As every sentence is more or less incomplete until the end is reached,

_rising intervals are the rule in intonation, and falling intervals the

exception_, and it is this infrequency of use which gives to the falling

movement its value as a mode of emphasis. But where the emphasis is that

of doubt, uncertainty, surprise, or interrogation, the suspensiveness of

these emotional states is appropriately expressed by rising intonations;

and hence, too, in all sentences in which the interrogative element is

strongly present, the rising interval should characterize every syllable

in it, and the sentences be uttered with interrogative intonations

throughout. If in any such sentence, a particular word is to be

especially emphasized, this is effected by giving to the word a low

radical pitch and retaining the rising interval indicative of

interrogation.

=The width of the interval= depends, as is natural, upon the intensity

of the thought or emotion of which the concrete is intended to be an

expression. For example, suppose the statement, "=You= _are the

culprit_," be answered by the surprised and indignant interrogation,

"=I?=" The emphatic words here used may be appropriately uttered with

intervals of a tone, a third, a fifth, or an octave, according to the

emphasis supposed necessary.

=The Semitone=, as has been said before, is an interval sometimes heard

in language of distress, complaint, grief, sorrow, tenderness,

compassion, pity. Occasionally it is introduced in diatonic melody as an

appropriate emphatic mode of uttering a single word; as, for example,

"_Other friends have flown before; on the morrow_ HE _will leave me_."

At times diction may assume what may be called a _pathetic drift_, and

for the suitable interpretation of this drift semitonic intervals may be

used, and the mode of progression cease for a space to be diatonic and

become semitonic, or _chromatic_, as it is called.

=The Wave= is one of the most impressive of the elements of expression;

but its proper use demands great flexibility in the vocal organs and a

high degree of taste in the reader. Like all other unusual modes, its

employment lends color and contrast to utterance; that is, it makes it

more effective for the purposes of emphasis or distinction. The wave, as

has been described, is a concrete with an upward and a downward movement

united; but its last constituent is that which most affects the ear and

leaves upon it the stronger impression, and hence, especially if it be

given with a wide interval, _its dominant characteristic will be that of

the second movement_; for example, if the second movement be upward, the

wave may express interrogation mingled with surprise or scorn; if the

second movement be downward, the wave may express astonishment mingled

with indignation. The intervals which are given to the wave depend upon

the diction to which it is applied. To express great surprise or

vehement indignation it may sweep through a fifth or a whole octave. In

these extreme modes _the wave frequently is given a wider interval in

the second movement than in the first_, and its effect intensified by

the appropriate use of stress, and (for the expression of such emotions

as scorn, contempt, irony, ridicule, and so on) of the impure qualities

of voice. When used with intervals of the second, the characteristics of

direct and inverted forms lose some of their distinctness; but in this

degree the wave is effectively used to put into relief occasional words,

or, with median stress and long quantities, to give to the otherwise

short and tripping character of the second a dignified and impressive

effect suited to the rendering of all serious and important diction that

is not impassioned.

=The Wave of the Semitone= is generally employed when time, or syllabic

quantity, is needed as an element in the expression of the language of

complaint or pathos. The effect is much the same whether it be direct or

indirect.

=The Tremor= may be used to express grief, supplication, tenderness, in

which the interval through which it ranges may be wide, or, for a more

plaintive effect, be limited to the semitone. With constituent intervals

other than the semitone (that is, of a tone or otherwise), and ranging

through an aggregate interval of less or greater width, it may be used

to express laughter; as, for example, in the utterance of the syllables

"_ha_, _ha_, _ha_, _ha_, _ha_," which, when rapidly effected, resembles

one syllable uttered with discrete intervals. Combined with stress,

aspiration, and guttural vibration, in suitable modifications, this

laughing tone may be made to express scorn, derision, exultation,

triumph, and so on.

II. FORCE. Force must be considered under two aspects: first, as to the

_degree of its intensity_ in the utterance of syllables, words, phrases,

and sentences; and second, as to the _form of its application in the

utterance of the concrete_. When the term is used without qualification,

the first of these considerations is intended; when the second is

intended, force is generally spoken of as =stress=.

_Force must be contradistinguished from loudness._ In mere loudness the

vocal organs are comparatively relaxed--the intensity of sound being

produced by the violent discharge of a great volume of air from the

lungs. In forceful utterance the vocal organs are compressed and tense,

and though the volume of air effused be small, the resulting

sound-vibrations are strong, and distinct, and of penetrating power.

In respect of intensity, force may be manifested in infinite variation,

but the degrees usually spoken of are _very light_, _light_,

_moderate_, _strong_, and _very strong_. As with all other modes, these

degrees will vary from word to word, and from sentence to sentence; and

great judgment and taste must be exercised in employing them, so that

they appropriately represent the intensity of the thought and feeling of

which they are to be the expression.

=Moderate Force= is the natural expression of tranquillity, and,

therefore, of all unimpassioned diction. As the diction becomes pervaded

by the more positive emotions, the tones of the voice naturally become

stronger. Certainty requires strong force with pure quality. So all the

passions, the lighter as well as the more vehement, require the degree

of force to be heightened: cheerfulness, joy, ecstacy, requiring force

moderately strong; and anger, hate, terror, revenge, being suitably

rendered by very strong force. Again, doubt, uncertainty, secrecy, as

well as the gentler and more plaintive emotions, are most suitably

represented by the lighter shades of force.

As the voice assumes the intenser modes of force, the vocal organs

become more and more compressed, and utterance is more and more labored;

the breath forced out cannot all be vocalized; the voice becomes less

and less pure, and manifests itself in the aspirate and guttural

qualities. _Hence, strongly suppressed utterance in impure vocality,

rather than mere loudness in pure vocality, is the appropriate

expression for all the intenser passions._

III. STRESS. Stress is force considered with respect of the form of its

application to the concrete. Since the equable concrete is the natural

colorless expression of unimpassioned thought, force applied to any part

of it changes its character, and gives it a more or less significant

emphasis. The three most usual forms of stress are the _radical_, the

_median_, and the _final_; these may be effected in any of the degrees

of force. _Compound stress_ and _thorough stress_ admit of but little

variation.

=Radical Stress=, to some extent an essential, but not an expressive

element in the equable concrete, is, in a somewhat stronger form, an

element in all utterance that is intended to be vivid and energetic,

emphasizing these characteristics by its own incisive clearness. The

more animated and energetic the diction the clearer and more determined

should be the opening of the concrete, that is, the more distinct and

forcible should be its radical stress; while in graver language the

radical stress is less pronounced. In its emphatic degree it ought at no

time to be allowed to become a current mode, imparting its peculiar

incisive character to every syllable; though, for especial emphasis, it

may be appropriately used in this way in the utterance of the several

words of a phrase.

=Final Stress= differs from radical stress principally in this, that

while it equally indicates energy and positiveness, it does so as in

accordance with predetermination and reflection. _Radical stress

denotes, as it were, an involuntary state of energy; final stress, the

energy or fixedness of resolve._ Hence, final stress is appropriate to

the expression of resolution, of obstinacy, of earnest conviction, of

passionate resolve. It emphasizes the characteristics of wide intervals,

giving to rising intonations a more decidedly interrogatory character,

and making falling intonations more vehemently and passionately

positive.

=Median Stress=, as it can be effectively applied to none but indefinite

or mutable syllables, is compatible only with such a rate of utterance

as will permit of these receiving long quantities. It may receive any

degree of force, from that gentle swell which indicates a tranquil flow

of emotion, to that firm and swelling energy which is the appropriate

expression of the language of elevated feeling. With the wider intervals

it should be used only for occasional emphasis; but in its lighter forms

it may prevail as a drift of dignified expression. Median stress, being

always necessarily associated with long quantity in syllables, is not an

appropriate mode in the language of colloquy, or in vivacious discourse

of any kind. It is, however, the fit interpreter of that fervid and

lofty imagination which clothes itself in forms of grace and grandeur;

and hence, with intonations and waves of the lesser intervals, with

medium or low sentential pitch, a moderate degree of force, and the pure

or orotund quality, it is the appropriate expression of all exalted

prose and poetry, not strongly dramatic.

=Thorough Stress= is effected by continuing the force and fulness of the

radical stress throughout the whole concrete. Used as a current mode,

which should be but rarely, it is expressive of bluntness, arrogance,

bravado; and, with short quantities, of ignorant coarseness.

Occasionally it may be used instead of final stress to give emphasis to

a syllable whose vanishing movement is but little capable of receiving

an increase of force.

=Compound Stress= combines the qualities of both radical and final

stress; it is therefore of extreme character, and can be only

occasionally used. With wide intervals, in its stronger modes, it is

expressive of the utmost intensity of feeling; in its lighter modes it

is the natural expression of strong surprise.

=The Loud Concrete= is simply the equable concrete uttered with greater

fulness of breath and loudness of tone. It is used to break a current of

light force for the sake of emphasizing some word or phrase; and, in

impassioned discourse, it may be used as a current mode, individual

words or phrases being then put in relief by receiving the forcible

radical, or thorough, or compound stress.

In reference to stress it must be remembered that, as with all other

varieties of emphatic utterance, no one form should prevail as an

exclusive mode. Even a prevalent drift of thought or feeling will be

most effectively rendered by vocal signs which change in color and

intensity from word to word. It must also be borne in mind in reference

both to force and stress, and to pitch and time as well, that the modes

which are employed must sustain a suitable relation to the situation and

surroundings of the speaker. Where considerable space has to be filled

and distance overcome, the energy of utterance should be correspondingly

intense; but for great distances, what is called =level speaking= is the

only effectual mode,--that is, speaking exclusively in those tones of

normal pitch in which the voice has most penetrating power, with force

of almost constant intensity, and in a somewhat slow movement with long

syllabic quantities, but of course with as much needful variation of

expression as is possible within these limits.

IV. TIME. Time is rate of utterance. It comprehends _quantity_, or rate

considered in reference to the duration of individual syllables; and

_movement_, or rate considered in reference to the utterance of

syllables and words in succession. With it may be considered _pauses_,

or cessations of the voice, helpful in the expression of thought and

feeling, and necessary to the working of the vocal mechanism.

=Quantity=, as defined above, is an arbitrary thing, dependent almost

entirely upon the will of the speaker. But many words and syllables are

more expressive of their meaning when, in uttering them, the voice is

somewhat prolonged,--hence _quantity is an element of expression_.

Again, many words and syllables can receive this prolongation of

utterance more readily than others,--hence _quantity is a natural

element of spoken language_. As indefinite syllables are much more

capable of prolongation than mutable or immutable syllables, they are

said to possess long quantity, or, more shortly, "to possess quantity";

mutable syllables possess quantity in a less degree, and immutable

syllables are naturally deficient in quantity.

As an element of expression, quantity (that is, long quantity) lends

dignity and grace to the movement of the voice, and affords ground for

the display of those expressive modes of vocal action which are

incompatible with the rapid or ejaculatory utterance of the concrete;

and hence, with median stress, the wave, moderate intervals, medium or

low sentential pitch, it is used as naturally interpretative of

solemnity, reverence, awe, deep pathos, ardent admiration, and all

elevated emotion. Colloquial tones, excited argument, wit, raillery, and

all the lighter emotions, require for their expression, brilliancy

rather than grace, and so are more fittingly interpreted by short

quantities and radical stress.

The discerning reader, in his work of vocal interpretation, will not

fail to take advantage of the inherent character of syllables with

respect to quantity. Our language abounds in indefinite syllables to

which he may impart whatever quantity he may desire. On the other hand,

immutable syllables, while not admitting the wave and the median stress,

are eminently fitted to receive the more forcible forms of radical

stress; and mutable syllables, with their abrupt closes, permit of

perfect exemplifications of thorough and final stress.

=Movement=, though it depends for its slower and more expressive forms

upon the capacities of syllables for the reception of long quantities,

is, in its more rapid forms, quite independent of syllabic structure,

and dependent only on the will of the speaker; hence it may be spoken of

as being altogether under his control. A medium rate of utterance is,

with respect to time, the natural expression of an equable flow of

thought. The livelier emotions should be indicated by quicker rates, and

hence, cheerfulness, joy, vivacious dialogue, animated narration,

naturally find their expression in movements more or less brisk, with

short quantities, varied intonations, and pitch higher than the normal;

the more vehement emotions, eagerness, anger, excited anxiety, demand

simply heightened forms of these modes. Contrariwise, thought of grave

and meditative character, admiration, reverence, and all the deeper and

calmer feelings, require a deliberative, slow-timed utterance, with long

quantities for accented syllables, and extended time for even unaccented

syllables. As these serious emotions become stronger and deeper, the

syllabic quantities become proportionately longer, and with impressive

median swells, orotund quality, low pitch, waves and simple intonations

of the second, frequent phrases in monotone, and an occasional tremor,

constitute the most impressive utterance of adoration.

_Occasionally an abrupt change in quantity, or movement, may be employed

as a mode of emphasis_, either positive or negative; for example, in a

current of rapid movement, a word may be put into strong relief by being

uttered with quantity much extended; contrariwise, a parenthetical or

explanatory phrase is usually touched upon lightly and with a more rapid

movement than that of the current in which it is found.

=Pause= _may be used as an element in the expression of thought simply,

that is, as a help to the interpretation of the mere sense of the words

read_; or, _more emphatically, as an element in the expression of

feeling and emotion_. As interpretative of thought, pauses should

correspond mainly with the graphical marks of punctuation. Two things,

however, must be borne in mind: _first_, the use of punctuation marks in

writing and in printing is always more or less an arbitrary matter,

scarcely any two authors agreeing in their employment of them; and

therefore the reader's own good sense must be to him his principal

authority as to the closeness with which he follows them: and _second_,

pauses are to an auditor what punctuation marks are intended to be to a

reader; but, whereas the eye may constantly keep within its vision the

relation of each word uttered, both to those which preceded it and to

those which are to follow, the ear hears the words that are read only

_ictus_ by _ictus_, stroke by stroke, and therefore can not aid the mind

to grasp this relation--the memory alone helping to do that; and hence,

in reading, pauses should be more frequent, and perhaps more prolonged,

than the punctuation marks might seem to necessitate. The reader should

also bear in mind that even the plainest and simplest diction, or that

requiring the most rapid utterance, may be so marked by appropriate

pauses that those stoppages of the voice necessarily required for

inspiration, shall never occur except when they assist to interpret the

sense,--they must not interrupt it.

As interpretative of emotion pauses do not necessarily correspond to

grammatical structure; but, as with all the modes of expression

previously considered, their frequency and length--their only

modifications--must harmonize with the feeling which they are to assist

in interpreting. In length, for example, they should correspond with the

movement of which they may be said to form a part; when the movement is

slow, as in the expression of awe, reverence, and the like, they are

naturally long; in the brisk movement required to interpret the livelier

emotions, they should be short. As a mode of emphasis pause serves to

fix the attention of the hearer,--either _backward_ upon a word or

phrase, that the mind may dwell upon it, or _forward_ to awaken

curiosity and expectation: it is evident then that a frequent use of it

for this purpose would destroy its value.

_Pauses may be used in reading to simulate an appropriate labor of

utterance_, as when the mind is supposed to be overcome by sorrow, or

disturbed by anger. At such times also, they serve as fit rests for the

voice in its efforts to express the disturbed condition of the mind, and

as appropriate avenues for the escape of emotion otherwise than by

vocality, as by sibling. _Pauses should be used also to indicate sudden

transitions from one state of caution to another._

_THE HIGH SCHOOL READER_.

* * * * *

I. KING SOLOMON'S PRAYER AND BLESSING AT THE DEDICATION OF THE TEMPLE.

_From_ THE FIRST BOOK OF KINGS.

_Translated 1611--Revised 1885._

Then Solomon assembled the elders of Israel, and all the heads of the

tribes, the princes of the fathers' houses of the children of Israel,

unto king Solomon in Jerusalem, to bring up the ark of the covenant of

the LORD out of the city of David, which is Zion. And all the men of

Israel assembled themselves unto king Solomon at the feast, in the month

Ethanim, which is the seventh month. And all the elders of Israel came,

and the priests took up the ark. And they brought up the ark of the

LORD, and the tent of meeting, and all the holy vessels that were in the

Tent; even these did the priests and the Levites bring up. And king

Solomon and all the congregation of Israel, that were assembled unto

him, were with him before the ark, sacrificing sheep and oxen, that

could not be told nor numbered for multitude. And the priests brought in

the ark of the covenant of the LORD unto its place, into the oracle of

the house, to the most holy place, even under the wings of the cherubim.

For the cherubim spread forth their wings over the place of the ark, and

the cherubim covered the ark and the staves thereof above. There was

nothing in the ark save the two tables of stone which Moses put there at

Horeb, when the LORD made a covenant with the children of Israel, when

they came out of the land of Egypt. And it came to pass, when the

priests were come out of the holy place, that the cloud filled the house

of the LORD, so that the priests could not stand to minister by reason

of the cloud: for the glory of the LORD filled the house of the LORD.

Then spake Solomon, The LORD hath said that he would dwell in the thick

darkness. I have surely built thee an house of habitation, a place for

thee to dwell in for ever. And the king turned his face about, and

blessed all the congregation of Israel: and all the congregation of

Israel stood. And he said, Blessed be the LORD, the God of Israel, which

spake with his mouth unto David my father, and hath with his hand

fulfilled it, saying, Since the day that I brought forth my people

Israel out of Egypt, I chose no city out of all the tribes of Israel to

build an house, that my name might be there; but I chose David to be

over my people Israel. Now it was in the heart of David my father to

build an house for the name of the LORD, the God of Israel. But the LORD

said unto David my father, Whereas it was in thine heart to build an

house for my name, thou didst well that it was in thine heart:

nevertheless thou shalt not build the house; but thy son that shall come

forth out of thy loins, he shall build the house for my name. And the

LORD hath established his word that he spake; for I am risen up in the

room of David my father, and sit on the throne of Israel, as the LORD

promised, and have built the house for the name of the LORD, the God of

Israel. And there have I set a place for the ark, wherein is the

covenant of the LORD, which he made with our fathers, when he brought

them out of the land of Egypt.

The Ontario Readers: The High School Reader, 1886 · 第 3 / 29 段