Literally Illiterate

It is indeed their feeble boast that they are not literally illiterate.

They are always saying the ancient barons could not sign their own

names--for they know less of history perhaps than of anything else. The

modern barons, however, can sign their own names--or someone else’s for

a change. They can sign their own names; and that is about all they can

do. They cannot face a fact, or follow an argument, or feel a tradition;

but, least of all, can they, upon any persuasion, read through a plain

impartial book, English or foreign, that is not specially written to

soothe their panic or to please their pride. Looking up at these seats

of the mighty I can only say, with something of despair, what Robert

Lowe said of the enfranchised workmen: “We must educate our masters.”

I do not mean this as paradoxical, or even as symbolical; it is simply

tame and true. The modern English rich know nothing about things, not

even about the things to which they appeal. Compared with them, the

poor are pretty sure to get some enlightenment, even if they cannot get

liberty; they must at least be technical. An old apprentice learnt

a trade, even if his master came like any Turk and banged him most

severely. The old housewife knew which side her bread was buttered, even

if it were so thin as to be almost imperceptible. The old sailor knew

the ropes; even if he knew the rope’s end. Consequently, when any

of these revolted, they were concerned with things they knew, pains,

practical impossibilities, or the personal record.

Utopia of Usurers and Other Essays · 第 59 / 71 题