But They Know

The apprentice cried “Clubs?” and cracked his neighbours’ heads with

the precision and fineness of touch which only manual craftsmanship can

give. The housewives who flatly refused to cook the hot dinner knew how

much or how little, cold meat there was in the house. The sailor who

defied discipline by mutinying at the Nore did not defy discipline in

the sense of falling off the rigging or letting the water into the hold.

Similarly the modern proletariat, however little it may know, knows what

it is talking about.

But the curious thing about the educated class is that exactly what it

does not know is what it is talking about. I mean that it is startlingly

ignorant of those special things which it is supposed to invoke and keep

inviolate. The things that workmen invoke may be uglier, more acrid,

more sordid; but they know all about them. They know enough arithmetic

to know that prices have risen; the kind Levantine gentleman is always

there to make them fully understand the meaning of an interest sum; and

the landlord will define Rent as rigidly as Ricardo. The doctors can

always tell them the Latin for an empty stomach; and when the poor man

is treated for the time with some human respect (by the Coronet) it

almost seems a pity he is not alive to hear how legally he died.

Against this bitter shrewdness and bleak realism in the suffering

classes it is commonly supposed that the more leisured classes stand for

certain legitimate ideas which also have their place in life; such as

history, reverence, the love of the land. Well, it might be no bad thing

to have something, even if it were something narrow, that testified to

the truths of religion or patriotism. But such narrow things in the

past have always at least known their own history; the bigot knew his

catechism; the patriot knew his way home. The astonishing thing about

the modern rich is their real and sincere ignorance--especially of the

things they like.

No!

Take the most topical case you can find in any drawing-room: Belfast.

Ulster is most assuredly a matter of history; and there is a sense in

which Orange resistance is a matter of religion. But go and ask any of

the five hundred fluttering ladies at a garden party (who find Carson so

splendid and Belfast so thrilling) what it is all about, when it began,

where it came from, what it really maintains? What was the history

of Ulster? What is the religion of Belfast? Do any of them know where

Ulstermen were in Grattan’s time; do any of them know what was the

“Protestantism” that came from Scotland to that isle; could any of them

tell what part of the old Catholic system it really denied?

It was generally something that the fluttering ladies find in their own

Anglican churches every Sunday. It were vain to ask them to state the

doctrines of the Calvinist creed; they could not state the doctrines

of their own creed. It were vain to tell them to read the history of

Ireland; they have never read the history of England. It would matter as

little that they do not know these things, as that I do not know German;

but then German is not the only thing I am supposed to know. History and

ritual are the only things aristocrats are supposed to know; and they

don’t know them.

Utopia of Usurers and Other Essays · 第 60 / 71 题