worked out by Caullery and Mesnil in the case of _Sphaeractinomyxon
stolci_. A noteworthy point is the differentiation of an external
(covering) cellular layer, which affords, perhaps, the nearest approach
to distinct tissue-formation known among Protozoa. This envelope is
formed soon after nuclear multiplication of the young trophozoite has
begun, and is constituted by two nuclei and a thin, peripheral layer of
cytoplasm. It remains binuclear throughout the entire period of
development, and serves as a delicate cyst-membrane. The multiplication
of the internal nuclei is accompanied by a corresponding division of the
cytoplasm; so that instead of a multinucleate or plasmodial condition,
distinct uninucleate cellules are formed, up to sixteen in number. These
cellules, as a matter of fact, are sexual elements or gametes; and eight
of them can be distinguished from the other eight by slight differences
in the nuclei. The gametes unite in couples, each couple being most
probably composed of dissimilar members: in other words, conjugation is
slightly anisogamous. Each of these eight copulae gives rise to a spore.
As the name of the order implies, there are always eight spores formed.
These differ from other Endosporan spores in having invariably a ternary
symmetry and constitution (fig. 9). The wall of the spore is composed of
three valves, each formed from an enveloping cell, and three capsular
cells, placed at the upper or anterior pole, and containing each a
polar-capsule, visible in the fresh condition. The valves are usually
prolonged into processes or appendages, whose form and arrangement
characterize the genus; but in _Sphaeractinomyxon_ the spore is
spherical and lacks processes. The sporoplasm may be either a plasmodial
mass, with numerous nuclei, or may form a certain number of uninuclear
sporozoites. A remarkable feature in the development of the spore is
that the germinal tissue (sporoplasm) arises separate from and outside
the cellules which give rise to the spore-wall; later, when the
envelopes are nearly developed, the sporoplasm penetrates into the
spore.
Four genera have been made known. (1) _Hexactinomyxon_, Stolc. Spores
having the form of an anchor with six arms; sporoplasm plasmodial,
situate near the anterior pole of the spore. One sp. _H.
psammoryctis_, from _Psammoryctes_. (2) _Triactinomyxon_, St. Spores
having the form of an anchor with three arms; distinct sporozoites,
disposed near the anterior pole. _T. ignotum_, with eight spores, from
_Tubifex tubifex_, and also from an unspecified Tubificid; another
sp., unnamed, with 32 sporozoites, also from T. t. (3)
_Synactinomyxon_, St. Spores united to one another, each having two
aliform appendages; sporoplasm plasmodial. One sp., _S. tubificis_,
from _T. rivulorum_. (4) _Sphaeractinomyxon_, C. and M. Spores
spherical, without aliform prolongations; sporoplasm gives rise to
very many sporozoites, occupying the whole spore. One sp., _S.
st_olci, from _Clitellio_ and _Hemitubifex_.
[Illustration: From Lankester's _Treatise on Zoology_, vol. Protozoa.
FIG. 9.--Spores of Actinomyxidia (after Stolc).
a, _Hexactinomyxon psammoryctis_ (par. _Psammoryctes barbatus_).
b, _Synactinomyxon tubificis_ (par. _Tubifex rivulorum_); the mass
of united spores.
c, _Triactinomyxon ignotum_ (par. _Clitellio_, sp.).
d, Upper portion of _Hexactinomyxon_, showing two of the three polar
capsules, one with filament discharged.]
[Illustration: From Wasielewski's _Sporozoenkunde_.
FIG. 10.--A. Sarcosporidia in the ox; a transverse section of the
oesophagus, natural size, showing the parasites in the outer (a, b, c,
d, e) and inner (f, g, h) muscular coats.
B. Longitudinal section of a muscle-fibre containing a Sarcosporidian
parasite, X 60.]
3. Order--Sarcosporidia. With the exception of one or two forms
occurring in reptiles, these parasites are always found in warm-blooded
Vertebrates, usually Mammals. They are of common occurrence in domestic
animals, such as pigs, sheep, horses and (sometimes) cattle. A
Sarcosporidian has also been described from man. The characteristic
habitat is the striped muscle, generally of the oesophagus (fig. 10, A)
and heart, but in acute cases the parasites overrun the general
musculature. When this occurs, as often happens in mice, the result is
usually fatal. Unless, however, the organisms thus spread throughout the
body, the host does not appear to suffer any serious consequences. In
addition to the effects produced by the general disturbance to the
tissues, the attacked animals have apparently to contend--at any rate in
the case of _Sarcocystis tenella_ in the sheep--with a poison secreted
by the parasite. For Laveran and Mesnil (27) have isolated a toxine from
this form, which they have termed sarcocystin.
In the early stages of growth, a Sarcosporidian appears as an elongated
whitish body lodged in the substance of a muscle-fibre; this phase has
long been known as a "Miescher's tube," or _Miescheria_. The youngest
trophozoites that have been yet observed (by Bertram, 1) were
multinucleate (fig. 11, A), but there is no reason to doubt that they
begin life in a uninuclear condition. The protoplasm is limited by a
delicate cuticle. With growth, organellae corresponding to the
Myxosporidian pansporoblasts are formed by the segregation internally of
little uninuclear spheres of protoplasm. At the same time, a thick
striated envelope is developed around the parasite, which later comes to
look like a fur of fine filaments. The probable explanation of this
feature (given by Vuillemin, 44) is that it is due to the partial
breaking down of a stiff, vertically (or radially) striated external
layer (fig. 12, A), such as is seen in _Myxidium lieberkuhnii_.
Immediately internal to this is a thin, homogeneous membrane, which
sends numerous partitions or septa inwards; these divide up the
endoplasm into somewhat angular chambers or alveoli (fig. 12). In each
chamber is a pansporoblast, which divides up to produce many spores;
hence the spores formed from different pansporoblasts are kept more or
less separate. The pansporoblasts originate, in a growing
Sarcosporidian, at the two poles of the body, where the peripheral
endoplasm with its nuclei is chiefly aggregated. More internally,
spore-formation is in progress; and in the centre, pansporoblasts full
of ripe spores are found.
By this time the parasite has greatly distended the muscle-fibre in
which it has hitherto lain, absorbing, with its growth, practically all
the contractile-substance, until it is surrounded only by the sarcolemma
and sarcoplasm. It next passes into the adjacent connective-tissue, and
in this phase has been distinguished from _Miescheria_ as _Balbiania_,
under the impression that the two forms were quite distinct. In the
later stages, the parasite may become more rounded, and a cyst may be
secreted around it by the host's tissue. In these older forms, the most
centrally placed spores degenerate and die, having become over-ripe and
stale.
[Illustration: After Bertram, from Wasielewski's _Sporozoenkunde_.
FIG. 11.--Stages in the growth of _Sarcocystis tenella_ of the sheep. A,
Youngest observed stage in which the radially striated outer coat has
not appeared; the body of the trophozoite is already divided into a
number of cells or pansporoblasts (k). B and C, Older stages with
numerous pansporoblasts and two envelopes, an inner membrane and an
outer radially striated layer.]
With regard to the spores themselves and what becomes of them, our
knowledge is defective. Two kinds of reproductive germ have been
described, termed respectively _gymnospores_ (so-called sporozoites,
"Rainey's corpuscles") and _chlamydospores_, or simply spores. It seems
probable that the former serve for endogenous or auto-infection, and the
latter for infecting fresh hosts. Unfortunately, however, both kinds of
germ are not yet known in the case of any one species. The gymnospores,
which are the more commonly found (e.g. in _S. muris_, _S. miescheriana_
of the pig, and other forms), are small sickle-shaped or reniform
bodies which are more or less amoeboid, and capable of active movement
at certain temperatures. They appear to be naked, and consist of finely
granular protoplasm, containing a single nucleus and one or two
vacuoles. The chlamydospores, or true spores, occur in _S. tenella_ of
sheep (fig. 13), and have been described by Laveran and Mesnil (26).
They also are falciform, but one extremity is rounded, the other
pointed. There is a very thin, delicate membrane, most unlike a typical,
resistant spore-wall; and the spores themselves are extremely fragile
and easily acted upon and deformed by reagents, even by distilled water.
The rounded end of the spore contains a large nucleus, while at the
other end is an oval, clear space, which, in the fresh condition, shows
a distinct spiral striation. The exact significance of this structure
has been much debated. In position and appearance it recalls the
polar-capsule of a Myxosporidian spore. The proof of this interpretation
would be the expulsion of a filament on suitably stimulating the spore;
while, however, some investigators have asserted that such a filament is
extruded, this cannot be regarded as at all certain. Hence it is still
doubtful whether this striated body really corresponds to a
polar-capsule.
[Illustration: From Wasielewski's _Sporozoenkunde_.
_Fig._ 12.--A, _Sarcocystis miescheriana_ (Kuhn) from the pig: late
stage in which the body has become divided up into numerous chambers or
alveoli, each containing a number of germs.
B, _Sarcocystis_ of the ox: section of a stage similar to fig. 12. a,
Substance of muscle-fibre; b, envelope of parasite; c, nuclei of the
muscle; d, parasitic germs (gymnospores); e, walls of the alveoli. In
the peripheral alveoli are seen immature germs.]
[Illustration: (After Laveran and Mesnil, from Lankester's _Treatise on
Zoology_, vol. Protozoa.)
FIG. 13.--Spores of _Sarcocystis tenella_, Raill., from the sheep.
a, Spore in the fresh condition, showing a clear nucleus (n) and a
striated body or capsule (c).
b, Stained spore; the nucleus (n) shows a central karyosome; the
striations of the polar capsule (c) are not visible.]
Nothing whatever is known as to the natural means by which infection
with Sarcosporidia is brought about. Smith (39) showed that mice can be
infected with _Sarcocystis muris_ by simply feeding them on the flesh of
infected mice. It is not very likely, however, that this represents the
natural mode, even in the case of mice; and it certainly cannot do so in
the case of Herbivora. The difficulty in the way is the delicacy of the
spores, which seem totally unfitted to withstand external conditions. It
may be that some alternative (intermediate) host is concerned in
dispersal; but this has yet to be ascertained.
All known Sarcosporidia are included in a single genus _Sarcocystis_,
Lank. (= _Miescheria_ + _Balbiania_, Blanchard.) Some of the principal
species are: _S. miescheriana_, from pigs; _S. tenella_, from sheep;
_S. bertrami_, from horses; _S. blanchardi_, from Bovines; _S. muris_,
from mice; _S. platydactyli_, from the gecko; and lastly, _S.
lindemanni_, described from man.
4. Order--Haplosporidia. The Sporozoa included in this order are
characterized by the general simplicity of their development, and by the
undifferentiated character of their spores. The order includes a good
many forms, whose arrangement and classification have been recently
undertaken by Caullery and Mesnil (15), to whom, indeed, most of our
knowledge relating to the Haplosporidia is due. The habitat of the
parasites is sufficiently varied; Rotifers, Crustacea, Annelids and
fishes furnishing most of the hosts. A recent addition to the list of
Protozoa causing injury to man, a Haplosporidian, has been described by
Minchin and Fantham (29d), who have termed the parasite
_Rhinosporidium_, from its habitat in the nasal septum, where it
produces pedunculate tumours.
[Illustration: From Minchin, in Lankester's _Treatise on Zoology_, vol.
Protozoa.
FIG. 14.--_Bertramia Asperospora_ (Fritsch) from the body-cavity of
_Brachionus_. X 1040.
a, Young form with opaque, evenly-granulated protoplasm and few
refringent granules; the nuclei (n) are small, and appear to be
surrounded each by a clear space.
b and c, Full-grown specimens with large nuclei and clearer
protoplasm, containing numerous refringent granules (r. gr.).
d and e, Morula stages, derived from b and c by division of the body
into segments centred round the nuclei, each cell so formed being a
spore. Between the spores a certain amount of intercellular substance
or residual protoplasm is left, in which the refringent granules seem
to be embedded. The morula may break up forthwith and scatter the
spores, or may first round itself off and form a spherical cyst with
a tough, fairly thick wall.
f, Empty, slightly shrunken cyst, from which the spores have escaped.
g, Free spore or youngest unicellular trophozoite.
h, i, j, Commencing growth of the trophozoite, with multiplication of
the nuclei, which results ultimately in forms such as a and b.]
_Bertramia_, a well-known parasite of the body-cavity of Rotifers, will
serve very well to give a general idea of the life-cycle so far as it
has yet been made out (fig. 14). The trophozoite begins life as a small,
rounded uninucleate corpuscle, which as it grows, becomes multinucleate.
The multinuclear body generally assumes a definite shape, often that of
a sausage. Later, the protoplasm becomes segregated around each of the
nuclei, giving the parasite a mulberry-like aspect; hence this stage is
frequently known as a morula. The uninuclear cellules thus formed are
the spores, which are ultimately liberated by the break-up of the parent
body. Each is of quite simple, undifferentiated structure, possesses a
large, easily-visible nucleus, and gives rise in due course to another
young trophozoite. In some instances, as described by Minchin, the
sporulating parasite becomes rounded off and forms a protective cyst,
doubtless for the protection of the spores during dissemination.
In some forms (e.g. _Haplosporidium_ and _Rhinosporidium_) the
spore-mother-cells, instead of becoming each a single spore, as in
_Bertramia_, give rise to several, four in the first case, many in the
latter. Sometimes, again, the spore, while preserving the essentially
simple character of the sporoplasm, may be enclosed in a spore-case;
this may have the form of a little box with a lid or operculum, as in
some species of _Haplosporidium_, or may possess a long process or tail,
as in _Urosporidium_ (fig. 15).
[Illustration: From Caullery and Mesnil, _Archives de zoologie
experimentale_, vol. 4, 1905, by permission of Schleicher Freres et
Cie, Paris.
FIG. 15.--Spores of various Haplosporidia.
1. _Haplosporidium heterocirri_:
a, on liberation;
b, after being in sea-water.
2, _H. scolopli_.
3, _H. vejdovskii_.
4, _Urosporidium fuliginosum_:
a, surface-view;
b, side-view. X 1000.]
The _Haplosporidia_ are divided by Caullery and Mesnil into three
families, _Haplosporidiidae_, _Bertramiidae_ and _Coelosporidiidae_;
one or two genera are also included whose exact position is doubtful.
(a) _Haplosporidiidae_: 3 genera, _Haplosporidium_, type-species _H.
heterocirri_; _Urosporidium_, with one sp., _U. fuliginosum_; all
parasitic in various Annelids; and _Anurosporidium_, with the species
_A. pelseneeri_, from the sporocysts of a Trematode, parasitic on
_Donax_.
(b) _Bertramiidae_: 2 genera, _Bertramia_, with _B. capitellae_ from
an Annelid and _B. asperospora_, the Rotiferan parasite above
described; and _Ichthyosporidium_, with _I. gasterophilum_ and _I.
phymogenes_, parasitic in various fish.
(c) _Coelosporidiiae_: genera _Coelosporidium_, type-species _C.
chydoriclola_; and _Polycaryum_, type-species _P. branchiopodianum_.
These forms are parasitic in small Crustacea. The genus _Blastulidium_
is referred, doubtfully, by Caullery and Mesnil to this family; but
certain phases of this organism seem to indicate rather a vegetable
nature.
The genus _Rhinosporidium_ should probably be placed in a distinct
family. The only species so far described is _R. kinealyi_ from the
nasal septum of man, to which reference has above been made. Another
form, _Neurosporidium cephalodisci_, agreeing in some respects with
_Rhinosporidium_, has been described by Ridewood and Fantham (37a)
from the nervous system of _Cephalodiscus_.
A parasite whose affinities are doubtful, but which is regarded by
Caullery and Mesnil as allied to the Haplosporidia, is the curious
parasite originally described by Schewiakoff as "endoparasitic tubes"
of _Cyclops_; it has been named by Caullery and Mesnil,
_Scheviakovella_. This organism is remarkable in one or two ways: it
possesses a contractile vacuole; the amoeboid trophozoites tend to
form plasmodia; and the spores, of the usual simple type, may
apparently divide by binary fission.
5. There remain, lastly, certain forms, which are conveniently grouped
together as "Sporozoa _incertae sedis_," either for the reason that it
is impossible to place them in any of the well-defined orders, or
because their life-cycle is at present too insufficiently known.
Serosporidia is the name given by Pfeiffer to certain minute parasites
of the body-cavity of Crustacea; they include _Serosporidium_,
_Blanchardina_ and _Botellus_. _Lymphosporidium_, a form with
distributed nucleus, causing virulent epidemics among brook-trout, is
considered by Calkins(3) to be suitably placed here. Another parasite of
lymphatic spaces and channels is the remarkable _Lymphocystis_,
described by Woodcock (46), from plaice and flounders, which in some
respects rather recalls a Gregarine. The group Exosporidia was founded
by Perrier to include a peculiar organism, ectoparasitic on Arthropods,
to which the name of _Amoebidium_ had been given by Cienkowsky. It has
recently been shown, however, that this organism is most probably an
Alga. Another genus, _Exosporidium_, described by Sand (38), is placed
at present in this group. For details of the structure of these forms
and others like _Siedleckia_, _Toxosporidium_, _Chitonicium_
_Joyeuxella_ and _Metschnikovella_, a comprehensive treatise on the
Sporozoa, such as that of Minchin, should be consulted.
To complete this article, it will be sufficient to mention various
enigmatical bodies, associated with different diseases, which are
regarded by their describers as Protozoa. Among such is the
"_Histosporidium carcinomatosum_" of Feinberg, which he finds in
cancerous growths. _Cytoryctes_, the name given to "Guarnieri's bodies"
in small-pox and vaccinia, has been recently investigated by Calkins
(3a), who has described a complex life-cycle for the alleged parasite.
Other workers, however, such as Siegel, give a quite different account
of these bodies, and, moreover, find similar ones in scarlet-fever,
syphilis, &c.; while yet others (e.g. Prowazek) deny that they are
parasitic organisms at all.
BIBLIOGRAPHY.--(For general works see under SPOROZOA.) (1) Bertram,
"Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Sarcosporidien," _Zool. Jahrb. Anat._ 5,
1902; (2) L. Brasil, "Joyeuxella toxoides," (n.g., n.sp.), _Arch.
zool. exp._ N. et R. (3) 10, p. 5, 7 figs., 1902; (3) G.N. Calkins,
"Lymphosporidium truttae," (n.g., n.sp.), _Zool. Anz_. 23, p. 513, 6
figs., 1903; (3a) ib. _The Life-History of Cytoryctes Variolae_;
Guarnieri, "Studies path. etiol. variola," _J. Med. Research_ (Boston,
1904), p. 136, 4 pls.; (3b) M. Caullery and A. Chappellier,
"Anurosporidium pelseneeri, (n.g., n.sp.), Haplosporidie," &c., _C. R.
soc. biol._ 60, p. 325, 1906; (4) M. Caullery and F. Mesnil, "Sur un
type nouveau" (_Metchnikovella_, n.g.), _C. R. ac. sci._ 125, p. 787,
10 figs., 1897; (5) ib. "Sur trois Sporozoaires parasites de la
Capitella," _C. R. soc. biol_. 49, p. 1005, 1877; (6) ib. "Sur un
Sporozoaire aberrant" (_Siedleckia_, n.g.), op. cit. 50, p. 1093, 7
figs., 1898; (7) ib. "Sur le genre Aplosporidium" (nov.), op. cit. 51,
p. 789, 1899; (8) ib. "Sur les Aplosporidies," _C. R. ac. sci._ 129,
p. 616, 1899; (9) ib. "Sur les parasites intimes des Annelides"
(_Siedleckia_, _Toxosporidium_), C. R. ass. franc., 1899, p. 491,
1900; (10) ib. "Sur un type nouveau (_Sphaeractinomyxon_, n.g.)
d'Actinomyxidies," _C. R. soc. biol._ 56, p. 408, 1904; (11) ib.
"Phenomenes de sexualite dans le developpement des Actinomyxidies,"
op. cit. 58, p. 889, 1905; (12) ib. "Recherches sur les
Actinomyxidies," _Arch. Protistenk._ 6, p. 272, pl. 15, 1905; (13) ib.
"Sur quelques nouvelles Haplosporidies d'Annelides," C. R. soc. biol.
58, p. 580, 6 figs., 1905; (14) ib. "Sur des Haplosporidies parasites
de poissons marins," ib. p. 640, 1905; (15) ib. "Recherches sur les
Haplosporidies," _Arch. zool. exp._ (4) 4, p. 101, pls. 11-13, 1905;
(16) L. Cohn, "Uber die Myxosporidien von Esox lucius," _Zool. Jahr.
Anat_. 9, p. 227, 2 pls., 1896; (17) ib. "Zur Kenntniss der
Myxosporidien," Centrbl. Bakt. 1, Orig. 32, p. 628, 3 figs., 1902;
(18) ib. "Protozoen als Parasiten in Rotatorien," Zool. Anz. 25, p.
497, 1902; (19) F. Doflein, "Uber Myxosporidien," Zool. Jahr. Anat.
11, p. 281, 6 pls., 1898; (20) ib. "Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der
Myxosporidienkunde," _Zool. Centrbl_. 7, p. 361, 1899; (21) R. Gurley,
"The Myxosporidia," _Bull. U.S. Fish. Comm., 1892_, p. 65, 47 pls.,
1894; (22) E. Hesse, "Sur une nouvelle Microsporidie tetrasporee du
genre Gurleya," _C. R. soc. biol._ 55, p. 495, 1903; (23) ib.
"Thelohania legeri" (n.sp.), op. cit. 57, pp. 570-572, 10 figs., 1904;
(24) ib. "Sur Myxocystis Mrazeki Hesse," &c., op. cit. 58, p. 12, 9
figs., 1905; (25) A. Laveran and F. Mesnil, "Sur la multiplication
endogene des Myxosporidies," op. cit. 54, p. 469, 5 figs., 1902; (26)
ib. "Sur la morphologie des Sarcosporidies," op. cit. 51, p. 245,
1899; (27) ib. "De la Sarcocystin," op. cit. p. 311, 1899; (28) L.
Leger, "Sur la sporulation du Triactinomyxon," op. cit. 56, p. 844, 4
figs., 1904; (29) ib. "Considerations sur ... les Actinomyxidies," op.
cit. p. 846, 1904; (29a) L. Leger and E. Hesse, "Sur une nouvelle
Myxosporidie, Coccomyxa, n.g.," _C. R. ac. sci._, 1st July 1907; (29b)
ib. "Sur la structure de la paroisporale des Myxosporidies," op. cit.
142, p. 720, 1906; (29c) A. Lutz and A. Splendore, "Uber 'Pebrine' and
verwandte Mikrosporidien," _Centrbl. Bakt_. 1, 33, Orig. p. 150, 1903,
and 36, Orig. p. 645, 2 pls., 1904; (29d) E.A. Minchin and H.B.
Fantham, "Rhinosporidium kinealyi" (n.g., n.sp.), _Q. J. Micr. Sci._
49, p. 521, 2 pls., 1905; (30) A. Mrazek, "Uber eine neue
Sporozoenform" (_Myxocystis_), _S. B. Bohm. Ges._ 8, 5 pp., 9 figs.,
1897; (31) ib. "Glugea lophii," Doflein, op. cit. 10, 8 pp., 1 pl.,
1899; (32) C. Perez, "Sur un organisme nouveau, Blastulidium," _C. R.
soc. biol._ 55, p. 715, 5 figs., 1903; (33) ib. "Sur nouvelles
Glugeidees," op. cit. 58, pp. 146-151, 1905; (34) ib. "Microsporidies
parasites des crabes," _Bull. sta. biol. d'Arcachon_, 8, 22 pp., 14
figs., 1905; (35) W.S. Perrin, "Pleistophora periplanetae," _Q. J.
Micr. Sci._ 49, p. 615, 2 pls., 1906; (36) L. Plate, "Uber einen
einzelligen Zellparasiten" (_Chitonicium_), _Fauna Chilensis_, 2, pp.
601, pls., 1901; (37) M. Plehn, "Uber die Drehkrankheit der
Salmoniden" (_Lentospora_, n.g.), _Arch. Protistenk_. 5, p. 145, pl.
5, 1904; (37a) W.J. Ridewood and H.B. Fantham, "Neurosporidium
cephalodisci, n.g., n.sp.," _Q. J. Micr. Sci._ 51, p. 81, pl. 7, 1907;
(38) R. Sand, "Exosporidium marinum" (n.g., n.sp.), _Bull. soc. micr.
belge_, 24, p. 116, 1898; (39) T. Smith, "The production of
sarcosporidiosis in the mouse," &c., _J. Exp. Med._ 6, p. 1, 4 pls.,
1901; (40) W. Stempell, "Uber Thelohania mulleri," _Zool. Jahr. Anat._
16, p. 235, pl. 25, 1902; (41) ib. "Uber Polycaryum branchiopodianum"
(n.g., n.sp.), _Zool. Jahrb. Syst._ 15, p. 591, pl. 31, 1902; (42) ib.
"Uber Nosema anomalum," _Arch. Protistenk_, 4, p. 1, pls. 1-3, 1904;
(43) P. Thelohan, "Recherches sur les Myxosporidies," _Bull. sci.
France belg._ 26, p. 100, 3 pls., 1895; (44) P. Vuillemin, "Le
Sarcocystis tenella, parasite de l'homme," _C. R. ac. sci._ 134, p.
1152, 1902; (45) H.M. Woodcock, "On Myxosporidia in flat fish," _Proc.
Liverp. Biol. Soc._ 18, p. 126, pl. 2, 1904; (46) ib. "On a remarkable
parasite" (_Lymphocystis_), op. cit. p. 143, pl. 3, 1904.
(H. M. Wo.)
ENDYMION, in Greek mythology, son of Aethlius and king of Elis. He was
loved by Selene, goddess of the moon, by whom he had fifty daughters,
supposed to represent the fifty moons of the Olympian festal cycle. In
other versions, Endymion was a beautiful youth, a shepherd or hunter
whom Selene visited every night while he lay asleep in a cave on Mount
Latmus in Caria (Pausanias v. 1; Ovid, _Ars am._ iii. 83). Zeus left him
free to choose anything he might desire, and he chose an everlasting
sleep, in which he might remain youthful for ever (Apollodorus i. 7).
According to others, Endymion's eternal sleep was a punishment inflicted
by Zeus upon him because he ventured to fall in love with Hera, when he
was admitted to the society of the Olympian gods (Schol. Theocritus iii.
49). The usual form of the legend, however, represents Endymion as
having been put to sleep by Selene herself in order that she might enjoy
his society undisturbed (Cicero, _Tusc. disp._ i. 38). Some see in
Endymion the sun, setting opposite to the rising moon, the Latmian cave
being the cave of forgetfulness, into which the sun plunges beneath the
sea; others regard him as the personification of sleep or death (see
Mayor on Juvenal x. 318).
ENERGETICS. The most fundamental result attained by the progress of
physical science in the 19th century was the definite enunciation and
development of the doctrine of energy, which is now paramount both in
mechanics and in thermodynamics. For a discussion of the elementary
ideas underlying this conception see the separate heading ENERGY.
Ever since physical speculation began in the atomic theories of the
Greeks, its main problem has been that of unravelling the nature of the
underlying correlation which binds together the various natural
agencies. But it is only in recent times that scientific investigation
has definitely established that there is a quantitative relation of
simple equivalence between them, whereby each is expressible in terms of
heat or mechanical power; that there is a certain measurable quantity
associated with each type of physical activity which is always
numerically identical with a corresponding quantity belonging to the new
type into which it is transformed, so that the energy, as it is called,
is conserved in unaltered amount. The main obstacle in the way of an
earlier recognition and development of this principle had been the
doctrine of caloric, which was suggested by the principles and practice
of calorimetry, and taught that heat is a substance that can be
transferred from one body to another, but cannot be created or
destroyed, though it may become latent. So long as this idea maintained
itself, there was no possible compensation for the destruction of
mechanical power by friction; it appeared that mechanical effect had
there definitely been lost. The idea that heat is itself convertible
into power, and is in fact energy of motion of the minute invisible
parts of bodies, had been held by Newton and in a vaguer sense by Bacon,
and indeed long before their time; but it dropped out of the ordinary
creed of science in the following century. It held a place, like many
other anticipations of subsequent discovery, in the system of Natural
Philosophy of Thomas Young (1804); and the discrepancies attending
current explanations on the caloric theory were insisted on, about the
same time, by Count Rumford and Sir H. Davy. But it was not till the
actual experiments of Joule verified the same exact equivalence between
heat produced and mechanical energy destroyed, by whatever process that
was accomplished, that the idea of caloric had to be definitely
abandoned. Some time previously R. Mayer, physician, of Heilbronn, had
founded a weighty theoretical argument on the production of mechanical
power in the animal system from the food consumed; he had, moreover,
even calculated the value of a unit of heat, in terms of its equivalent
in power, from the data afforded by Regnault's determinations of the
specific heats of air at constant pressure and at constant volume, the
former being the greater on Mayer's hypothesis (of which his calculation
in fact constituted the verification) solely on account of the power
required for the work of expansion of the gas against the surrounding
constant pressure. About the same time Helmholtz, in his early memoir on
the Conservation of Energy, constructed a cumulative argument by tracing
the ramifications of the principle of conservation of energy throughout
the whole range of physical science.
_Mechanical and Thermal Energy._--The amount of energy, defined in this
sense by convertibility with mechanical work, which is contained in a
material system, must be a function of its physical state and chemical
constitution and of its temperature. The change in this amount, arising
from a given transformation in the system, is usually measured by
degrading the energy that leaves the system into heat; for it is always
possible to do this, while the conversion of heat back again into other
forms of energy is impossible without assistance, taking the form of
compensating degradation elsewhere. We may adopt the provisional view
which is the basis of abstract physics, that all these other forms of
energy are in their essence mechanical, that is, arise from the motion
or strain of material or ethereal media; then their distinction from
heat will lie in the fact that these motions or strains are simply
co-ordinated, so that they can be traced and controlled or manipulated
in detail, while the thermal energy subsists in irregular motions of the
molecules or smallest portions of matter, which we cannot trace on
account of the bluntness of our sensual perceptions, but can only
measure as regards total amount.
_Historical: Abstract Dynamics._--Even in the case of a purely
mechanical system, capable only of a finite number of definite types of
disturbance, the principle of the conservation of energy is very far
from giving a complete account of its motions; it forms only one among
the equations that are required to determine their course. In its
application to the kinetics of invariable systems, after the time of
Newton, the principle was emphasized as fundamental by Leibnitz, was
then improved and generalized by the Bernoullis and by Euler, and was
ultimately expressed in its widest form by Lagrange. It is recorded by
Helmholtz that it was largely his acquaintance in early years with the
works of those mathematical physicists of the previous century, who had
formulated and generalized the principle as a help towards the
theoretical dynamics of complex systems of masses, that started him on
the track of extending the principle throughout the whole range of
natural phenomena. On the other hand, the ascertained validity of this
extension to new types of phenomena, such as those of electrodynamics,
now forms a main foundation of our belief in a mechanical basis for
these sciences.
In the hands of Lagrange the mathematical expression for the manner in
which the energy is connected with the geometrical constitution of the
material system became a sufficient basis for a complete knowledge of
its dynamical phenomena. So far as statics was concerned, this doctrine
took its rise as far back as Galileo, who recognized in the simpler
cases that the work expended in the steady driving of a frictionless
mechanical system is equal to its output. The expression of this fact
was generalized in a brief statement by Newton in the _Principia_, and
more in detail by the Bernoullis, until, in the analytical guise of the
so-called principle of "virtual velocities" or virtual work, it finally
became the basis of Lagrange's general formulation of dynamics. In its
application to kinetics a purely physical principle, also indicated by
Newton, but developed long after with masterly applications by
d'Alembert, that the reactions of the infinitesimal parts of the system
against the accelerations of their motions statically equilibrate the
forces applied to the system as a whole, was required in order to form a
sufficient basis, and one which Lagrange soon afterwards condensed into
the single relation of Least Action. As a matter of history, however,
the complete formulation of the subject of abstract dynamics actually
arose (in 1758) from Lagrange's precise demonstration of the principle
of Least Action for a particle, and its immediate extension, on the
basis of his new Calculus of Variations, to a system of connected
particles such as might be taken as a representation of any material
system; but here too the same physical as distinct from mechanical
considerations come into play as in d'Alembert's principle. (See
DYNAMICS: _Analytical_.)
It is in the cases of systems whose state is changing so slowly that
reactions arising from changing motions can be neglected, that the
conditions are by far the simplest. In such systems, whether stationary
or in a state of steady motion, the energy depends on the configuration
alone, and its mathematical expression can be determined from
measurement of the work required for a sufficient number of simple
transformations; once it is thus found, all the statical relations of
the system are implicitly determined along with it, and the results of
all other transformations can be predicted. The general development of
such relations is conveniently classed as a separate branch of physics
under the name _Energetics_, first invented by W.J.M. Rankine; but the
essential limitations of this method have not always been observed. As
regards statical change, the complete specification of a mechanical
system is involved in its geometrical configuration and the function
expressing its mechanical energy in terms thereof. Systems which have
statical energy-functions of the same analytical form behave in
corresponding ways, and can serve as models or representations of one
another.
_Extension to Thermal and Chemical Systems._--This dominant position of
the principle of energy, in ordinary statical problems, has in recent
times been extended to transformations involving change of physical
state or chemical constitution as well as change of geometrical
configuration. In this wider field we cannot assert that mechanical (or
available) energy is never lost, for it may be degraded into thermal
energy; but we can use the principle that on the other hand it can never
spontaneously increase. If this were not so, cyclic processes might
theoretically be arranged which would continue to supply mechanical
power so long as energy of any kind remained in the system; whereas the
irregular and uncontrollable character of the molecular motions and
strains which constitute thermal energy, in combination with the vast
number of the molecules, must place an effectual bar on their unlimited
co-ordination. To establish a doctrine of _energetics_ that shall form a
sufficient foundation for a theory of the trend of chemical and physical
change, we have, therefore, to impart precision to this motion of
available energy.
_Carnot's Principle: Entropy._--The whole subject is involved in the new
principle contributed to theoretical physics by Sadi Carnot in 1824, in
which the far-reaching modern conception of cyclic processes was first
scientifically developed. It was shown by Carnot, on the basis of certain
axioms, whose theoretical foundations were subsequently corrected and
strengthened by Clausius and Lord Kelvin, that a reversible mechanical
process, working in a cycle by means of thermal transfers, which takes
heat, say H1, into the material system at a given temperature T1, and
delivers the part of it not utilized, say H2, at a lower given
temperature T2, is more efficient, considered as a working engine, than
any other such process, operating between the same two temperatures but
not reversible, could be. This relation of inequality involves a definite
law of equality, that the mechanical efficiencies of all reversible
cyclic processes are the same, whatever be the nature of their operation
or the material substances involved in them; that in fact the efficiency
is a function solely of the two temperatures at which the cyclically
working system takes in and gives out heat. These considerations
constitute a fundamental general principle to which all possible slow
reversible processes, so far as they concern matter in bulk, must conform
in all their stages; its application is almost coextensive with the scope
of general physics, the special kinetic theories in which inertia is
involved, being excepted. (See THERMODYNAMICS.) If the working system is
an ideal gas-engine, in which a perfect gas (known from experience to be
a possible state of matter) is passed through the cycle, and if
temperature is measured from the absolute zero by the expansion of this
gas, then simple direct calculation on the basis of the laws of ideal
gases shows that H1/T1 = H2/T2; and as by the conservation of energy the
work done is H1 - H2, it follows that the efficiency, measured as the
ratio of the work done to the supply of heat, is 1 - T2/T1. If we change
the sign of H1 and thus consider heat as positive when it is restored to
the system as is H2, the fundamental equation becomes H1/T1 + H2/T2 = 0;
and as any complex reversible working system may be considered as
compounded in various ways of chains of elementary systems of this type,
_whose effects are additive_, the general proposition follows, that in
any reversible complete cyclic change which involves the taking in of
heat by the system of which the amount is [delta]H, when its temperature
ranges between T_r and T_r + [delta]T, the equation [Sigma][delta]H_r/T_r
- 0 holds good. Moreover, if the changes are not reversible, the
proportion of the heat supply that is utilized for mechanical work will
be smaller, so that more heat will be restored to the system, and
[Sigma][delta]H_r/T_r or, as it may be expressed, [int]dH/T, must have a
larger value, and must thus be positive. The first statement involves
further, that for all reversible paths of change of the system from one
state C to another state D, the value of [int]dH/T must be the same,
because any one of these paths and any other one reversed would form a
cycle; whereas for any irreversible path of change between the same
states this integral must have a greater value (and so exceed the
difference of entropies at the ends of the path). The definite quantity
represented by this integral for a reversible path was introduced by
Clausius in 1854 (also adumbrated by Kelvin's investigations about the
same time), and was named afterwards by him the increase of the _entropy_
of the system in passing from the state C to the state D. This increase,
being thus the same for the unlimited number of possible reversible paths
involving independent variation of all its finite co-ordinates, along
which the system can pass, can depend only on the terminal states. The
entropy belonging to a given state is therefore a function of that state
alone, irrespective of the manner in which it has been reached; and this
is the justification of the assignment to it of a special name, connoting
a property of the system depending on its actual condition and not on its
previous history. Every reversible change in an isolated system thus
maintains the entropy of that system unaltered; no possible spontaneous
change can involve decrease of the entropy; while any defect of
reversibility, arising from diffusion of matter or motion in the system,
necessarily leads to increase of entropy. For a physical or chemical
system only those changes are spontaneously possible which would lead to
increase of the entropy; if the entropy is already a maximum for the
given total energy, and so incapable of further continuous increase under
the conditions imposed upon the system, there must be stable equilibrium.
This definite quantity belonging to a material system, its entropy
[phi], is thus concomitant with its energy E, which is also a definite
function of its actual state by the law of conservation of energy;
these, along with its temperature T, and the various co-ordinates
expressing its geometrical configuration and its physical and chemical
constitution, are the quantities with which the thermodynamics of the
system deals. That branch of science develops the consequences involved
in just two principles: (i.) that the energy of every isolated system is
constant, and (ii.) that its entropy can never diminish; any
complication that may be involved arises from complexity in the systems
to which these two laws have to be applied.
_The General Thermodynamic Equation._--When any physical or chemical
system undergoes an infinitesimal change of state, we have [delta]E =
[delta]H + [delta]U, where [delta]H is the energy that has been acquired
_as heat_ from sources extraneous to the system during the change, and
[delta]U is the energy that has been imparted by reversible agencies
such as mechanical or electric work. It is, however, not usually
possible to discriminate permanently between heat acquired and work
imparted, for (unless for isothermal transformations) neither [delta]H
nor [delta]U is the exact differential of a function of the constitution
of the system and so independent of its previous history, although their
sum [delta]E is such; but we can utilize the fact that [delta]H is equal
to T[delta][phi] where [delta][phi] is such, as has just been seen. Thus
E and [phi] represent properties of the system which, along with
temperature, pressure and other independent data specifying its
constitution, must form the variables of an analytical exposition. We
have, therefore, to substitute T[delta][phi] for [delta]H; also the
_change_ of internal energy is determined by the change of constitution,
involving a differential relation of type
[delta]U = -p[delta]v + [delta]W + [mu]1[delta]m1 + [mu]2[delta]m2
+ ... + [mu]_n[delta]m_n,
when the system consists of an intimate mixture (solution) of masses m1,
m2, ... m_n of given constituents, which differ physically or chemically
but may be partially transformable into each other by chemical or
physical action during the changes under consideration, the whole being
of volume v and under extraneous pressure p, while W is potential energy
arising from physical forces such as those of gravity, capillarity, &c.
The variables m1, m2, ... m_n may not be all independent; for example,
if the system were chloride of ammonium gas existing along with its
gaseous products of dissociation, hydrochloric acid and ammonia, only
one of the three masses would be independently variable. The sufficient
number of these variables (independent components) together with two
other variables, which may be v and T, or v and [phi], specifies and
determines the state of the system, considered as matter in bulk, at
each instant. It is usual to include [delta]W in [mu]1[delta]m1 + ...;
in all cases where this is possible the single equation
[delta]E = T[delta][phi] - p[delta]v + [mu]1[delta]m1 + [mu]2[delta]m2
+ ... + [mu]_n[delta]m_n (1)
thus expresses the complete variation of the energy-function E arising
from change of state; and when the part involving the n constitutive
differentials has been expressed in terms of the number of them that are
really independent, this equation by itself becomes the unique
expression of _all_ the thermodynamic relations of the system. These are
in fact the various relations ensuring that the right-hand side is an
exact differential, and are of the type of reciprocal relations such as
d[mu]_r/d[phi] = dT/dm_r.
The condition that the state of the system be one of stable equilibrium
is that [delta][phi], the variation of entropy, be negative for all
formally imaginable infinitesimal transformations which make [delta]E
vanish; for as [delta][phi] cannot actually be negative for any
spontaneous variation, none of these transformations can then occur.
From the form of the equation, this condition is the same as that
[delta]E - T[delta][phi] must be _positive for all possible_ variations
of state of the system as above defined in terms of co-ordinates
representing its constitution in bulk, without restriction.
We can change one of the independent variables expressing the state of
the system from [phi] to T by subtracting [delta]([phi]T) from both
sides of the equation of variation: then
[delta](E - T[phi]) = - [phi][delta]T - p[delta]v + [mu]1[delta]m1
+ ... + [mu]_n[delta]m_n.
It follows that for _isothermal_ changes, i.e. those for which [delta]T
is maintained null by an environment at constant temperature, the
condition of stable equilibrium is that the function E - T[phi] shall be
a minimum. If the system is subject to an external pressure p, which as
well as the temperature is imposed constant from without and thus
incapable of variation through internal changes, the condition of stable
equilibrium is similarly that E - T[phi] + pv shall be a minimum.
A chemical system maintained at constant temperature by communication of
heat from its environment may thus have several states of stable
equilibrium corresponding to different minima of the function here
considered, just as there may be several minima of elevation on a
landscape, one at the bottom of each depression; in fact, this analogy,
when extended to space of n dimensions, exactly fits the case. If the
system is sufficiently disturbed, for example, by electric shock, it may
pass over (explosively) from a higher to a lower minimum, but never
(without compensation from outside) in the opposite direction. The
former passage, moreover, is often effected by introducing a new
substance into the system; sometimes that substance is recovered
unaltered at the end of the process, and then its action is said to be
purely _catalytic_; its presence modifies the form of the function E -
T[phi] so as to obliterate the ridge between the two equilibrium states
in the graphical representation.
There are systems in which the equilibrium states are but very slightly
dependent on temperature and pressure within wide limits, outside which
reaction takes place. Thus while there are cases in which a state of
mobile dissociation exists in the system which changes continuously as a
function of these variables, there are others in which change does not
sensibly occur at all until a certain _temperature of reaction_ is
attained, after which it proceeds very rapidly owing to the heat
developed, and the system soon becomes sensibly permanent in a
transformed phase by completion of the reaction. In some cases of this
latter type the cause of the delay in starting lies possibly in passive
resistance to change, of the nature of viscosity or friction, which is
competent to convert an unstable mechanical equilibrium into a
moderately stable one; but in most such reactions there seems to be no
exact equilibrium at any temperature, short of the ultimate state of
dissipated energy in which the reaction is completed, although the
velocity of reaction is found to diminish exponentially with change of
temperature, and thus becomes insignificant at a small interval from the
temperature of pronounced activity.
_Free Energy._--The quantity E - T[phi] thus plays the same fundamental
part in the thermal statics of general chemical systems at uniform
temperature that the potential energy plays in the statics of mechanical
systems of unchanging constitution. It is a function of the geometrical
co-ordinates, the physical and chemical constitution, and the
temperature of the system, which determines the conditions of stable
equilibrium _at each temperature_; it is, in fact, the potential energy
generalized so as to include temperature, and thus be a single function
relating to each temperature but at the same time affording a basis of
connexion between the properties of the system at different
temperatures. It has been called the _free energy_ of the system by
Helmholtz, for it is the part of the energy whose variation is connected
with changes in the bodily structure of the system represented by the
variables m1, m2, ... m_n, and not with the irregular molecular motions
represented by heat, so that it can take part freely in physical
transformations. Yet this holds good only subject to the condition that
the temperature is not varied; it has been seen above that for the more
general variation neither [delta]H nor [delta]U is an exact
differential, and no line of separation can be drawn between thermal and
mechanical energies.
The study of the evolution of ideas in this, the most abstract branch of
modern mathematical physics, is rendered difficult in the manner of most
purely philosophical subjects by the variety of terminology, much of it
only partially appropriate, that has been employed to express the
fundamental principles by different investigators and at different
stages of the development. Attentive examination will show, what is
indeed hardly surprising, that the principles of the theory of free
energy of Gibbs and Helmholtz had been already grasped and exemplified
by Lord Kelvin in the very early days of the subject (see the paper "On
the Thermoelastic and Thermomagnetic Properties of Matter, Part I."
_Quarterly Journal of Mathematics_, No. 1, April 1855; reprinted in
Phil. Mag., January 1878, and in _Math. and Phys. Papers_, vol. i. pp.
291, seq.). Thus the striking new advance contained in the more modern
work of J. Willard Gibbs (1875-1877) and of Helmholtz (1882) was rather
the sustained general application of these ideas to chemical systems,
such as the galvanic cell and dissociating gaseous systems, and in
general fashion to heterogeneous concomitant phases. The fundamental
paper of Kelvin connecting the electromotive force of the cell with the
energy of chemical transformation is of date 1851, some years before the
distinction between free energy and total energy had definitely
crystallized out; and, possibly satisfied with the approximate exactness
of his imperfect formula when applied to a Daniell's cell (_infra_), and
deterred by absence of experimental data, he did not return to the
subject. In 1852 he briefly announced (_Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin._) the
principle of the dissipation of mechanical (or available) energy,
including the necessity of compensation elsewhere when restoration
occurs, in the form that "any restoration of mechanical energy, without
more than an equivalent of dissipation, is impossible"--probably even in
vital activity; but a sufficient specification of available energy (cf.
_infra_) was not then developed. In the paper above referred to, where
this was done, and illustrated by full application to solid elastic
systems, the total energy is represented by c and is named "the
intrinsic energy," the energy taken in during an isothermal
transformation is represented by e, of which H is taken in as heat,
while the remainder, the change of free (or mechanical or available)
energy of the system is the unnamed quantity denoted by the symbol w,
which is "the work done by the applied forces" at uniform temperature.
It is pointed out that it is w and not e that is the potential
energy-function for isothermal change, of which the form can be
determined directly by dynamical and physical experiment, and from which
alone the criteria of equilibrium and stress are to be derived--simply
for the reason that for all _reversible_ paths at constant temperature
between the same terminal configurations, there must, by Carnot's
principle, be the same gain or loss of heat. And a system of formulae
are given (5) to (11)--_Ex. gr._ e = w - t(dw/dt) + J [int]s dt for
finding the total energy e for any temperature t when w and the thermal
capacity s of the system, in a standard state, have thus been
ascertained, and another for establishing connexion between the form of
w for one temperature and its form for adjacent temperatures--which are
identical with those developed by Helmholtz long afterwards, in 1882,
except that the entropy appears only as an unnamed integral. The
progress of physical science is formally identified with the exploration
of this function w for physical systems, with continually increasing
exactness and range--except where pure kinetic considerations prevail,
in which cases the wider Hamiltonian dynamical formulation is
fundamental. Another aspect of the matter will be developed below.
A somewhat different procedure, in terms of entropy as fundamental, has
been adopted and developed by Planck. In an isolated system the trend of
change must be in the direction which increases the entropy [phi], by
Clausius' form of the principle. But in experiment it is a system at
constant temperature rather than an adiabatic one that usually is
involved; this can be attained formally by including in the isolated
system (cf. _infra_) a source of heat at that temperature and of
unlimited capacity, when the energy of the original system increases by
[delta]E this source must give up heat of amount [delta]E, and its
entropy therefore diminishes [delta]E/T. Thus for the original system
maintained at constant temperature T it is [delta][phi] - [delta]E/T
that must always be positive in spontaneous change, which is the same
criterion as was reached above. Reference may also be made to H.A.
Lorentz's _Collected Scientific Papers_, part i.
A striking anticipation, almost contemporaneous, of Gibbs's
thermodynamic potential theory (_infra_) was made by Clerk Maxwell in
connexion with the discussion of Andrews's experiments on the critical
temperature of mixed gases, in a letter published in Sir G.G. Stokes's
_Scientific Correspondence_ (vol. ii. p. 34).
_Available Energy._--The same quantity [phi], which Clausius named the
entropy, arose in various ways in the early development of the subject,
in the train of ideas of Rankine and Kelvin relating to the expression
of the _available energy_ A of the material system. Suppose there were
accessible an auxiliary system containing an _unlimited_ quantity of
heat at absolute temperature T0, forming a condenser into which heat can
be discharged from the working system, or from which it may be recovered
at that temperature: we proceed to find how much of the heat of our
system is available for transformation into mechanical work, in a
process which reduces the whole system to the temperature of this
condenser. Provided the process of reduction is performed reversibly, it
is immaterial, by Carnot's principle, in what manner it is effected:
thus in following it out in detail we can consider each elementary
quantity of heat [delta]H removed from the system as set aside at its
actual temperature between T and T + [delta]T for the production of
mechanical work [delta]W and the residue of it [delta]H0 as directly
discharged into the condenser at T0. The principle of Carnot gives
[delta]H/T = [delta]H0/T0, so that the portion of the heat [delta]H that
is not available for work is [delta]H0, equal to T0[delta]H/T. In the
whole process the part not available in connexion with the condenser at
T0 is therefore T0[int][delta]H/T. This quantity must be the same
whatever reversible process is employed: thus, for example, we may first
transform the system reversibly from the state C to the state D, and
then from the state D to the final state of uniform temperature T0. It
follows that the value of T0[int]dH/T, representing the heat degraded,
is the same along all reversible paths of transformation from the state
C to the state D; so that the function [int]dH/T is the excess of a
definite quantity [phi] connected with the system in the former state as
compared with the latter.
It is usual to change the law of sign of [delta]H so that gain of heat
by the system is reckoned positive; then, relative to a condenser of
unlimited capacity at T0, the state C contains more mechanically
_available energy_ than the state D by the amount E_C - E_D + T0
[int]dH/T, that is, by E_C - E_D - T0([phi]_C - [phi]_D). In this way
the existence of an entropy function with a definite value for each
state of the system is again seen to be the direct analytical equivalent
of Carnot's axiom that no process can be more efficient than a
reversible process between the same initial and final states. The name
_motivity_ of a system was proposed by Lord Kelvin in 1879 for this
conception of available energy. It is here specified as relative to a
condenser of unlimited capacity at an assigned temperature T0: some such
specification is necessary to the definition; in fact, if T0 were the
absolute zero, all the energy would be mechanically available.
But we can obtain an intrinsically different and self-contained
comparison of the available energies in a system in two different states
at different temperatures, by ascertaining how much energy would be
dissipated in each in a reduction to the _same_ standard state of the
system itself, at a standard temperature T0. We have only to reverse the
operation, and change back this standard state to each of the others in
turn. This will involve abstractions of heat [delta]H0 from the various
portions of the system in the standard state, and returns of [delta]H to
the state at T0; if this return were [delta]H0T/T0 instead of [delta]H,
there would be no loss of availability in the direct process; hence
there is actual dissipation [delta]H - [delta]H0T/T0, that is
T([delta][phi] - [delta][phi]0). On passing from state 1 to state 2
through this standard state 0 the difference of these dissipations will
represent the energy of the system that has become unavailable. Thus in
this sense E - T[phi] + T[phi]0 + const. represents for each state the
amount of energy that is available; but instead of implying an unlimited
source of heat at the standard temperature T0, it implies that there is
no extraneous source. The available energy thus defined differs from E -
T[phi], the _free energy_ of Helmholtz, or the _work function of the
applied forces_ of Kelvin, which involves no reference to any standard
state, by a simple linear function of the temperature alone which is
immaterial as regards its applications.
The determination of the available mechanical energy arising from
differences of temperature between the parts of the same system is a
more complex problem, because it involves a determination of the common
temperature to which reversible processes will ultimately reduce them;
for the simple case in which no changes of state occur the solution was
given by Lord Kelvin in 1853, in connexion with the above train of ideas
(cf. Tait's _Thermodynamics_, S179). In the present exposition the
system is sensibly in equilibrium at each stage, so that its temperature
T is always uniform throughout; isolated portions at different
temperatures would be treated as different systems.
_Thermodynamic Potentials._--We have now to develop the relations
involved in the general equation (1) of thermodynamics. Suppose the
material system includes two coexistent states or phases, with
opportunity for free interchange of constituents--for example, a salt
solution and the aqueous vapour in equilibrium with it. Then in
equilibrium a slight transfer [delta]m of the water-substance of mass
m_r constituting the vapour, into the water-substance of mass m_s,
existing in the solution, should not produce any alteration of the first
order in [delta]E - T[delta][phi]; therefore [mu]_r must be equal to
[mu]_s. The quantity [mu]_r is called by Willard Gibbs the potential of
the corresponding substance of mass m_r; it may be defined as its
marginal available energy per unit mass at the given temperature. If
then a system involves in this way coexistent phases which remain
permanently separate, the potentials of any constituent must be the same
in all of them in which that constituent exists, for otherwise it would
tend to pass from the phases in which its potential is higher to those
in which it is lower. If the constituent is non-existent in any phase,
its potential when in that phase would have to be higher than in the
others in which it is actually present; but as the potential increases
logarithmically when the density of the constituent is indefinitely
diminished, this condition is automatically satisfied--or, more
strictly, the constitutent cannot be entirely absent, but the presence
of the merest trace will suffice to satisfy the condition of equality of
potential. When the action of the force of gravity is taken into
account, the potential of each constituent must include the
gravitational potential _gh_; in the equilibrium state the total
potential of each constituent, including this part, must be the same
throughout all parts of the system into which it is freely mobile. An
example is Dalton's law of the independent distributions of the gases in
the atmosphere, if it were in a state of rest. A similar statement
applies to other forms of mechanical potential energy arising from
actions at a distance.
When a slight constitutive change occurs in a galvanic element at given
temperature, producing available energy of electric current, in a
reversible manner and isothermally, at the expense of chemical energy,
it is the free energy of the system E - T[phi], not its total intrinsic
energy, whose value must be conserved during the process. Thus the
electromotive force is equal to the change of this free energy per
electrochemical equivalent of reaction in the cell. This proposition,
developed by Gibbs and later by Helmholtz, modifies the earlier one of
Kelvin--which tacitly assumed all the energy of reaction to be
available--except in the cases such as that of a Daniell's cell, in
which the magnitude of the electromotive force does not depend sensibly
on the temperature.
The effects produced on electromotive forces by difference of
concentrations in dilute solutions can thus be accounted for and traced
out, from the knowledge of the form of the free energy for such cases;
as also the effects of pressure in the case of gas batteries. The free
energy does not sensibly depend on whether the substance is solid or
fused--for the two states are in equilibrium at the temperature of
fusion--though the total energy differs in these two cases by the heat
of fusion; for this reason, as Gibbs pointed out, voltaic
potential-differences are the same for the fused as for the solid state
of the substances concerned.
_Relations involving Constitution only._--The potential of a component
in a given solution can depend only on the temperature and pressure of
the solution, and the densities of the various components, including
itself; as no distance-actions are usually involved in chemical physics,
it will not depend on the aggregate masses present. The example above
mentioned, of two coexistent phases liquid and vapour, indicates that
there may thus be relations between the constitutions of the phases
present in a chemical system which do not involve their total masses.
These are developed in a very direct manner in Willard Gibbs's original
procedure. In so far as attractions at a distance (a uniform force such
as gravity being excepted) and capillary actions at the interfaces
between the phases are inoperative, the fundamental equation (1) can be
integrated. Increasing the volume k times, and all the masses to the
same extent--in fact, placing alongside each other k identical systems
at the same temperature and pressure--will increase [phi] and E in the
same ratio k; thus E must be a homogeneous function of the first degree
of the independent variables [phi], v, m1, ..., m_n, and therefore by
Euler's theorem relating to such functions
E = T[phi] - pv + [mu]1m1 + ... + [mu]_nm_n.
This integral equation merely expresses the additive character of the
energies and entropies of adjacent portions of the system at uniform
temperature, and thus depends only on the absence of sensible physical
action directly across finite distances. If we form from it the
expression for the complete differential [delta]E, and subtract (1),
there remains the relation
0 = [phi][delta]T - v[delta]p + m1[delta][mu]1
+ ... + m_n[delta][mu]_n. (2)
This implies that in each phase the change of pressure depends on and is
determined by the changes in T, [mu]1, ... [mu]_n alone; as we know
beforehand that a physical property like pressure is an analytical
function of the state of the system, it is therefore a function of these
n + 1 quantities. When they are all independently variable, the
densities of the various constituents and of the entropy in the phase
are expressed by the partial fluxions of p with respect to them: thus
[phi] dp m_r dp
----- = --, --- = -------.
v dT v d[mu]_r
But when, as in the case above referred to of chloride of ammonium gas
existing partially dissociated along with its constituents, the masses
are not independent, necessary linear relations, furnished by the laws
of definite combining proportions, subsist between the partial fluxions,
and the form of the function which expresses p is thus restricted, in a
manner which is easily expressible in each special case.
This proposition that the pressure in any phase is a function of the
temperature and of the potentials of the independent constituents, thus
appears as a consequence of Carnot's axiom combined with the energy
principle and the absence of effective actions at a distance. It shows
that at a given temperature and pressure the potentials are not all
independent, that there is a necessary relation connecting them. This is
the _equation of state_ or constitution of the phase, whose existence
forms one mode of expression of Carnot's principle, and in which all the
properties of the phase are involved and can thence be derived by simple
differentiation.
_The Phase Rule._--When the material system contains only a single
phase, the number of independent variations, in addition to change of
temperature and pressure, that can spontaneously occur in its
constitution is thus one less than the number of its independent
constituents. But where several phases coexist in contact in the same
system, the number of possible independent variations may be much
smaller. The present independent variables [mu]1, ..., [mu]_n are
specially appropriate in this problem, because each of them has the same
value in all the phases. Now each phase has its own characteristic
equation, giving a relation between [delta]p, [delta]T, and
[delta][mu]1, ... [delta][mu]_n, or such of the latter as are
independent; if r phases coexist, there are r such relations; hence the
number of possible independent variations, including those of v and T,
is reduced to m - r + 2, where m is the number of independently variable
chemical constituents which the system contains. This number of degrees
of constitutive freedom cannot be negative; therefore the number of
possible phases that can coexist alongside each other cannot exceed m +
2. If m + 2 phases actually coexist, there is no variable quantity in
the system, thus the temperature and pressure and constitutions of the
phases are all determined; such is the triple point at which ice, water
and vapour exist in presence of each other. If there are m + 1
coexistent phases, the system can vary in one respect only; for example,
at any temperature of water-substance different from the triple point
two phases only, say liquid and vapour, or liquid and solid, coexist,
and the pressure is definite, as also are the densities and potentials
of the components. Finally, when but one phase, say water, is present,
both pressure and temperature can vary independently. The first example
illustrates the case of systems, physical or chemical, in which there is
only one possible state of equilibrium, forming a point of transition
between different constitutions; in the second type each temperature has
its own completely determined state of equilibrium; in other cases the
constitution in the equilibrium state is indeterminate as regards the
corresponding number of degrees of freedom. By aid of this phase rule of
Gibbs the number of different chemical substances actually interacting
in a given complex system can be determined from observation of the
degree of spontaneous variation which it exhibits; the rule thus lies at
the foundation of the modern subject of chemical equilibrium and
continuous chemical change in mixtures or alloys, and in this connexion
it has been widely applied and developed in the experimental
investigations of Roozeboom and van 't Hoff and other physical chemists,
mainly of the Dutch school.
_Extent to which the Theory can be practically developed._--It is only
in systems in which the number of independent variables is small that
the forms of the various potentials,--or the form of the fundamental
characteristic equation expressing the energy of the system in terms of
its entropy and constitution, or the pressure in terms of the
temperature and the potentials, which includes them all,--can be readily
approximated to by experimental determinations. Even in the case of the
simple system water-vapour, which is fundamental for the theory of the
steam-engine, this has not yet been completely accomplished. The general
theory is thus largely confined, as above, to defining the restrictions
on the degree of variability of a complex chemical system which the
principle of Carnot imposes. The tracing out of these general relations
of continuity of state is much facilitated by geometrical diagrams, such
as James Thomson first introduced in order to exhibit and explain
Andrews' results as to the range of coexistent phases in carbonic acid.
Gibbs's earliest thermodynamic surface had for its co-ordinates volume,
entropy and energy; it was constructed to scale by Maxwell for
water-substance, and is fully explained in later editions of the _Theory
of Heat_ (1875); it forms a relief map which, by simple inspection,
reveals the course of the transformations of water, with the
corresponding mechanical and thermal changes, in its three coexistent
states of solid, liquid and gas. In the general case, when the substance
has more than one independently variable constituent, there are more
than three variables to be represented; but Gibbs has shown the utility
of surfaces representing, for instance, the entropy in terms of the
constitutive variables when temperature and pressure are maintained
constant. Such graphical methods are now of fundamental importance in
connexion with the phase rule, for the experimental exploration of the
trend of the changes of constitution of complex mixtures with
interacting components, which arise as the physical conditions are
altered, as, for example in modern metallurgy, in the theory of alloys.
The study of the phenomena of condensation in a mixture of two gases or
vapours, initiated by Andrews and developed in this manner by van der
Waals and his pupils, forms a case in point (see CONDENSATION OF GASES).
_Dilute Components: Perfect Gases and Dilute Solutions._--There are,
however, two simple limiting cases, in which the theory can be completed
by a determination of the functions involved in it, which throw much
light on the phenomena of actual systems not far removed from these
ideal limits. They are the cases of mixtures of perfect gases, and of
very dilute solutions.
If, following Gibbs, we apply his equation (2) expressing the pressure
in terms of the temperature and the potentials, to a very dilute
solution of substances m2, m3, ... m_n in a solvent substance m1, and
vary the co-ordinate m_r alone, p and T remaining unvaried, we have in
the equilibrium state
d[mu]_r d[mu]1 d[mu]_n
m_r------- + m1------ + ... + m_n------- = 0,
dm_r dm_r dm_r
in which every m except m1 is very small, while d[mu]1/dm_r is
presumably finite. As the second term is thus finite, this requires
that the total potential of each component m_r, which is m_r
d[mu]_r/dm_r, shall be finite, say k_r, in the limit when m_r is null.
Thus for very small concentrations the potential [mu]_r of a dilute
component must be of the form k_r log m_r/v, being proportional to the
logarithm of the density of that component; it thus tends
logarithmically to an infinite value at evanescent concentrations,
showing that removal of the last traces of any impurity would demand
infinite proportionate expenditure of available energy, and is
therefore practically impossible with finite intensities of force. It
should be noted, however, that this argument applies only to fluid
phases, for in the case of deposition of a solid m_r is not uniformly
distributed throughout the phase; thus it remains possible for the
growth of a crystal at its surface in aqueous solution to extrude all
the water except such as is in some form of chemical combination.
The precise value of this logarithmic expression for the potential can
be readily determined for the case of a perfect gas from its
characteristic properties, and can be thence extended to other dilute
forms of matter. We have pv = R/m.T for unit mass of the gas, where m
is the molecular weight, being 2 for hydrogen, and R is a constant
equal to 82 X 10^6 in C.G.S. dynamical units, or 2 calories
approximately in thermal energy units, which is the same for all gases
because they have all the same number of molecules per unit volume.
The increment of heat received by the unit mass of the gas is [delta]H
= p[delta]v + [kappa][delta]T, [kappa] being thus the specific heat at
constant volume, which can be a function only of the temperature. Thus
[phi] = [int]dH/T = R/m.log v + [int][kappa]T^(-1)dT;
and the available energy A per unit mass is E - T[phi] + T[phi]0 where
E = [epsilon] + [int][kappa]dT, the integral being for a standard
state, and [epsilon] being intrinsic energy of chemical constitution;
so that
A = [epsilon] + [phi]0T + [int][kappa]dT - T [int][kappa]T^(-1)dT -
R/m.T log v.
If there are [nu] molecules in the unit mass, and N per unit volume,
we have m[nu] = Nmv, each being 2 [nu]', where [nu]' is the number of
molecules per unit mass in hydrogen; thus the free energy per molecule
is a' + R'T log bN, where b = m/2[nu]', R' = R/2[nu]', and a' is a
function of T alone. It is customary to avoid introducing the unknown
molecular constant [nu]' by working with the available energy per
"gramme-molecule," that is, for a number of grammes expressed by the
molecular weight of the substance; this is a constant multiple of the
available energy per molecule, and is a + RT log[rho], [rho] being the
density equal to bN where b = m/2[nu]'. This formula may now be
extended by simple summation to a mixture of gases, on the ground of
Dalton's experimental principle that each of the components behaves in
presence of the others as it would do in a vacuum. The components are,
in fact, actually separable wholly or partially in reversible ways
which may be combined into cycles, for example, either (i.) by
diffusion through a porous partition, taking account of the work of
the pressures, or (ii.) by utilizing the modified constitution towards
the top of a long column of the mixture arising from the action of
gravity, or (iii.) by reversible absorption of a single component.
If we employ in place of available energy the form of characteristic
equation which gives the pressure in terms of the temperature and
potentials, the pressure of the mixture is expressed as the sum of
those belonging to its components: this equation was made by Gibbs the
basis of his analytical theory of gas mixtures, which he tested by its
application to the only data then available, those of the equilibrium
of dissociation of nitrogen peroxide (2NO2 <--> N2O4) vapour.
_Van 't Hoff's Osmotic Principle: Theoretical Explanation._--We proceed
to examine how far the same formulae as hold for gases apply to the
available energy of matter in solution which is so dilute that each
molecule of the dissolved substance, though possibly the centre of a
complex of molecules of the solvent, is for nearly all the time beyond
the sphere of direct influence of the other molecules of the dissolved
substance. The available energy is a function only of the co-ordinates
of the matter in bulk and the temperature; its change on further
dilution, with which alone we are concerned in the transformations of
dilute solutions, can depend only on the further separation of these
molecular complexes in space that is thereby produced, as no one of them
is in itself altered. The change is therefore a function only of the
number N of the dissolved molecules per unit volume, and of the
temperature, and is, per molecule, expressible in a form entirely
independent of their constitution and of that of the medium in which
they are dissolved. This suggests that the expression for the change on
dilution is the same as the known one for a gas, in which the same
molecules would exist free and in the main outside each other's spheres
of influence; which confirms and is verified by the experimental
principle of van 't Hoff, that osmotic pressure obeys the laws of
gaseous pressure with identically the same physical constants as those
of gases. It can be held, in fact, that this suggestion does not fall
short of a demonstration, on the basis of Carnot's principle, and
independent of special molecular theory, that in all cases where the
molecules of a component, whether it be of a gas or of a solution, are
outside each other's spheres of influence, the available energy, so far
as regards dilution, must have a common form, and the physical constants
must therefore be the known gas-constants. The customary exposition
derives this principle, by an argument involving cycles, from Henry's
law of solution of gases; it is sensibly restricted to such solutes as
appear concomitantly in the free gaseous state, but theoretically it
becomes general when it is remembered that no solute can be absolutely
non-volatile.
_Source of the Idea of Temperature._--The single new element that
thermodynamics introduces into the ordinary dynamical specification of a
material system is temperature. This conception is akin to that of
potential, except that it is given to us directly by our sense of heat.
But if that were not so, we could still demonstrate, on the basis of
Carnot's principle, that there is a definite function of the state of a
body which must be the same for all of a series of connected bodies,
when thermal equilibrium has become established so that there is no
tendency for heat to flow from one to another. For we can by mere
geometrical displacement change the order of the bodies so as to bring
different ones into direct contact. If this disturbed the thermal
equilibrium, we could construct cyclic processes to take advantage of
the resulting flow of heat to do mechanical work, and such processes
might be carried on without limit. Thus it is proved that if a body A
is in temperature-equilibrium with B, and B with C, then A must be in
equilibrium with C directly. This argument can be applied, by aid of
adiabatic partitions, even when the bodies are in a field of force so
that mechanical work is required to change their geometrical
arrangement; it was in fact employed by Maxwell to extend from the case
of a gas to that of any other system the proposition that the
temperature is the same all along a vertical column in equilibrium under
gravity.
It had been shown from the kinetic theory by Maxwell that in a
gas-column the mean kinetic energy of the molecules is the same at all
heights. If the only test of equality of temperature consisted in
bringing the bodies into contact, this would be rather a proof that
thermal temperature is of the same physical nature in all parts of the
field of force; but temperature can also be equalized across a distance
by radiation, so that this law for gases is itself already necessitated
by Carnot's general principle, and merely confirmed or verified by the
special gas-theory. But without introducing into the argument the
existence of radiation, the uniformity of temperature throughout all
phases in equilibrium is necessitated by the doctrine of energetics
alone, as otherwise, for example, the raising of a quantity of gas to
the top of the gravitational column in an adiabatic enclosure together
with the lowering of an equal mass to the bottom would be a source of
power, capable of unlimited repetition.
_Laws of Chemical Equilibrium based on Available Energy._--The complete
theory of chemical and physical equilibrium in gaseous mixtures and in
very dilute solutions may readily be developed in terms of available
energy (cf. _Phil. Trans_., 1897, A, pp. 266-280), which forms perhaps
the most vivid and most direct procedure. The available energy per
molecule of any kind, in a mixture of perfect gases in which there are N
molecules of that kind per unit volume, has been found to be a' + R'T
logbN where R' is the universal physical constant connected with R
above. This expression represents the marginal increase of available
energy due to the introduction of one more molecule of that kind into
the system as actually constituted. The same formula also applies, by
what has already been stated, to substances in dilute solution in any
given solvent. In any isolated system in a mobile state of reaction or
of internal dissociation, the condition of chemical equilibrium is that
the available energy at constant temperature is a minimum, therefore
that it is stationary, and slight change arising from fresh reaction
would not sensibly alter it. Suppose that this reaction, per molecule
affected by it, is equivalent to introducing n1 molecules of type N1, n2
of type N2, &c., into the system, n1, n2, ... being the numbers of
molecules of the different types that take part in the reaction, as
shown by its chemical equation, reckoned positive when they appear,
negative when they disappear. Then in the state of equilibrium
n1(a'1 + R'T log b1N1) + n2(a'2 + R'T log b2N2) + ...
must vanish. Therefore N1^(n1) N2^(n2) ... must be equal to K, a
function of the temperature alone. This law, originally based by
Guldberg and Waage on direct statistics of molecular interaction,
expresses for each temperature the relation connecting the densities of
the interacting substances, in dilution comparable as regards density
with the perfect gaseous state, when the reaction has come to the state
of mobile equilibrium.
All properties of any system, including the heat of reaction, are
expressible in terms of its available energy A, equal to E - T[phi] +
[phi]0T. Thus as the constitution of the system changes with the
temperature, we have
dA dE d[phi]
-- = -- - T------ - ([phi] - [phi]0)
dT dT dT
where
[delta]E = [delta]H + [delta]W, [delta]H = T[delta][phi],
[delta]H being heat and [delta]W mechanical and chemical energy imparted
to the system at constant temperature; hence
d(A - W) d(A - W)
-------- = -([phi] - [phi]0), so that A = E + T--------,
dT dT
which is equivalent to
d /A - W\
E - W = -T^2 -- (-------).
dT \ T /
This general formula, applied differentially, expresses the heat
[delta]E - [delta]W absorbed by a reaction in terms of [delta]A, the
change produced by it in the available energy of the system, and of
[delta]W, the mechanical and electrical work done on the system during
its progress.
In the problem of reaction in gaseous systems or in very dilute
solution, the change of available energy per molecule of reaction has
just been found to be
[delta]A = [delta]A0 + R'T log K', where K' = b1^(n1) b2^(n2) ... K;
thus, when the reaction is spontaneous without requiring external work,
the heat absorbed per molecule of reaction is
d [delta]A0 d
-T^2 -- ---------, or -R'T^2 -- log K.
dT T dT
This formula has been utilized by van 't Hoff to determine, in terms of
the heat of reaction, the displacement of equilibrium in various systems
arising from change of temperature; for K, equal to N1^(n1) N2^(n2) ...,
is the reaction-parameter through which alone the temperature affects
the law of chemical equilibrium in dilute systems.
_Interfacial Phenomena: Liquid Films._--The characteristic equation
hitherto developed refers to the state of an element of mass in the
interior of a homogeneous substance: it does not apply to matter in the
neighbourhood of the transition between two adjacent phases. A
remarkable analysis has been developed by J.W. Gibbs in which the
present methods concerning matter in bulk are extended to the phenomena
at such an interface, without the introduction of any molecular theory;
it forms the thermodynamic completion of Gauss's mechanical theory of
capillarity, based on the early form of the principle of total energy.
The validity of the fundamental doctrine of available energy, so far as
regards all mechanical actions in bulk such as surface tensions, is
postulated, even when applied to interfacial layers so thin as to be
beyond our means of measurement; the argument from perpetual motions
being available here also, as soon as we have experimentally ascertained
that the said tensions are definite physical properties of the state of
the interface and not merely accidental phenomena. The procedure will
then consist in assuming a definite excess of energy, of entropy, and of
the masses of the various components, each per unit surface, at the
interface, the potential of each component being of necessity, in
equilibrium, the same as it is in the adjacent masses. The interfacial
transition layer thus provides in a sense a new surface-phase coexistent
with those on each side of it, and having its own characteristic
equation. It is only the extent of the interface and not its curvatures
that need enter into this relation, because any slight influence of the
latter can be eliminated from the equation by slightly displacing the
position of the surface which is taken to represent the interface
geometrically. By an argument similar to one given above, it is shown
that one of the forms of the characteristic equation is a relation
expressing the surface tension as a function of the temperature and the
potentials of the various components present on the two sides of the
interface; and from the differentiation of this the surface densities of
the superficial distributions of these components (as above defined) can
be obtained. The conditions that a specified new phase may become
developed when two other given ones are brought into contact, i.e. that
a chemical reaction may start at the interface, are thence formally
expressed in terms of the surface tensions of the three transition
layers and the pressures in the three phases. In the case of a thin
soap-film, sudden extension of any part reduces the interfacial density
of each component at each surface of the film, and so alters the surface
tension, which requires time to recover by the very slow diffusion of
dissolved material from other parts of the thin film; the system being
stable, this change must be an increase of tension, and constitutes a
species of elasticity in the film. Thus in a vertical film the surface
tension must be greater in the higher parts, as they have to sustain the
weight of the lower parts; the upper parts, in fact, stretch until the
superficial densities of the components there situated are reduced to
the amounts that correspond to the tension required for this purpose.
Such a film could not therefore consist of pure water. But there is a
limit to these processes: if the film becomes so thin that there is no
water in bulk between its surfaces, the tensions cannot adjust
themselves in this slow way by migration of components from one part of
the film to another; if the film can survive at all after it has become
of molecular thickness, it must be as a definite molecular structure all
across its thickness. Of such type are the black spots that break out in
soap-films (suggested by Gibbs and proved by the measures of Reinold and
Rucker): the spots increase in size because their tension is less than
that of the surrounding film, but their indefinite increase is
presumably stopped in practice by some clogging or viscous agency at
their boundary.
_Transition to Molecular Theory._--The subject of energetics, based on
the doctrine of available energy, deals with matter in bulk and is not
concerned with its molecular constitution, which it is expressly
designed to eliminate from the problem. This analysis of the phenomena
of surface tension shows how far the principle of negation of perpetual
motions can carry us, into regions which at first sight might be classed
as molecular. But, as in other cases, it is limited to pointing out the
general scheme of relations within which the phenomena can have their
play. There is now a considerable body of knowledge correlating surface
tension with chemical constitution, especially to a certain extent with
the numerical density of the distribution of molecules; thus R. Eotvos
has shown that a law of proportionality exists for wide classes of
substances between the temperature-gradient of the surface tension and
the density of the molecules over the surface layer, which varies as the
two-thirds power of the number per unit volume (see CHEMISTRY:
_Physical_). This takes us into the sphere of molecular science, where
at present we have only such indications largely derived from
experiment, if we except the mere notion of inter-atomic forces of
unknown character on which the older theories of capillarity, those of
Laplace and Poisson, were constructed.