“I took it from the Soudan Turk

When you and your men durstna come see.”[3]

Who the devil was this Soudan Turk? I would be very happy in

contributing any assistance in my power to the elucidating the

annals of that illustrious and beloved though now decayed house,

but I have no means of accession to any information. I imagine the

whole manuscript might be procured from some of the connections of

the family. Is it not in the library at Philiphaugh?[4] As to the

death of the Baron of Oakwood and his brother-in-law on Yarrow,

if Mr Mercer or Mr Scott, or either of them, wisheth to see it

poetically described, they might wait until my tragedy is performed

at the Theatre-royal; and if that shall never take place, they must

sit in darkness and the shadow of death for what light the poets

of Bruce’s time can afford them!

‘I believe I could get as much from these traditions as to make

good songs out of them myself. But without Mr Scott’s permission

this would be an imposition; neither would I undertake it without

an order from him in his own handwriting, as I could not bring my

language to bear with my date. As a supplement to his songs, if

you please, you may send him the one I sent last to you: it will

satisfy him, yea or nay, as to my abilities. Haste; communicate

this to him; and ask him if, in his researches, he hath lighted on

that of John Armstrong of Gilnockie Hall, as I can procure him a

copy of that. My uncle says it happened in the same reign with that

of Murray, and if so, I am certain it has been written by the same

bard. I could procure Mercer some stories--such as the tragical,

though well-authenticated one of the unnatural murder of the son

and heir of Sir Robert Scott of Thirlstane, the downfall of the

family of Tushilaw, and the horrid spirit that still haunts the

Alders. And we might give him that of John Thomson’s Aumrie, and

the Bogle of Bell’s Lakes.

‘My muse still lies dormant, and with me must sleep for ever, since

a liberal public hath not given me what my sins and mine iniquities

deserved.--I am yours for ever.

JAMES HOGG.

‘_July 20th, 1801._’

The ‘liberal public’ had given a reception ‘the north side of

friendly,’ as Bailie Nicol Jarvie says, to a small publication which

made its appearance about six months before the date of the above

letter, entitled ‘_Scottish Pastorals, Poems_, &c., by James Hogg,

Farmer at Ettrick’--a most unlucky speculation.

Mr Laidlaw was constantly annoyed, he said, to find how much the

affectation and false taste of Allan Ramsay had spoiled or superseded

many striking and beautiful old strains of which he got traces and

fragments, and how much Scott was too late in beginning his researches,

as many aged persons, who had been the bards and depositaries of a

former generation, were then gone.

‘I heard,’ he says, ‘from one of our servant-girls, who had all the

turn and qualifications for a collector, of a ballad called _Auld

Maitland_, that a grandfather of Hogg’s could repeat, and she herself

had several of the first stanzas (which I took a note of, and have

still the copy). This greatly aroused my anxiety to procure the whole,

for this was a ballad not even hinted at by Mercer in his list of

desiderata received from Mr Scott. I forthwith wrote to Hogg himself,

requesting him to endeavour to procure the whole ballad. In a week

or two, I received his reply, containing _Auld Maitland_ exactly as

he had copied it from the recitation of his uncle, Will Laidlaw of

Phawhope, corroborated by his mother, who both said they learned it

from their father, a still older Will of Phawhope, and an old man

called Andrew Muir, who had been servant to the famous Mr Boston,

minister of Ettrick.’[5] These services of the olden time were marked

by reciprocal kindness and attachment, not unworthy of the patriarchal

age. Son succeeded father in tending the _hirsel_ or herding the cows,

while in the case of ‘the master,’ the same hereditary or family

succession was often preserved.

The person of the sheriff was not unknown to the new friend with whom

he was afterwards destined to form so intimate a connection. ‘I first

saw Walter Scott,’ Laidlaw used to relate, ‘when the Selkirk troop of

yeomanry met to receive their sheriff shortly after his appointment. I

was on the right of the rear rank, and my front-rank man was _Archie

Park_, a brother of the traveller. Our new sheriff was accompanied by

a friend, and as they retired to the usual station of the inspecting

officer previous to the charges, the wonderful _springs_ and bounds

which Scott made, seemingly in the excitation and gaiety of his heart,

joined to the effect of his fine fair face and athletic appearance,

were the cause of a general murmur of satisfaction, bordering on

applause, which ran through the troop. Archie Park looked over his

shoulder to me, and growled, in his deep rough voice: “Will, what a

strong chield that would have been if his right leg had been like his

left ane!”’

Scott and Leyden duly appeared at Blackhouse, carrying letters of

introduction. They put up their horses, and experienced a homely

unostentatious hospitality, which afterwards served to heighten the

delightful traits of rustic character in the delineation of Dandie

Dinmont’s home at Charlies-Hope. If the sheriff did not ‘shoot

a blackcock and eat a blackcock too,’ the fault was not in his

entertainers. After the party had explored the scenery of the burn,

and inspected Douglas Tower, Laidlaw produced his treasure of _Auld

Maitland_. Leyden seemed inclined to lay hands on the manuscript, but

the sheriff said gravely that _he_ would read it. Instantly both Scott

and Leyden, from their knowledge of the subject, saw and felt that

the ballad was undoubtedly ancient, and their eyes sparkled as they

exchanged looks. Scott read with great fluency and emphasis. Leyden was

like a roused lion. He paced the room from side to side, clapped his

hands, and repeated such expressions as echoed the spirit of hatred to

King Edward and the Southrons, or as otherwise struck his fancy. ‘I had

never before seen anything like this,’ said the quiet Laidlaw; ‘and,

though the sheriff kept his feelings under, he, too, was excited, so

that his _burr_ became very perceptible.’ The wild Border energy and

abruptness are certainly seen in such verses as these:

‘As they fared up o’er Lammermore,

They burned baith up and down,

Until they came to a darksome house;

Some call it Leader-Town.

“Wha hauds this house?” young Edward cried,

“Or wha gies’t ower to me?”

A gray-haired knight set up his head,

And crackit right crousely:

“Of Scotland’s king I haud my house;

He pays me meat and fee;

And I will keep my gude auld house

While my house will keep me.”

They laid their sowies to the wall,

Wi’ mony a heavy peal;

But he threw ower to them agen

Baith pitch and tar barrel.

With springalds, stanes, and gads of airn,

Among them fast he threw;

Till mony of the Englishmen

About the wall he slew.

Full fifteen days that braid host lay,

Sieging auld Maitland keen,

Syne they hae left him, hail and fair,

Within his strength of stane.’

Scott valued this ballad and his other lyrical acquisitions highly.

In a letter to Mr Laidlaw, dated 21st January 1803, he remarks as

follows: ‘_Auld Maitland_, laced and embroidered with antique notes

and illustrations, makes a most superb figure. I have got, through the

intervention of Lady Dalkeith, a copy of Mr Beattie of Meikledale’s

_Tamlane_. It contains some highly poetical stanzas descriptive of

fairy-land, which, after some hesitation, I have adopted, though they

have a very refined and modern cast. I do not suspect Mr Beattie of

writing ballads himself; but pray, will you inquire whether, within the

memory of man, there has been any poetical clergyman or schoolmaster

whom one could suppose capable of giving a coat of modern varnish to

this old ballad. What say you to this, for example?

“We sleep on rose-buds soft and sweet,

We revel in the stream,

We wanton lightly on the wind,

Or glide on a sunbeam.”

This seems quite modern, yet I have retained it.’

Laidlaw had procured a version of another ballad, _The Demon Lover_,

which he took down from the recitation of Mr Walter Grieve, then in

Craik, on Borthwick Water. Grieve sung it well to a singularly wild

tune; and the song embodies a popular but striking superstition, such

as Lewis introduced into his romance of _The Monk_. To complete the

fragment, Laidlaw added the 6th, 12th, 17th, and 18th stanzas; and

those who consult the ballad in Scott’s _Minstrelsy_ will see how well

our friend was qualified to excel in the imitation of these strains of

the elder muse. After the party had ‘quaffed their fill’ of old songs

and legendary story, they all took horse, and went to dine with Mr

Ballantyne of Whitehope, the uncle of Laidlaw.

‘There was not a minute of silence,’ says Mr Laidlaw’s memorandum,

‘as we rode down the narrow glen, and over by the way of Dryhope,

to get a view of St Mary’s Loch and of the Peel or Tower. When we

entered the Hawkshaw-doors, a pass between Blackhouse and Dryhope,

where a beautiful view of the lake opens, Leyden, as I expected, was

so struck with the scene that he suddenly stopped, sprung from his

horse (which he gave to Mr Scott’s servant), and stood admiring the

fine Alpine prospect. Mr Scott said little; but as this was the first

time he had seen St Mary’s Loch, doubtless more was passing in his mind

than appeared. Often, when returning home with my fishing-rod, had I

stopped at this place, and admired the effect of the setting sun and

the approaching twilight; and now when I found it admired by those whom

I thought likely to judge of and be affected with its beauty, I felt

the same sort of pleasure that I experienced when I found that Walter

Scott was delighted with Hogg. Had I at that time been gifted with a

glimpse--a very slight glimpse--of the second-sight, every word that

passed, and they were not few, until we reached Whitehope or Yarrow

Church, I should have endeavoured to record. Scott, as all the world

knows, was great in conversation; and Leyden was by no means a common

person. He had about him that unconquerable energy and restlessness

of mind that would have raised him, had he lived, very high among

the remarkable men of his native country. I cannot forget the fire

with which he repeated, on the Craig-bents, a half-stanza of an

irrecoverable ballad--

“Oh swiftly gar speed the berry-brown steed

That drinks o’ the Teviot clear!”--

which his friend, when finally no brother to it could be found, adopted

in the reply of William of Deloraine to the Lady of Branksome.’

The regret that Laidlaw here expresses at having omitted to note down

the conversation of his friends is extremely natural, but few men

could be less fitted for such a task. He had nothing of Boswell in his

mind or character. He wanted both the concentration of purpose and the

pliant readiness of talent and power of retention. At Abbotsford he

had ample opportunities for keeping such a record, and he was often

urged to undertake it. Scott himself on one occasion, after some

brilliant company had left the room, remarked half jocularly, that

many a one meeting such people, and hearing such talk, would make a

very lively and entertaining book of the whole, which might some day

be read with interest. Laidlaw instantly felt it necessary to put

in a disclaimer. He said he would consider it disreputable in him

to take advantage of his position, or of the confidence of private

society, and make a journal of the statements and opinions uttered

in free and familiar conversation. We may respect the delicacy and

sensitiveness of his feelings, but society, collectively, would lose

much by the rigid observance of such a rule. The question, we think,

should be determined by the nature and quality of the circumstances

recorded. It must be a special, not a general case. There is nothing

more discreditable in noting down a brilliant thought or interesting

fact, than in repeating it in conversation; while to play the part of a

gossiping and malicious eavesdropper, is equally a degradation in life

and in literature. It would have been detestable (if the idea could

for a moment be entertained) for Mr Laidlaw to pry into the domestic

details and personal feelings or failings of his illustrious friend

at Abbotsford; but we may wish that his pen had been as ready as his

ear when Scott ran over the story of his literary life and opinions,

or discriminated the merits of his great contemporaries--when Davy

expatiated on the discoveries and delights of natural philosophy--when

Miss Edgeworth painted Irish scenes and character--when Moore

discoursed of poetry, music, and Byron--when Irving kindled up like

a poet in his recollections of American lakes, and woods, and old

traditions--when Mackintosh began with the Roman law, and ended in

Lochaber--when some septuagenarian related anecdotes of the past--when

artists and architects talked of pictures, sculpture, and buildings--or

when some accomplished traveller and _savant_ opened up the interior of

foreign courts and the peculiarities of national manners. Many a wise

and witty saying and memorable illustration--the life-blood of the best

books--might thus have been preserved, though with occasional _lacunæ_

and mistakes; and all are now lost--

‘Gone glittering through the dream of things that were’--

and cannot be recalled. Surely society is the worse for the loss of

these racy, spontaneous fruits of intellect, study, and observation.

While dinner was getting ready at Whitehope, Laidlaw and Leyden

strolled into the neighbouring churchyard of Yarrow, and saw the

tomb of Mr Rutherford, the first minister of that parish after the

Revolution, and the maternal great-grandfather of Scott. Leyden recited

to his companion the ballads of _The Eve of St John_ and _Glenfinlas_,

which naturally impressed on the hearer a vivid idea of the poetical

talents of the sheriff, and Laidlaw felt towards him as towards an

old friend. This was increased by Scott’s partiality for dogs. He was

struck with a very beautiful and powerful greyhound which followed

Laidlaw, and he begged to have a brace of pups from the same dog,

saying he had now become a forester, as sheriff of Ettrick, and must

have dogs of the true mountain breed. ‘This request,’ said the other,

‘I took no little pains to fulfil. I kept the puppies till they were

nearly a year old. My youngest brother, then a boy, took great delight

in training them; and the way was this: he took a long pole having a

string and a piece of meat fastened to it, and made the dogs run in a

circular or oval course. Their eagerness to get the meat gave them, by

much practice, great strength in the loins, and singular expertness

in turning, besides singular alertness in _mouthing_, for which they

were afterwards famous. Scott hunted with them for two years over the

mountains of Tweedside and Yarrow, and never dreamed that a hare could

escape them. He mentions them in the Introduction to the second canto

of _Marmion_--

“Remember’st thou my greyhounds true?

O’er holt or hill there never flew,

From slip or leash there never sprang,

More fleet of foot, or sure of fang.”’

After this visit, Laidlaw doubled his diligence in gathering

up fragments of the elder Muse, and the sheriff was profuse in

acknowledgments:

‘MY DEAR SIR--I am very much obliged to you for your letter and

the enclosure. The _Laird o’ Logie_ is particularly acceptable, as

coming near the real history. Carmichael, mentioned in the ballad,

was the ancestor of the Earl of Hyndford, and captain of James

VI.’s guard, so that the circumstance of the prisoner’s being in

his custody is highly probable. I will adopt the whole of this

ballad instead of the common one called _Ochiltree_. _Geordie_ I

have seen before: the ballad is curious, though very rude. _Ormond_

may be curious, but is modern. The story of _Confessing the Queen

of England_ is published by Bishop Percy, so I will neither trouble

you about that nor about _Dundee_. “Glendinning” is a wrong

reading: the name of the Highland chief who carries off the lady is

Glenlyon, one of the Menzieses. Among Hogg’s ballads is a curious

set of _Lamington_ or _Lochinvar_, which I incline to adopt as

better than that in the _Minstrelsy_. Who was Katherine Janfarie,

the heroine? She could hardly be a damsel of rank, as the estate

of Whitebank is an ancient patrimony of the Pringles. I don’t know

what to make of Cockburn’s name, unless it be Perys, the modern

Pierce, which is not a common name in Scotland. I am very much

interested about the Tushilaw lines, which, from what you mention,

must be worth recovering. I forgot to bring with me from Blackhouse

your edition of the _Goshawk_, in which were some excellent various

readings. I am so anxious to have a complete Scottish _Otterburn_,

that I will omit the ballad entirely in the first volume, hoping

to recover it in time for insertion in the third. I would myself

be well pleased to delay the publication of all three for some

time, but the booksellers are mutinous and impatient, as a book is

always injured by being long out of print. As to the Liddesdale

traditions, I think I am pretty correct, although doubtless much

more may be recovered. The truth is that, in these traditions, as

you must have observed, old people are usually very positive about

their own mode of telling a story, and as uncharitably critical in

their observations on those who differ from them.--Yours faithfully,

WALTER SCOTT.’

Before the friends parted, Scott made a note of Hogg’s address, and

from that time never ceased to take a warm interest in his fortunes.

He corresponded with him, and becoming curious to see the poetical

Shepherd, made another visit to Blackhouse, for the purpose of

getting Laidlaw along with him as guide to Ettrick. The visit was

highly agreeable. The sheriff’s _bonhomie_ and lively conversation

had deeply interested his companion, and he rode by his side in a

sort of ecstasy as they journeyed again by St Mary’s Loch and the

green hills of Dryhope, which rise beyond the wide expanse of smooth

water. It was a fine summer morning, and the impressions of the day

and the scene have been recorded in imperishable verse.[6] Dryhope

Tower, so intimately associated with the memory of Mary Scott, the

‘Flower of Yarrow,’ made the travellers stop for a brief space; and

_Dhu Linn_ (where Marjory, the wife of Percy de Cockburn, sat while

men were hanging her husband), with Chapelhope and other scenes and

ruins famous in Border tradition, deeply interested Scott. At the west

end of the Loch of the Lowes, the surrounding mountains close in, in

the face of the traveller, apparently preventing all farther egress.

At this spot, as Laidlaw was trying to find a safe place where they

might cross the marsh through which the infant Yarrow finds its way

to the loch, Scott’s servant, an English boy, rode up, and, touching

his hat, respectfully inquired, with much interest, where the people

got their necessaries! This unromantic question, and the _naïveté_ of

the lad’s manner, was a source of great amusement to the sheriff. The

day’s journey was a favourite theme with Laidlaw. First, after passing

the spots we have described, the horsemen crossed the ridge of hills

that separates the Yarrow from her sister stream. These hills are high

and green, but the more lofty parts of the ridge are soft and boggy,

and they had often to pick their way, and proceed in single file. Then

they followed a foot-track on the side of a long _cleugh_ or _hope_,

and at last descended towards the Ettrick, where they had in view the

level green valley, walled in by high hills of dark green, with here

and there gray crags, the church and the old _place_ of Ettrick Hall

in ruins, embosomed in trees. Scott was somewhat chafed by having

left in his bedroom that morning his watch--a valuable gold repeater,

presented to him on the occasion of his marriage--and to Laidlaw’s

ejaculations of delight he sometimes replied quickly: ‘A savage enough

place--a very savage place.’ His good-humour, however, was restored

by the novelty of the scenes and the fine clear day, and he broke out

with snatches of song, and told endless anecdotes, either new, or

better told than ever they were before. The travellers went to dine at

Ramsey-cleugh, where they were sure of a cordial welcome and a good

farmer’s dinner; and Laidlaw sent off to Blackhouse for the sheriff’s

watch (which he received next morning), and to Ettrick House for Hogg,

that he might come and spend the evening with them. The Shepherd (who

then retained all his original simplicity of character) came _to tea_,

and he brought with him a bundle of manuscripts, of size enough at

least to shew his industry--all of course ballads, and fragments of

ballads. The penmanship was executed with more care than Hogg had ever

bestowed on anything before. Scott was surprised and pleased with

Hogg’s appearance, and with the hearty familiarity with which _Jamie_,

as he was called, was received by Laidlaw and the Messrs Bryden of

Ramsey-cleugh. Hogg was no less gratified. ‘The sheriff of a county

in those days,’ said Laidlaw, ‘was regarded by the class to whom Hogg

belonged with much of the fear and respect that their _forbears_

looked up to the ancient hereditary sheriffs, who had the power of

pit and gallows in their hands; and here Jamie found himself all at

once not only the chief object of the sheriff’s notice and flattering

attention, but actually seated at the same table with him.’ Hogg’s

genius was sufficient passport to the best society. His appearance was

also prepossessing. His clear ruddy cheek and sparkling eye spoke of

health and vivacity, and he was light and agile in his figure. When a

youth, he had a remarkably fine head of long curling brown hair, which

he wore coiled up under his bonnet; and on Sundays, when he entered

the church and let down his locks, the _lasses_ (on whom Jamie always

turned an expressive _espiègle_ glance) looked towards him with envy

and admiration. He doubtless thought of himself as the Gaelic bard did

of Allan of Muidart--

‘And when to old Kilphedar’s church

Came troops of damsels gay,

Say, came they there for Allan’s fame,

Or came they there to pray?’

Mr Laidlaw thus speaks of the evening at Ramsey-cleugh: ‘It required

very little of that tact or address in social intercourse for which Mr

Scott was afterwards so much distinguished, to put himself and those

around him entirely at their ease. In truth, I never afterwards saw

him at any time apparently enjoy company so much, or exert himself

so greatly--or probably there was no effort at all--in rendering

himself actually fascinating; nor did I ever again spend such a night

of merriment. The qualities of Hogg came out every instant, and his

unaffected simplicity and fearless frankness both surprised and charmed

the sheriff. They were both very good mimics and story-tellers born and

bred; and when Scott took to employ his dramatic talent, he soon found

he had us all in his power; for every one of us possessed a quick sense

of the ludicrous, and perhaps of humour of all kinds. I well recollect

how the tears ran down the cheeks of my cousin, George Bryden; and

although his brother was more quiet, it was easy to see that he too

was delighted. Hogg and I were unbounded laughers when the occasion

was good. The best proof of Jamie’s enjoyment was, that he never sung

a song that blessed night, and it was between two and three o’clock

before we parted.’

Life of Sir Walter Scott, with Abbotsford Notanda · 第 8 / 13 段