_Bellario_ answered, That he was not only satisfied with it, but highly

applauded all the material Parts of it; that the various distressful

Situations in which you had placed your Heroine, were noble beyond

Expression; that these three last Volumes contained many Scenes, each

singly arising to as high a Tragedy as can possibly be wrote; that the

Tears you had drawn from his Eyes were such Tears as flow'd from a Heart

at once filled with Admiration and Compassion, and labouring under

Sensations too strong for any Utterance in Words; and that for the Sake

of _Clarissa_, he would never form any Judgment of a Work again till the

whole was lain before him. This was noble! this was candid! this was

like _Bellario_! and Miss _Gibson_ could not forbear saying, that she

rejoyced in the Tears _he_ had shed for _Clarissa_. And, Sir, (continued

she) 'I am convinced, that those whose Eyes melt not at Scenes of

well-wrought Distress, cannot properly be said to laugh, from a liberal

and chearful Spirit, at the true Scenes of comic Humour.'

'The Beginning of this Season I went with a Lady, whose Acquaintance I

accidentally fell into, to _Drury-Lane_ Play-house, where Mr. _Garrick_

performed the Part of King _Lear_. I should have thought (tho' altered

and defaced as it is by Mr. _Tate_) that even Butchers must have wept;

but to my great Astonishment, my Companion sat unmoved: Silent indeed

she was, only now and then said, _she did not love Tragedy_; that, for

her part, _she had rather laugh than cry_, and liked a Comedy best. I

had a Curiosity to see in what manner comic Scenes would affect her; and

therefore proposed going to _Covent-Garden_ Play-house the next Night,

when Mr. _Quin_ was to play the Part of Sir _John Falstaff_, in _Harry_

the Fourth. Accordingly we went. The Lady did, indeed, now and then

catch the Laugh of those around her, enough to move about her Features a

little; but upon the whole, was pretty near as unmov'd as she had been

the Night before; and at last she confessed, that the Humours of Sir

_John Falstaff_ was not the Sort of Comedy that pleased her Fancy; but

that the merry Dialogues between _Tom_ and _Phillis_ in the _Conscious

Lovers_, and the comical Humours of _Ben_ and Miss _Prue_ in _Love for

Love_, were more suited to her Taste. I was not much surprised, because

I before suspected, that whoever could sit the Play of King _Lear_

without weeping, would see Sir _John Falstaff_ without laughing.'

Mr. _Dellincourt_ now raised a new Objection to _Clarissa_, in that she

talked so much of Religion, which he call'd Canting. Nay, Sir, said

_Bellario_, 'I cannot see how she can be said to cant; for her religious

Reflections are neither nonsensical or affected, but such as naturally

arise from a pious Mind in her several Situations; and if you are a

Christian, Sir, I am sure you cannot, on Consideration, dislike that

Part of her Character.' Mr. _Dellincourt_ said, 'Yes, he was a

Christian, and he did not dislike some of her Reflections, at least when

she was near Death; but he thought she talked too much of Religion at

the Beginning; for it was unnatural for a young Beauty to have such

grave Thoughts.' _Bellario_ smiled and said,

'You put me in mind, Sir, of Dame _Quickly_, who when Sir _John

Falstaff_, in his Illness, calls upon God, told him, to comfort him, she

hoped there was no Occasion yet to think of any such Matters; supposing,

that to think of God, except he was quite dying, was very unnecessary.

And, indeed, I have often known a professed Christian excuse introducing

a Word of Religion into Company, as if it would be indecent to mention

any such matters; but as to _Clarissa_, I think the Principles she had

imbibed from her Infancy from the good and pious Mrs. _Norton_, and

which were afterwards strengthned by her Conversation with Doctor

_Lewin_, renders it very natural for her to be early and steadily

religious.' Mr. _Dellincourt_ made no Answer, but dropped his Objection;

and Mr. _Barker_ said, 'that he thought there was one great Fault in the

Conduct of your Story; and that was, the Indelicacy of making _Clarissa_

seek _Lovelace_ after the Outrage; for that he was strongly of Opinion,

that she had better have escaped from Mrs. _Sinclair's_ and have avoided

the Sight of _Lovelace_.' 'Indeed, Sir, said Miss _Gibson_, I believe

she would have been very thankful for your Advice, if you could at the

same time have found out any Expedient to have put it in Execution; but

if you will please to recollect, you may remember the Difficulty she had

to escape once before, even when she was not suspected; and _Lovelace_

now could have no manner of doubt, but that she would fly that House, if

not prevented, as soon as her Strength would permit her to leave her

Bed.

As to the Indelicacy of _Clarissa's_ seeking _Lovelace_, said

_Bellario_, 'I confess I do not see it; however, I will leave that

matter to be decided by the Ladies', who all agreed, that they thought

it no Breach of the strictest Modesty to declare it was their Opinion,

that the whole Scene, as it now stands, is what it _should be_, and

would have admited of no Alteration, but for the worse; that the

picturesque Manner in which a young Woman, without Fear or Confusion,

beholds the Man who dared imagine his Guilt could baffle all her

Resolutions, and sink her Soul to Cowardice, most beautifully displays

the Power of conscious Innocence; and, on the other hand, that the

confused Mind, the flattering Speech, unavoidable even by a _Lovelace_

when his guilty Soul was awed by the Presence of an Object injured

beyond the Power of Reparation, displays the Deformity of Wickedness in

all its Force. In short, this Scene was allowed to be Virtue's Triumph,

and _Clarissa's_ Conduct to be a direct Opposition to that of all those

whining Women, who blubber out an humble Petition to be joined for Life

to the Men who have betrayed them.

Had not _Clarissa_ seen _Lovelace_, said Miss _Gibson_, her Triumph

could never have been so compleat; and as I think the Impossibility of

her Escape at that time, from Mrs. _Sinclair's_, is very apparent, had

she not sought him, the true Lovers of _Clarissa_ must have mourned the

Loss of seeing her Behaviour in such an uncommon Situation.

_Bellario_ gave these Sentiments a Sanction by his Approbation, and the

rest of the Company either concurr'd with his Opinion, or at least did

not contradict him; and the next Day Miss _Gibson_ received the

following Letter from _Bellario_.

~_MADAM_~,

You seem'd so pleased last Night with my Conversion, if I may be allowed

the Expression, to your Favourite _Clarissa_, that I could not seek any

Repose till I had thrown together my Thoughts on that Head, in order to

address them to you; nor am I ashamed to confess, that the Author's

Design is more noble, and his Execution of it much happier, than I even

suspected till I had seen the whole.

In a Series of familiar Letters to relate a compleat Story, where there

is such a Variety of Characters, every one conducing to the forming the

necessary Incidents to the Completion of that Story, is a Method so

intirely new, so much an Original manner of Writing, that the Author

seems to have a Right to make his own Laws; the painting Nature is

indeed his Aim, but the Vehicle by which he conveys his lively Portraits

to the Mind is so much his own Invention, that he may guide and direct

it according to his own Will and Pleasure. _Aristotle_ drew his Rules of

Epic Poetry from _Homer_, and not _Homer_ from _Aristotle_; tho' had

they been Cotemporaries, perhaps that had been a Point much disputed.

As to the Length of the Story, I fancy that Complaint arises from the

great Earnestness the Characters inspire the Reader with to know the

Event; and on a second Reading may vanish. _Clarissa_ is not intended as

a Dramatic, but as a real Picture of human Life, where Story can move

but slowly, where the Characters must open by degrees, and the Reader's

own Judgment form them from different Parts, as they display themselves

according to the Incidents that arise. As for Example; the Behaviour of

_Lovelace_ to his Rosebud must strike every one, at first View, with

Admiration and Esteem for him; but when his Character comes to blaze in

its full Light, it is very apparent that his Pride preserved his

Rosebud, as well as it destroyed _Clarissa_; like _Milton's Satan_, he

could for a Time cloath himself like an Angel of Light, even to the

Deception of _Uriel_.

_For neither Man, nor Angel can discern

Hypocrisie; the only Evil that walks

Invisible, except to God alone,

By his permissive Will, through Heaven and Earth:

And oft, though Wisdom wake, Suspicion sleeps

At Wisdom's Gate, and to Simplicity

Resigns her Charge; while Goodness thinks no ill

Where no Ill seems; which now, for once, beguiled_

Uriel, _though Regent of the Sun, and held

The sharpest-sighted Spirit of all in Heaven._

Proud Spirits, such as _Satan's_ and _Lovelace's_, require Objects of

their Envy, as Food for their Malice, to compleat their Triumph and

applaud their own Wickedness. From this Incident of the Rosebud, and the

subsequent Behaviour of _Lovelace_, arises a Moral which can never be

too often inculcated; namely, that Pride has the Art of putting on the

Mask of Virtue in so many Forms, that we must judge of a Man upon the

whole, and not from any one single Action.

A celebrated _French_ Critick says, that

'An indifferent Wit may form a vast Design in his Imagination; but it

must be an EXTRAORDINARY GENIUS that can work his Design, and fashion it

according to Justness and Proportion: For 'tis necessary that the same

Spirit _reign throughout_; that all contribute to the same _End_; and

that all the _Parts_ bear a secret _Relation_ to each other; all depend

on this Relation and Alliance.'

Let the nicest Critick examine the Story of _Clarissa_, and see if in

any Point it fails of coming up exactly to the before-mentioned Rule.

The Author had all Nature before him, and he has beautifully made use of

every Labyrinth, in the several Minds of his Characters, to lead him to

his purposed End.

The Obstinacy of old _Harlowe_, who never gave up a Point, unaccustomed

to Contradiction, and mad with the Thoughts of his own Authority; the

Pride of the two old Batchelors, who had lived single, in order to

aggrandize their Family; the overbearing impetuous _James Harlowe's_

Envy, arising from Ambition; the two-fold Envy of _Arabella Harlowe_,

springing from Rivalship in general Admiration, as well as in particular

liking; the former more rough, the latter more sly, tho' full as keen in

her Reproaches; the constant Submission of Mrs. _Harlowe_, and the mad

Vanity of _Lovelace_, all conspire to the grand End of distressing and

destroying the poor _Clarissa_; whose Misfortune it was to be placed

amongst a Set of Wretches, who were every one following the Bent of

their own peculiar Madness, without any Consideration for the innocent

Victim who was to fall a Sacrifice to their ungovernable Passions. And

here I must observe, how artfully the Author has conducted the opening

of his different Characters, as they became more interested in his

Story. The Correspondence between Miss _Howe_ and _Clarissa_, with some

characteristical Letters of each of the _Harlowes_, as these were then

his principal Actors, chiefly compose the two first Volumes.

In the third, fourth and fifth Volumes, _Lovelace_ comes prancing before

the Reader's Eye; gives an unrestrained Loose to his uncurbed

Imagination, and ripens into full-blown Baseness that Blackness of Mind,

which had hitherto only shot forth in Buds but barely visible. The

strong and lively Pen of _Lovelace_ was most proper to relate the most

active Scenes. But when his mischievous Heart and plotting Head had left

him no farther use for his wild Fancies, than to rave and curse his own

Folly, _Belford_ takes up the Pen, and carries on the Story; and in the

sixth and seventh Volumes, Colonel _Morden_ (who has hitherto made but a

small Appearance) is brought upon the Stage, and his Character, as he is

to be the Instrument of the Death of _Lovelace_, is as strongly painted,

and as necessary to the Completion of the Story, as are any of the

others. It is astonishing to me how much the different Stile of each

Writer is in every Particular preserved; indeed so characteristically

preserved, that when I read _Clarissa's_ Letters, where every Line

speaks the considerate and the pious Mind, I could almost think the

Author had studied nothing but her Character. When Miss _Howe's_ lively

Vein and flowing Wit entertains me, She appears to have been the

principal Person in his Thoughts. When Mrs. _Harlowe_ writes, her broken

half-utter'd Sentences are so many Pictures of the broken timorous

Spirit of Meekness tyrannised over, that dictates to her Pen. When Mr.

_Harlowe_ condescends to sign his much valued Name, the dictatorial

Spirit of an indulged tyrannic Disposition indites every arbitrary

Command. When _John Harlowe_ writes, the Desire of proving himself of

Consequence from his Fortune, and being infected with the Idea of his

Niece's Disobedience, (a Word which continually resounded through his

Family) plainly appear to be the only two Causes that make him insist on

her Compliance. In _Anthony Harlowe's_ Roughness and Reproaches, 'The

Sea prosper'd Gentleman, (as _Clarissa_ says) not used to any but

elemental Controul, and even ready to buffet that, blusters as violently

as the Winds he was accustomed to be angry at.' In _James Harlowe's_

Letters, we see how the Mind infected with the complicated Distemper of

Envy, Insolence and Malice, can blot the fair Paper, and poison it with

its Venom. In _Arabella Harlowe_, the sly Insinuations of feminine Envy

break forth in every taunting Word, and she could "speak Daggers, tho'

she dared not use them." But, to imitate our Author, in turning suddenly

from this detestable Picture, how does every Line of the good Mrs.

_Norton_ shew us a Mind inured to, and patiently submitting to

Adversity, looking on Contempt as the unavoidable Consequence of

Poverty, and fixed in a firm and pious Resolution of going through all

the Vicissitudes of this transitory Life without repining.

Nor does the Author fail more in the preserving the characteristical

Difference of Stile in the Writings of _Mowbray_, _Belford_ and

_Lovelace_.

_Mowbray_, tho' he writes but two Letters in the whole, yet do those two

so strongly fix his Character, that every Reader may see of what

Consequence he made himself to Society; namely, to act the blustring

Part in a Club of Rakes, to fill a Seat at the Table, and assist in

keeping up the Roar and Noise necessary to make the Life of such

Assemblies.

Mr. _Belford's_ Letters prove, that he acts the second Part under Mr.

_Lovelace_; he follows the Paths the other beats through the thorny

Labyrinths of wild Libertinism; he has not the lively Humour of

_Lovelace_, altho' in Understanding I think he has rather the Advantage;

and his not being quite so lively, is owing to his not giving such a

loose to every unbridled Fancy; but he has less Pride, and consequently

more Humanity: this appears in the many Arguments he makes use of to his

Friend in favour of _Clarissa_; but these Arguments, as they are only

the Produce of sudden Starts of Compassion, and have no fixed Principle

for their Basis, could have no Weight with _Lovelace_; and the

fluctuating of a Mind sometimes intruded upon by the Force of

Good-nature, and then again actuated by the Principles of Libertinism,

is finely set before us by _Belford's_ Writings. And as there is a great

Beauty throughout the whole of _Clarissa_, in the specific Difference of

Stile preserved by every Writer, so is there an inimitable Beauty in

_Belford_ differing from himself, when he changes the State of his Mind;

his Stile accompanies that Change, and he appears another Man. He was

always more of the true Gentleman in his Stile than _Lovelace_, because

his Will was not enough overbearing to break through all Bounds; but

when his Mind is softned by the many different Deaths he is witness of,

and he becomes animated by _Clarissa's_ Example to think in earned of

reforming his Life, the Gentleman and the Christian increase together,

till he becomes at once the Executor of _Clarissa's_ Will, and, if I may

be allowed the Expression, the Heir to her Principles.

In _Lovelace's_ Stile, his Humour, his Parts, his Pride, his wild Desire

of throwing Difficulties in his own way, in order to conquer them, and

exercise his own intriguing Spirit, break forth in every Line. His

impetuous Will, unrestrained from his Infancy, as he himself complains,

by his Mother, and long accustomed to bear down all before it, destroys

the Gentleman, and equally every other amiable Qualification: For tho' a

Knowledge of the Customs of the World may make a Man in Company, where

he stays but a little while, appear polite; yet when that Man indulges

himself in gratifying continually his own wild Humour, those who are

intimate with him, must often have Cause to complain of his

Unpoliteness; as _Clarissa_ does of _Lovelace_. And by such Complaints

of _Clarissa_, I think it is very apparent, that the Author designed

_Lovelace_ should be unpolite, notwithstanding his Station, in order to

prove that indulged overbearing Passions will trample under Foot every

Bar that would stop them in their raging Course. But now I am upon the

Subject of the different Stiles in _Clarissa_, I must observe how

strictly the Author has kept up in all the Writings of his Rakes to what

he says of _Lovelace_ in his Preface.

'That they preserve a Decency, as well in their Images, as in their

Language, which is not always to be found in the Works of some of

the most celebrated modern Writers, whose Subjects and Characters

have less warranted the Liberties they have taken.'

The various Stiles adapted to the many different Characters in

_Clarissa_ make so great a Variety, as would, it attended to, in a great

Measure, answer any Objection that might otherwise fairly be raised to

the Length of the Story.

There is one Thing has almost astonished me in the Criticisms I have

heard on _Clarissa's_ Character; namely, that they are in a Manner a

Counterpart to the Reproaches cast on her in her Lifetime.

She has been called perverse and obstinate by many of her Readers;

_James Harlowe_ called her so before them. Some say she was romantic; so

said _Bella_; disobedient; all the _Harlowes_ agree in that; a Prude; so

said _Salley Martin_; had a Mind incapable of Love; Mr. _Lovelace's_

Accusation; for he must found his Brutality on some Shadow of a

Pretence, tho' he confesses at last it was but a Shadow, for that he

knew the contrary the whole Time. Others say, she was artful and

cunning, had the Talent only to move the Passions; the haughty Brother

and spiteful Sister's Plea to banish her from her Parents Presence. I

verily think I have not heard _Clarissa_ condemned for any one Fault,

but the Author has made some of the _Harlowes_, or some of Mrs.

_Sinclair's_ Family accuse her of it before.

As I have, as concisely as I could, pointed out the Difference in the

chief Characters of _Clarissa_, all necessary to the same End; in the

same Manner could I go through the Scenes all as essentially different,

and rising in due Proportion one after another, till all the vast

Building centers in the pointed View of the Author's grand Design. Of

all the lively well-painted Scenes in the four first Volumes, and all

those in the fifth previous to the Night before the Outrage, mention but

any of the most trifling Circumstances, such as _Clarissa's_ torn

Rufles, and Remembrance places her before us in all the Agonies of the

strongest Distress; insulted over by the vilest of Women, and prostrate

on her Knees imploring Mercy at the Feet of her Destroyer. Her Madness

equals, (I had almost said exceeds) any Thing of the Kind that ever was

written: That hitherto so peculiar Beauty in King _Lear_, of preserving

the Character even in Madness, appears strongly in _Clarissa_: the same

self-accusing Spirit, the same humble Heart, the same pious Mind

breathes in her scattered Scrapes of Paper in the midst of her Frenzy;

and the Irregularity and sudden broken Starts of her Expressions alone

can prove that her Senses are disordered. Her Letter to _Lovelace_,

where, even in Madness, _galling_ Reproach drops not from her Pen, and

which contains only Supplications that she may not be farther

persecuted, speaks the very Soul of _Clarissa_, and by the Author of her

Story could have been wrote for no one but herself. Whoever can read her

earnest Request to _Lovelace_, that she may not be exposed in a public

Mad-house, on the Consideration that it might injure _him_, without

being overwhelmed in Tears, I am certain has not in himself the Concord

of sweet Sounds, and, must, as _Shakespear_ says, be fit for Treasons,

Stratagems and Spoils. And to close at once, all I will say of the

Author's Conduct in regard to the managing (what seems most

unmanageable) the Mind even when overcome by Madness, he has no where

made a stronger Contrast between _Clarissa_ and _Lovelace_, or kept the

Characters more distinct than in their Madness. I have already mentioned

how much _Clarissa's_ Thoughts in her Frenzy apparently flow from the

same Channel, tho' more disturbed and less clear than when her

uninterrupted Reason kept on its steady Course. _Lovelace's_ Character

is not less preserved: his Pen or Tongue indeed seldom uttered the Words

of Reason, but the same overbearing Passions, the same Pride of Heart

that had accustomed him to strut in his fancy'd Superiority, makes him

condemn all the World but himself; and rave that _Bedlam_ might be

enlarged, imagining, that a general Madness had seized Mankind, and he

alone was exempt from the dreadful Catastrophy.

In the Penknife Scene _Clarissa_ is firmly brave; her Soul abhorred

Self-murder, nor would she, as she told Miss _Howe_, willingly like a

Coward quit her Post; but in this Case, could she not have awed

_Lovelace_ into Distance, tho' _her_ Hand had pointed the Knife, yet

might _he_ properly have been said to have struck the Blow. The

picturesque Attitude of all present, when _Clarissa_ suddenly cries out,

'God's Eye is upon us' has an Effect upon the Mind that can only be

felt; and that it would be a weak and vain Effort for Language to

attempt to utter.

In the Prison Scene _Clarissa_ exerts a different kind of Bravery.

Insult and Distress, Cold and Hardships, to what she was accustomed to,

she bears almost in silence; and by her Suffering without repining,

without Fear of any thing but _Lovelace_, she is the strongest Proof of

what _Shakespear_ says, that

_----where the greater Malady is fixt

The Lesser is scarce felt----_

And let those who have accused _Clarissa_ of having a suspicious Temper,

from her being apt to suspect _Lovelace_, here confess, that it must be

the Person's Fault at whom her Suspicion is level'd, when she wants that

Companion of a great Mind, a generous Confidence; for how soon does

_Belford's_ honest Intentions breaking forth in the Manner in which he

addresses her, make her rely on the known Friend of her Destroyer, and

the publick Companion of all his Rakeries. Nor can I here pass by in

perfect Silence, the noble Simplicity with which _Clarissa_ sums up her

Story to Mrs. _Smith_ and Mrs. _Lovick_; for I think 'tis the strongest

Pattern that can be imagined of that Simplicity which strikes to the

Heart, and melts the Soul with all the softer Passions.

Remarks on Clarissa (1749) · 第 2 / 3 段