CHAPTER XXVI

AMATEURS--AND OTHERS

In the seventies New York was interesting musically, chiefly because of

its amateurs. This sounds something like a paradox, but at that time New

York had a collection of musical amateurs who were almost as highly

cultivated as professionals. It was a set that was extremely interesting

and quite unique; and which bridged in a wonderful way the traditional

gulf between art and society.

Those of us who were fortunate enough to know New York then look about

us with wonder and amazement now. It seems, with our standards of an

earlier generation, as if there were no true social life to-day, just as

there are left no great social leaders. As for music--but perhaps it

behooves a retired _prima donna_ to be discreet in making comparisons.

Mrs. Peter Ronalds; Mrs. Samuel Barlow; her daughter Elsie, who became

Mrs. Stephen Henry Olin; May Callender; Minnie Parker--the granddaughter

of Mrs. Hill and later the wife of M. de Neufville;--these and many

others were the amateurs who combined music and society in a manner

worthy of the great French hostesses and originators of _salons_. Mrs.

Barlow was in advance of everybody in patronising music. She was

cultivated and artistic, had travelled a great deal abroad, and had

acquired a great many charming foreign graces in addition to her own

good American brains and breeding, and her fine natural social tact.

When I returned to New York after a sojourn on the other side, she came

to see me one day, and said:

"Louise, you've been away so much you don't know what our amateurs are

doing. I want you to come to my house to-night and hear them sing."

Like all professionals, I was a bit inclined to turn up my nose at the

very word "amateur," but of course I went to Mrs. Barlow's that evening,

and I have rarely spent a more enjoyable three hours. Elsie Barlow sang

delightfully. She had a limited voice, but an unusual musical

intelligence; I have seldom heard a public singer give a piece of music

a more delicate and discriminating interpretation. Then Miss May

Callender sang "Nobile Signor" from the _Huguenots_, and astonished me

with her artistic rendering of that _aria_. Miss Callender could have

easily been an opera singer, and a distinguished one, if she had so

chosen. Eugene Oudin, a Southern baritone, also sang with charming

effect. Minnie Parker, an eminent connoisseur in music, had her turn.

She sang "Bel Raggio" from _Semiramide_ with fine execution and all the

Rossini traditions. And I must not forget to mention Fanny Reed, Mrs.

Paran Stevens's sister, who sang very agreeably an _aria_ from _Il

Barbiere_. Altogether it was a most startling and illuminating evening,

and I was proud of my country and of a society that could produce such

amateurs.

Mrs. Peter Ronalds was another charming singer of that group; as was,

also, Mrs. Moulton, who was Lillie Greenough before her marriage. Both

had delightful and well cultivated voices. Mrs. Moulton had studied

abroad, but for the most part the amateurs of that day were purely

American products.

I often visited Mrs. Barlow at her country place at Glen Cove, L. I. She

was the most tactful of hostesses, and in her house there was no fuss or

formality, nothing but kind geniality and courtesy. She was the first

hostess in the United States to ask her women guests to bring their

maids; and she never once has asked me to sing when I was there. I did

sing, of course, but she was too well-bred to let me feel under the

slightest obligation. American hostesses are certainly sometimes very

odd in this connection. I have mentioned Fanny Reed and Mrs. Stevens in

Boston, and the time I had to play "Tommy Tucker" and sing for my

supper; and I am now reminded of another occasion even more

unpardonable, one that made me indirectly quite a bit of trouble.

Once upon a time when I was visiting in Chicago, and was being made much

of as an American _prima donna_ freshly arrived from European triumphs,

some old friends of my father gave me a reception. I had been for nearly

fourteen months abroad, and had come back with the associations and

manners of the best people of the older countries: and this I

particularly mention to suggest what a shock my treatment was to me.

On the day of the reception I had one of my worst sick headaches. I did

not want to go, naturally, but the husband of the woman giving the

reception called for me and begged that I would show myself there, if

only for a few moments. My mother also urged me to make an effort and

go. I made it--and went. In view of what afterwards occurred, I want to

say that my costume was a black velvet gown created by Worth, with a

heavy, long, handsome coat and a black velvet hat. When I reached the

house I was so ill that I could not stand at the door with my hostess

to receive the guests, but remained seated, hoping that I would not

groan aloud with the throbbing of my head.

The ladies began arriving, and nearly every one of them was in full

evening dress--_in the afternoon_! Mrs. Marshall Field, I remember, came

in an elaborate point lace shawl, and no hat.

I had not been there half an hour before I was asked to sing! I had

brought no music, there was no accompanist, and I was so dizzy that I

could hardly see the keys of the piano, yet, as the request was not

altogether the fault of my hostess, I did my best, playing some sort of

an accompaniment and singing something--very badly, I imagine. Then I

went home and to bed.

That episode was served up to me for eight years. I never went to

Chicago without reading some reference to it in the newspapers, and my

friends have told me that years later it was still discussed with

bitterness. It was stated that I was "ungracious," "rude," and that I

had "insulted the guests by my plain street attire" (shade of the great

Worth!); that I only sang once and then with no attempt to do my best;

that I did not eat the elaborate refreshments; did not rise from my

chair when people were presented to me; and left the house inside an

hour, although the reception was given for me. The bitterest attack was

an article printed in one of the morning papers, an article written by a

woman who had been among the guests. I never answered that or any other

of the attacks because the host and hostess were old friends and felt

very badly about the affair; but I have a memory of Chicago that will go

with me to the grave. It was very different with the New York hostesses

of whom Mrs. Barlow, Mrs. Ronalds, and Mrs. Gilder were the

representatives. By them a singer was treated as a little more, not

less, than an ordinary human being!

O you unfortunate people of a newer day who have not the memory of that

enchanting meeting-ground in East Fifteenth Street:--the delightful

Gilder studio, the rebuilding of which from a carriage house into a

studio-home was about the first piece of architectural work done by

Stanford White. There was one big, beautiful room, drawing-room and

sitting-room combined, with a fine fireplace in it. Many a time have I

done some scene from an opera there, in the firelight, to a sympathetic

few. Everybody went to the Richard Watson Gilders'--at least, everybody

who was worth while. They were in New York already the power that they

remained for so many years. Some pedantic enthusiast once said of them

that, "The Gilders were empowered by divine right to put the _cachet_ of

recognition upon distinction."

Miss Jeannette Gilder came into my life as long ago as 1869. I was

singing in a concert in Newark and she was in the wings, listening to my

first song. My mother and my maid were near her and, when I came off the

stage, as we were trying to find a certain song for an _encore_, the

pile of music fell at her feet. Promptly the tall young stranger said:

"Please let me hold them for you."

Her whole personality expressed a species of beaming admiration. I

looked at her critically; and from this small service began our

friendship.

The Gilders were then living in Newark. The father, who was a Chaplain

in the 40th New York Volunteers, died during the Civil War. His sons,

Richard Watson Gilder and William H. Gilder, were also soldiers in the

Civil War. The Richard Watson Gilders were married in 1874. Mrs. Gilder

was Miss Helena de Kay, granddaughter of Joseph Rodman Drake, who was

the author of _The Culprit Fay_.

I met many interesting people at the Fifteenth Street studio. Helen Hunt

Jackson, I remember well. She was then Mrs. Hunt, long before she had

married Mr. Jackson or had written _Ramona_. She was a most pleasing

personality, just stout enough to be genuinely genial. And Mrs. Frances

Hodgson Burnett I first met there, about the time her _Lass o'Lowrie's_

appeared, a story we all thought most impressive. George Cable was

discovered by the Gilders, like so many other literary lights, and he

and I used to sing Creole melodies before their big fireplace. His voice

was queer and light, without colour, but correct and well in tune. He

had only one bit of colour in him and that--the poetry of his nature--he

gave freely and exquisitely in his tales of Creole life. At a much later

time I saw something of the old French Quarter of New Orleans of which

he wrote, the whole spirit of which was so lovely. I also first met John

Alexander at the Gilders' after he came back from Paris; and John La

Farge, who brought there with him Okakura, the Japanese art connoisseur.

That was when I first met Okakura; and on the same occasion he was

introduced to Modjeska, she and I being the first stage people he had

ever met socially.

Later, in '79-'80, I saw a good deal of the Gilders in Paris, where they

had a studio in the Quartier Latin. At that time, Mr. Gilder arranged

for Millet's autobiography which first made him widely known in America;

and in their Paris studio I met Sargent and Bastien Le Page and many

other notables. I recall how becomingly Rodman Gilder--then three or

four years old--was always dressed, in "Little Lord Fauntleroy" fashion

long before the days of his young lordship. It was at this same period

that I went to Fontainebleau to study the Barbizon School and met the

son of Millet, who was trying to paint and never succeeded.

Speaking of the Gilders reminds me, albeit indirectly, of Helena

Modjeska, whom I first saw in Sacramento, playing _Adrienne Lecouvreur_.

I was simply enchanted and thought I had never seen such delicate and

yet such forcible acting. One reason why I was so greatly impressed was

that I had acquired the foreign standard of acting, and had been much

disturbed when I came home to find such lack of elegance and ease upon

the stage. She had the foreign manner--the grace and, at the same time,

the authority of the great French and German players; and it seemed to

me that she ought to be heard by the big critics. So I wrote home to

Jeannette Gilder in New York an enthusiastic account of this actress who

was being wasted on the Sacramento Valley. The public-spirited efforts

of the Gilders in promoting anything artistic was so well and so long

known that it is almost unnecessary to add that they interested

themselves in the Polish artist and secured for her an opportunity to

play in the East. She came, saw, and conquered; and I shall always feel,

therefore, that I was definitely instrumental in launching Modjeska in

theatrical New York.

"Didn't I tell you so?" I said to Jeannette Gilder. There was always

something very odd to me about Helena Modjeska. I never liked her

personally half as much as I did as an actress. But she certainly was a

wonderful actress. I once met John McCullough and talked with him about

Modjeska, and he told me that she first acted in Polish to his

English--Ophelia to his Hamlet--out West somewhere, I think it was in

San Francisco. He said that he had been the first to urge her to learn

English, and he was most enthusiastic about the wonderful effect she

created even at that early time. As I had seen her in Sacramento during,

approximately, the same period, I could discuss her with him

sympathetically and intelligently.

Although I never personally liked Helena Modjeska, I have liked as well

as known many stage folk and have had, first and last, many real friends

among them. It was my good fortune to know the elder Salvini in America.

He happened to be stopping at the same hotel. He looked like a

successful farmer; a very plain man,--very. He told me, among other

interesting things, that no matter how small his part happened to be, he

always played each succeeding act in a stronger colour, maintaining a

steady _crescendo_, so that the last impression of all was the climax. I

remember him in Othello, particularly his delicate and lovely _silent_

acting. When Desdemona came in and told the court how he had won her,

Salvini only looked at her and spoke but the one word: "Desdemona!"--but

the way he said it "made the tears rise in your heart and gather to your

eyes."

Irving and Terry, always among my close friends, I first met in London,

at the McHenrys' house in Holland Park. At that time the McHenrys'

Sunday night dinners were an institution. Later, when they came to

America, I saw a great deal of them; and I remember Ellen Terry saying

once, after a luncheon given by me at Delmonico's, "What a splendid

woman Jeannette Gilder is! You know--" and she gave me a rueful

glance--"I am _always_ wrong about men,--but seldom about women!"

Dear Ellen Terry! She has always been the freshest, the most wholesome,

and the most spontaneous personality on the stage: a sweet and candid

woman, with a sound, warm heart and a great genius. At Lady Macmillan's

a number of people, most of them literary, were discussing that deadly

worthy and respectable actress Madge Robertson--Mrs. Kendall. The morals

of stage people was the subject, and Mrs. Kendall was cited as an

example of propriety. One of the women present spoke up from her corner:

"Well," said she, "all I can say is that if I were giving a party for

young girls I would steer very clear of Mrs. Kendall and ask Miss Terry

instead. The Kendall lady does nothing but tell objectionable stories

that lead to the glorification of her own purity, but you will never in

a million years hear an indelicate word from the lips of Ellen Terry!"

The only complaint Henry Irving had to make against New York was that he

"had no one to play with." He insisted, and quite justly, too, that New

York had no leisure class: that cultivated Bohemia, the playground for

people of intellectual tastes and varied interests, did not exist in New

York. He used to say that after the theatre, and after supper, he could

not find anybody at his club who would discuss with him either modern

drama or the old dramatic traditions; or give him any exchange of ideas

or intelligent comradeship.

[Illustration: =Ellen Terry=

From a photograph by Sarony]

He and I had many delightful talks, and I wish now that I had made notes

of the things he told me about stagecraft. He had a great deal to say

about stage lighting, a subject he was for ever studying and about which

he was always experimenting. It was his idea to do away with shadows

upon the stage, and he finally accomplished his effect by lighting the

wings very brilliantly. Until his radical reforms in this direction

the theatres always used to be full of grotesque masses of light and

shade. To-day the art of lighting may be said to have reached

perfection.

One of the most interesting things about Henry Irving was the way in

which he made use of the smallest trifles that might aid him in getting

his effects. He knew perfectly his own limitations, and was always

seeking to compensate for them. For example, he was utterly lacking in

any musical sense; like Dr. Johnson, he did not even possess an

appreciation of sweet sounds, and did not care to go to either concerts

or operas. But he knew how important music was in the theatre, and he

knew instinctively--with that extraordinary stage-sense of his--what

would appeal to an audience, even if it did not appeal to him. So, if he

went anywhere and heard a melody or sequence of chords that he thought

might fit in somewhere, he had it noted down at once, and collected bits

of music in this way wherever he went. Sometime, he felt, the need for

that particular musical phrase would arrive in some production he was

putting on, and he would be ready with it. That was a wonderful thing

about Irving--he was always prepared.

Speaking of Irving and his statement about the lack of a cultivated

leisure class in New York, reminds me of the Vanderbilts, who were

shining examples of this very lack, for they were immensely wealthy and

yet did not half understand, at that time, the possibilities of wealth.

William H. Vanderbilt was always my very good friend. His father,

Cornelius, the founder of the family, used to say of him that "Bill

hadn't sense enough to make money himself--he had to have it left to

him!" The old man was wont to add, "Bill's no good anyway!" The

Vanderbilts were plain people in those days, but had the kindest hearts.

"Bill" took a course in practical railroading, filling the position of

conductor on the Hudson River Railroad, from which "job" he had just

been promoted when I first knew him. He did turn out to be some "good"

in spite of his father's pessimistic predictions.

My mother and I spent many summers at "Clarehurst," my country home at

Cold Spring on the Hudson. The Vanderbilts' railroad, the New York

Central, ran through Cold Spring, so that my Christmas present from

William H. Vanderbilt each year was an annual pass. He began sending it

to me alone, and then included my mother, until it became a regular

institution. We saw something of Mr. and Mrs. Vanderbilt at Saratoga

also, which was then a fashionable resort, before Newport supplanted it

with a higher standard of formality and extravagance. I remember I once

started to ask William H. Vanderbilt's advice about investing some

money.

"You may know of some good security--" I began.

"I don't! I don't!" he exclaimed with heat.

Then he shook his finger at me impressively, saying:

"Let me tell you something that my father always said, and don't you

ever forget it. He said that 'it takes a smart man to make money, but a

_damned sight smarter one to keep it_!'"

My place at Cold Spring was where I went to rest between seasons, a

lovely place with the wind off the Hudson River, and gorgeous oak trees

all about. When the acorns dropped on the tin roof of the veranda in the

dead of night they made an alarming noise like tiny ghostly footsteps.

One day when I was off on an herb-hunting expedition, some highwaymen

tried to stop my carriage, and that was the beginning of troublous times

at Cold Spring. It developed that a band of robbers was operating in our

neighbourhood, with headquarters in a cave on Storm King Mountain, just

opposite us. They made a specialty of robbing trains, and were led by a

small man with such little feet that his footprints were easily enough

traced;--traced, but not easily caught up with! He never was caught, I

believe. But he, or his followers, skulked about our place; and we were

alarmed enough to provide ourselves with pistols. That was when I

learned to shoot, and I used to have shooting parties for target

practice. My father would prowl about after dark, firing off his pistol

whenever he heard a suspicious sound, so that, for a time, what with

acorns and pistols, the nights were somewhat disturbed.

During the summers I drove all over the country and had great fun

stopping my pony--he was a dear pony, too,--and rambling about picking

flowers. I never passed a spring without stopping to drink from it. I've

always had a passion for woods and brooks; and was the enterprising one

of the family when it came to exploring new roads. Of the beaten track I

can stand only just so much; then my spirit rises in rebellion. I love a

cowpath.

I used to be an adept, too, at finding flag-root, which was "so good to

put in your handkerchief to take to church"! (We carried our

handkerchiefs in our hands in those days.) Or dill, or fresh fennel, "to

chew through the long service"! Now the dill flavour is called caraway

seed; but it isn't the same, or doesn't seem so. And there was fresh,

sweet, black birch! Could anything be more delicious than the taste of

black birch? The present generation, with its tea-rooms and soda-water

fountains, does not know the refreshment of those delicacies prepared by

Nature herself. I feel sure that John Burroughs appreciates black birch,

being, as he is, one of the survivals of the fittest!

Memoirs of an American Prima Donna · 第 26 / 33 章