Baron de Lahontan[12] asserts that the Algonkin is a mother

Early Western Travels

1748–1846

Volume II

Early Western Travels

1748–1846

A Series of Annotated Reprints of some of the best and rarest

contemporary Volumes of Travel, descriptive of the Aborigines and Social

and Economic Conditions in the Middle and Far West, during the Period of

Early American Settlement

Edited with Notes, Introductions, Index, etc., by

Reuben Gold Thwaites

Editor of “The Jesuit Relations and Allied Documents,” “Wisconsin

Historical Collections,” “Chronicles of Border Warfare,” “Hennepin’s New

Discovery,” etc.

Volume II

John Long’s Journal, 1768–1782

[Illustration: [Logo]]

Cleveland, Ohio

The Arthur H. Clark Company

1904

COPYRIGHT 1904, BY

THE ARTHUR H. CLARK COMPANY

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

=The Lakeside Press=

R. R. DONNELLEY & SONS COMPANY

CHICAGO

CONTENTS OF VOLUME II

PREFACE. _The Editor_ 9

VOYAGES AND TRAVELS OF AN INDIAN INTERPRETER AND TRADER, describing

the Manners and Customs of the North American Indians; with an

Account of the Posts situated on the River Saint Laurence, Lake

Ontario, &c. April 10, 1768–Spring, 1782. _John Long_

Author’s Dedication 22

List of Subscribers 23

Author’s Preface 27

Voyages and Travels 33

Vocabulary

English-Esquimeaux 223

English-Iroquois, Algonkin, Chippeway 224

English-Algonkin, Chippeway 238

English-Mohegan, Shawanee 250

English-Mohegan, Algonkin, Chippeway 252

English-Iroquois 254

English-French 257

English-Chippeway 259

Chippeway-English 289

Familiar Phrases: English-Chippeway 317

ILLUSTRATIONS TO VOLUME II

Facsimile (reduced) of original title-page 21

Map: “Sketch of the Western Countries of Canada, 1791.” _Facsimile

of original_ 32

PREFACE

The second volume of our series of Early Western Travels is devoted to

the reprint of John Long’s _Voyages and Travels of an Indian Interpreter

and Trader_, originally published in London in 1791.

Concerning Long, but little is known further than what he himself

relates in his book. Coming from England to North America in 1768, he

passed nearly twenty years upon this continent, chiefly consorting with

the Indians—learning their languages, wearing their garb, living their

life. An expert woodsman, fur-trader, and explorer, he penetrated into

regions north and west of Canada, that are still practically unexplored.

At first an articled clerk in Canada, he later was apprenticed to a

Montreal fur merchant. Having displayed an adaptability for Indian

philology, Long was sent to the neighboring mission colony at

Caughnawaga, where he remained seven years, becoming an adept in the

arts and occupations of savage life. His term of service having expired,

the excitements of army life attracted him. The American Revolution had

just broken out, and volunteering for service with the British he was

detailed to lead Indian parties to hang upon the flanks of the invading

American army—one of these expeditions captured the famous Ethan Allen.

After a year and a half of this service, in which—dressed as an Indian,

and scalping his prisoners in their fashion—he could scarcely be

distinguished from a brave, Governor Guy Carleton appointed Long a

midshipman in the navy. But when his vessel sailed for England, he left

the sea in order to enter upon the more lucrative business of

fur-trading.

In May, 1777, Long left Montreal for Mackinac, engaged as a bourgeois to

lead a party of voyageurs into the far Northwest, and trade with the

Indians on their own hunting grounds. The independent Canadian merchants

of this period were endeavoring to maintain the old French connections

with the Indians of the “upper country,” and at the same time to

undermine the trade of the Hudson’s Bay Company, by intercepting the

natives before they reached the posts of the latter. Long was assigned

to the Nipigon district north and northeast of Lake Superior—a region

early occupied by the French, and the scene of their hardy and audacious

enterprises against the Hudson Bay trade.

Cameron[1] defines the limits of this region as follows: “Bounded on the

south by Lake Superior, on the southwest and west, by the northwest road

from Lake Superior to the lower end of Lake Ouinipique (Winnipeg); on

the northwest and north by Hayes river and part of Hudson Bay; and on

the northeast by Hudson Bay. Its greatest length from Pierre Rouge (Red

Rock), at the entrance of Nipigon River, to the Lake of the Islands, on

the Hayes river, is about three hundred and fifty leagues and its

greatest breadth, from Trout Lake to Eagle Lake, is about one hundred

and eighty leagues, but in most parts not over eighty leagues. The

two-thirds at least of this country are nothing but rivers and lakes,

some fifty leagues long; properly speaking, the whole country is nothing

but water and islands.” Into this watery wilderness Long and his

voyageurs pushed their way, literally subsisting on the country. The

bourgeois’s chief qualification for the enterprise was his familiarity

with the Indian life and language, and the fact that he had undergone

the ceremony of adoption by one of the most noted chiefs of the Chippewa

nation.

During the French régime, this country was noted for producing the

largest number and best quality of furs in the Northwest;[2] but after

the English occupation the district had been nearly abandoned, the

difficulties of existence proving too great. Four out of eight traders

starved to death in the region in one year, and it was avoided in favor

of the better-provisioned Western districts. Cameron says that in 1785

the whole district produced but fifty-six packs of furs. We may judge

from this of Long’s success as a trader; in the first year, he not only

subsisted himself and a party of eight Canadians, during the “hardest

winter ever remembered,” but rescued a brother trader from destruction

by a murderous band of Indians, and brought out a cargo of a hundred and

forty packs of furs all in good condition, valued between $25,000 and

$30,000. For these services he received from his chiefs the salary of

$750 a year, and a supply of Indian corn and “hard grease,” or tallow,

as provision.[3]

At the end of his first year’s engagement, Long returned only to Pays

Plat, a trading station on Lake Superior. Being there relieved of his

furs, and supplied with fresh provisions, he set out August 15, 1778,

for another winter in the “inlands,” whither, after many hardships and

experiences with murderous Indians, he returned to Mackinac, and spent

the following winter with the Chippewas near that fort.

In June, 1780, he joined a party of Canadians and Indians who were sent

from Mackinac to Prairie du Chien to secure the deposits of furs at the

latter place, and prevent them from falling into the hands of the

emissaries of George Rogers Clark from the Illinois, and the Spaniards

from St. Louis. After a march through Wisconsin, this undertaking was

successfully accomplished—the furs that could not be saved being burned

to keep them from the enemy.[4]

The following autumn, Long returned to Quebec never again to come to the

“upper country.” He made one more successful trading expedition to

unknown lands, by way of the Saguenay River and Lake St. John,

penetrating the country east of Hudson Bay, and bringing back a rich

cargo—in the very year that the Hudson’s Bay Company was pillaged by the

French expedition of La Pérouse.

Long returned for a year to England, his mother-land being entirely

strange to him after fifteen years’ absence. He was, therefore, glad to

fit out a cargo for another venture in the Indian trade of Canada. But

his good fortune seems now to have deserted him—debt, lack of

employment, and other difficulties drove him from one place to another.

In the spring of 1785 he was in New York, where he pushed the claim of a

Huron Indian through Congress. A fur-trading expedition among the

Iroquois failed, and the British commandant at Oswego confiscated his

goods. Taking refuge among his Loyalist friends near Kingston, he

received a grant of land for his services, but debt drove him from that;

and after securing some assistance from the authorities, he returned to

England in the fall of 1788,[5] there to write and publish the volume of

his adventures.

He appears to have secured some patronage for this work, as is evidenced

by the list of subscribers, and the dedication to Sir Joseph Banks. He

also consulted the best available authorities on Indian traditions and

Canadian history, and seems to have taken pains to verify his own

experiences and observations, without slavishly following his

authorities.[6] In his defense of the Hudson’s Bay Company, there is to

be noted either a desire to secure its favor for future services, or

pique in relation to the new North West Company, under some one of whose

partners he had undoubtedly served. The book, which was published in

1791, attained considerable popularity. It was favorably reviewed in the

_Monthly Review_ (June, 1792), and translated into both French and

German. The French translation, made by J. B. L. J. Billecocq, with

notes by the translator (but without the vocabularies, a fact deplored

by French philologists),[7] appeared in 1794, and again in 1810. Two

German translations were made, the first by B. Gottlob Hoffmann, issued

in 1791; the second by G. Forster, published in Berlin the following

year.

The interest of the work, aside from incidental historical references to

expeditions in Canada and Wisconsin during the Revolution, the Loyalist

settlements, and the retention of the Northern posts, lies in the

author’s intimate knowledge of Indian life and customs, especially those

of the more primitive and savage tribes of the North; and in the light

he incidentally throws on the history of the fur-trade.[8]

It is anything but an engaging picture which Long paints of his Indian

friends and companions—they are in the stage of downright savagery,

debauched by contact with the dregs of civilization, learning its vices,

appropriating its weapons, and dominating the whites by sheer force of

numbers, and knowledge of the weakness and greed of the latter. A

pleasant contrast is his account of the Canadian mission Indians; but

even these proved their savagery during the American Revolution. Of

their aboriginal customs, Long’s notices of totemism, religious rites

and beliefs, courtship and marriage, social customs—games, dances, food,

dwellings—habits of hunting, and physical and mental characteristics,

are valuable because original and the result of immediate observation.

Scarcely less dark is the picture presented by Long, of the fur-trade

and the traders. This was the period of unlicensed and almost ruinous

competition between the great company at the North, and the independent

merchants from Canada—the latter acting each for himself, with slight

regard for the interest of the trade, the Indians, or the lesser

employees.

The fur-trade under the French régime had been under strict

surveillance. All traders were required to purchase a government

license, and the products of their traffic were closely inspected. By

the close of the French rule, even the lawless _coureurs de

bois_—trading through the forest at will, and carrying their peltries to

the English at Albany and Hudson Bay—had been quite largely suppressed,

and brought into the service of the licensed traders.

After the conquest of New France, a period of cutthroat competition

began. The English traders did not at first dare venture into the

wilderness peopled with Indians faithful to the French; those who did,

nearly paid the penalty with their lives (as witness Alexander Henry, at

Mackinac). But after Pontiac’s War, and the gradual subsidence of Indian

hostility, British traders from Montreal and Quebec began reaching out

for this lucrative traffic, and a class of enterprising _entrepreneurs_

was developed, recruited chiefly from the ranks of Scotchmen. By them

the fur-trade was pushed to its highest development, and the rivers,

lakes, and fastnesses of the great Northwest discovered and explored in

rapid succession. This work was done by such men as the Henrys, Ponds,

Frobishers, Finlays, Camerons, McDonalds—and, greatest of all, Sir

Alexander Mackenzie.

By 1780, they began to unite their fortunes, and a sixteen-share stock

corporation was formed of the principal traders.[9] A conspiracy of the

Indians in the same year, to massacre all the whites and pillage the

posts, was discovered and averted; but by the following season a still

more terrible scourge had begun. Smallpox appeared among the tribes in

the Northwest, and spread so rapidly that hunting was but languidly

carried on, and profits fell to the zero mark. To avert the chaos into

which the trade seemed falling, the North West Company was established

in 1783, for a term of five years. In 1787 its organization was

perfected, and the corporate period of the Canadian fur-trade began;

competitors were gradually bought out—union with the X Y Company

occurring in 1805, and with the Hudson’s Bay Company in 1821.

Long’s narrative, therefore, portrays conditions during the period of

the free trader, responsible to no authority, exploiting the country and

the natives for the largest immediate returns, without reference to the

preservation of the hunting grounds or the protection of the hunters.

The frightful debauchery of the Indians by means of traders’ rum, and

the necessity for the use of laudanum to control their drunken excesses,

are shown in full by Long in his simple narrative of events. The

dangers, also, to which this system exposed the trader, are only too

evident from his relation of the case of Mr. Shaw. As for the

competition with the Hudson’s Bay Company, it is plain from Long’s

narrative that the Canadian traders were encroaching on the hunting

grounds of this great monopoly. The case of M. Jacques Santeron shows

the possibility of dishonest men passing from one employ to the other.

As for the rest of the picture, Long presents the usual traits of the

trader and interpreter—a certain rude honesty, taking the form of

loyalty to his employer, a disregard of dangers, and small concern for

hardships. His knowledge of wilderness life was intimate, but to this

fact he alludes only in an incidental way. In acquaintance with Indian

character, and power of influencing them in a crisis, he seems to have

been superior to the ordinary trader. His vices were those of his

class—slight regard for laws, either moral or military (witness the

incident at Fort Mackinac), improvidence and wastefulness, restlessness,

and dissatisfaction with the routine life of towns. His literary style,

while discursive, is simple, and as clear as running water. What he

wishes to say, he says plainly, leaving the reader as a rule to draw his

own conclusions. There is an unvarnished, unflinching directness in his

statements, conveying to the reader the impression that he is concealing

nothing, doing nought for effect, but telling a straightforward story of

travels and adventures. The book forms a contribution of note to this

important class of literature, and will always be readable.

In the preparation of the notes, the Editor has had, as in the first

volume of the series, the assistance of Dr. Louise Phelps Kellogg, of

the Wisconsin Historical Library. He has also had helpful suggestions

from Dr. James Bain, Jr., of the Toronto Public Library.

R. G. T.

MADISON, WIS., February, 1904.

LONG’S VOYAGES AND TRAVELS—1768–1782

Reprint of the original edition: London, 1791

[Illustration:

_VOYAGES AND TRAVELS_

OF AN

INDIAN INTERPRETER AND TRADER,

DESCRIBING

_The Manners and Customs_

OF THE

NORTH AMERICAN INDIANS;

WITH

_AN ACCOUNT OF THE POSTS_

SITUATED ON

THE RIVER SAINT LAURENCE, LAKE ONTARIO, &c.

TO WHICH IS ADDED,

A VOCABULARY

OF

The Chippeway Language.

_Names of Furs and Skins, in English and French._

A LIST OF WORDS

IN THE

IROQUOIS, MOHEGAN, SHAWANEE, AND ESQUIMEAUX TONGUES,

AND A TABLE, SHEWING

_The Analogy between the Algonkin and Chippeway Languages_.

BY J. LONG.

LONDON:

PRINTED FOR THE AUTHOR; AND SOLD BY ROBSON, BOND-STREET; DEBRETT,

PICCADILLY; T. AND J. EGERTON, CHARING-CROSS; WHITE AND SON,

FLEET-STREET; SEWELL, CORNHILL; EDWARDS, PALL-MALL; AND MESSRS.

TAYLORS, HOLBORN, LONDON; FLETCHER, OXFORD; AND BULL, BATH.

M,DCC,XCI.

]

TO SIR JOSEPH BANKS, BAR^T. PRESIDENT OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY,[10] &c. &c.

&c.

SIR,

I feel the highest satisfaction in being permitted to dedicate this work

to one whose pursuits have ever been more peculiarly directed to objects

of originality, and whose scientific researches have contributed so

largely to the information and benefit of society.

The public are too well acquainted with your general knowledge in every

branch of literature, to suspect that I hold the language of adulation.

Should I attempt to do justice to a character so eminently

distinguished, my feeble efforts could only be regarded as the grateful

effusions of a mind proud of a patronage that can ensure an especial

share of public notice and protection.

I have the honour to be, very respectfully,

SIR,

Your most obedient servant,

J. LONG.

_London,

February, 1791._

LIST OF SUBSCRIBERS

Addis, Mr. George.

Annereau, Mr.

Banks, Sir Joseph, Bart.

Beaufoy, Henry, Esq. M. P.

Berens, Hermanus, Esq.

Berens, Joseph, Esq.

Boddam, Thomas, Esq.

Bettesworth, Thomas, Esq.

Baker, John, Esq.

Baker, William, Esq.

Baker, Miss.

Batson, Robert, Esq.

Baynes, Burdon, Esq.

Blache, J. F. Esq.

Belfour, John, Esq.

Belfour, Mr. Okey. 3 copies.

Belfour, Mr. J. D.

Bird, William, Esq.

Bird, Thomas, Esq.

Bird, Michael, Esq.

Barbe, St. Samuel, Esq.

Barbe, St. John, Esq.

Bingley, ——, jun. Esq.

Bates, Mr. John.

Birkley, Mr. John.

Bowden, John, Esq.

Brandon, Mr.

Bull, Mr. J. Bath.

Beilby, Mr. 6 copies.

Croft, the Rev. Herbert.

Cornthwaite, the Rev. Mr.

Chalmers, George, Esq.

Culverden, William, Esq.

Corsellis, Nicholas Cæsar, Esq.

Coussmaker, John, Esq.

Croix, N. D. St., Esq.

Cleaver, Miss.

Cotton, Thomas, Esq.

Cotton, Bayes, Esq.

Chandler, George, Esq.

Coningham, William, Esq.

Cope, Thomas, Esq.

Cleugh, John, Esq.

Clay, Felix, Esq.

Clay, James, Esq.

Clay, William, Esq.

{iv} Clay, George, Esq.

Cooper, Mr.

Cooper, Mr. James.

Corbet, ——, Esq. 2 copies.

Dawson, William, Esq.

Dalrymple, Alexander, Esq.

Dicken, John, Esq.

Earle, James, Esq.

Emes, William, Esq.

Edwards, Charles, Esq.

Etches, R. C., Esq.

Eldridge, Thomas, Esq.

Fraser, Major.

Finch, Thomas, Esq.

Forbes, Thomas, Esq.

Fayle, Benjamin, Esq.

Faden, Mr. William. 6 copies.

Fawler, Mrs.

Forsteen, ——, Esq.

Finch, Mr. John.

Fletcher, Mr. James, Oxford.

Grote, George, Esq.

Gould, Thomas, Esq.

George, C. G., Esq.

Goldthwaite, Thomas, Esq.

George, Mr. Edward.

Graft, Mr. James.

Hollingsworth, John, Esq.

Hulse, Richard, Esq.

Hulse, Edward, Esq.

Howison, John, Esq. Lisbon.

Hayward, Francis, Esq. 2 copies.

Holden, Joseph, Esq.

Haffey, John, Esq.

Hill, Edward, Esq.

Hussey, William Wheatley, Esq.

Harper, Mrs.

Hillier, Mr.

Hale, Mr. Harry. 2 copies.

Hill, Mr. John.

Jones, Edward, Esq.

Jeudwine, Thomas, Esq.

Justice, Mr. Richard.

Jacks, Mr.

Knill, John, Esq.

Kensington, Charles, Esq.

Long, Sir James Tylney, Bart. M.P. 7 copies.

{v} Lake, Sir J. Winter, Bart. 4 cop.

Langmore, William, Esq.

Legg, Leaver, Esq.

Long, Mrs.

Locke, Miss.

Locke, John, Esq.

Lion, Thomas, Esq.

Lane, Benjamin, Esq.

Lang, Charles, Esq.

Lightfoot, John, Esq.

Lonsdale, Mr.

Mulgrave, the Right Hon. Lord.

Monsel, Lieutenant Colonel.

Marsden, William, Esq.

Morris, John, Esq.

Martin, Captain.

Man, Henry, Esq. 6 copies.

Mukins, Francis, Esq.

Malleson, John, Esq.

Murray, Mr. J. 2 copies.

Nesbitt, Lieutenant Colonel.

Nesbitt, Arnold, Esq.

Nasmyth, Maxwell, Esq.

Neave, Richard, Esq.

Prescott, George William, Esq.

Pott, Rev. J. H. Archdeacon of St. Albans.

Pott, Percival, Esq.

Pott, E. H. Esq.

Pott, Mrs.

Powell, Baden, Esq.

Powell, James, Esq.

Powell, Thomas, Esq.

Peck, Jasper, Esq.

Pooley, John, Esq.

Perry, John, Esq.

Palmer, Peregrine, Esq.

Pickwoad, Robert, Esq.

Pickering, Thomas, Esq.

Popplewell, Mr.

Roberts, John, Esq.

Rennell, Major.

Robertson, Captain.

Ruspini, J. B., Esq.

Rouse, Benjamin, Esq.

Ross, G. W., Esq. 2 copies.

Rutter, Miss.

Row, William, Esq.

Regail, Alexander, Esq.

Reading Society, Hackney.

Scott, Thomas, Esq. M. P.

{vi} Sneyd, Samuel, Esq.

Symons, the Rev. Mr.

Sheldon, John, Esq. Professor of Anatomy in the Royal Academy of Arts,

London, and F. R. S.

Shamier, ——, Esq.

Stoe, Harry, Esq.

Sedgwick, Harry, Esq.

Stone, John Hurford, Esq.

Surman, William, Esq.

Smith, Haskett, Esq.

Scafe, Mr. Richard.

Scargill, Mr. James.

Stable, Mr. William.

Smith, Mr. Thomas.

Smith, Mr. J. Thomas.

Turner, Miss.

Turner, Miss Jane.

Tanner, N. Esq.

Toulmin, William, Esq.

Taylors, Messrs. 6 copies.

Vaston, Mrs.

Vandriel, Mr. J. C.

Wegg, Samuel, Esq.

Winter, John, Esq.

Walker, John, Esq.

Wilson, Stephen, Esq.

Wilson, William, Esq.

Wilcox, William, Esq.

Wilcox, Edward, Esq.

Wilcox, Mrs. Anne.

Wickham, Lieut.

Woolhead, Major, Esq.

Wright, Mr. Thomas.

Watson, Mr. William.

White, Messrs. and Son. 6 copies.

Young, Mrs.

PREFACE

The reader will naturally expect some account of this work.

With regard to the historical part, I have endeavoured to explain the

situation of the Posts, which, by Mr. Oswald’s Treaty, were stipulated

to be surrendered to the Americans; and pointed out their convenience to

Great Britain in a political and commercial point of view:[11] I have

also given a description of the Five and Six Nation Indians; and

endeavoured to shew the usefulness, as well as necessity, of a strict

alliance with them as long as we retain any possessions in Canada.

With respect to the descriptions of lakes, rivers, &c. which lie beyond

Lake Superior, from Lake Nipegon to Lake Arbitibis, I have given them as

accurately as possible, either from my own knowledge, or the most

authentic Indian accounts; and when it is considered that interpreters

in the commercial line seldom have occasion for any geographical

knowledge, the want of better information will be excused.

The Vocabulary which is subjoined, and on which I have bestowed some

pains, it is hoped will not only afford information to such as may be

desirous of attaining a knowledge of the Chippeway language, but prove

useful to those who are already engaged in traffic with the Indians.

{viii} As the mode of spelling a language which has never been reduced

to a grammatical system, must be arbitrary, and principally depend on

the ear, I have endeavoured to use such letters as best agree with the

English pronunciation; avoiding a multiplicity of consonants, which only

perplex: and to enable the reader to speak so as to be understood by the

natives, it is necessary to observe that _a_ is generally sounded broad;

and _e_ final never pronounced but in monosyllables.

The following are the motives which induced me to make the Vocabulary in

the Chippeway language so copious.

In the first place it is, strictly speaking, one of the mother tongues

of North America, and universally spoken in council by the chiefs who

reside about the great lakes, to the westward of the banks of the

Mississippi, as far south as the Ohio, and as far north as Hudson’s Bay;

notwithstanding many of the tribes, within the space of territory I have

described, speak in common a different language.—This observation is

confirmed by authors of established repute, and further proved by the

concurrent testimony of the Indian interpreters.

Baron de Lahontan[12] asserts that the Algonkin is a mother tongue, and

that it is in as much estimation in North America, as Greek and Latin in

Europe: this being admitted, I am persuaded the Chippeway language

possesses as much, if not greater merit, as it is in every respect

better understood by the northwest Indians. But as the knowledge of both

{ix} may not only be useful, but necessary, I have given a comparative

table of about two hundred and sixty words in both tongues, that the

reader may use either as he shall find it best understood by the tribes

with whom he may have occasion to trade; though he will find, in a

variety of instances, a perfect accordance.

The table of words in the Muhhekaneew, or Mohegan, and Shawanee tongues,

are extracted from the Rev. Mr. Edwards’s publication, and are inserted

to shew their analogy with the Chippeway language;[13] and, as he

observes that the language of the Delawares in Pennsylvania, of the

Penobscots on the borders of Nova Scotia, of the Indians of St. Francis,

in Canada, of the Shawanees on the Ohio, and many other tribes of

Savages radically agree, I judged the tables of analogy would not be

unacceptable.

In the course of the historical part, several speeches in the Chippeway

language are introduced: and at the end of the Vocabulary, a number of

familiar phrases, which not only serve to shew the mode of speech, but

give a better idea of the language than single words.

The numeral _payshik_, or one, is frequently used to express the

articles _a_ and _the_; and _woke_ is the general word for the plural

number, though not always used.

Mr. Carver’s Vocabulary will, in many instances, be found to differ from

the Chippeway;[14] but when it is considered that though he calls it the

Chippeway Vocabulary, in p. 414 of his work, he says “The Chippeway, or

Algonkin,” which {x} evidently proves that he believes them the same

language:—but with regard to the usefulness of the tongue, there is a

perfect corroboration of sentiment; for he remarks that the Chippeway

tongue appears to be the most prevailing of all the Indian languages.

It may not be amiss to observe, that the Chippeway tongue, as spoken by

the servants of the Hudson’s Bay Company, is somewhat different, though

not essentially so, and is called by them the _Home-Guard_ Language.

With regard to the Iroquois, or Mohawk tongue, which is peculiar to the

Five and Six Nation Indians, it is not necessary in the fur-trade beyond

Michillimakinac; and if it were, there are not wanting printed

authorities sufficient to instruct:—this consideration has induced me to

give only the numerals, and a few words in the language.

I have not any thing further to add, but a sincere wish that my labours

may prove useful to the world; and that whatever defects may be found in

the following work, the Public will look on them with candour; and will

recollect that they are perusing, not the pages of a professed

_Tourist_, but such observations as a commercial man flatters himself

may be found acceptable to the merchant and the philosopher.

[Illustration: _SKETCH of the_ WESTERN COUNTRIES of CANADA 1791]

VOYAGES AND TRAVELS

Having engaged myself, at an early period of life, to go to North

America, in the quality of an articled clerk, I left Gravesend on the

10th of April, 1768, on board the “Canada,” captain Smith, bound to

Quebec and Montreal. We had a pleasant voyage, till we reached the coast

of America, when the weather proving unfavourable, we were obliged to

put into Newfoundland, where we stayed fourteen days. Nothing remarkable

occurred here, except that a party went on shore to hunt, and one of

them, Mr. Jordan, who was a passenger, bound to Montreal, finding

himself much fatigued, remained in the woods; the rest returned on board

in the evening, anxiously expecting their companion; but after four days

painful solicitude, not being able to obtain any intelligence of him, we

gave up all hopes of seeing him again; and as the snow was deep on the

ground, and the wild animals numerous, we supposed him to be either

frozen to death, or devoured by the beasts. Just as the captain proposed

setting sail, an Indian came on board, to whom we endeavoured to

communicate our distress. On this occasion, he seemed to understand us,

and made signs of his intention to go in search of him; and being

furnished with some rum by way of encouragement, he got into his canoe

and paddled {2} ashore. The captain, with great humanity, deferred

prosecuting the voyage for some time: but the Indian not returning, we

left Newfoundland, and after a tedious passage of near eleven weeks,

arrived at Quebec, the capital of Canada.

When the Spaniards (who first discovered this northern clime) sailed

past Cape Rosiers at the entrance of the River St. Laurence, the

mountains, now called the Mountains of Nôtre Dame, were covered with

snow. Such a prospect, in the summer season, gave them a very

unfavourable opinion of the country, and they were deterred from going

up the river, supposing the land to be too barren to recompence their

labours at present, or afford any future advantages; and the same

impressions induced them to call it Capo di Nada, or Cape Nothing, by

which name it is described in their charts, and from whence, by

corruption of language, it has derived its present name of Canada.[15]

The River St. Laurence takes its rise from Lake Nipissin, northeast of

Lake Superior, about the distance of 2000 miles from Quebec.[16] The

breadth of it is 90 miles at the entrance, and it is navigable near 500

miles from the sea.

The Isle of Orleans, which is but a small distance from the city, is a

beautiful spot of ground, about 20 miles in length, and six in breadth.

The fertility of the soil makes it a useful and valuable garden,

insomuch that it supplies the capital with vegetables and grain in great

abundance. The opposite village of Beauport also charms the eye, and

very much heightens the scene, which is rich, romantic, and magnificent.

{3} The Fall of Montmorenci particularly attracted my notice, as it is

perhaps the most pleasing natural cascade in the world; and though its

height and width are not to be compared in point of awful grandeur with

the stupendous cataract of Niagara, it is sufficiently wonderful to shew

the power of the great Architect of the Universe; and its effects are

more pleasing than the latter; for while it produces wonder and pleasure

in the highest degree, it does not strike the beholder with such

tremendous ideas.

As our ship was bound to Montreal, as well as Quebec, and I was under

the captain’s care and direction, he did not allow me to go on shore at

the latter place; but in a few days, to my great joy, we arrived safe at

Montreal, the place of our last destination.

Montreal, formerly called Ville Marie, has nothing remarkable in it at

present; it was formerly famous for a great fair, which lasted near

three months, and was resorted to by the Indians, who came from the

distance of many hundreds of miles, to barter their peltry for English

goods. It will give pleasure to the reader to be informed, that we

received here the agreeable intelligence that Mr. Jordan was found in

the woods, two days after our departure from Newfoundland, though with

the loss of his feet, occasioned by the severity of the weather: he went

afterwards in a vessel to Trois Riviéres, where he settled in an iron

foundry.

Trois Riviéres,[17] is so called from the junction of three currents

which empty themselves into the River St. Laurence. About a league from

the town there is an iron foundry, which was erected by private {4}

persons in the year 1737, and afterwards ceded to the King. At first

cannon and mortars were cast there, but it is now principally used in

the manufacture of stoves and kettles. The ore is taken at a small

distance from the works. A river runs down from the foundry into the

River St. Laurence, which enables the proprietors to send their

manufactures round the country in boats upon very moderate terms.

This town, which is half way between Quebec and Montreal, had formerly a

very considerable trade in peltry, and was the second mart in Canada;

but in process of time the inhabitants of Montreal contrived to draw

almost all the fur-trade to themselves; and though the residents in

Trois Riviéres live by their commerce with the savages, and the

manufacturing of birch canoes, yet the town has lost that rank and

consequence which it formerly maintained; nevertheless, the advantage of

the iron foundry makes them some amends, and they live, upon the whole,

as happy as any people in Canada. The inhabitants of Trois Riviéres were

formerly very much incommoded with fleas, which swarmed in great

quantities, and which, Baron de Lahontan humorously observes, occasioned

an inconvenient quickness in conversation.

On my arrival at Montreal, I was placed under the care of a very

respectable merchant to learn the Indian trade, which is the chief

support of the town. I soon acquired the names of every article of

commerce in the Iroquois and French languages, and being at once

prepossessed in favour of the savages, improved daily in their tongue,

to the satisfaction of my employer, who approving my assiduity, and

wishing me to be completely qualified in the Mohawk language to enable

me to traffic with the Indians in his absence, sent me to a village

called {5} Cahnuaga, or Cocknawaga, situated about nine miles from

Montreal, on the south side of the River St. Laurence,[18] where I lived

with a chief whose name was _Assenegethter_, until I was sufficiently

instructed in the language, and then returned to my master’s store, to

improve myself in French, which is not only universally spoken in

Canada, but is absolutely necessary in the commercial intercourse with

the natives, and without which it would be impossible to enjoy the

society of the most respectable families, who are in general ignorant of

the English language.

{6} _A Description of the Village and Inhabitants of_ CAHNUAGA, _or_

COCKNAWAGA, _who some years since separated from the_ MOHAWKS.

The Savages of this nation, who are called the praying Indians, from the

circumstance of their chiefs wearing crucifixes, and going through the

streets of Montreal with their beads, begging alms, separated long since

from the Mohawk and River Indians, and for a considerable time after

their separation, carried on an illicit trade between Albany and

Montreal. The village contains about two hundred houses, which, though

they are chiefly built of stone, have a mean and dirty appearance. The

inhabitants amount to about eight hundred, and (what is contrary to the

general observation on the population of the Indians) are continually

increasing. It is considered as the most respectable of all the Indian

villages, and the people are in a great degree civilized and

industrious. They sow corn, and do not depend like other nations solely

upon hunting for support; but at the same time, they are not fond of

laborious work, conceiving it only suited to those who are less free,

and retaining so much of their primeval valour and independence as to

annex the idea of slavery to every domestic employment. Their hunting

grounds are within the United States, at a considerable distance from

the village, round Fort George, Ticonderoga, and Crown Point, where they

kill beaver and deer, but not in such great abundance at present as they

did formerly, the country being better inhabited, and the wild animals,

from the present state of population, being obliged to seek a more

distant {7} and secure retreat. The skins they obtain are generally

brought down to Montreal, and either sold for money, or bartered for

goods. It is not improbable, that in a few years there will not be many

good hunters among them, as they are extravagantly fond of dress, and

that too of the most expensive kind. Their fondness for this luxury,

which the profits arising from the lands they let out to the Canadians

enables them to indulge, contributes to make them more idle; and in

proportion as their vanity increases, ease and indolence are the more

eagerly courted and gratified, insomuch that hunting is in danger of

being totally abandoned. Their religion is Catholic, and they have a

French priest, or, as the Chippeway Indians term it, “_The Master of

Life’s Man_,” who instructs them, and performs divine service in the

Iroquois tongue. Their devotion impressed my mind too powerfully to

suffer it to pass unnoticed, and induces me to observe that great praise

is due to their pastors, who by unwearied assiduity, and their own

exemplary lives and conversation, have converted a savage race of beings

from Heathenism to Christianity, and by uniformity of conduct, continue

to preserve both their religion and themselves in the esteem of their

converts: An example worthy of imitation, and amounting to an

incontrovertible proof that nature, in her most degenerate state, may be

reclaimed by those who are sincere in their endeavours, gentle in their

manners, and consistent in the general tenor of their behaviour. And it

is to be expected, and certainly most ardently to be wished, that the

savage temper among them may in time be more effectually subdued, their

natural impetuosity softened and restrained, and their minds weaned from

their unhappy attachment to the use of strong liquors; their indulgence

in which is frequently attended with the most melancholy and fatal

consequences.

{8} _Of the_ INDIANS _of the Five and Six Nations_.

I shall now give a particular account of the Indians of the Five and Six

Nations, and the reasons why they are so called, in order to enable the

reader to form an idea of their consequence in a political point of

view, as well as their importance on account of the fur-trade; because

the vicinity of the American territories from Georgia to New England,

gives the United States a great command and influence from their

situation, and renders them more to be dreaded than even the French were

in the zenith of their American power, when it was universally known

they had such an interest among the savages, as induced them to call the

French their fathers, and of which so much yet remains, as to prompt

them to retain a predilection in favour of the traders of the Gallic

race who are settled among them.

In 1603, when the French settled in Canada, part of the Five Nations

resided on the island of Montreal, and were at war with the

Adirondacks (who lived on the Uttawa, or grand river leading to

Michillimakinac);[19] these, considered the Five Nations as very

insignificant opponents, and incapable of serious revenge, and they

were held in as much derision as the Delawares, who were usually

called old women, or the Shawanees (who lived on the Wabach River),

who were obliged to wear petticoats for a considerable time, in

contempt of their want of courage, and as a badge of their

pusillanimity and degradation. But as no people can bear the

imputation of cowardice or effeminacy as a {9} national character, the

chiefs determined to rouse their young men, and stimulate them to

retrieve, or establish, a reputation; and inspiring them with heroic

notions, led them to war against the Satanas, or Shaounons, whom they

subdued with great ease. This success revived their drooping spirits,

and forgetting how often they had been defeated by the Adirondacks,

[they] commenced hostilities against them; and availing themselves of

the mean opinion their enemies entertained of their valour, gained the

victory in several actions: and at last carried on a successful war

against them even in their own country, obliging their former

conquerors to abandon their native land, and seek refuge on the spot

where Quebec is now situated.

Soon after the French arrived and had settled at Quebec, they formed an

alliance with the Adirondacks against the Five Nations. The first

engagement proved decisive in favour of the Adirondacks, owing entirely

to the use of fire arms having been introduced among them by their new

allies, which the Indians of the Five Nations had never before seen.

This alliance, and the consequent defeat was far from subduing or

disheartening the Five Nations, but rather seemed to inspire them with

additional ardour, and what they were deficient in military skill and

suitable weapons, they supplied by stratagem and courage. Although the

French gained several advantages over them in the course of more than

fifteen years, they at length were glad to bring the contest to a

conclusion, by making a peace with them.

This shews that the Savages of the Five Nations are not easily to be

conquered, and proves the necessity of preserving them in our interest,

{10} as long as we shall deem it expedient, from policy, to keep

possession of Canada. This being admitted, it is certain that no method

will more effectually conduce to that end, than retaining such barriers

in our hands as will enable us to afford them protection, and supply

them with arms and ammunition, and other necessaries, in time of danger.

The Indians who lie to the north of Philadelphia, between the provinces

of Pennsylvania and the Lakes, consist of three distinct leagues, of

which the Senekas, Mohawks, and Onondagoes, who are called the fathers,

compose the first; the Oneidoes, Cayugas, Tuscororas, Conoys and

Nanticokes, which are one tribe, compose the second, and these two

leagues constitute what is called the Six Nations. The third league is

formed of the Wanamis, Chihokockis, or Delawares, the Mawhiccons,

Munseys, and Wapingers, to which may be added the Mingoes. The Cowetas,

or Creek Indians, are also united in friendship with them.[20]

Mr. Colden says, the nations who are joined together by a league or

confederacy, like the United Provinces of Holland, are known by the

names of Mohawks, Oneydoes, Onondagoes, Cayugas, and Senekas; that each

of these nations is again divided into three tribes or families, who are

distinguished by the names of the Tortoise, Bear, and Wolf; and that the

Tuscororas, after the war they had with the people of Carolina, fled to

the Five Nations, and incorporated with them, so that in fact they now

consist of six, although they still retain the name of the Five

Nations.[21] This union is of such long duration as to leave little or

no traces of its origin.

{11} Baron Lahontan observes, that the Iroquois are in reality but one

nation, divided into five districts; and which he distinguishes in the

following manner:—The Tsonontouans, the Goyogans, the Onontagues, the

Oneyouts, and the Agnies, who were all settled about thirty leagues from

each other, near the great Lake Frontenac, now called Ontario.

The Mohawks, or Maquas, are the most warlike among the Five Nations, and

consist of near seven hundred warriors. They are called by the French,

Agnies, or Annies, and were originally settled on the French or grand

River, leading to Michillimakinac, from whence they afterwards removed

to the Mohawk River, near Schenectady, about sixteen miles from Albany,

in the state of New York. Since the war in 1757 they have separated, and

part of the nation is settled on the grand river, near Niagara, and the

rest at the back of the bay of Quenty, or Kenty, about forty-eight miles

above Cataraqui, the capital of the Loyalist settlements on the River

St. Laurence.[22]

Cataraqui, or Fort Frontenac, is built near to the place where Lake

Ontario discharges itself into the River St. Laurence. It was erected by

Le Comte de Frontenac, governor general of Canada, to stop the

incursions of the Iroquois, and divert the channel of the commerce in

peltry, which that people carried on with the inhabitants of New York,

and which they bartered for with the Savages by merchandize, at a

cheaper rate than the French could supply them.

This fort was at first built of wood and turf, and surrounded with high

pickets, but during the mission of Father Hennepin, it was faced {12}

with stone, by the direction of the Sieur Cavelier de la Salle, and

enlarged to a circuit of more than seven hundred yards. The bason in

which it stands is capable of holding a number of vessels of

considerable burthen. There is a small garrison at present, and a

commanding officer, to examine all boats which pass either to the new

settlements or the upper posts.[23]

The Oneidoes, or Oneyouts, the Onondagoes, Cayugas, Senekas, or

Tsonontouans, and the Tuscororas, who live with the Oneidoes and

Onondagoes, are settled about thirty leagues distant from each other,

and none of them exceeding two hundred and fifty miles from the Mohawk

River. All these nations express peace by the metaphor of a tree, whose

top they say will reach the sun, and whose branches extend far abroad,

not only that they may be seen at a great distance, but to afford them

shelter and repose.

The Five Nations claim all the country south of the River St. Laurence

to the Ohio, and down the Ohio to the Wabache, which lies to the

westward of the state of Pennsylvania, near to the borders of Virginia;

westerly, to the Lakes Ontario and Erie, and the River Miamis, and the

eastern boundaries of Lake Champlain, and the United States.

The firmness of this league, the great extent of land it claims, the

number of great warriors it produces, and the undaunted courage and

skill which distinguish the members of it in their contests both with

the Savages and European nations, all conspire to prove the good policy

of an alliance with them; as it is an undoubted fact, that in case of a

dispute with the Americans, the posts would make but a feeble resistance

{13} without their exertions; and deprived of the forts, the fur-trade

would soon be lost to this country.

I shall next consider the situation and utility of these barriers, in a

commercial point of view, and endeavour to shew the propriety of keeping

possession of the posts, notwithstanding by the treaty of peace with the

United States, they were expressly stipulated to be given up; although

it is not probable indeed that the Americans will be able to fulfil the

treaty on their part, so as to entitle them to make a reasonable

demand—I mean such a claim as government must absolutely admit.

The first post I shall notice is Oswegatche, on the River St. Laurence,

about one hundred and fifty miles above Montreal, at the mouth of the

Black River, where there are about an hundred Savages, who occasionally

frequent it, and are called Oswegatche Indians, although they belong to

the tribes of the Five Nations.[24] To this fort the inhabitants of New

England may with ease transport goods, to supply the Mohawks, Cahnuagas,

Connecedagas, St. Regis, and some straggling Messesawger Indians, who

live near the Détroit,[25] at a smaller expence than they can possibly

be obtained from the merchants at Quebec or Montreal, but particularly

Rum, which is now become an essential requisite in every transaction

with the Savages; for though they used formerly often to complain of the

introduction of strong water by the traders (as appears by the language

of their chiefs in council) to the prejudice of their young men, yet

they have not now the resolution to refrain from the use of it;—on the

contrary, it is become so familiar, and even necessary to them, that a

drunken frolic is {14} looked upon as an indispensible requisite in a

barter, and anticipated with extreme delight.

Carlton Island is higher up the river, and has greater conveniences

annexed to it than Oswegatche, having an excellent harbour, with a

strong fortification well garrisoned.[26] It affords excellent

accommodation for shipping, and may be considered as the naval

storehouse for supplying Niagara and the other posts. There are vessels

of considerable bulk continually sailing from thence to Niagara, Oswego,

&c.—There is also a commodore of the Lakes, whose residence is on the

island.

Fort Oswego, on Lake Ontario, formerly called Lake Frontenac, is a good

fortification, and capable of containing six hundred men. This post is

particularly important, as it is the key to the United States, and

commands the opening to the North, or Hudson’s River, protecting the

trade with the Indians who live on the banks of the River St. Laurence,

and the whole extent of the great sheet of water near which it stands,

reckoned about eighty leagues in length, and in some places from

twenty-five to thirty broad.[27]

John Long's journal, 1768-1782 · 第 1 / 18 段