The Supreme Charity _of the_ World

True charity is not typified by an almsbox. The benevolence of a check

book does not meet all the wants of humanity. Giving food, clothing and

money to the poor is only the beginning, the kindergarten class, of real

charity. Charity has higher, purer forms of manifestation. Charity is

but an instinctive reaching out for justice in life. Charity seeks to

smooth down the rough places of living, to bridge the chasms of human

sin and folly, to feed the heart-hungry, to give strength to the

struggling, to be tender with human weakness, and greatest of all, it

means—obeying the Divine injunction: “Judge not.”

The true symbol of the greatest charity is the scales of judgment held

on high, suspended from the hand of Justice. So perfectly are they

poised that they are never at rest; they dare not stop for a moment to

pronounce final judgment; each second adds its grain of evidence to

either side of the balance. With this ideal before him, man, conscious

of his own weakness and frailty, dare not arrogate to himself the Divine

prerogative of pronouncing severe or final judgment on any individual.

He will seek to train mind and heart to greater keenness, purity, and

delicacy in watching the trembling movement of the balance in which he

weighs the characters and reputations of those around him.

It is a great pity in life that all the greatest words are most

degraded. We hear people say: “I do so love to study character, in the

cars and on the street.” They are not studying character; they are

merely observing characteristics. The study of character is not a puzzle

that a man may work out over night. Character is most subtle, elusive,

changing and contradictory—a strange mingling of habits, hopes,

tendencies, ideals, motives, weaknesses, traditions and

memories—manifest in a thousand different phases.

There is but one quality necessary for the perfect understanding of

character, one quality that, if man have it, he may _dare to

judge_—that is, omniscience. Most people study character as a

proofreader pores over a great poem: his ears are dulled to the majesty

and music of the lines, his eyes are darkened to the magic imagination

of the genius of the author; that proofreader is busy watching for an

inverted comma, a mis-spacing, or a wrong-font letter. He has an eye

trained for the imperfections, the weaknesses. Men who pride themselves

on being shrewd in discovering the weak points, the vanity, dishonesty,

immorality, intrigue and pettiness of others, think they understand

character. They know only part of character—they know only the depths

to which some men may sink; they know not the heights to which some men

may rise. An optimist is a man who has succeeded in associating with

humanity for some time without becoming a cynic.

We never see the target a man aims at in life; we see only the target he

hits. We judge from results, and we imagine an infinity of motives that

we say must have been in his mind. No man since the creation has been

able to live a life so pure and noble as to exempt him from the

misjudgment of those around him. It is impossible to get aught but a

distorted image from a convex or a concave mirror.

If misfortune comes to someone, people are prone to say, “It is a

judgment upon him.” How do they know? Have they been eavesdropping at

the door of Paradise? When sorrow and failure come to us, we regard them

as misdirected packages that should be delivered elsewhere. We do too

much watching of our neighbor’s garden, too little weeding in our own.

Bottles have been picked up at sea thousands of miles from the point

where they have been cast into the waters. They have been the sport of

wind and weather; carried along by ocean currents, they have reached a

destination undreamed of. Our flippant, careless words of judgment of

the character of someone, words lightly and perhaps innocently spoken,

may be carried by unknown currents and bring sorrow, misery and shame to

the innocent. A cruel smile, a shrug of the shoulders or a cleverly

eloquent silence may ruin in a moment the reputation a man or woman has

been building for years. It is as a single motion of the hand may

destroy the delicate geometry of a spider’s web, spun from its own body

and life, though all the united efforts of the universe could not put it

back as it was.

We do not need to judge nearly so much as we think we do. This is the

age of snap judgments. The habit is greatly intensified by the

sensational press. Twenty-four hours after a great murder there is

difficulty in getting enough men who have not already formulated a

judgment, to try the case. These men, in most instances, have read and

accepted the garbled, highly colored newspaper account; they have to

their own satisfaction discovered the murderer, practically tried him

and—sentenced him. We hear readers state their decisions with all the

force and absoluteness of one who has had the whole Book of Life made

luminant and spread out before him. If there be one place in life where

the attitude of the agnostic is beautiful, it is in this matter of

judging others. It is the courage to say: “I don’t know. I am waiting

further evidence. I must hear both sides of the question. Till then I

suspend all judgment.” It is this suspended judgment that is the supreme

form of charity.

It is strange that in life we recognize the right of every criminal to

have a fair, open trial, yet we condemn unheard the dear friends around

us on mere circumstantial evidence. We rely on the mere evidence of our

senses, trust it implicitly, and permit it to sweep away like a mighty

tide the faith that has been ours for years. We see all life grow dark,

hope sink before our eyes, and the golden treasures of memory turn to

cruel thoughts of loss to sting us with maddening pain. Our hasty

judgment, that a few moments of explanation would remove, has estranged

the friend of our life. If we be thus unjust to those we hold dear, what

must be the cruel injustice of our judgment of others?

We know nothing of the trials, sorrows and temptations of those around

us, of pillows wet with sobs, of the life-tragedy that may be hidden

behind a smile, of the secret cares, struggles and worries that shorten

life and leave their mark in hair prematurely whitened, and in character

changed and almost re-created in a few days.

We say sometimes to one who seems calm and smiling: “You ought to be

supremely happy; you have everything that heart could wish.” It may be

that at that very moment the person is passing alone through some agony

of sorrow, where the teeth seem almost to bite into the lips in the

attempt to keep feelings under control, when life seems a living death

from which there is no relief. Then these light, flippant phrases jar

upon us, and we seem as isolated and separated from the rest of humanity

as if we were living on another planet.

Let us not dare to add to the burden of another the pain of our

judgment. If we would guard our lips from expressing, we must control

our mind, we must stop this continual sitting in judgment on the acts of

others, even in private. Let us by daily exercises in self-control learn

to turn off the process of judging—as we would turn off the gas. Let us

eliminate pride, passion, personal feeling, prejudice and pettiness from

our mind, and higher, purer emotions will rush in, as air seeks to fill

a vacuum. Charity is not a formula; it is an atmosphere. Let us

cultivate charity in judging; let us seek to draw out latent good in

others rather than to discover hidden evil. It requires the eye of

charity to see the undeveloped butterfly in the caterpillar. Let us, if

we would rise to the full glory of our privilege, to the dignity of true

living, make for our watchword the injunction of the supreme charity of

the world—“Judge not.”

V

Self-Control, Its Kingship and Majesty · 第 9 / 33 题