Another practice which has recently been introduced, is to consider

each generator with its step-up transformers as a unit and to connect

the generator permanently with its bank of transformers, and to

control this unit by a single three-pole machine-operated oil switch.

In this case there are no switchboard switches between generators and

transformers, and this simplifies the switchboard considerably. There

must be switches on the high-tension side of the transformers in any

event. The switchboard for rotary converters in the substations is, of

course, a combination of alternating and direct-current apparatus. The

direct-current ends of the rotary converters are treated almost exactly

like direct-current railway generators; and their switchboard panels

are similarly equipped, except that usually there is a rheostat that

can be connected in series with the armature whereby a rotary converter

can be brought up to speed from a state of rest by connecting it with

the direct-current bus bars of the substation.

The alternating-current end of the rotary converter is supplied

through switches in the alternating-current leads from the step-down

transformers. A rotary converter can be started from a state of rest

by connecting it to the alternating-current leads through the medium

of compensating coils which reduce the voltage. A very heavy current

is required to do this, as the motor thus starts as a very inefficient

induction motor with a very low power factor.

[Illustration: Fig. 92. Connection of Substations.]

There are usually but two direct-current feeder panels in a substation

of an interurban electric road. One of these feeders is to supply the

trolley or third rail extending in one direction from the substation,

and the other feeds that extending in the other direction from the

substation. The trolley or third rail has a section insulator directly

at the substation. When both feeders are connected to the bus bars,

it is evident that this section insulator is short-circuited through

the medium of the substation bus bars, every substation on the line

being connected in this way, as indicated in Fig. 92. It is seen that,

should a short circuit occur on any section, it would open the circuit

breakers at the substations at both ends, and that section would not

interfere with the balance of the road. At the same time, when the

road is in normal operation and there is an unusually heavy load

between any two substations, the other substations along the line can

help out those nearest to the load by feeding through the bus bars of

the nearest substation. The high-tension apparatus at a substation

consists usually of a bank of high-tension lightning arresters;

high-tension switches, for shutting off the high-tension current; and

step-down transformers, for reducing from the high transmission voltage

to the 370 volts commonly fed to the alternating-current end of railway

rotary converters.

=Storage Batteries in Stations.= Storage batteries are frequently

used both in substations and in direct-current power stations. They

may be connected directly across the line and allowed to “float,” as

it is termed; or they may be used in connection with storage-battery

boosters, which will cause the storage battery to take the fluctuations

in the load and to give a constant load on the rotary converters or

power station. The action of storage-battery boosters which cause the

storage battery to be charged automatically at light loads and to

discharge and assist the station at heavy loads, is explained in the

paper on “Storage Batteries.”

ALTERNATING-CURRENT SYSTEMS.

So far this paper has been devoted almost entirely to electric railway

systems employing 500-volt direct-current motors on the cars, since

this is the system almost universally employed on electric railways

at the present time. There are, however, several systems employing

alternating-current motors on cars, which have already been used

experimentally and to some extent commercially. Some of these give

promise of coming into extensive use.

=Three-Phase Motors.= On several roads in Europe three-phase induction

motors are employed. These induction motors are operated by three-phase

alternating current taken direct from the trolley wires. As three

conductors are necessary, two trolley wires are used, with the rails

as the third conductor. The two principal objections to the system are

the necessity of two trolley wires, and the fact that the induction

motor operates very much like a direct-current shunt motor in that it

is a constant-speed motor and not adapted to variable-speed work. The

power factor is low in starting; that is, a great volume of current

is taken, although, owing to the voltage and the current not being in

phase, the actual energy consumed is small.

=Single-Phase Motors.= The Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing

Company has brought out a railway motor adapted to operate on

single-phase alternating-current circuits. This motor is very similar

in construction to the ordinary series-wound 500-volt direct-current

railway motor. It has, however, more field poles than the ordinary

direct-current motor; and the pole pieces are laminated to avoid

heating of the iron by eddy currents caused by the influence of

the alternating current. There are also other special features

in the design that reduce the sparking at the commutator, which

sparking was for several years the greatest obstacle to the use of

alternating-current motors of this kind. In the Westinghouse system

the current is taken from the trolley wire at high potential, and is

reduced by an auto-transformer on the car. This auto-transformer is

connected with an induction regulator so arranged that a low voltage

can be supplied to the motor in starting or for slow running, and

this voltage increased to increase the speed. There is thus no need

to reduce the trolley voltage by wasting part of it in a rheostat,

as is the case with direct-current motors; and the efficiency during

acceleration is, therefore, higher with this alternating system than

with the direct current. Several other single-phase railway motors

are also being worked out at the present time, including that of the

General Electric Company.

=Alternating-Current Motor Advantages.= There are two great advantages

secured by the use of an alternating-current railway motor. The first

is a reduction in investment and operating expenses by doing away

with substations containing rotary converters. Such substations are

necessary on long lines of railway operating with direct-current

motors. The second advantage is that, owing to the fact that a high

tension current can be used on the trolley wire and reduced by a

transformer on the car, the difficulties of collecting a large amount

of energy from a trolley wire are much reduced.

First, in regard to the substations, it will be seen that with the

alternating-current motor system, high-tension current can be conducted

from the power house to substations along the line which contain

nothing but static transformers. Since these transformers have no

revolving parts they do not require the constant attendance that a

rotary converter does. Furthermore, the investment in rotary converters

is entirely dispensed with, and this makes a considerable reduction in

the total cost of the distribution plant. With the alternating-current

system, current is fed direct to the trolley wire from the secondary

terminals of the transformers at the substations.

As regards the advantages of carrying a high voltage on the trolley

wire, it will readily be seen that, since the amount of power, or the

watts required by a car, is equal to the product of the voltage and

current, an increase in the voltage reduces the volume of current

necessary. By having high voltage on the trolley wire, even a large car

can be operated with a small volume of current, and this current can be

taken through an ordinary trolley wheel without difficulty. Where 500

volts is the pressure used on the trolley wire, there is considerable

flashing and burning of trolley wheel and wire when large cars and

locomotives are run, owing to the heavy current conducted; and this has

been one of the principal reasons for the adoption of the third rail

instead of the trolley on certain roads. Even with the third rail, the

volume of current that must be conducted to large electric locomotives

involves some difficulties in the way of heated contact shoes and

considerable loss of energy. The use of high voltage on the trolley

wire, with transformers on the car to reduce the voltage to a safe

pressure for use on the motors, overcomes many of the difficulties that

would otherwise be found in the use of electricity for heavy railroad

work.

OPERATION.

=Power Taken by Cars.= The amount of power required in the practical

operation of a car depends upon so many variable elements that many of

the calculations sometimes given for determining the power required

by a car are of little value. The theoretical horsepower required to

maintain a car at a certain speed on a level, is evidently the tractive

effort in pounds multiplied by the speed in feet per minute and divided

by 33,000. What the tractive effort per ton of car will be, depends

on the condition of the rail and on several other uncertain factors.

For street-railway motor cars, 20 pounds per ton is the usual tractive

effort assumed as necessary. A calculation of this kind, however, takes

no account of the losses in the motors and gears, nor of the fact

that the greater part of the power required to propel a street car in

practical service is used in accelerating the car from a state of rest

to full speed. In interurban service, of course, the power required

in acceleration is not so great a proportion of the whole.

[Illustration: Fig. 93. Plotted Data of Road Test.]

The safest figures to use in engineering calculations as to the amount

of power required, are those taken from actual results obtained in

everyday commercial service. The power required by an eight-ton car in

service in a large city like Chicago, is in the neighborhood of one

kilowatt hour per car-mile run. On outlying lines this figure may be

reduced to .7 kilowatt hour, and in the down-town districts may run up

to 1.5 kilowatt hours per car mile. Double-truck cars in city service,

weighing from 20 to 25 tons, take from 2½ to 4 kilowatt hours per car

mile at the power station. Interurban cars around Detroit, weighing

about 32 tons, in interurban service, making 25 miles per hour,

including stops, in level country, and geared to 43 miles per hour,

take about 3 kilowatt hours per car mile at the power station. However,

interurban railway conditions are extremely variable.

The reports of several Indiana electric railways show an average power

consumption of 1.48 kilowatt hours per car mile for city cars and 5.18

kilowatt hours for interurban cars, including line and distribution

losses.

An interurban car weighing 31½ tons and equipped with two 150

horsepower motors, on a test run of 50 miles at an average speed of

39 miles per hour consumed 2.20 kilowatt hours per car mile. This car

made 18 stops. A similar car under the same conditions made the same

run at an average speed of 26 miles per hour with 44 stops, consumed

2.44 kilowatt hours and a third car, making 12 stops and at a speed of

33 miles per hour, consumed 2.10 kilowatt hours per car mile. These

individual car test figures are from measurements taken at the car and

do not include line losses.

=Road Tests of Electric Cars.= Of late considerable attention has been

given to making road tests of electric cars. The results of the tests

are usually plotted in the form shown in Fig. 93. Time is plotted

horizontally in seconds, while volts, amperes, speed and per cent grade

are plotted vertically. The diagram referred to is the result of a

continuous run of 6 minutes of a 32.5 ton car equipped with two motors.

The line voltage, motor consumption and other readings may be obtained

for any instant of time. The acceleration in miles per hour per

second may be obtained by noting the increase in height of the speed

curve in one second. In making such a test the necessary instruments,

voltmeters, ammeters, wattmeters and speed indicators are mounted

direct on the car and are read at intervals of a few seconds.

The curve of motor consumption gives an idea of the abnormal current

required to get the car under headway.

=Economy in Power.= As already stated, a large part of the energy

taken by a car in city service is used in accelerating the car. Much

of this energy must be destroyed or used up in the brake shoes at the

next stop. The energy stored up in a car by process of acceleration is

represented by the formula:

Mass in lbs. × (Velocity in ft. per sec.)²

Energy in ft. lbs. = ——————————————————————————————————————————, which

2

is the formula for kinetic or live energy, the derivation of which is

found in any Instruction Paper on Mechanics. In performing any given

schedule with frequent stops, the more rapid the acceleration the lower

the maximum speed required to make the schedule, and the less the

energy required in acceleration. For city street and elevated service,

therefore, rapid acceleration and low maximum speeds are desirable

because not only more economical but safer.

For economical operation with any given equipment and schedule, it

is important to use as much of the energy stored up in the car as

possible, before wasting it by applying the brakes. Motors are built

of a size to yield the large horsepower required in acceleration, and

consequently are lightly loaded when operating the car at maximum

speed. To economize in power, current should be shut off as soon as

possible after the car has attained full speed; and the car should be

allowed to drift without current as long as possible before the brakes

are applied. In this way the energy stored in the car will propel it

at nearly maximum speed for a considerable distance between stops;

there will be the smallest possible waste of energy in the brake shoes;

and the losses of energy which take place when the current is in the

motors will be prevented as far as possible. Practical tests as well

as theoretical calculations show a possibility of very material saving

in energy in the operation of an electric railway car or train, by the

observance of this simple rule of drifting as much as possible and

using the brakes as little as possible. Whatever energy is used up in

the brake shoes is necessarily wasted. The smaller this waste can be

kept while performing a given service, the greater the economy secured.

=Cost of Power.= The reports of 85 per cent of the railway power

generating stations in Indiana show the average cost at the station per

kilowatt hour to be .755 cent. This was divided as follows: Fuel .526

cents, labor .158 cents, lubricants and miscellaneous supplies .032

cents, repairs .039 cents. The lowest cost reported was .505 cents.

During 1901 the average cost of power generated at the power house of

the Indiana Union Traction Company was .443 cents per kilowatt hour at

the switchboard. Distributed from the substations it was .765 cents per

kilowatt hour. Natural gas was used for fuel. On occasions when this

failed, coal at $1.50 per ton was burned.

=Sliding and Spinning Wheels.= In accelerating a car, however, there

is no economy in turning on current so rapidly as to spin the wheels.

As mentioned in the section on “Brakes,” the tractive effort between

wheels and rails falls off about two-thirds when the wheels begin to

slip; and this slipping of wheels, therefore, reduces the chance of

securing the acceleration which is possible. For the same reason, in

making emergency stops either by the use of brakes or by reversing the

motors, care should be taken not to slide the wheels, as by so doing

the time required to stop the car is much increased.

In the ordinary straight air-brake equipment used on heavy electric

cars, there is much higher pressure carried in the storage reservoir

than it is permissible to turn into the brake cylinder, since, if the

full pressure were turned into the brake cylinder, it would result in

sliding of the wheels—which, it has just been shown, is something to

be avoided, not only on account of making flat spots on the wheels,

but also because of the reduction in the braking force as soon as

the wheels begin to slide. An experienced motorman can tell from the

feeling of the car when the wheels are sliding, and will instantly

release the brake sufficiently to allow the wheels to begin to revolve

as soon as he notices that this has taken place.

The friction between brake shoes and car wheels decreases as the speed

increases. A certain pressure applied to the brake shoes upon a car

running 50 miles per hour, therefore, exerts much less retarding force

than the same pressure at ten miles per hour. In order to give the

same braking or retarding force at higher speeds, the brakes must be

applied harder than at the lower speeds. If they are applied at the

maximum pressure possible without sliding the wheels at higher speeds,

it is evident that this pressure must be reduced as the speed of the

car is reduced, or the wheels will be “skidded.” In the Westinghouse

high-speed automatic air brake used on steam roads, this reduction of

pressure is automatically accomplished.

TESTING FOR FAULTS.

[Illustration: Fig. 94. Bond Testing.]

=Bond Testing.= It is important to test the conductivity of rail bonds

from time to time in order to determine if they have deteriorated so

as to reduce their conductivity and introduce an unnecessary amount

of resistance into the return circuits. One way of doing this is to

measure the drop in potential over a bonded joint as compared with

the drop in potential of an equal length of unbroken rail. To do

this, an apparatus is employed whereby simultaneous contact will be

made bridging three or more feet of rail and an equal length of rail

including the bonded joint, as shown in Fig. 94, which illustrates the

connections of a common form of apparatus where two milli-voltmeters

are employed that measure the drop in voltage of the bonded and

unbonded rail simultaneously. If the current flowing through the

rail due to the operation of the cars were constant, of course one

milli-voltmeter might be used, being connected first to one circuit

and then to the other. The current in the rail, however, fluctuates

rapidly, so that two instruments are necessary for rapid work. The

resistance of the bonded joint is usually considerably more than that

of the unbroken rail, and the milli-voltmeter used to bridge the joint

consequently need not be so sensitive as that bridging the unbroken

rail.

In another form of apparatus, a telephone receiver is used instead

of the milli-voltmeter, the resistance of a long unbroken rail being

balanced against that of the bonded joint, as in a Wheatstone bridge,

until, upon closing the circuit, these two resistances when balanced

give no sound in the telephone receiver.

Bond tests of this kind can be made with satisfaction only when a

considerable volume of current is flowing through the rails at the

time of the test, because the drop in voltage is dependent on the

current flowing, and in any event is small. It has sometimes been found

necessary or advisable to fit up a testing car equipped with a rheostat

which will itself use a considerable volume of current, so as to give

a current in the rail which will give an appreciable drop of potential

across a bonded joint. Some of the latest forms of testing cars carry

motor generators which will pass a large current of known value through

a bonded joint, and so cause a drop of potential across the joint large

enough to be easily measured.

=Motor-Coil Testing.= Testing for faults in the motor armature and

field coils is done in a great variety of ways. The resistance of these

coils can be measured by means of a Wheatstone bridge employing a

telephone receiver in place of the galvanometer used in such bridges in

laboratory practice; but other less delicate tests are also in use.

Another method is to pass a known current through the coil to be tested

and to measure the drop in the voltage between the terminals of the

coil, the voltage divided by the current equaling the resistance.

A simple method, and one which involves no delicate instruments, has

lately been introduced into railway shop practice very successfully.

This is known as the _transformer test_ for short-circuited coils. It

requires an alternating current which can easily be supplied either

by a regular motor generator or by putting collecting rings onto an

ordinary direct-current motor and connecting these rings to bars of

opposite polarity on the commutator.

The method of testing for short-circuited armature coils employed in

the shops of the St. Louis Transit Company is indicated in diagram

in Fig. 95. A core built up of soft laminated iron is wound with 28

turns of No. 6 copper wire. This coil is supplied with alternating

current from a 110-volt circuit. The core has pole pieces made to fit

the surface of the armature. When one side of a short-circuited coil

in the armature is brought between the pole pieces of this testing

transformer, as in Fig. 95, the short-circuited armature coil becomes

like the short-circuited secondary of a transformer, and a large

current will flow in it. This current will in time manifest itself by

heating the coil; but it is not necessary to wait for this, as a piece

of iron held over that side of the coil not enclosed between the pole

pieces, as indicated in. Fig. 95, will be attracted to the face of the

armature if held directly over the coil, but will be attracted at no

other point.

[Illustration: Fig. 95. Method of Testing for Short-circuited Armature

Coils.]

This testing can be done very rapidly, and does not require delicate

instruments or skilled operators.

Tests for short circuits in field coils can be made in a similar

manner, by placing the coils on a core which is magnetized by

alternating current. The presence of a short circuit, even of one

convolution of a field coil, will be apparent from the increase in

the alternating current required to magnetize the core upon which the

field coil is being tested. The insulation resistance of armatures

and fields is frequently tested by means of alternating current, about

2,000 volts being the common testing voltage for 500-volt motor coils.

One terminal of the testing circuit is connected to the frame of the

motor, and the other to its windings. Any weakness in the insulation

insufficient to withstand 2,000 volts will, of course, be broken down

by this test. Alternating current is generally used for such tests

because it is usually more easily obtained at the proper voltage, as it

is a simple matter to put in an alternating transformer which will give

any desired voltage and which can be controlled by a primary circuit of

low voltage.

Open circuits in the armature can be easily detected by placing

the armature in a frame so that it can be rotated, the frame being

provided with brushes resting 90° apart on the commutator. If either an

alternating or direct current be passed through the armature by means

of these brushes, and the armature be rotated by hand, a flash will

occur when the open-circuited coils pass under the brushes. A large

current should be used.

The tests just mentioned are among the best of the methods used by

electric-railway companies for systematic work in the location of

certain classes of faults. A large number of other methods of testing

have also been evolved.

The following are some of the most common faults experienced with

electric railway car equipments:

=Grounds.= As one side of the circuit is grounded, any accidental

leakage of current from the car wiring or the motors to ground will

cause a partial short circuit. Such a ground on a motor will manifest

itself by blowing the fuse or opening the circuit breaker whenever

current is turned into the motor. In case the fuse blows when the

trolley is placed on the wire and the controller is off, it is a

sign that there is a ground somewhere in the car wiring outside of

the motors. Moisture and the abrasion of wires are the most common

causes of grounds in car wiring. In motors, defects are usually due to

overheating and the charring of the insulation.

=Burn-Outs.= Burning out of motors is due to two general causes: First,

a ground on the motor, which, by causing a partial short circuit,

causes an excessive current to flow; second, overloading the motor,

which causes a gradual burning or carbonizing of the insulation until

it finally breaks down.

Electric railways · 第 8 / 11 段