“Well, it was just before then that we had been set to occupy those

lines. If they had been retired a hundred and fifty yards they

would have been on the slope of the hill and dry and safe. But the

staff--or some bellicose individual on the staff--in spite of every

representation preferred to lose a third of my battalion, let alone

thirds of all the other battalions that occupied them, rather than

to lose the little bit of prestige that it would have meant, by a

retirement. Of a hundred and fifty yards! Think of that!

“Anyhow, there we came down in the early hours of a September

moonlight--into a world of beautiful, bluish and misty calm. There

were those calms in the line when the vengeful activities of seven or

so million men had exhausted themselves and their imaginations had

just gone to sleep. You would have long periods of quiet. They would

be broken by sudden bursts of machine gun fire and flares of Verey

lights when some bemused sentry had taken it into his head that half

a dozen corpses in No Man’s Land were stealing upon him. One’s nerves

did that in quiet, moonlit moments. You would look at a corpse, or some

sacking, or some sandbags until you could swear they were creeping upon

you. Then in a crisis, ‘bang’ would go your hipe, and off would go the

machine guns, and up would flare the Verey lights. The guns too might

come in and some poor devil or another lose his life. But as a rule

silence would settle down again for another long period.... I wrote a

poem about that, in French. But I never heard of any one having read

it.”

It was at that moment that your Compiler burst in with the words:

“Oh, it begins with: ‘I should like to imagine a moonlight in which

there will be no machine guns.’ I heard my friend Mrs. Carmody recite

it only yesterday. Recite, not read it!”

Gringoire grunted slightly.

“The point was that it was most beautiful moonlight, before a blue,

silent mountain with mists dim all up its flanks. And the other point

was that we, as you may remember, were a flying division. We were used

for reinforcing threatened points or for resting overtired troops.

And, facing us, the Germans had similar divisions that they called

‘_Sturmtruppen_.’ The curious thing was that either their Intelligence

was so good or ours was so good that whenever we were moved up or

down the line we found the same regiments in front of us so that when

we were on the Somme we fought the Second Brandenburgers, and when

we moved up to the Salient there we found the Second Brandenburgers

in front of us and after we had been in front of Armentières for a

little, there sure enough were the famous Second Brandenburgers. The

Cockchafers, they were nicknamed. After that they began to desert to us

a good deal and they were replaced by the Würtembergers whom we used to

consider better fellows, I don’t know why, for we never, in the nature

of the case, consorted much with either.

“On the occasion of that moonlight night the Brandenburgers had got in

before us and displayed a natural curiosity to know who we were when

we got in. The German--or rather the Hun--method of trying to unmask

the identity of opponents was to sing national anthems. I use the word

‘Hun’ here because only a Delbrueck or a Bethmann-Hollweg--a professor

or a politician--would have thought of anything so ingeniously

imbecile. For naturally we did not fall in with that little idea....

The idea, by the bye, was that if we were Scots and they sang ‘Scots

Wha Hae’ or Irish and they sang ‘The Wearin’ of the Green,’ or for us

‘Hen Wlad Wy Nadhau’ we should, in a burst of patriotic emotion either

cheer or join in the chorus. We didn’t. I remember that once when,

no doubt suspecting who we were, they had tried singing “Ap Jenkin,”

which is our quickstep, our men replied by singing the imperial Chorus

from the ‘Mikado’ as if to show that we were Japanese. That irritated

them so much that they pounded our trench for an hour and a half with

everything they could think of.

“On this occasion they tried everything from ‘Rule Britannia’ to

‘Australia, Australia,’ and elicited no reply. And then they suddenly

touched off an immense gramophone that sang, through the still

moonlight ... the ‘Hymn of Hate.’ And in English!

“It was curious and eerie to hear that passionless machine let off

those dire words devoted solely to ourselves, for they never evolved

anything like it for the French or the Belgians or the Italians or

Annamites or Cochin Chinese or Brazilians. Now it screamed and brayed:

“Hate of the head and hate of the hand,

Hate of the breed and hate of the land

ENGLAND

Hate of the standing and hate of the lying,

Hate of the living and hate of the dying

ENGLAND ... ENGLAND”

(“And as a detail I may add that they had to get an English

renegade--for there was one!--to make that translation.)

“I am bound to say that it made one shiver a little. There were the

moonlight, and the mists, and the lights of poor Wytschaete far away

on the ridge. And those words creeping towards us. It is perhaps more

disagreeable to think of being prayed to death than of being shelled.

One shivered.

“And when it fell silent one wondered if anything in the war or in the

world could surpass it for drama. But one was wrong. You don’t know the

Welsh. They are the incomparable singers of four-part music in the open

air.

“I remember, years ago, being on the side of a Welsh mountain on a

Saturday evening at sunset and far below a Welsh miners’ beanfeast was

going along a thread of a road in char-à-bancs. And as each filled car

passed there came up the sounds of four-part songs, incredibly sweet

and incredibly mournful in the falling darkness. They are a conquered

people, the Welsh, and their music is the music of a conquered people.

“But on that occasion the Germans had delivered themselves into their

hands in the endless struggle between Saxon and Celt. For suddenly a

single voice in ‘B’ Company began to sing with extraordinary clearness:

‘Maxwelton braes are bonnie

When earlie fa’s the dew....’

“And extraordinarily, before the singer had come to ‘there that Annie

Laurie,’ the whole of ‘B’ Company was crooning out the other parts of

the song. Beneath the moon. And then the whole Battalion, along a front

of a mile. Crooning, you know, rather softly, not shouting....

“And for Bonnie Annie Laurie ...”

“It was a good answer.

“They were forbidden of course to sing Welsh songs, or it might have

been ‘Land of My Fathers’ or the ‘Men of Harlech.’ As it was, it was

better.

“But there was not much hatred about that. And you will observe that

even the Huns had had to get a machine to do their hating.”

VI

_Just Country_

It is one of the burdens of advancing age--as it is one of the

penalties of having been unreasonably prolific--that one is always

haunted by a vague dread of repeating one’s self. One’s mind,

presumably, progresses, one touches and retouches one’s ideas; hammers

at the wording; seeks after a final clarity of expression. It is all

one that one may have already printed the matter of the theme; the mind

continues to work at the phraseology until one, finally, isn’t certain

that one has or hasn’t sought the crystallization of the press. So it

happens that I cannot be certain whether I have or haven’t printed

already what I am about to write. It can’t, however, in the nature of

things, have been more than a shortish article; so that if I have to

apologize to any readers, the apology can’t be for any great fault.

I fancy that what I then tried to put on paper was suggested by a

letter that our poet wrote, having another moment of leisure, at

about the time of his long wait for the General on Mont Vedaigne. I

wrote an article, and certainly it was suggested by a passage in one

of Gringoire’s letters to a friend, at some one’s request, for the

journal called the N--. And that journal called the N-- refused to

print the article because it was too militarist. I don’t myself see

where the militarism can have come into the expression of what was pure

speculation of a psychological kind--but censors, whether military or

anti-military, are queer people, and I presume that their main job,

as it presents itself to their minds, is the suppression of ideas....

The more I think about it now, the more the thought hardens and takes

shape; some one--connected with the propaganda-ministry--_did_ ask me

to write an article for the N-- and the N-- did refuse to print it. I

daresay the journal had quarreled with the department in between whiles.

Anyhow, the psychological speculation wasn’t very profound, or, as

far as I can see, very likely to render conscription a permanent

institution in these islands. Stated in its baldest terms, it merely

amounted to saying that when you are very busy with a job, you do not

much notice what is going on around you. You don’t, of course.

And, in the end, that is the basic idea that underlies these records

of four landscapes. Gringoire was simply trying to state--or rather

to illustrate--the fact that, during the whole of the period from the

4/8/’14 till the date when the German plenipotentiaries appended, in

the Salle des Glaces, their signatures to the peace treaty, he only

four times achieved a sufficient aloofness of mind to notice the

landscape that surrounded him.

“I don’t mean to say,” our poet summed the matter up, “that I didn’t

have ‘leaves,’ but, for one cause and another, my leaves weren’t ever

pensive or leisurely. One was snatched into the civilian frame of

mind--but into a civilian frame of mind that was always preoccupied

with ‘The War’--that was, indeed, in odd ways, far more preoccupied

with the war than were one’s self and one’s friends. Thus I remember

that, on the occasion of my first return from France, being in a

Tommy’s tunic, before I had arrived at the barrier of Viltona, I was

stopped by an Assistant Provost Marshal and told that if I didn’t

immediately procure leather gloves, another sort of hat, a collar,

a tie, and get rid of my divisional mark, I should be put under

arrest and returned to my battalion. In the booking office, I found

a telephone--which cost thruppence, instead of tuppence--and when I

remonstrated with a lady who three times gave me a wrong number, I was

told to remember that there was a war going on. When, there being no

one in my own house, I tried to go by omnibus to my club for lunch, I

being in mufti and a little lame, a lady conductor put her hand on my

chest, exclaimed: ‘There’s a war on,’ and very neatly threw me back

into the road.

“When I got to my club, a civilian of an eminently moral appearance

was lunching at my table. He addressed me condescendingly--as no doubt

one would address a Tommy if one were a civilian at a club. I had the

feeling that he was about to offer me a glass of beer--therefore I

hurriedly began to talk of peace. I wanted, you see, to consider peace

and to avoid at once the offer of a free drink and the remembrance of

my comrades who were still in danger of their lives. I admit that my

words were inconsiderate, for I simply said:

“‘Won’t there be a high old fortnight’s drunk after that day!’

“My table companion drew himself up, pursed dry lips, and as it were

hissed:

“‘I think we have taken very good steps to prevent that.’

“He wouldn’t, you see, let me forget my poor comrades who were still in

the trenches. I do not remember what I said then; but only his attitude

as with his napkin very white and crumpled in his hand, he removed

to another table. Straight from that club I went to the house of an

Eminent Reformer who told me that he would rather we lost the war than

that the Cavalry should have a hand in winning it.[5] He couldn’t know

that it wasn’t so very long since I had seen the empty saddles of the

Deccan Horse, as, all intermingled with the men of some battalion of

Gordons, they returned from an adventure in No Man’s Land, during the

1916 Battle of the Somme. So I went and had tea with a lady who gave

me three milk biscuits from a silver tray and said: ‘This _must_ be a

change from your hardships over there!’

“They _wouldn’t_, you see, let me forget the poor dear fellows who

were still in the trenches. So I passed the night in a Y.M.C.A. hut,

discussing Mametz Wood of the 14/7/’16 with an officer of the 38th

Division.”

That, of course, was rather a special day, Gringoire said--though

it was nothing out of the common. Given his age, former career, and

surroundings, he couldn’t be expected to come in for any huge amount

of the salutary dissipation or the healing hospitality which did so

much to _remonter_ the _moral_ of the troops. Moving mostly amongst

the Intelligentsia, he came a good deal in contact with Conscientious

Objectors who abused him to his face for militarism or with literary

civilians of military age who, after calling at his house, returned

to their own and wrote him anonymous but easily recognizable letters,

the purport of which was that he had never heard a shot fired and

that the only gas he had ever smelled had been emitted by himself.

To balance them, he received a number of letters from the German

population of London, threatening to murder him on account of his

propagandist writings, whilst one of the most frequent preoccupations

of his military career arose from the anonymous letters addressed to

the War Office, to his various Colonels, and to the officers and other

ranks of his regiment by a professional man whom he had once employed

and who, after he lost that particular job, found that his conscience

as a patriot demanded that he should continuously but unsuccessfully

denounce our poet as a German spy.

That is all in the day’s journey. _Homo homini lupus._ But it is not to

be wondered at that in his periods of leisure Gringoire was not in a

position to pay what he would have called a hell of a lot of attention

to landscapes--or, in the alternative, that the essential call, of the

land, of the war, was not the humanity that England contained--but just

the country.

Possibly the idea of country--just country--postulates the idea of

human companionship--but that is not the same thing as humanity.

“When I was a boy,” as Gringoire put it, “every hedge and every turn

of a white, long road, concealed a possible Princesse Lointaine.” In

those days one walked on and on--from the North Foreland to the Land’s

End; from Kensington to Winchelsea, from Minehead, by Porlock and

Brendon, to Water’s Meet. Or one cycled from Calais to Beauvais, by way

of Arras; from Paris to Tours and along the Loire, somehow ending at

Houlgate and Caen. Or one went in a slow fiacre from Amiens to Albert,

ostensibly to see the new brick and mosaic cathedral, with the Madonna

atop. But, no doubt, whether one went to Mevagissy or Mentone; Port

Scathow, Pontardulais, Château Gaillard, or Curt-yr-Ala, one was really

chasing the Only Possible She.

“Nowadays one sits in a green field--any green field--and longs for

nothing more than just a little bit of loyalty. One longs, that is

to say, that one may at last find the _hominem bonæ voluntatis_ that

one has chased all one’s life. Possibly one desires that, resting

one’s eyes in the green of the grass as--do you remember, old Dai

Bach?--according to the maxims of Color-Sergeant Davis of Caerphilly,

we used to rest our eyes from the targets by looking into the trampled

green blades, one longs to discover some formula that shall make us

ourselves forever loyal to some ideal or other....

“Or perhaps it is just rest that one wants. Anyhow, one wants the

country that is just country--not heaths, moors, crags, forests,

passes, named rivers, or famous views. No--just fields, just dead

ground, or fields of clover that have never heard and will never hear

the crepitation of machine guns; hedgerows unwired and not too trim,

with a spray or so of bramble just moving in a wind from which one is

sheltered. That, until the other day, one so seldom saw in France--or

in England either, for that matter.”

“I remember,” Gringoire said in one of his anecdotes, “being in a

wood--behind Tenby, I think, or near Manorbier or Pembroke, in 1915.

It was very warm, and that part of Wales is a sleepy country. I had

bicycled ahead of troops afoot to inspect some sort of position that,

the day before, with my over-meticulousness, I had already spent hours

in surveying, when I might have been listening to Pierrots. At any

rate, I had three-quarters of an hour of entire leisure.

“The sun beat down; I was just inside the edge of a wood. A little

marsh--a reëntrant--ran right in under the trees. There was a mill

where the insignificant valley opened out; a little dam where the

road mounted an opposite slope. And then, though I had sketched, in

a military sense, every clump of rushes, every contour, every bridge,

every railway cutting and bit of embankment, many times--suddenly this

place of greenery assumed--that too!--the aspect of being just country.

“A little Welsh sheep poked its horns through the hedge and looked

at me; a wren crept through a tangle of old thorns at my elbow, a

nuthatch pursued a curious and intricate course amongst the netted,

coarse fibers of ivy on a wild cherry-trunk. I lay still in the dappled

sunlight and thought nothing, except that it was good to stretch out

one’s limbs, recumbent. Because the level, green ground in front of

me was so grown with rushes, I began to try to remember what were the

provisions of the Field Drain Act of the middle of last century. Surely

the farmer could obtain from the State, on easy terms, a loan with

which to defray the expense of soil-pipes and labor for the draining

of that land. And I began to think about the queer, stodgy, Victorian

mind; and about Albert the Good, and the Crystal Palace, which in those

days was known as the Temple of Peace; and I remembered John Brown and

John Morley and John Bright and John Stuart Mill and Mr. Ruskin and

the rest of them, and mahogany chairs with horsehair seats and Argand

lamps and the smoke and steam that used to fill the underground at

Gower Street station. And in those days I had a 13-hand New Forest pony

and a very old governess car and went to market on a Tuesday....

“And then, quite suddenly, I felt that, for thousands and thousands of

miles, on the green fields and in the woodlands, stretching away under

the high skies, in the August sunlight, millions, millions, millions of

my fellow men were moving--like tumultuous mites in a cheese, training

and training, as we there were training--all across a broad world to

where the sun was setting and to where the sun was rising--training

to live a little, short space of time in an immense long ribbon of

territory, where, for a mile or so the earth was scarred, macerated,

beaten to a pulp, and burnt by the sun till it was all dust.... The

thought grew, became an immense feeling, became an obsession. Then

Major Ward, on a bay with a white forehead, appeared on the little

bridge that carried the waters of the marsh beneath the road. The

others were coming!”

[Footnotes]

[5] Our friend is here venting a little of the bile that, as will be

seen, at times obscures his outlook on life and makes him, elsewhere,

appear ungenerous to the civilian population that so loyally did its

bit. The train of thought of his friend the Eminent Reformer would seem

to be as follows: (a) this is a war for liberty; (b) the Cavalry are

officered mainly by the hereditary aristocracy; (c) if the hereditary

aristocracy wins out in the war, liberty will suffer; (d) it would be

preferable to lose the war. This seems logical. Our poet, however,

refuses to see matters in this light. He says that he has never since

spoken to that Eminent Reformer, who was once the closest of his

friends--and that he never will again. This is lamentable. But is there

not a tag beginning “_Irritabile genus_”...?

VII

_Playing the Game_

As will appear in my last chapter Gringoire insists that I shall

include in this volume a specimen of his prose written under fire. As

that was written in French your compiler flatly refused to insert it in

the body of his book so that, since Gringoire flatly refused to let the

book appear at all unless it _was_ included, it will be found elsewhere

than in the body and what follows is his translation. I confess to

regretting its inclusion for although I myself and a great number of my

friends including even Mrs. Carmody who is the wife of the headmaster

at the ancient grammar-school, a foundation of Edward VI’s in the XVI

century at which I have the honor to teach English Literature--although

I and my friends consider him a very great poet, if not the greatest

poet in the world at the moment, poet’s prose is well known to be too

florid for the real connoisseur of prose. And what follows is actually

his own translation and Gringoire himself has asserted many times both

in private and in public that he is entirely unable to translate his

own prose. It does however present a picture of the poet under fire--a

matter as to which he here refuses to say anything elsewhere under

the plea that to talk about actual fighting disturbs his subsequent

sleep with nightmares and also that he intends to treat of fighting

subsequently himself when both the public bitterness and his own

emotions shall have diminished. This decision I regret. For who in ten

years’ time will be found to take an interest in the late struggle

whereas enshrined here in the amber of my own prose the record of his

emotions might well interest people who have such memories still vivid

within them. I may say that I myself, a journalist of considerable

pre-war practice, never went to the front though I served during the

whole war in the depot of Gringoire’s regiment.

Here then is Gringoire’s prose, the original French of which he says

was written at Pont de Nieppe during September 1916 after his visit to

the French Ministry which he will describe in my next chapter.

A CRICKET MATCH

BEING A LETTER WRITTEN FROM THE LINES OF SUPPORT

IN FLANDERS TO CAPTAIN UN TEL IN PARIS.

_Mon cher monsieur, camarade et confrère_ (Gringoire’s addressee was

also a poet soldier):

Behind Bécourt Wood, on a July evening, whilst the shells of the

Germans were passing overhead, we were playing cricket. The heavy

shells went over, seeming to cry in their passage the word “We;

e; eary”; then, changing their minds farther on they exclaimed

peremptorily: “Whack!” But when one plays cricket one forgets the

Hun orchestra; one does not even hear the shells that pass overhead.

We were running about; we were cursing the butterfingered fool who

dropped a catch; we even argued about points of play, because the

rules of such cricket as one plays with a tennis-ball, two axe-helves

for bats and bully-beef-cases for wicket--those rules are apt to be

elastically interpreted. But no match England v. Australia at Lords’

itself was ever so full of incident nor so moving as our game behind

Bécourt Wood. The turf was of clay, baked porcelain-hard by the almost

tropical sun; for grass there was only an expanse of immense thistles;

boundaries and spectators at once were provided by the transport mules

in their lines. But we cheered, we gesticulated, we rushed about, we

disputed, we roared ... we--British infantry officers who are said to

be phlegmatic, cold and taciturn.

I present the considerations that follow in the form of a letter to

you, my dear Un Tel, though I would rather have written a balanced,

careful and long-thought-out essay. But I cannot chisel at my prose

today. “Ker wooley woo,” as our Tommies say, “say la gair!” I have

passed twenty-five years of my life in trying to find new cadences; in

chasing assonances out of my prose, with an enraged meticulousness that

might have been that of Uncle Flaubert himself. But today I only write

letters--long, diffuse, and in banal phrases. The other demands too

much time, too much peace of mind.... Ah, and too much luck!

No enemy · 第 5 / 14 段