"I would accept the partie instantly," said the Frenchman, "were it

not so unequal. But six to one! ... is not this too hard?"

"No! ... not the least in the world, if we take it in the quizzing

vein," replied the other; "for it is well known that a Frenchman can

out-quiz six Englishmen at any time."

"Eh bien!" ... said the complaisant Parisian with a sigh, "I will do

my best. Begin, ladies, if you please."

"No! no! no!" exclaimed several female voices in a breath; "we will

have nothing to do with it; fight it out between yourselves: we will

be the judges, and award the honours of the field to him who hits the

hardest."

"This is worse and worse," cried our laughing enemy: "if this be the

arrangement of the combat, the judgment, à coup sûr, will be given

against me. How can you expect such blind confidence from me?"

We protested against this attack upon our justice, promised to be as

impartial as Jove, and desired the champions to enter the lists.

"So then," said the Englishman, "I am to enact the part of St. George

... and God defend the right!"

"And I, that of St. Denis," replied the Frenchman, his right hand upon

his breast and his left gracefully sawing the air. "Mon bras ... non

...

'Ma _langue_ à ma patrie,

Mon coeur à mon amie,

Mourir gaiement pour la gloire et l'amour,

C'est la devise d'un vaillant troubadour.'

Allons!... Now tell me, St. George, what say you in defence of the

English mode of suffering ladies--the ladies of Britain--the most

lovely ladies in the world, n'est-ce pas?--to rise from table, and

leave the room, and the gentlemen--alone--with downcast eyes and timid

step--without a single preux chevalier to offer them his protection or

to bear them company on their melancholy way--banished, turned

out--exiled from the banquet-board!--I protest to you that I have

suffered martyrdom when this has happened, and I, for my sins, been

present to witness it. Croyez-moi, I would have joyfully submitted to

make my exit à quatre pattes, so I might but have followed them. Ah!

you know not what it is for a Frenchman to remain still, when forced

to behold such a spectacle as this!... Alas! I felt as if I had

disgraced myself for life; but I was more than spell-bound--I was

promise-bound; the friend who accompanied me to the party where I

witnessed this horror had previously told me what I should have to

endure--I did endure it--but I have not yet forgiven myself for

participating in so outrageous a barbarism."

"The gentlemen only remain to drink the fair ladies' health," said our

St. George very coolly; "and I doubt not all ladies would tell you,

did they speak sincerely, that they were heartily glad to get rid of

you for half an hour or so. You have no idea, my good fellow, what an

agreeable interlude this makes for them: they drink coffee, sprinkle

their fans with esprit de rose, refresh their wit, repair their

smiles, and are ready to set off again upon a fresh campaign, certain

of fresh conquests. But what can St. Denis say in defence of a

Frenchman who makes love to three women at once--as I positively

declare I saw you do last night at the Opera?"

"You mistook the matter altogether, mon cher; I did not make love--I

only offered adoration: we are bound to adore the whole sex, and all

the petits soins offered in public are but the ceremonies of this our

national worship.... We never make love in public, my dear friend--_ce

n'est pas dans nos moeurs_. But will you explain to me un peu, why

Englishmen indulge themselves in the very extraordinary habit of

taking their wives to market with that vilaine corde au cou that it is

so dreadful to mention, and there sell them for the mesquine somme de

trois francs?... Ah! be very sure that were there a single Frenchman

present at your terrible Smithfield when this happened, he would buy

them all up, and give them their liberty at once."

The St. George laughed--but then replied very gravely, that the custom

was a very useful one, as it enabled an Englishman to get rid of a

wife as soon as he found that she was not worth keeping. "But will you

tell me," he continued, "how it is that you can be so inhuman as to

take your innocent young daughters and sisters, and dispose of them as

if they were Virginian slaves born on your estates, to the best

bidder, without asking the charming little creatures themselves one

single word concerning their sentiments on the subject?"

"We are too careful of our young daughters and sisters," replied the

champion of France, "not to provide them with a suitable alliance and

a proper protector before they shall have run the risk of making a

less prudent selection for themselves: but, what can put it into the

heads of English parents to send out whole ship-loads of young English

demoiselles--si belles qu'elles sont!--to the other side of the earth,

in order to provide them with husbands?"

Our knight paused for a moment before he answered, and I believe we

all shook for him; but at length he replied very sententiously--

"When nations spread their conquests to _the other side of the earth_,

and send forth their generals and their judges to take and to hold

possession for them, it is fitting that their distant honours should

be shared by their fair countrywomen. But will you explain to me why

it is that the venerable grandmothers of France think it necessary to

figure in a contre-danse--nay, even in a waltz, as long as they think

that they have strength left to prevent their falling on their noses?"

"'Vive la bagatelle!' is the first lesson we learn in our nurses'

arms--and Heaven forbid we should any of us live long enough to forget

it!" answered the Frenchman. "But if the question be not too

indiscreet, will you tell me, most glorious St. George, in what school

of philosophy it was that Englishmen learned to seek satisfaction for

their wounded honour in the receipt of a sum of money from the lovers

of their wives?"

"Most puissant St. Denis," replied the knight of England, "I strongly

recommend you not to touch upon any theme connected with the marriage

state as it exists in England; because I opine that it would take you

a longer time to comprehend it than you may have leisure to give. It

will not take you so long perhaps to inform me how it happens that so

gay a people as the French, whose first lesson, as you say, is 'Vive

la bagatelle!' should make so frequent a practice as they do of

inviting either a friend or a mistress to enjoy a tête-à-tête over a

pan of charcoal, with doors, windows, and vent-holes of all kinds

carefully sealed, to prevent the least possible chance that either

should survive?"

"It has arisen," replied the Frenchman, "from our great intimacy with

England--where the month of November is passed by one half of the

population in hanging themselves, and by the other half in cutting

them down. The charcoal system has been an attempt to improve upon

your insular mode of proceeding; and I believe it is, on the whole,

considered preferable. But may I ask you in what reign the law was

passed which permits every Englishman to beat his wife with a stick as

large as his thumb; and also whether the law has made any provision

for the case of a man's having the gout in that member to such a

degree as to swell it to twice its ordinary size?"

"It has been decided by a jury of physicians," said our able advocate,

"that in all such cases of gout, the decrease of strength is in exact

proportion to the increase of size in the pattern thumb, and therefore

no especial law has passed our senate concerning its possible

variation. As to the law itself, there is not a woman in England who

will not tell you that it is as laudable as it is venerable."

"The women of England must be angels!" cried the champion of France,

suddenly starting from his chair and clasping his hands together with

energy,--"angels! and nothing else, or" (looking round him) "they

could never smile as you do now, while tyranny so terrible was

discussed before them!"

What the St. Denis thus politely called a smile, was in effect a very

hearty laugh--which really and bonâ fide seemed to puzzle him, as to

the feeling which gave rise to it. "I will tell you of what you all

remind me at this moment," said he, reseating himself: "Did you ever

see or read 'Le Médecin malgré Lui'?"

We answered in the affirmative.

"Eh bien! ... do you remember a certain scene in which a certain good

man enters a house whence have issued the cries of a woman grievously

beaten by her husband?"

We all nodded assent.

"Eh bien! ... and do you remember how it is that Martine, the beaten

wife, receives the intercessor?--'Et je veux qu'il me batte, moi.'

Voyez-vous, mesdames, I am that pitying individual--that kind-hearted

M. Robert; and you--you are every one of you most perfect Martines."

"You are positively getting angry, Sir Champion," said one of the

ladies: "and if that happens, we shall incontestably declare you

vanquished."

"Nay, I am vanquished--I yield--I throw up the partie--I see clearly

that I know nothing about the matter. What I conceived to be national

barbarisms, you evidently cling to as national privileges. Allons! ...

je me rends!"

"We have not given any judgment, however," said I. "But perhaps you

are more tired than beaten?--you only want a little repose, and you

will then be ready to start anew."

"Non! absolument non!--but I will willingly change sides, and tell you

how greatly I admire England...."

The conversation then started off in another direction, and ceased not

till the number of parties who passed us in making their exit roused

us at length to the necessity of leaving our flowery retreat, and

making ours also.

LETTER LXVII.

Chamber of Deputies.--Punishment of Journalists.--Institute

for the Encouragement of Industry.--Men of Genius.

Of all the ladies in the world, the English, I believe, are the most

anxious to enter a representative chamber. The reason for this is

sufficiently obvious,--they are the only ones who are denied this

privilege in their own country; though I believe that they are in

general rather disposed to consider this exclusion as a compliment,

inasmuch as it evidently manifests something like a fear that their

conversation might be found sufficiently attractive to draw the Solons

and Lycurguses from their duty.

But however well they may be disposed to submit to the privation at

home, it is a certain fact that Englishwomen dearly love to find

themselves in a legislative assembly abroad. There certainly is

something more than commonly exciting in the interest inspired by

seeing the moral strength of a great people collected together, and in

the act of exerting their judgment and their power for the well-being

and safety of millions. I suspect, however, that the sublimity of the

spectacle would be considerably lessened by a too great familiarity

with it; and that if, instead of being occasionally hoisted outside a

lantern to catch an uncertain sight and a broken sound of what was

passing within the temple, we were in the constant habit of being

ushered into so commodious a tribune as we occupied yesterday at the

Chamber of Deputies, we might soon cease to experience the sort of

reverence with which we looked down from thence upon the collected

wisdom of France.

Nothing can be more agreeable than the arrangement of this chamber for

spectators. The galleries command the whole of it perfectly; and the

orator of the hour, if he can be heard by any one, cannot fail of

being heard by those who occupy them. Another peculiar advantage for

strangers is, that the position of every member is so distinctly

marked, that you have the satisfaction of knowing at a glance where to

find the brawling republican, the melancholy legitimatist, and the

active doctrinaire. The ministers, too, are as much distinguished by

their place in the Chamber as in the Red Book, (or whatever may be the

distinctive symbol of that important record here,) and by giving a

franc at the entrance, for a sort of map that they call a "_Table

figurative_" of the Chamber, you know the name and constituency of

every member present.

This greatly increases the interest felt by a stranger. It is very

agreeable to hear a man speak with fervour and eloquence, let him be

who he may; but it enhances the pleasure prodigiously to know at the

same time who and what he is. If he be a minister, every word has

either more or less weight according ... to circumstances; and if he

be in opposition, one is also more au fait as to the positive value of

his sentiments from being acquainted with the fact.

The business before the house when we were there was stirring and

interesting enough. It was on the subject of the fines and

imprisonment to be imposed on those journalists who had outraged law

and decency by their inflammatory publications respecting the trials

going on at the Luxembourg.--General Bugeaud made an excellent speech

upon the abuse of the freedom of the press; a subject which certainly

has given birth to more "cant," properly so called, than any other I

know of. To so strange an extent has this been carried, that it really

requires a considerable portion of moral courage to face the question

fairly and honestly, and boldly to say, that this unrestricted power,

which has for years been dwelt upon as the greatest blessing which can

be accorded to the people, is in truth a most fearful evil. If this

unrestricted power had been advocated only by demagogues and

malcontents, the difficulties respecting the question would be slight

indeed, compared to what they are at present; but so many good men

have pleaded for it, that it is only with the greatest caution, and

the strongest conviction from the result of experience, that the law

should interfere to restrain it.

Nothing, in fact, is so plausible as the sophistry with which a young

enthusiast for liberty seeks to show that the unrestrained exercise of

intellect must not only be the birthright of every man, but that its

exercise must also of necessity be beneficial to the whole human race.

How easy is it to talk of the loss which the ever-accumulating mass of

human knowledge must sustain from stopping by the strong hand of power

the diffusion of speculation and experience! How very easy is it to

paint in odious colours the tyranny that would check the divine

efforts of the immortal mind!--And yet it is as clear as the bright

light of heaven, that not all the sufferings which all the tyrants who

ever cursed the earth have brought on man can compare to those which

the malign influence of an unchecked press is calculated to inflict

upon him.

The influence of the press is unquestionably the most awful engine

that Providence has permitted the hand of man to wield. If used for

good, it has the power of raising us higher in the intellectual scale

than Plato ever dreamed; but if employed for evil, the Prince of

Darkness may throw down his arms before its unmeasured strength--he

has no weapon like it.

What are the temptations--the seductions of the world which the

zealous preacher deprecates, which the watchful parent dreads,

compared to the corruption that may glide like an envenomed snake into

the bosom of innocence from this insidious agency? Where is the

retreat that can be secured from it? Where is the shelter that can

baffle its assaults?--Blasphemy, treason, and debauchery are licensed

by the act of the legislature to do their worst upon the morals of

every people among whom an unrestricted press is established by law.

Surely, but perhaps slowly, will this truth become visible to all men:

and if society still hangs together at all, our grandchildren will

probably enjoy the blessing without the curse of knowledge. The head

of the serpent has been bruised, and therefore we may hope for

this,--but it is not yet.

The discussions in the Chamber on this important subject, not only

yesterday, but on several occasions since the question of these fines

has been started, have been very animated and very interesting. Never

was the right and the wrong in an argument more ably brought out than

by some of the speeches on this business: and, on the other hand,

never did effrontery go farther than in some of the defences which

have been set up for the accused gérans of the journals in question.

For instance, M. Raspail expresses a very grave astonishment that the

Chamber of Peers, instead of objecting to the liberties which have

been taken with them, do not rather return thanks for the useful

lesson they have received. He states too in this same _defence_, as he

is pleased to call it, that the conductors of the "Réformateur" have

adopted a resolution to publish without restriction or alteration

every article addressed to them by the accused parties or their

defenders. This _resolution_, then, is to be pleaded as an excuse for

whatever their columns may contain! The concluding argument of this

defence is put in the form of a declaration, purporting that whoever

dooms a fellow-creature to the horrors of imprisonment ought to

undergo the same punishment for the term of twenty years as an

expiation of the crime. This is logical.

There is a tone of vulgar, insolent defiance in all that is recorded

of the manner and language adopted by the partisans of these Lyons

prisoners, which gives what must, I think, be considered as very

satisfactory proof that the party is not one to be greatly feared.

After the vote had passed the Chamber of Peers for bringing to account

the persons who subscribed the protest against their proceedings, two

individuals who were not included in this vote of reprobation sent in

a written petition that they might be so. What was the official answer

to this piece of bravado, or whether it received any, I know not; but

I was told that some one present proposed that a reply should be

returned as follows:--

"The court regrets that the request cannot be granted, inasmuch as the

sentence has been already passed on those whom it concerned;--but that

if the gentlemen wished it, they might perhaps contrive to get

themselves included in the next indictment for treason."

* * * * *

In the evening we went to the Institute for the encouragement of

Industry. The meeting was held in the Salle St. Jean, at the Hôtel de

Ville. It was extremely full, and was altogether a display extremely

interesting to a stranger. The speeches made by several of the members

were in excellently good taste and extremely to the purpose: I heard

nothing at all approaching to that popular strain of eloquence which

has prevailed of late so much in England upon all similar

occasions,--nothing that looked like an attempt to bamboozle the

respectable citizens of the metropolis into the belief that they were

considered by wise men as belonging to the first class in society.

The speeches were admirably calculated to excite ingenuity, emulation,

and industry; and I really believe that there was not a single word of

nonsense spoken on the occasion. Several ingenious improvements and

inventions were displayed, and the meeting was considerably égayé by

two or three pieces exceedingly well played on a piano-forte of an

improved construction.

Many prizes were bestowed, and received with that sort of genuine

pleasure which it is so agreeable to witness;--but these were all for

useful improvements in some branch of practical mechanics, and not, as

I saw by the newspapers had recently been the case at a similar

meeting in London, for essays! One of the prize compositions was, as I

perceived, "The best Essay on Education," from the pen of a young

bell-hanger! Next year, perhaps, the best essay on medicine may be

produced by a young tinker, or a gold medal be awarded to Betty the

housemaid for a digest of the laws of the land. Our long-boasted

common sense seems to have emigrated, and taken up its abode here;

for, spite of their recent revolution, you hear of no such stuff on

this side the water;--mechanics are mechanics still, and though they

some of them make themselves exceeding busy in politics, and discuss

their different kings with much energy over a bottle of small wine, I

have not yet heard of any of the "_operative classes_" throwing aside

their files and their hammers to write essays.

This queer mixture of occupations reminds me of a conversation I

listened to the other day upon the best manner in which a nation could

recompense and encourage her literary men. One English gentleman, with

no great enthusiasm of manner or expression, quietly observed that he

thought a moderate pension, sufficient to prevent the mind from being

painfully driven from speculative to practical difficulties, would be

the most fitting recompense that the country could offer.

"Is it possible you can really think so, my dear sir?" replied

another, who is an amateur, and a connoisseur, and a bel esprit, and

an antiquary, and a fiddler, and a critic, and a poet. "I own my ideas

on the subject are very different. Good God! ... what a reward for a

man of genius!... Why, what would you do for an old nurse?"

"I would give her a pension too," said the quiet gentleman.

"I thought so!" retorted the man of taste. "And do you really feel no

repugnance in placing the immortal efforts of genius on a par with

rocking a few babies to sleep?--Fie on such philosophy!"

"And what is the recompense which you would propose, sir?" inquired

the advocate for the pension.

"I, sir?--I would give the first offices and the first honours of the

state to our men of genius: by so doing, a country ennobles itself in

the face of the whole earth."

"Yes, sir.... But the first offices of the state are attended with a

good deal of troublesome business, which might, I think, interfere

with the intellectual labour you wish to encourage. I should really be

very sorry to see Dr. Southey made secretary-at-war,--and yet he

deserves something of his country too."

"A man of genius, sir, deserves everything of his country.... It is

not a paltry pension can pay him. He should be put forward in

parliament ... he should be..."

"I think, sir, he should be put at his ease: depend upon it, this

would suit him better than being returned knight of the shire for any

county in England."

"Good Heaven, sir!"... resumed the enthusiast; but he looked up and

his opponent was gone.

LETTER LXVIII.

Walk to the Marché des Innocens.--Escape of a Canary

Bird.--A Street Orator.--Burying-place of the Victims of

July.

I must give you to-day an account of the adventures I have encountered

in a _course à pied_ to the Marché des Innocens. You must know that

there is at one of the corners of this said Marché a shop sacred to

the ladies, which débits all those unclassable articles that come

under the comprehensive term of haberdashery,--a term, by the way,

which was once interpreted to me by a celebrated etymologist of my

acquaintance to signify "_avoir d'acheter_." My magasin "à la Mère de

Famille" in the Marché des Innocens fully deserves this description,

for there are few female wants in which it fails to "avoir d'acheter."

It was to this compendium of utilities that I was notably proceeding

when I saw before me, exactly on a spot that I was obliged to pass, a

throng of people that at the first glance I really thought was a

prodigious mob; but at the second, I confess that they shrank and

dwindled considerably. Nevertheless, it looked ominous; and as I was

alone, I felt a much stronger inclination to turn back than to

proceed. I paused to decide which I should do; and observing, as I did

so, a very respectable-looking woman at the door of a shop very near

the tumult, I ventured to address an inquiry to her respecting the

cause of this unwonted assembling of the people in so peaceable a part

of the town; but, unfortunately, I used a phrase in the inquiry which

brought upon me more evident quizzing than one often gets from the

civil Parisians. My words, I think, were,--"Pourriez-vous me dire,

madame, ce que signifie tout ce monde?... Est-ce qu'il y a quelque

mouvement?"

Paris and the Parisians in 1835 (Vol. 2) · 第 16 / 21 段