CHAPTER VII.

VIENNA AND WATERLOO.

After the restoration of Louis XVIII. as a constitutional king, the

treaty of Paris between France and the allied powers was signed on May

30, 1814. The treaty amounted to a settlement in outline of those

territorial questions in Europe in which France was concerned, and aimed

mainly at the construction of a strong barrier to resist further

encroachments by France on her neighbours. The French boundaries were to

coincide generally with the limits of French territory on January 1,

1792, but with certain additions. The principle adopted was that France

should retain certain detached pieces of foreign states within her own

frontier (such as Mühlhausen, Montbéliard, and the Venaissin), while the

line of frontier was extended so as to include certain detached

fragments belonging to France before 1792, such as Landau, Mariembourg,

and Philippeville, as well as Western Savoy with Chambéry for its

capital. She was moreover allowed to regain all her colonies except the

Mauritius, St. Lucia, and Tobago. The Spanish portion of San Domingo was

restored to the Spanish government. Holland was placed under the

sovereignty of the house of Orange, and was to receive an increase of

territory; so much of Italy as was not to be ceded to Austria was to

consist of independent sovereign states; and Germany was to be formed

into a confederation. Finally an European congress was to meet at Vienna

in two months' time "to regulate the arrangements necessary for

completing the dispositions of the treaty". At the same time secret

articles provided that the disposition of territories was to be

controlled at Vienna by Austria, Great Britain, Prussia, and Russia;

that Austria, was to receive Venice and Lombardy as far as the Ticino;

and that the former territories of Genoa were to be annexed to

Sardinia, and the late Austrian Netherlands to Holland.

In the midst of the general restoration of legitimate princes

difficulties were occasioned by the exceptional cases in which

territories were reserved for the new dynasties that had arisen during

the Napoleonic wars. France, Spain, and Sicily objected to the retention

of the kingdom of Naples by Murat, Spain resented the cession of Parma

to the Bonapartes, and Norway was in revolt against the attempt to

subjugate it to the king of Sweden and his heir Marshal Bernadotte. The

Norwegian government under Prince Christian vainly endeavoured to secure

the British recognition of the independence of Norway. The British

government, on the contrary, held itself bound to support the claims of

Sweden, and on April 29 notified a blockade of the Norwegian ports,

which was promptly carried into effect. Meanwhile a new constitution was

promulgated in Norway, and Prince Christian was proclaimed king. While

the British maintained the blockade Sweden attempted to gain its ends by

negotiation. At last, on July 30, the Swedes invaded Norway. After some

Swedish successes a convention was signed at Moss on August 14, which

recognised the new Norwegian constitution, but provided for a personal

union of the crowns of Sweden and Norway. This constitution was accepted

by Charles XIII. of Sweden in the following November, and Norway

retained almost complete independence, though united to Sweden.

[Pageheading: _THE SLAVE TRADE._]

Among the last acts of Napoleon's government had been the release and

restoration of Ferdinand VII. of Spain and of Pope Pius VII. Ferdinand,

supported by the vast mass of Spanish opinion, declared against the

rather unpractical constitution established in his absence, and entered

Madrid as an absolute king on May 14. One of his first acts was the

revival of the inquisition. There was some apprehension among British

representatives lest the two restored Bourbon monarchies should renew

the family compact, and also lest they should attempt to assert the

Bourbon claims to Naples and Parma. Sir Henry Wellesley, afterwards Lord

Cowley, was, however, successful in negotiating a treaty of alliance

between Great Britain and Spain, which made provision against any

renewal of the family compact, restored the commercial relations of the

two countries to the footing on which they had been before 1796, and

promised the future consideration of means to be adopted for the

suppression of the slave trade. Spain was in fact too dependent on

British credit to be able to adopt a line of her own in politics. But

the hold which Great Britain had thus gained over Spain was somewhat

weakened by the British attitude towards the slave trade.

It is remarkable how large a space the abolition of the slave trade

occupied in the foreign policy of Great Britain, when the liberties of

Europe were at stake. During the months preceding the meeting of the

congress of Vienna, which had been postponed till September by the tsar,

British diplomacy had been engaged in a strenuous effort to obtain the

co-operation of such European powers as possessed American colonies in

securing this philanthropic object. Sweden had already consented to it,

and now Holland also gave her consent. Portugal agreed to relinquish the

trade north of the equator, on condition that the other powers consented

to impose a similar restriction on themselves. Strong pressure was

brought to bear upon France to consent to the immediate abolition of the

trade, and Wellington, who had been created a duke in May and who

arrived at Paris in August in the capacity of British ambassador, was

authorised by Liverpool to offer the cession of Trinidad or the payment

of two or three million pounds to obtain this end. By the treaty of

Paris only French subjects were allowed to trade in slaves with the

French colonies, and French subjects were excluded from trading

elsewhere; and the whole trade was to cease within French dominions

after five years. Talleyrand, negotiating with Wellington, refused to

consent to a general abolition, but, on being pressed to surrender the

slave trade north of the equator, consented to abandon it to the north

of Cape Formoso. In the following year Napoleon on his return from Elba

ordered its immediate suppression, and this was not the least

significant act of the Hundred Days. With Spain our diplomatists were

less successful. The British government refused to renew its subsidy to

Spain for the last half of 1814 except on condition that Spain

relinquished the slave trade north of the equator at once, and consented

to relinquish that south of the equator in five years' time; while it

would not issue a loan except on condition that Spain abolished the

whole trade immediately. Even these terms did not prevail with Spain,

and the most that she would grant at the congress was to relinquish the

trade at the conclusion of eight years.

Meanwhile Talleyrand was endeavouring to induce Great Britain to combine

with France in a joint mediation between Austria and Russia at the

congress, in the event of Russia demanding the duchy of Warsaw.

Wellington, while expressing himself in favour of an understanding,

refused to accept anything which might seem equivalent to a declaration

in favour of mediation by the two powers in every case. At the congress

itself Great Britain was first represented by Castlereagh, who was

succeeded in February, 1815, by Wellington. The two principal

difficulties were the questions of Poland and Saxony. The tsar desired

to erect the duchy of Warsaw, Prussia's share in the two partitions of

Poland in 1793 and 1795, into a constitutional monarchy attached to the

Russian crown, while Prussia, though not unwilling to resign her claims

to Polish dominion, wished to increase her territory by the

incorporation of Saxony in her monarchy. Austria was naturally averse

from any increase of strength in the states on her northern borders, and

she was also opposed to the establishment of a constitutional monarchy

in Poland which might serve as a centre for political discontent in her

own dominions. Even France urged this objection to a constitutional

Poland. Great Britain alone was willing to see an independent Poland,

but preferred to join France, Prussia, and Austria in demanding its

repartition between the two latter powers rather than its annexation to

Russia. All through October Austria, Great Britain, and Prussia

endeavoured to induce the tsar to withdraw his demand. Early in November

he won over the King of Prussia to whom he promised the kingdom of

Saxony, proposing to indemnify the Saxon king with a new state on that

lower Rhine which France was not allowed to have, but which no other

power desired.

[Pageheading: _THE RETURN OF NAPOLEON._]

It was no longer possible to resist Russia's claims on Poland, but

Austria was determined not to allow Prussia to receive the proffered

compensation. On December 10 Metternich notified the Prussian minister,

Hardenberg, that he would not allow Prussia to annex more than a fifth

part of Saxony. Great Britain, France, Bavaria, and the minor German

states joined Austria in this action, and thus the attempt to effect a

settlement of Europe by a concert of the four allied powers broke down.

On January 3, 1815, a secret treaty was concluded between Austria,

France, and Great Britain in defence of what their diplomatists called

"the principles of the peace of Paris". Each of these powers was to be

prepared, if necessary, to place an army of 50,000 men in the field.

Bavaria joined them in their preparations for war, and many of the

troops which occupied Paris in 1815 would have been disbanded or

dispersed, but for the prospect of a rupture between the allies

themselves. But a compromise was soon arranged, and on February 8 it was

agreed that Cracow, the Polish fortress which threatened Austria most,

should be an independent republic, and that Prussia should retain enough

of Western Poland to round off her dominions, while the remainder of the

duchy of Warsaw became a constitutional kingdom under the tsar. Prussia

was to be allowed to annex part of Saxony, and was to receive a further

compensation on the left bank of the Rhine and in Westphalia. The most

thorny questions were now settled, and Castlereagh had left Vienna when

the congress was electrified by the news that Napoleon had reappeared in

France.

The episode of "the Hundred Days" interrupted, but did not break up, the

councils of the congress at Vienna. It cannot be said that Napoleon's

escape from Elba took the negotiators altogether by surprise. They were

already aware of his correspondence with the neighbouring shores of

Italy, and his removal to St Helena or some other distant island had

been proposed by the French government, though never discussed at the

congress. Sir Neil Campbell, the British commissioner at Elba, had gone

so far as to warn his government of Napoleon's suspected "plan," and to

indicate, though erroneously, the place of his probable descent upon the

Italian coast. Owing to an almost incredible want of precaution, he

embarked on February 26 with the least possible disguise, and

accompanied by 400 of his guards, on board his brig the _Inconstant_,

eluded the observation of two French ships, and landed near Cannes on

March 1. Thence he hastened across the mountains to Grenoble, passing

unmolested, and sometimes welcomed, through districts where his life had

been threatened but a few months before. The commandant of Grenoble was

prepared to resist his further progress, but a heart-stirring appeal

from Napoleon induced a regiment detached to oppose him to join his

standard, and the rest of the garrison was brought over by Colonel

Labedoyère, one of the officers who had conspired to bring him back.

Thence he proceeded to Lyons, issuing decrees, scattering proclamations,

and gathering followers at every stage. He was lavish of promises, not

perhaps wholly insincere, that he would adopt constitutional

government--already established by the charter of Louis XVIII.--and

cease to wage aggressive wars. He relied unduly on the discontent

provoked by the blind partisans of the Bourbons, who, it was said, had

learned nothing and forgotten nothing. This was true, if the spirit of

the restoration were to be measured by the parade of expiatory masses

for the execution of royalists under the revolution, the ostentatious

patronage of priests, the preference of returned _émigrés_ to well-tried

servants of the republic and the empire, or the anticipated expulsion of

landowners in possession of "national domains" for the purpose of

dividing them among their old proprietors. All this naturally

exasperated those who had imbibed the principles of the revolution, but

it was more than compensated in the eyes of millions of Frenchmen by the

cessation of conscription and the infinite blessings of peace.

[Pageheading: _"THE HUNDRED DAYS."_]

The king was amongst the least infatuated of the royalists. On hearing

of Napoleon's proclamation, he had the sense to appreciate the danger of

such a bid for sovereignty and the magic of such a name, while his

courtiers regarded Napoleon's enterprise as the last effort of a madman.

He addressed the chamber of deputies in confident and dignified

language; the Duke of Angoulême was employed to rouse the royalist party

at Bordeaux; the Duke of Bourbon was sent into Brittany, the Count of

Artois, with the Duke of Orléans and Marshal Macdonald, visited Lyons,

upon the attitude of which everything, for the moment, seemed to depend.

Most of the marshals remained faithful to the restored monarchy, and Ney

was selected to bar the progress of Napoleon in Burgundy, and has been

credited with a vow that he would bring him back in an iron cage. But it

was all in vain. The Count of Artois was loyally received by the

officials and upper classes at Lyons, but he soon found that Napoleon

possessed the hearts of the soldiers and the mass of the people. Ney

yielded to urgent appeals from his old chief, signed and read to his

troops a proclamation drawn up by Napoleon himself, and was followed in

his treason by his whole army. As Napoleon approached Paris, all armed

opposition to him melted away. On March 19, Louis XVIII., seeing that

his cause was hopeless, proclaimed a dissolution of the chambers, and

retired once more into exile, fixing his residence at Ghent.

Napoleon re-entered the Tuileries on the 20th, after a journey which he

afterwards described as the happiest in his life. But his penetrating

mind was not deceived by the manifestations of popular joy. He well knew

that he was distrusted by the middle classes, as well as by the

aristocracy, and threw himself more and more on the sympathy of the old

revolutionists. When he came to fill up the higher offices, he met with

a strange reluctance to accept them, and was driven to enlist the

services of two regicides, the virtuous republican, Carnot, and the

double-dyed traitor Fouché. Feeling the necessity of resting his power

on a democratic basis, he promulgated a constitution modelled on the

charter of Louis XVIII., and known as the _Acte Additionnel_, which,

however, satisfied no one. The royalists objected to its anti-feudal

spirit, the revolutionists and moderates to its express recognition of

an hereditary peerage, and its tacit recognition of a dictatorial power.

It was by no means with a light heart that Napoleon took leave of Paris

on June 7, having appointed a provisional government, to place himself

at the head of his army.

Attempts had been made in the southern provinces and La Vendée to

organise armed rebellion against the emperor, and met for a time with

considerable success. But they were soon quelled by the overwhelming

imperialism not only of the regular army, but of vast numbers of

disbanded soldiers and half-pay officers, dispersed throughout France,

and disgusted with their treatment under the restored monarchy. Even

among the _bourgeoisie_ Napoleon had an advantage which he never

possessed before. Disguise it as he might, all his former wars had been

essentially wars of conquest, and, however patiently they might endure

it, the peasantry of France, in thousands upon thousands of humble

cottages, groaned under the exaction of crushing taxes--worst of all,

the blood-tax of conscription--in order to enable one man, in the name

of France, to usurp the empire of the world. Now, however, as in the

early days of the revolution, France was put on its defence, and called

upon to repel an invasion of its frontiers. For the news of Napoleon's

escape, announced by Talleyrand on March 11, instantly stilled the

quarrels and rebuked the jealousies which had so nearly proved fatal to

any settlement at Vienna. For the moment, the designs of Russia in

Poland, the selfish demands of Prussia, and the half-formed coalition

between Great Britain, France, and Austria, were thrust into the

background. Austria thought it necessary to repudiate decisively the

audaciously false assertion of Napoleon that he was returning with the

concurrence of his father-in-law, and would shortly be supported by

Austrian troops. Metternich, therefore, assumed the lead in drawing up a

solemn manifesto, dated March 13, in which Napoleon was virtually

declared an outlaw "abandoned to public justice," and the powers which

had signed the treaty of Paris in the preceding May bound themselves, in

the face of Europe, to carry out all its provisions and defend the king

of France, if need be, against his own rebellious subjects.

By a further convention made at the end of March, they engaged to

provide forces exceeding 700,000 men in the aggregate, to be

concentrated on the Upper Rhine, the Lower Rhine, and the Low Countries,

with an immense reserve of Russians to be rapidly moved across Germany

from Poland. Wellington having succeeded Castlereagh at Vienna, was

appointed to command the British, Hanoverian, and Belgian contingents on

the north-east frontier of France; Blücher's headquarters were to be on

the Lower Rhine, within easy reach of that frontier; for, whichever side

might take the offensive, it was there that the first shock of war might

be expected. The recent conclusion of peace with America at Ghent on

December 24, 1814, left England free to use her whole military power.

Enormous sums were voted by Parliament, with a rare approach to

unanimity, for the equipment of a British army, and a sum of £5,000,000

for subsidies to the allied powers. A small section of the opposition

led by Whitbread opposed the renewal of war. On April 7 he moved an

amendment to the address in reply to the prince regent's message

announcing that measures for the security of Europe were being concerted

with the allies, but he was only supported by 32 votes against 220. On

April 28 his motion for an address to the prince regent, deprecating

war with Napoleon, was defeated by 273 votes against 72. This was

Whitbread's last prominent appearance in parliament. On July 6, during a

fit of insanity, he died by his own hand. The subsidies to the allies

were opposed by Bankes, but were carried on May 26 by 160 votes against

17. There can be no doubt that the majorities in the house of commons

correctly expressed the national sentiment. Nobody wished to dictate to

France the form of government which she was to adopt, but it was

generally felt that Napoleon's character rendered peace with him

impossible.

[Pageheading: _THE CAMPAIGN OF 1815._]

In the end, about 80,000 men were assembled in Belgium under

Wellington's orders, but of these not half were British soldiers,

including untrained drafts from the militia, who replaced veteran

Peninsular regiments still detained in Canada and the United States. Yet

Napoleon admitted the British contingent to be equal, man for man, to

his own troops, while he estimated these to be worth twice their own

number of Dutchmen, Prussians, or other Germans. The first blow in the

war was struck by Murat. Already in February, dissatisfied with his

ambiguous position, he had levied troops and summoned Louis XVIII. to

declare whether he was at war with him. As soon as he heard of

Napoleon's return, he invaded the Papal States, and summoned the

Italians to rise in the cause of Italian unity and independence. Though

disowned by Napoleon, he persevered in this plan, but he was attacked

and twice defeated by an Austrian army. On May 22 the British and

Austrians took the city of Naples, and Murat fled to France. In October

he made an attempt to recover his kingdom, but was captured and shot. It

is noteworthy that, on hearing of his fate at St. Helena, Napoleon

showed but little sympathy with his brother-in-law.

On the morning of June 12, Napoleon left Paris, saying as he entered his

carriage that he went to match himself with Wellington. All his troops

were already marshalled on the Belgian frontier, and numbered 124,588

men, with 344 guns. The Imperial Guard alone was 20,954 strong, and the

whole army was largely composed of seasoned veterans. The Prussian army

consisted of 116,897 men, with 312 guns under Marshal Blücher, whose

headquarters were at Namur. Though the majority of these were veterans,

there was a considerable leaven of inferior troops, hastily raised from

the Westphalian and Rhine militia. Between this town and Quatre Bras lay

the Prussian line of defence, Sombreffe being the centre, with Ligny and

St. Amand in front of it, and rather on the south-west. Wellington's

headquarters were at Brussels, and, having no certain intelligence of

Napoleon's movements, he kept the various divisions of his army within

easy distance of that capital until the very eve of the final conflict.

Of the 93,717 men under his command, 31,253 were British, two-thirds of

whom had never been under fire; 6,387 were of the king's German legion;

15,935 Hanoverians; 29,214 (including 4,300 Nassauers in the service of

the Prince of the Netherlands) Dutch and Belgians; 6,808 Brunswickers;

2,880 Nassauers; the engineers, numbering 1,240, were not classified by

nationality. He fully expected that Napoleon would move upon Brussels

along the route by Mons and Hal, and maintained in later days that such

would have been the best strategical course. Napoleon thought otherwise,

and resolved to strike in between the Prussian and British armies,

crushing the former before the latter could be fully assembled. He very

nearly succeeded, and, if all had gone as he hoped, he could scarcely

have failed to win one of his greatest victories.

[Pageheading: _LIGNY AND QUATRE BRAS._]

On the evening of the 15th, Wellington was still at Brussels, with the

great body of his army, and only a weak force of Dutch and Belgians was

at Quatre Bras, some sixteen miles to the south. Blücher, with about

three-fourths of his army, was at Sombreffe, a few miles south-east of

Quatre Bras. Napoleon himself was at or close by Charleroi, ten or

twelve miles south of Quatre Bras; the mass of his army was at Fleurus,

south-west of Sombreffe, with Ligny and St. Amand between it and the

Prussians; and Marshal Ney, with Reille's corps, was at Frasnes,

opposite to and due south of Quatre Bras. On the morning of the 16th,

Napoleon arrived from Charleroi at Fleurus, and carefully inspected his

enemy's position, but delayed his attack upon Ligny and St Amand until

half-past two in the afternoon. The Prussians outnumbered the French,

and a murderous conflict ensued among the streets, gardens, and

enclosures of these little towns, which lasted until eight or nine

o'clock. At last Napoleon ordered his guard to advance, and the plateau

behind Ligny was taken, with a loss to the French of 12,000, and to the

Prussians of over 20,000. Blücher himself was unhorsed and severely

bruised in a furious charge of cavalry, but the Prussians retired in

good order towards Wavre, north of the battlefield.

Had Ney been in a condition to obey an urgent message from Napoleon, and

to envelop the Prussian right and rear, this defeat would have been

overwhelming in its effect. But while the battle of Ligny was raging,

another battle was going on at Quatre Bras, six miles distant, in which

the French sustained a serious check. Happily for the British, Ney

failed to bring up his divisions for an attack on Quatre Bras until two

o'clock in the afternoon, when the Dutch and Belgians under the Prince

of Orange were still his only opponents. The news for which Wellington

had been waiting did not reach him until just before the memorable ball,

given by the Duchess of Richmond at Brussels on the night of the 15th,

which he nevertheless attended, hurrying off his troops to Quatre Bras.

They arrived just in time to reinforce the Prince of Orange and save the

position; but Ney, too, was receiving fresh reinforcements every hour,

the Duke of Brunswick was killed, and a fearful stress fell on Picton's

division and the Hanoverians, who alone were a match for Ney's splendid

infantry and Kellermann's cuirassiers.

These made a charge like that which had borne down the Austrians at

Marengo, but the British squares were proof against it, and when a

division of guards came up from Nivelles, the French in turn were put on

the defensive and retreated to Frasnes. The loss on the British side was

4,500 men; that on the French somewhat less. It is not difficult to

imagine what the issue of the battle must have been if D'Erlon's corps

had been brought into action. This corps was occupied in marching and

countermarching, under contradictory orders from Napoleon and Ney,

between the British left and the Prussian right during the whole of this

eventful day. Its appearance in the distance just when Napoleon was

about to launch his guard against the Prussians at Ligny, caused him to

hesitate long, and lose the decisive moment for demolishing his enemy.

Its failure to appear at Quatre Bras, and to roll up the wavering

Dutch-Belgians, before Picton took up the fighting, enabled Wellington

to hold his ground at first, to repulse Ney afterwards, and on hearing

of Blücher's defeat at Ligny, to fall back in good order on Waterloo.

Even then, something was due to good fortune. Had Napoleon joined Ney

and marched direct on Quatre Bras early on the 17th, it is difficult to

see how his advance to Brussels could have been arrested. But whether he

was exhausted by his incessant labours since leaving Paris, or whether

his marvellous intuition was deserting him, certain it is that he

allowed that critical morning to slip by without an effort--and without

a reconnaissance. He assumed that Blücher must retire upon Namur as his

base of operations, and that Wellington, retiring towards Brussels,

would be cut off from his allies. He therefore despatched Marshal

Grouchy, with 33,000 men, to follow up the Prussians eastward by the

Namur road. His assumption was unfounded. Blücher, loyal to his

engagements, retired upon Wavre; Wellington, relying upon Blücher's

loyalty, took his stand on the field of Waterloo; and this error on the

part of Napoleon determined the fortunes of the campaign.[61]

[Pageheading: _WATERLOO._]

The British army retreated upon Waterloo almost unmolested. Ney was

probably awaiting orders, and Napoleon, believing the Prussians to be at

Namur, probably thought he might safely rest himself and his army before

crushing Wellington at his leisure. When they realised that Wellington

was deliberately moving his army to a position nearer Brussels, they

both followed in pursuit along different roads converging at Quatre

Bras, and a brisk skirmish took place near Genappe between Ney's cavalry

and that of the British rear-guard. Heavy rain came on, and the two

armies spent a miserable night, half a mile from each other, close to

Mont St. Jean, and south of Waterloo. Napoleon rose before daybreak on

the 18th, reconnoitred the British position, and convinced himself that

Wellington intended to give battle. He expressed to his staff his

satisfaction and confidence of victory, when General Foy, who had

experience of the Peninsular war, replied in significant words: "Sire,

when the British infantry stand at bay, they are the very devil

himself". Why Napoleon did not begin the battle at eight o'clock has

been the subject of much discussion. It is said that he waited for

Grouchy to join him before the close of the action. But neither he nor

Grouchy, though aware that at least a large force of Prussians had gone

to Wavre and not to Namur, suspected that Blücher had promised

Wellington to march with his whole army on the morning of the 18th to

support the British at Waterloo. It is more likely that he waited for

his men to assemble and for the ground to dry and become more

practicable for his powerful artillery.[62]

Exception has been taken to the conduct of Wellington in detaching

17,000 men to guard the approach to Brussels at Hal, and, still more, in

not recalling them, when he must have ascertained that nothing was to be

feared on that side, and when such a reinforcement of his right wing

must have been all-important. But it must be remembered that in this

force there were only 1,500 English troops, and 2,000 Hanoverian

militia. The rest were Dutch and Belgians. At all events, Napoleon left

his right flank undefended, though he was already somewhat anxious about

the Prussian movements, and Wellington fought the battle of Waterloo

with a force numerically inferior to that under Napoleon's command,

though it might have been rendered superior by the accession of the Hal

contingent. The effective part of this force, numbering in all 67,661

men, consisted of 24,000 British soldiers, 6,000 soldiers of the king's

German legion, and about 11,000 Hanoverians. Napoleon's force numbered

72,000 men, and it was stronger both in cavalry and in guns. It

represented the flower of the French army; there were few, if any,

recruits as raw as those who swelled the ranks of the British regiments;

there were thousands upon thousands who had formed part of that _Grande

Armée_ which had overawed the continent of Europe. It is fair, however,

to record that, while the British rank and file suffered much for want

of sufficient food, the French had fared still worse, and that very many

of them could have been in no fit condition for the struggle impending

over them.

Both armies occupied ground extending from west to east, on opposite

ridges, and crossed at right angles by the great highway running north

and south from Charleroi to Brussels. In front of the British right were

the château and enclosures of Hougoumont which were occupied by the

British; nearly in front of the centre were the large farm-house and

buildings of La Haye Sainte. Further to the left were the hamlet of

Smohain and the farms Papelotte and La Haye. Wellington had arranged his

brigades so as to distribute the older troops as much as possible among

the less experienced. Sir Thomas Picton's fifth division formed the left

of the line; to his right was Alten's second division, and beyond him to

the right was the guards division under Cooke. Further to the right and

partly in reserve was Clinton's second division, while Chassé's Dutch

division on the extreme right occupied the village of Braine l'Alleud.

Somerset's brigade of heavy cavalry and Kruse's Dutch cavalry were

posted behind Alten's division, and Ponsonby's "union brigade,"

consisting of the royal dragoons, Scots greys, and Inniskillings, was

stationed in Picton's rear. The whole line lay on the inner slopes of

the ridge with the exception of Bylandt's Dutch-Belgian brigade which

was posted on the outer slope in front of Picton's division. D'Erlon's

corps was opposite the British left, Reille's opposite the British

right. Squadrons of cavalry covered the outer flank of either of the two

French corps. The magnificent squadrons of French cavalry, 15,000

strong, under Milhaud, Kellermann, and other famous leaders, were in the

second line; the imperial guard, as usual, was massed in the rear.

[Pageheading: _WATERLOO._]

The battle opened about half-past eleven with a furious attack on

Hougoumont. It was defended with desperate gallantry, mainly by the

British guards, who reopened the old loopholes in the garden-walls, and

closed by sheer muscular force the eastern gate of the yard, which had

been forced open by the French. In the fruitless siege of Hougoumont, as

it may be called, the French left wing thus wasted most of its strength,

and incurred enormous loss. Meanwhile, the French right wing under

D'Erlon, advanced to attack the British left, which had been assailed

for an hour and a half by the fire of a battery with seventy-eight guns.

The Dutch and Belgians, who in their exposed position had suffered

severely from the French artillery fire, soon gave way; but Picton's

division, after a single volley, charged with the bayonet and drove

their assailants reeling backward, though Picton himself fell dead on

the field. Without orders from Wellington, Lord Uxbridge, in command of

the British cavalry, seized the opportunity, and launched the union

brigade with other regiments upon the flying masses. This whirlwind of

British horsemen swept all before it, slaughtering many of the French

cavalry in passing, taking 3,000 prisoners, sabring the gunners of Ney's

battery, and spiking fifteen of the guns. But their ardour carried them

too far. By Napoleon's orders a large force of French cuirassiers and

lancers fell upon their flank before they could take breath again, and

their ranks were frightfully thinned in a disorderly retreat. But their

charge had saved the day.

At one o'clock, while the fate of D'Erlon's onslaught was still

undecided, Napoleon observed Prussian troops on his right. An

intercepted despatch proved these to be Bülow's corps. He instantly sent

off a despatch to Grouchy, whom he supposed to be within reach, ordering

him to attack Bülow in the rear. Then followed the memorable succession

of charges by the whole of the French cavalry upon the squares of the

British infantry. Not one of these squares was broken; a great part of

the French cavalry was mown down by volleys or cut to pieces by the

British cavalry in their precipitate retreat, and the British line

remained unmoved, though grievously weakened, behind its protecting

ridge. This was the crisis of the fight. Much of the British artillery

was dismounted, and Wellington confessed to one of his staff that he

longed for the advent of night or Blücher. Napoleon next felt himself

compelled to detach Lobau's corps for the purpose of meeting the

advancing Prussians. Soon afterwards Ney carried La Haye Sainte by a

most determined assault, aided by the failure of ammunition within its

defences, and thus captured the key of the British position. But

Napoleon saw that his one chance of victory lay in a final _coup_ before

the Prussians could wrest it from him. He ordered the imperial guard to

the front, leading it himself across the valley, and then handing over

the command to Ney. The guard was but the remnant of its original

strength, for all its cavalry had been wrecked in wild charges against

the British squares, and several battalions of its infantry were kept in

reserve to hold back the Prussians and protect the baggage train.

Nevertheless, the advance of this superb corps, the heroes of a hundred

fights, who had seldom failed to hurl back the tide of battle at the

most perilous junctures, was among the most impressive spectacles in the

annals of war. They swerved a little to the left, thereby exposing

themselves to the fire of the British footguards and of a battery in

excellent condition. The former were lying down for shelter, but when

the imperial guard came within sixty paces of them they started up at

the word of command from Wellington himself. The footguards poured a

deadly fire into the front, and the 52nd regiment into the flank of

their columns; as they wavered under the storm of shot a bayonet charge

followed, and the imperial guard, hitherto almost invincible, was

dissolved into a mob of fugitives scattered over the plain.

It was now past eight o'clock; Bülow's Prussians had long been engaged

on the British left, and Blücher, with indomitable energy, was pressing

forward with all his other divisions. Wellington first sent Vandeleur's

and Vivian's cavalry, still comparatively fresh, to sweep away what

remained of the French reserves, and then ordered a general advance. The

French retreat speedily became a rout, and a rout to which there is no

parallel except that which succeeded the battle of Leipzig. Wellington

and Blücher met at La Belle Alliance on the high road, just south of the

battlefield, and lately the French headquarters. The British troops were

utterly tired out, but the Prussian cavalry never drew rein until they

had driven the last Frenchman over the river Sambre in their relentless

pursuit. The slaughter had been prodigious, though far short of that at

Borodino. The British army lost 13,000 men, the Prussian 7,000, and the

French 37,000[63] (including prisoners), besides the whole of their

artillery, ammunition, baggage-waggons, and military train. But the

battle was one of the most decisive recorded in history, and was the

real beginning of a peace which lasted over the whole of Europe for

nearly forty years. Grouchy heard the cannonade of Waterloo on his march

from Ligny to Wavre, and was strongly urged by Gérard to hasten across

country, with his whole force, in the direction of the firing. But he

pleaded the letter of Napoleon's instructions, and reached Wavre only to

find Blücher gone. After an encounter with a Prussian corps, which had

been left behind, he received news of Napoleon's defeat, and ultimately

escaped into France.

[Pageheading: _NAPOLEON'S SECOND ABDICATION._]

The march of the allies into France after the battle of Waterloo was not

wholly unchecked, but it was far more rapid than in 1814. The French

could not be rallied, and in the first week of July Paris was occupied

by Anglo-Prussian troops. The Austrians and Prussians were moving again

upon the eastern frontiers of France, but were still far behind. The

Prussian general and soldiers were animated by the bitterest spirit of

vengeance, and it needed all the firmness of Wellington to prevent the

bridge of Jena from being blown up, and a ruinous contribution levied on

the citizens of Paris. Napoleon himself was now at Rochefort, having

quitted Paris after a second abdication on June 22, but four days after

the battle. No other course was open to him. When he started for his

last campaign, he was no longer the champion of an united nation, and

consciously staked his all on a single throw. When he returned from it,

discomfited and without an army, he found the chambers actively hostile

to him. Carnot, who had formerly opposed his assumption of the imperial

title, was now the only one of his ministers to deprecate his

abdication, but Napoleon himself saw no hope of retaining his power, or

transmitting it to his son, without a reckless appeal to revolutionary

passions. From this he shrank, and he represented himself at St. Helena

as having sacrificed personal ambition to patriotism.

The chamber of deputies appointed an executive commission of five,

including the infamous Fouché, and from this body the late emperor

actually received an order to quit Paris. He retired to Malmaison, where

he received a fresh order to set out for Rochefort, which he reached on

July 3. On the next day Paris capitulated to the allies, and the

necessity for his leaving the shores of France became more urgent. Two

frigates were assigned for his escape to America, but a British squadron

was lying ready to intercept them. Some of his bolder companions devised

a scheme for smuggling him on board a swift merchant ship, but it was

foiled by the vigilant watch of the British squadron off the islands of

Oléron and Ré. At last he surrendered himself on board the

_Bellerophon_, relying, as he said, on the honour of the British nation,

and claiming the generous protection of the prince regent. He was,

however, clearly informed that he would be at the disposal of the

government. Under an agreement with the allied powers, the ministers

decided, and were supported by the nation in deciding, that he could not

be detained in England, either as a guest or as a prisoner, with any

regard to public safety or the verdict of Europe at Vienna. The proposal

of banishing him to St. Helena, suggested in the previous year, was

finally adopted, and he sailed thither in the _Northumberland_ on August

8, vehemently protesting against the bad faith of Great Britain. Louis

XVIII. was restored, and the treaty of Vienna, signed on the eve of the

Waterloo campaign, was but slightly modified.

The action of Murat had solved the difficulties which the congress had

to face in Italy. The kingdom of the Two Sicilies reverted to the

Bourbon, Ferdinand; and the Bourbons also acquired a right of reversion

in Parma, where the protest of Spain against the rule of Maria Louisa

could now be ignored. Genoa was annexed to the kingdom of Sardinia; the

pope received back the states of the Church; the Grand Duke of Tuscany

and the Duke of Modena were restored; while Austria had to be content

with Venetia and Lombardy as far as the Ticino. The organisation of

Germany occupied the congress until June, and was the least durable part

of its work. The basis of it was a confederation of thirty-eight states,

represented and in theory controlled by a diet under the presidency of

Austria. This diet naturally resolved itself into a mere permanent

congress of diplomatists for the purpose of settling the mutual

relations of the constituent states. Each state was ordered to adopt a

constitutional form of government, but, as no provision was made for

enforcing this clause, it remained a dead letter. Prussia regained her

provinces on the left bank of the Rhine, with a population exceeding

1,000,000, and was allotted the northern part of Saxony, with a

population of 800,000, besides retaining her original share of Poland,

with the province of Posen, which had formed part of the duchy of

Warsaw. Most of this duchy was annexed by Russia, but Cracow was left a

republic. Prussia also gained Swedish Pomerania. Bavaria, Hanover, and

Denmark profited more or less by the repartition of Germany. Denmark,

however, finally lost Norway, and Sweden paid the price of this

acquisition by resigning Finland to Russia. The neutrality of

Switzerland was proclaimed and her constitution simplified. The Belgian

Netherlands were united to Holland, the two forming together the kingdom

of the Netherlands, to which Austria ceded all her claims in the Low

Countries.

[Pageheading: _THE SECOND TREATY OF PARIS._]

The treaty of Vienna left the boundaries of France itself as they had

been defined by the first treaty of Paris in 1814. The second treaty of

Paris, however, signed on November 20, 1815, was less favourable to

France, which had already ceded Western Savoy to Sardinia, and was now

required to abandon Landau and other outlying territories beyond the

frontier of 1792. She was also compelled to restore all the works of art

accumulated during the war.

Great Britain had failed to obtain from the congress any binding

regulation on the subject of the slave trade. The most that she could

obtain was a solemn denunciation of that trade issued on February 8,

which declared it to be "repugnant to the principles of civilisation and

of universal morality". The moderation of the British demands, as

embodied in these treaties, excited not only the amazement but the

contempt of Napoleon, who discussed the subject at St. Helena with great

freedom. Well knowing that his paramount object throughout all his wars

and negotiations had been to crush Great Britain, and that Great Britain

had been the mainstay of all the combinations against him, he could find

no explanation of our self-denial except our insular simplicity. Perhaps

it might be attributed with greater reason to politic magnanimity; nor,

indeed, could Great Britain, as a member of the European council,

dictate such terms as Napoleon suggested. Still, the gains of Great

Britain were substantial. She retained Ceylon, the Cape of Good Hope,

the Isle of France (Mauritius), Trinidad, St. Lucia, Tobago, and, above

all, Malta. She also obtained possession of Heligoland and the

protectorate of the Ionian Islands, both of which she has since resigned

of her own accord. If she afterwards lost the commanding position which

she had attained among the allied powers, it was chiefly because the

colossal empire which she had defied was effectually shattered, because

neither her armies nor her subsidies were any longer needed on the

continent of Europe, and perhaps because the energies of her statesmen

were no longer braced up by the stress of a struggle for national life.

Even before the allied armies entered Paris Wellington considered it

necessary to induce Louis XVIII. to make advances to certain politicians

of the revolution so as to inspire national confidence in him, and to

anticipate the risk of a "White Terror," or a continuance of the war.

Fouché was accordingly summoned to power, and he had sufficient

influence to prevent any national opposition to the Bourbon restoration.

Napoleon remained at large for three weeks after his abdication, that

is, for eight days after the allied troops had entered Paris, and the

fear of a future Bonapartist revolution inclined the British government

under Liverpool to entertain favourably the demand of Prussia for the

cession of Alsace, Lorraine, and the northern fortresses. When, however,

Napoleon had placed himself on board the _Bellerophon_, the situation

changed. A contented France seemed preferable to an impotent France, and

Wellington argued that the Bourbon restoration could not last, if French

opinion connected it with the loss of Alsace and Lorraine. The tsar took

this line from the first, and Wellington won for it the adhesion first

of his own government and then of Austria. Prussia had finally to be

contented with a provision for the cession of the outlying districts,

which the treaty of Paris of 1814 had left to France. The second treaty

of Paris, which embodied this stipulation, also provided for an

indemnity of £40,000,000 to be paid by France to the allies, and for the

temporary occupation of Northern France by the allied armies. On the

same day Austria, Great Britain, Prussia, and Russia signed a treaty

pledging themselves to act together in case fresh revolution and

usurpation in France should endanger the repose of other states, and

providing for frequent meetings of congresses to preserve the peace of

Europe.

In addition to the formal treaties of alliance signed at Chaumont,

Vienna, and Paris, an attempt was made by the Tsar Alexander to bind

together the European sovereigns in an union based on the principles of

Christian brotherhood. A form of treaty was accordingly drawn up which

gave expression to these motives, dealt with all Christians as one

nation, and committed their sovereigns to mutual affection and

reciprocal service. This treaty of the holy alliance was signed on

September 26, by Austria, Prussia, and Russia. All European princes

except the sultan were invited to adhere to it, and all except the pope

and the sultan ultimately either accepted it or expressed their sympathy

with its principles. But in England there was hardly a statesman who

regarded the treaty seriously, Wellington avowed his distrust of it, the

prince regent declined to join it, and its effective value in promoting

the subsequent concert of the powers was less than nothing. Still,

however visionary and extravagantly worded, it remains as an unique

record embodying the deliberate adoption of the principle of

international brotherhood, and the sacrifice of separate national

interests for the sake of European peace.

[Pageheading: _NAPOLEON AT ST. HELENA._]

It is remarkable that so little public discussion took place on two

questions which have since been so hotly debated--the legal _status_ of

Napoleon after he surrendered himself, and the moral right of Great

Britain to banish him to St. Helena. One reason for this apparent

indifference to the fate of one who had overawed all Europe may be found

in the fact that parliament was not sitting when the decision of the

government was taken, and that, when it met on February 1, 1816, that

decision was virtually irrevocable. We know, however, that the first

question was fully considered by the allied powers and the British

ministry before his place of exile was fixed, and Great Britain

undertook the custody of his person. The view which prevailed was that,

after his escape from Elba, he could neither be treated as an

independent sovereign nor as a subject of the French king, but must be

regarded as a public enemy who had fallen into the hands of one among

several allied powers. Accordingly, it was by their joint mandate that

he remained the prisoner of Great Britain, and was to be under the joint

inspection of commissioners appointed by the other powers. Still the

minds of Liverpool, Ellenborough, and Sir William Scott, judge of the

court of admiralty, were not altogether easy on the legal aspect of the

case, which Eldon reviewed in an elaborate and exhaustive memorandum.

His conclusion was that Napoleon's position was quite exceptional, that

he could not rightly be made over to France as a French rebel, but was a

prisoner of war at the disposal of the British government, both on the

broad principles of international law, and under the express terms of

his surrender, as reported officially by Captain Maitland of the

_Bellerophon_.

It was thought expedient, however, to pass an act of parliament in the

session of 1816 for the purpose of setting at rest any objections which

might afterwards be raised. This measure was introduced on March 17 by

Lord Castlereagh, who defended it on grounds of national justice and

national policy. It met with no opposition in the house of commons, but

Lords Holland and Lauderdale criticised it in the house of lords, not

as sanctioning a wrong to Napoleon, but as implicitly admitting the

right of other powers to join in arrangements for his custody. Little

attention was then bestowed by parliament or the public on the moral

aspect of his life-long detention at St. Helena, the restrictions to be

there imposed upon his liberty, or the provision to be made for his

comfort. Yet these subjects have ever since exercised the minds of

myriads both in England and France, and have given birth to a copious

literature for more than three generations.

FOOTNOTES:

[61] For the movements of June 15, 16, see Chesney, _Waterloo Lectures_,

pp. 70-137; Ropes, _The Campaign of Waterloo_, pp. 44-196.

[62] Rose, _Life of Napoleon I._, ii., 494, 495.

[63] Oman in _English Historical Review_, xix., 693, and xxi., 132.

The Political History of England - Vol XI From Addington's Administration to the close of William IV.'s Reign (1801-1837) · 第 7 / 21 章