THE REQUESTED LETTER

(TO THE LADY-READER IN THE COUNTRY.)

New York, Nov. —, 1850.

DEAR MADAM,—Your note, of some weeks since requesting “a more

particular account of Jenny Lind as a woman,” I threw aside, at first,

as one I was not likely to have the means of answering. Overrun as she

is, in her few leisure moments, by numberless visits of ceremony, as

well as of intrusion and impertinent curiosity, I felt unwilling to be

one of the unremembered particulars of a general complimentary

persecution, and had given up all idea of seeing Jenny Lind except over

the heads of an audience. Fortunate chance has enabled me to see a

little more of her than a ticket entitles one to, however, and, as this

“little more” rather confirms and explains to me the superiority of her

gifts, I may be excused for putting it into print as a debt due from

herself to her celebrity.

Jenny Lind’s reception, of the two or three intellectual men into the

wake of whose visit I had been accidentally invited to fall, was not

with such manners as would be learned in society. It was like a just

descended spirit, practising politeness for the first time, but with

perfect intelligence of what it was meant to express. The freshness and

sincerity of thoughts taken as they rise—the trustful deference due a

stranger, and yet the natural cordiality which self-respect could well

afford—the ease of one who had nothing to learn of courtesy, and yet

the impulsive eagerness to shape word and manner to the want of the

moment—these, which would seem to be the elements of a simple

politeness, were all there, but in Jenny Lind, notwithstanding, they

composed a manner that was altogether her own. A strict Lady of the

Court might have objected to the frank eagerness with which she seated

her company—like a school girl preparing her playfellows for a game of

forfeits—but it was charming to those who were made at home by it. In

the seating of herself, in the posture of attention and disposal of her

hands and dress—(small lore sometimes deeply studied, as the ladies

know!)—she evidently left all to nature—the thought of her own

personal appearance, apparently never once entering her mind. So

self-omitting a manner, indeed, for one in which none of the uses of

politeness were forgotten, I had not before seen.

In the conversation of this visit of an hour, and in the times that I

have subsequently observed Jenny Lind’s intercourse with other minds, I

was powerfully impressed with a quality that is perhaps the key to her

character and her success in life—a _singularly prompt and absolute

power of concentration_. No matter what the subject, the “burning-glass”

of her mind was instantly brought to a focus upon it, and her question

or comment, the moment after, sent the light through the matter, with a

clearness that a lawyer would admire. Although conversing in a foreign

language, she comprehended everything by the time it was half expressed,

and her occasional anticipation of the speaker’s meaning, though it had

a momentary look of abruptness, were invariably the mile-stones ahead at

which he was bound to arrive. In one or two instances, where the topics

were rather more abstract than is common in a morning call, and probably

altogether new to her, she summed up the scope and bearing of them with

a graphic suddenness that could receive its impulse from nothing but

genius. I have been startled, indeed, with this true swift-thoughtedness

whenever I have seen her, and have analyzed it afterwards, and I have no

hesitation in saying that the same faculty, exercised through a pen,

would be the inspiration of genius. Jenny Lind, I venture to believe, is

only not a brilliant writer, because circumstances have chained her to

the wheel of a lesser excellence. Perhaps a vague consciousness that the

perfection of this smaller gift was not the destiny of which she was

most worthy, prompted the devotion of its gains to the mission which

compensates to her self-respect. Her charities are given out, instead of

thoughts “the world would not willingly let die.” Blessings are

returned, instead of a fame to her. She moves those within reach of her

voice, instead of covering all distance with the magnetic net-work which

will electrify while the world lasts. The lesser service to mankind is

paid in gold, the higher in immortality—but, fated to choose the

lesser, she so uses the gold that the after-death profit will be made up

to her in heaven. Jenny Lind choosing between gold by her voice or fame

by her pen, has been a _tableau_ the angels have watched with

interest—I fancy the “knockers” would rap twice to affirm!

But I doubt, after all, whether Sweden has yet lost the poetess or

essayist that Song has thus misled or hindered. She says very frankly

that she shall not sing much longer—only till this mission of

benevolence is completed—and what then is to be the sphere of her

spirit of undying activity? There is no shelf for such a mind. There is

no exhaustion for the youth of such faculties. I am told she has a

wonderful memory, and—for one work alone—fancy what reminiscences she

might write of her unprecedented career! Having seen everything

truthfully—estimated persons of all ranks profoundly—been intimate

with every station in life, from the Queen’s to the cottager’s—studied

human allotment behind its closest curtains, and received more homage

than any living being of her time—what a book of Memories Jenny Lind

might give us! If she were to throw away such material, it seems to me,

she would rob the eye of more than she has given to the ear.

The more one sees of Jenny Lind, the more one is puzzled as to her

countenance. One’s sight, in her presence, does not seem to act with its

usual reliable discretion. Like the sinner who “went to scoff and

remained to pray,” the eye goes to find her plain, and comes back with a

report of her exceeding beauty. The expression, as she animates,

positively alters the lines; and there is an expansion of her irregular

features to a noble breadth of harmony, at times, which, had Michael

Angelo painted her, would have given to Art one of its richest types of

female loveliness. Having once seen this, the enchantment of her face

has thrown its chain over you, and you watch for its capricious

illuminations with an eagerness not excited by perpetual beauty. Of

course, she never sees this herself, and hence her evident conviction

that she is plain, and the careless willingness with which she lets

painters and Daguerreotypists make what they please of her. I noticed,

by the way, that the engraved likenesses, which stick in every

shop-window, had not made the public acquainted with her physiognomy,

for, in a walk of two or three miles in which I had the happiness of

bearing her company, on a Sunday, and when the streets were crowded with

the comers from church, there was no sign of a single recognition of

her. It seemed the more strange, as many passed who, I knew, were among

her worshippers, and any one of whom would confidently give a

description of her features. So do not be sure that you know how Jenny

Lind looks, even when you have seen her Daguerreotypes and heard her

sing.

In reading over what I have hastily written, I find it expresses what

has grown upon me with seeing and hearing the great Songstress—a

conviction that her present wonderful influence is but the forecast

shadow of a different and more inspired exercise of power hereafter. Her

magnetism is not all from a voice and a benevolent heart. The soul,

while it feels her pass, recognizes the step of a spirit of tall

stature, complete and unhalting in its proportions. We shall yet be

called upon to admire rarer gifts in her than her voice. Deference and

honor to her, meantime!

And with this invocation, I will close!

Famous Persons and Places · 第 102 / 116 题