THE NEW NAME

Something has come into our community, which is strong enough to save

our community; but which has not yet got a name. Let no one fancy I

confess any unreality when I confess the namelessness. The morality

called Puritanism, the tendency called Liberalism, the reaction called

Tory Democracy, had not only long been powerful, but had practically

done most of their work, before these actual names were attached to

them. Nevertheless, I think it would be a good thing to have some

portable and practicable way of referring to those who think as we do

in our main concern. Which is, that men in England are ruled, at this

minute by the clock, by brutes who refuse them bread, by liars who

refuse them news, and by fools who cannot govern, and therefore wish to

enslave.

Let me explain first why I am not satisfied with the word commonly used,

which I have often used myself; and which, in some contexts, is quite

the right word to use. I mean the word “rebel.” Passing over the fact

that many who understand the justice of our cause (as a great many at

the Universities) would still use the word “rebel” in its old and strict

sense as meaning only a disturber of just rule. I pass to a much more

practical point. The word “rebel” understates our cause. It is much too

mild; it lets our enemies off much too easily. There is a tradition in

all western life and letters of Prometheus defying the stars, of man

at war with the Universe, and dreaming what nature had never dared to

dream. All this is valuable in its place and proportion. But it has

nothing whatever to do with our ease; or rather it very much weakens it.

The plutocrats will be only too pleased if we profess to preach a new

morality; for they know jolly well that they have broken the old one.

They will be only too pleased to be able to say that we, by our own

confession, are merely restless and negative; that we are only what we

call rebels and they call cranks. But it is not true; and we must not

concede it to them for a moment. The model millionaire is more of a

crank than the Socialists; just as Nero was more of a crank than the

Christians. And avarice has gone mad in the governing class to-day, just

as lust went mad in the circle of Nero. By all the working and orthodox

standards of sanity, capitalism is insane. I should not say to Mr.

Rockefeller “I am a rebel.” I should say “I am a respectable man: and

you are not.”

Utopia of Usurers and Other Essays · 第 29 / 71 题