Tyranny and Head-Dress

But there is another and more subtle way in which we may miss the point;

and that is, not by keeping a dead silence about it, but by being just

witty enough to state it wrong. Thus, some of the Liberal official

papers have almost screwed up their courage to the sticking-point about

the bestial coup d’etat in South Africa. They have screwed up their

courage to the sticking-point; and it has stuck. It cannot get any

further; because it has missed the main point. The modern Liberals make

their feeble attempts to attack the introduction of slavery into South

Africa by the Dutch and the Jews, by a very typical evasion of the vital

fact. The vital fact is simply slavery. Most of these Dutchmen have

always felt like slave-owners. Most of these Jews have always felt like

slaves. Now that they are on top, they have a particular and curious

kind of impudence, which is only known among slaves. But the Liberal

journalists will do their best to suggest that the South African

wrong consisted in what they call Martial Law. That is, that there is

something specially wicked about men doing an act of cruelty in khaki

or in vermilion, but not if it is done in dark blue with pewter buttons.

The tyrant who wears a busby or a forage cap is abominable; the tyrant

who wears a horsehair wig is excusable. To be judged by soldiers is

hell; but to be judged by lawyers is paradise.

Now the point must not be missed in this way. What is wrong with the

tyranny in Africa is not that it is run by soldiers. It would be quite

as bad, or worse, if it were run by policemen. What is wrong is that,

for the first time since Pagan times, private men are being forced to

work for a private man. Men are being punished by imprisonment or exile

for refusing to accept a job. The fact that Botha can ride on a horse,

or fire off a gun, makes him better rather than worse than any man like

Sidney Webb or Philip Snowden, who attempt the same slavery by much less

manly methods. The Liberal Party will try to divert the whole discussion

to one about what they call militarism. But the very terms of modern

politics contradict it. For when we talk of real rebels against the

present system we call them Militants. And there will be none in the

Servile State.

Utopia of Usurers and Other Essays · 第 56 / 71 题