

could read, at least once, what there was at the bottom of her

heart."

He ends by killing that which he loved, and thinks that he is

satisfied: he believes he has killed the lie.

In "The Thought" we see the gradual development of insanity during

the period when it is doubtful, when the will is almost entirely

annihilated and replaced by a fixed idea, and when conscience is not

entirely abolished. Dr. Kerzhenzev kills his friend, obeying a

mental suggestion, which now forbids him to do it, now urges him on.

Then, like the "half-insane" or those sick people who feign madness

in order more easily to attain their end, this man suggests to

himself that he is in reality insane. This idea gets a hold on him

after the murder and fills his soul with mortal terror, the exposure

of which forms the most supremely pathetic part of the whole story.

All this drama of a foundering intelligence, complicated by bizarre

contradictions, is developed with a penetrating power of analysis.

Andreyev tells us that on the day of judgment the alienists are

divided as to the insanity of Kerzhenzev. The story ends at this

place. But the principal interest of the story does not lie in this

or that solution of the problem, which is not mysterious, for the

doctor is doubtlessly abnormal, and it is only as to the degree of

insanity that there can be any question. The main interest lies in

another direction, in the subtle analysis of this special mental

condition, which is done with consummate art.

This story had the honor of occupying an entire meeting of the

psychiatrists attached to the Academy of Medicine of St. Petersburg.

According to the report of Dr. Ivanov, the assembly was almost

unanimous in declaring the murderer insane. Another psychiatrist,

who thought he saw proofs of an abnormal mentality in all the

stories of Andreyev, pronounced the same verdict against Dr.

Kerzhenzev, in a meeting of doctors.

* * * * *

"All of priest Vassily Fiveyisky's life was weighed down by a cruel

and enigmatic fatality,"--it is thus that the story, "The Life of a

Pope," opens. "As if struck by an unknown malediction, he had from

his youth been made to carry a heavy burden of sorrows, sickness and

misfortunes; he was solitary among men as a planet is among planets;

a peculiar and malevolent atmosphere surrounded him. Son of an

obscure, patient, and submissive village priest, he also was patient

and submissive, and he was a long time in recognizing the

particular rancour of destiny. He fell rapidly and arose slowly.

Twig by twig he restored his nest. Having become a priest, the

husband of a good woman, the father of a son and a daughter, he

thought that all was going well with him, that all was solidly

established, and that he would remain thus forever. And he blessed

God."

But fate was always on the watch for him. It had showed him

happiness only to take it away again. After seven years of

prosperity, his little son is drowned one summer's day in the river.

Death and nameless misfortunes again invade the home of Vassily. One

does not live there any more, one prowls around gropingly in a

mournful stupor. From morning till evening, his wife comes and goes,

silent and indifferent to everything, as if she were looking for

some one or something.

In losing his son, poor Vassily has also lost his wife, his helpmate

and friend, for the unfortunate woman takes to drink. The faith of

the priest holds in this terrible trial. But his misery increases

immeasurably. The vice of his wife, his own sick weakness, excite

the meanness of the people. Insults have to be borne in silence,

tears hidden. At home, the priest's wife has no rest. She has the

idea that she can have another son who will take the place of the

dead one and be a balm to her broken heart. In her alcoholic desire,

a prey to savage fury, she demands that her husband gratify her

desire.

"Give him to me, Vassily! Give him back to me, I tell you...."

At last her desire is realized: a son is born to her; but the child,

conceived in madness, is born half-witted. The mother takes to drink

again, and the despair of Vassily increases. One day the unfortunate

woman hangs herself. The pope comes in, however, in time to save

her; but now another noose has tightened itself about the priest's

heart. One question oppresses him:

"Why these sufferings? If God exists, and if God is love, how is

such misery possible?"

Vassily's faith trembles. He decides to leave his cassock, to fly,

to put his idiot son out to board and to start life over again. This

resolution relieves him. His wife breathes easier. It seems to him

that she also can begin a new life. But fate does not loosen its

reins.

One day, on coming back from the harvest, he finds his house burned.

His wife, in a drunken stupor, had probably set fire to it. She is

dying of her burns. Vassily can only sigh. This new misfortune does

not put an end to the priest, but rather inspires him. His old faith

comes back, he sees in this supreme test a predestination. He kneels

down and cries:

"I believe! I believe! I believe!"

From that time on he devotes himself entirely to prayer and

macerations. He lives in perpetual ecstasy. The people around him

understand nothing of this change and are astounded. Every one of

them is waiting for something unusual. And their waiting is not in

vain. One day, when he is delivering the funeral oration of a

workingman, who has been suddenly killed, Vassily abruptly

interrupts the ceremony, approaches the corpse, which has begun to

decay, and addresses it thus three times:

"I tell you: arise!"

But the dead man does not move. Then the priest looks at this inert

and deformed corpse. He notices the fetid odor that arises from it,

the odor of the slow but sure decomposition, and he has a sort of

sudden revelation. The scepticism which, for a long time, has been

brooding in his heart suddenly is transformed into absolute

negation, and addressing himself to Him in whom he had believed,

Vassily cries out:

"Thou wishest to deceive me? Then why did I believe? Why hast Thou

kept me in servitude, in captivity, all of my life? No free thought!

No feeling! No hope! All with Thee! All for Thee! Thee alone! Well,

appear! I am waiting! I am waiting!... Ah! Thou dost not want to?

Very well...."

He does not finish. In a burst of savage madness he rushes forth

from the now empty church. He rushes straight ahead and finally

falls in the middle of the road. Death has put an end to his

miseries.

"Silence" also shows us a priest, stubborn in his prejudices. This

man, Father Ignatius by name, is a sort of rude and authoritative

Hercules. All tremble before his stern air, except his daughter, who

has decided to continue her studies in St. Petersburg, against the

will of her father. Coming back to her home after a long absence,

she wanders about, sad and silent. For days at a time she wanders

about, pale and melancholy, speaking little, seeking solitude. She

hides what oppresses her; she keeps her secret from all. One night,

she throws herself under a train, taking her secret with her.

Her grief-stricken mother gets a paralytic stroke which transforms

her into a sort of living corpse. The father, crushed by these two

catastrophes, which have destroyed all the joy of his life, becomes

the prey of a singular mental state: his conscience revolts against

the severe maxims and the pitiless prejudices that he has always

defended. Tender love, which he has hitherto concealed under his

pride, now softens him; he needs affection, and a vague feeling

suggests to him that he himself is to blame for all of these

misfortunes. His past life, his daughter, and his wife appear to

him as so many enigmas which raise anguishing questions in his

heart. He calls out, but no one answers. A death-like silence has

invaded the presbytery, and this silence is especially dreadful near

the paralyzed wife, who is dying without speaking. Even her eyes do

not betray a single thought. Gradually, a terrible desire to know

why his daughter committed suicide seizes him. At twilight, softly,

in his bare feet, he goes up to the room of his dead daughter and

speaks to her. He entreats her to tell him the truth, to confess to

him why she was always so sad, why she has killed herself. Only the

silence answers him. Then he rushes to the cemetery, where his

daughter's tomb irresistibly attracts him; again he implores, begs,

threatens. For a moment he thinks that a vague answer arises from

the earth; he places his ear on the rough turf.

"Vera, tell me!" he repeats in a loud and steady voice.

"And now Father Ignatius feels with terror that something

sepulchrally cold is penetrating his ear and congealing his brain;

it is Vera, who is continually answering him with the same prolonged

silence. This silence becomes more and more sinister and restless,

and when Father Ignatius arises with an effort, his face is as livid

as death."

Crushed by the same blind destiny which annihilated the powerful

personality of Father Ignatius, the piteous and tearful hero of "The

Marseillaise" moves us even more than does the old priest. The poor

fellow cannot grasp the reason for the ferocity of stupid fate,

which unrelentingly preys upon him. Arrested by mistake as a

revolutionist and condemned to deportation, he becomes an object of

derision to his comrades. However, gradually, he finds the strength

to share the severe privations of his companions who have sacrificed

themselves to their ideal of justice and liberty. And, on his

death-bed, he is elated by all that he has endured; he dreams of

liberty, which, up to this time, had been indifferent to him, and

asks them to sing the Marseillaise over his grave.

"He died, and we sang the Marseillaise. Our young and powerful

voices thundered forth this majestic song of liberty, accompanied by

the noise of the ocean which carried on the crests of its waves

towards 'dear France,' pale terror and blood-red hope.

"It became our standard forever, the picture of this nonentity with

the hare's body and the man's heart.

"On your knees to the hero, friends and comrades!

"We sang. The guns, with their creaking locks, were pointed

menacingly at us; the steel points of the bayonets were pointed at

our hearts. The song resounded louder and louder, with increasing

joy. Held in the friendly hands of the 'strugglers,' the black

coffin slowly sank into the earth.

"We sang the Marseillaise!"

* * * * *

The two main characters of "The Gulf," a student and a school-girl,

are walking and discussing rather deep things, such as immortality

and the beauty of pure and noble love. They feel some sadness in

speaking about these things, but love appears more and more luminous

to them. It rises before their eyes, as large as the world, bursting

forth like the sun and marvelously beautiful, and they know that

there is nothing so powerful as love.

"You could die for the woman you loved?" asked Zinochka.

"Of course," replies Nemovetsky unhesitatingly, in a frank and

sincere voice, "and you?"

"I too!" She remains pensive a moment. "To die for the one you love,

that is a great happiness! Would that that were to be my destiny!"

Gradually night falls. Nemovetsky and his companion lose their way

in the woods; they finally arrive in a clearing, where three

filthy-looking men are seated about an empty bottle. These

intoxicated men, whose wicked eyes light up with a brutal envy of

enjoyment and love of destruction, try to quarrel with Nemovetsky,

and one of them ends by striking him full in the face with his fist.

Zinochka runs away. His heart full of terror, Nemovetsky can hear

the shrieks of his friend, whom the vagabonds have caught. Then a

feeling of emptiness comes over him, and he loses consciousness. Two

of the men throw him into a ravine.

An hour later, Nemovetsky regains consciousness; he gets up with

great pain, for he is badly wounded. He remembers what has happened.

Fright and despair seize him. He begins to run and call for help

with all his strength, at the same time looking among all the

bushes, when at his feet, he sees a dim, white form. It is his

companion, who lies there motionless. He falls down on his knees and

touches her. His hand encounters a nude body, damp and cold, but

still living. It seems to grow warm at his touch. He pictures to

himself with abominable clearness what the men have done. A feeling

of strange strength circulates in his members. On his knees in front

of the young girl, in the obscurity of the forest, he tries to bring

her back to life, calling her sweet names, caressing her hair,

rubbing her cold hands.

"With infinite precautions, but also with deep tenderness, he tries

to cover her with the shreds of her torn dress, and the double

sensation of the cloth and the nude body are as keen as a sword and

as inconceivable as madness. And now he cries for help, now he

presses the sweet and supple body to his breast. His unconscious

abandonment unchains the savageness of his passion. He whispers in a

low voice, 'I love you, I love you.' And throwing himself violently

upon her lips, he feels his teeth entering her flesh.

"Then, in the sadness and impetuousness of the kiss, the last bit of

his mind gives way. It seems to him that the lips of the young girl

tremble. For an instant, a terrible terror fills his soul and he

sees a horrible gulf yawning at his feet.... And he hurls himself

into the mad throes of his insane passion."

The account of the collegian, which forms the plot of the story "In

the Fog," is even more daring in its realism. It actually oppresses

the reader, not so much by certain details that provoke disgust, as

by the analysis of the sufferings of an unfortunate young man, whose

mind is pure, but who has let himself be dragged into excesses which

are followed by a sickness of ill name. Severely reprimanded by his

father, the poor young fellow, overcome with sorrow, the victim of

an instinct which he could not conquer, ends his days in a most

horrible way: one evening, he leaves home and goes out into the

streets in an adventuresome spirit. A half-intoxicated prostitute

touches him in passing; he follows her. As they go along, a

conversation starts up, and the young man, although she is repugnant

to him, goes home with her. Once in her room, a violent quarrel

starts up and he kills her, and then commits suicide.

These two stories, especially "The Gulf," caused many lively

discussions on the part of the public, and then in the newspapers.

Mr. Bourenine, the well-known critic of the "Novoye Vremya," says

that he received from several correspondents a series of letters

which blamed Andreyev vehemently and requested that this "skunk" of

literature be called to order according to his deserts. These

protestations were reenforced by an ardent letter from Countess

Tolstoy, the wife of the great author, who reproached Andreyev for

having so complacently painted such sombre pictures, with such low

and violent scenes, all of which tended to pervert youth. The

writers were not the only ones to take offence. Two important

Russian newspapers organized a sort of inquiry, and they published

many of the answers received from the young people of both sexes,

but these were all favorable to Andreyev.

In truth, all these judgments are too passionate. It is true that

"most of the critics have understood Andreyev only in a superficial

manner," as Tolstoy rightfully asserted. The double impression, for

instance, produced by "The Gulf," is the result of a simple

misunderstanding. Those who think that the adventure of young

Nemovetsky is a slice of life and characterizes certain

psychological states, have, without a doubt, the right to judge this

story as an indiscretion, and to reproach the author with a

deviation from morality; but Andreyev has not taken his hero from

reality; he has not tried to give us a picture of manners, but has

expressed an idea, born in his brain under the influence of the

philosophy of Nietzsche. It illustrates the terrible power and the

brutality of a dormant instinct lurking in the purest minds.

* * * * *

Besides, "The Gulf" and "In the Fog" are compositions which are

exceptional in the work of Andreyev. The idea that he mostly

presents is not the power of bestial instincts, but rather the

indestructible vitality of human feelings and aspirations towards a

better existence, which sometimes comes to light among the most

miserable and depraved people, and even among those who are in the

most abject material condition.

In the destiny of these beings, there are, however, rays of hope.

The slightest incident serves to transform them; suddenly their

hearts begin to beat happily, tears of tenderness moisten their

eyes, they vaguely feel the existence of something luminous and

good. A profound sensibility, an ardent love of life bursts forth

in their souls. This sensibility, this attachment to existence, form

the theme of four touching stories: "He Was," "Petka in the

Country," "The Cellar," and "The Angel."

The action of "He Was" takes place in a hospital, where a deacon, a

foolishly debonair man, who is attached to his stunted existence,

and a pessimistic merchant, thoroughly satiated, are at the point of

death. The deacon has an incurable sickness, and his days are

numbered. But he does not know it, and speaks with enthusiasm of the

pilgrimage he is going to make after he is cured, and of the

apple-tree in his garden, which he expects will bear a great deal of

fruit. The fourth Friday of Lent he is taken into the amphitheatre.

He comes back, very much moved and making the sign of the cross.

"Ah! my brothers," he says, "I am all upset. The doctor made me sit

down in a chair and said to the students: 'Here you see a sick man.'

Ah! how painful it was to hear him add: 'He was a deacon!'"

"The unfortunate man stopped, and continued in a choking voice: '"He

was a deacon," the doctor told them. He told them the story of my

whole life, he even spoke about my wife. It was terrible! One would

have said that I was dead already, and that he was talking over my

coffin.'

"And as the deacon is thus speaking, all of the others see clearly

that he is going to die. They see it as clearly as if death itself

was standing there, at the foot of the bed...."

The merchant is a very different sort of man: he does not believe in

God; he has had enough of life and is not afraid of death. All of

his strength he has spent unnecessarily, without any appreciable

result, without joy. When he was young he had stolen meat and fruit

from his master. Caught in the act, he had been beaten, and he

detested those who had struck him. Later on, having become rich, he

crushed the poor with his fortune and scorned those who, on falling

into his hands, answered his hate with scorn. Finally, old age and

sickness had come; people now began to steal from him, and he, in

turn, beat those whom he caught terribly. And thus his life had been

spent; it had been nothing but a series of transgressions and

hatreds, where the flames of desire, in dying out, had left nothing

but cold ashes in his soul. He refuses to believe that any one can

love this existence, and he disdainfully looks at the sallow face of

the deacon, and mutters: "Fool!" Then, he looks at the third man in

the room, a young student who is asleep. This student never fails to

embrace his fiancee, a pretty young girl, whenever she comes to see

him. As he looks the merchant, more bitterly than before, repeats:

"Fool!"

Contemporary Russian Novelists · 第 11 / 16 段