CHAP. XVII.

As he therefore thus prepared his disciples for erudition, he did not

immediately receive into the number of his associates those who came to

him for that purpose, till he had made trial of, and judiciously

examined them. Hence in the first place he inquired after what manner

they associated with their parents, and the rest of their relatives. In

the next place he surveyed their unseasonable laughter, their silence,

and their speaking when it was not proper; and farther still, what their

desires were, with whom they associated, how they conversed with them,

in what they especially employed their leisure time in the day, and what

were the subjects of their joy and grief. He likewise surveyed, their

form, their mode of walking, and the whole motion of their body.

Physiognomically also considering the natural indications of their

frame, he made them to be manifest signs of the unapparent manners of

the soul. When, therefore, he had thus made trial of some one, he

suffered him to be neglected for three years, in the mean time observing

how he was disposed with respect to stability, and a true love of

learning, and if he was sufficiently prepared with reference to glory,

so as to despise [popular] honor. After this, he ordered those who came

to him to observe a quinquennial silence, in order that he might

experimentally know how they were affected as to continence of speech,

the subjugation of the tongue being the most difficult of all victories;

as those have unfolded to us who instituted the mysteries. During this

[probationary] time, however, the property of each was disposed of in

common, and was committed to the care of those appointed for this

purpose, who were called politicians, economizers, and legislators. And

with respect to these probationers, those who appeared to be worthy to

participate of his dogmas, from the judgment he had formed of them from

their life and the modesty of their behaviour, after the quinquennial

silence, then became _Esoterics_, and both heard and saw Pythagoras

himself within the veil. For prior to this they participated of his

words through the hearing alone, beyond the veil, without at all seeing

him, giving for a long time a specimen of their peculiar manners. But if

they were rejected they received the double of the wealth which they

brought, and a tomb was raised to them as if they were dead by the

_homacoï_; for thus all the disciples of the man were called. And if

they happened to meet with them afterwards, they behaved to them as if

they were other persons, but said that they were dead, whom they had

modelled by education, in the expectation that they would become truly

good men by the disciplines they would learn. They also were of opinion

that those who were more slow in the acquisition of knowledge, were

badly organized, and, as I may say, imperfect and barren. If, however,

after Pythagoras had physiognomically considered their form, their mode

of walking, and every other motion, and the state of their body, and he

had conceived good hope respecting them; after likewise the quinquennial

silence, and the orgies and initiations from so many disciplines,

together with the ablutions of the soul, and so many and such great

purifications produced from such various theorems, through which the

sagacity and sanctity of the soul is perfectly ingenerated; if, after

all this, some one was found to be still sluggish and of a dull

intellect, they raised to such a one in the school a certain pillar and

monument, (as they are said to have done to Perialus the Thurian, and

Cylon the prince of the Sybarites, who were rejected by them) expelled

him from the _Homacoïon_ or auditory, loading him with a great quantity

of silver and gold. For these were deposited by them in common, and were

committed to the care of certain persons adapted to this purpose, and

who were called Economics, from the office which they bore. And if

afterwards they happened to meet with such a one, they conceived him to

be any other person, than him who according to them was dead. Hence also

Lysis, blaming a certain person named Hipparchus, because he had

communicated the doctrines of the Pythagoreans to the profane, and to

those who acceded to them without disciplines and theory, says as

follows:

“It is reported that you philosophize to every one you may happen to

meet, and publicly, which Pythagoras did not think fit to do. And these

things, indeed, O Hipparchus, you learnt with diligent assiduity, but

you have not preserved them; having tasted, O excellent man, of Sicilian

delicacies, which you ought not to have tasted a second time. If,

therefore, you abandon these, I shall rejoice; but if not, you will be

dead in my opinion. For it will be pious to call to mind the divine and

human precepts of Pythagoras, and not to make the goods of wisdom common

to those, who have not even in a dream their soul purified. For it is

not lawful to extend to every casual person, things which were obtained

with such great labors, and such diligent assiduity, nor to divulge the

mysteries of the Eleusinian Goddesses to the profane. For those who do

either of these, are equally unjust and impious. But it will be well to

consider what a great length of time we consumed in wiping away the

stains which had insinuated themselves into our breasts, till, after the

lapse of some years, we became fit recipients of the doctrines of

Pythagoras. For as dyers previously purify garments, and then fix in the

colors with which they wish them to be imbued, in order that the dye may

not be washed away, and may never become evanescent; after the same

manner also that divine man prepared the souls of those that were lovers

of philosophy, so that they might not deceive him in any of those

beautiful and good qualities which he hoped they would possess. For he

did not impart spurious doctrines, nor snares, in which most of the

sophists, who are at leisure for no good purpose, entangle young men;

but he possessed a scientific knowledge of things human and divine.

These men, however, making his doctrine a pretext, perform many dreadful

deeds, ensnaring youth not in a becoming nor yet in a casual way. Hence

they render their auditors noxious and precipitate. For they infuse

theorems and divine doctrines into confused and turbid manners. Just as

if some one should pour pure and clear water into a deep well full of

mud; for he would disturb the mud, and destroy the clear water. The same

thing likewise takes place between those who teach and those who are

taught after this manner. For dense thickets and which are full of

briars surround the intellect and heart of those who have not been

purely initiated in disciplines, obscure the mild, tranquil, and

reasoning power of the soul, and openly impede the intellective part

from becoming increased and elevated. It is requisite likewise to call

intemperance and avarice the mothers of these thickets; both which are

naturally prolific. From intemperance, therefore, unlawful marriages,

[unjust] desires, corruptions, intoxication, preternatural pleasures,

and certain vehement appetites blossom forth, and which impel their

possessors into profundities and precipices. For now desires have

compelled some not to abstain either from their mothers or their

daughters, and violating law, their country, city, and king, with their

hands as it were bound behind them, they are violently dragged along

like slaves to extreme destruction. But from avarice germinate rapine,

robbery, parricide, sacrilege, sorcery, and such other evils at are the

sisters of these. In the first place, therefore, it is necessary to

purify the woods in which these passions have fixed their abode, with

fire and sword, and all the machines of disciplines; and having

liberated the reasoning power from such mighty evils, we may then

implant in and deliver to it something useful and good.” So great and so

necessary was the attention which, according to Pythagoras, ought to be

paid to disciplines prior to philosophy. He likewise ordained that a

singular honor, and the most accurate investigation, should be given to

the teaching and participation of his dogmas, as he judiciously examined

the conceptions of those that came to him, by various documents, and ten

thousand forms of scientific theory.

Iamblichus' Life of Pythagoras, or Pythagoric Life Accompanied by Fragments of the Ethical Writings of certain Pythagoreans in the Doric dialect; and a collection of Pythagoric Sentences from Stobaeus and others, which are omitted by Gale in his Opuscula Mythologica, and have not been noticed by any editor · 第 21 / 67 题