XVII

An English Radical, who would say of his King no more than that he was

a good little man, and most useful in promoting friendship with France,

was inclined to blame us because we did not stay by at the time of our

Revolution, and help them fight out as Englishmen the fight for English

freedom. He had none of the loyalty of sentiment which so mystifies the

American, but plenty of the loyalty of reason, and expected a Utopia

which should not be of political but of economical cast. But one was

always coming upon illustrations of the loyalty of sentiment with

which of course one could have no quarrel, for their patriotism seldom

concerned us, except rather handsomely to include us. The French have

ceased to be the hereditary enemy, and the Russians have now taken their

place in the popular patriotism. I always talked with the lower classes

when I could, perhaps because I felt myself near them in my unworthy

way, and one evening in a grassy lane I made the acquaintance of a

friendly man letting his horse browse the wayside turf. He was in the

livery-stable line, but he had been a soldier many years. Upon this

episode he became freely autobiographical, especially concerning his

service in India. He volunteered the declaration that he had had enough

of war, but he added, thoughtfully, “I should like to go out for a

couple of years if there was any trouble with Russia.”

The love of England comes out charmingly in the swarming of English

tourists in every part of their country. Americans may sometimes

outnumber them at the Continental shrines, but we are in a pitiful

minority at the memorable places in England; in fact, we are nowhere

beside the natives. I liked their fondness for their own so much that

I never could feel the fine scorn for “trippers” which I believe all

persons of condition ought to assume. Even when the trippers did

not seem very intelligently interested in what they saw, they were

harmlessly employed, for a scene of beauty, or of historic appeal, could

not be desecrated by the courtships which are constantly going on all

over England, especially at the holiday seasons.

The English are, indeed, great holiday-makers, even when past the age

of putting their arms around one another’s waists. The many and many

seaside resorts form the place of their favorite outings, where they try

to spend such days and weeks of the late summer as their savings will

pay for. It is said that families in very humble station save the year

round for these vacations, and, having put by twelve or fifteen pounds,

repair to some such waterside as Blackpool, or its analogue in their

neighborhood, and lavish them upon the brief joy of the time. They

take the cheaper lodgings, and bring with them the less perishable

provisions, and lead a life of resolute gayety on the sands and in the

sea, and at the pier-ends where the negro minstrels and the Pierrots,

who equally abound, make the afternoons and evenings a delight which no

one would suspect from their faces to be the wild thing it is. If they

go home at the end “high sorrowful and cloyed,” there is no forecast of

it in their demeanor, which is as little troubled as it is animated.

The young people are even openly gay, and the robustness of their

flirtations adds sensibly to the interest of the spectator. Our own

public lovers seem of a humbler sort, and they mostly content themselves

with the passive embraces of which every seat in our parks affords an

example; but in England such lovers add playful struggles. A favorite

pastime seemed to be for one of them to hold something in the hand, and

for the other to try prying it open. When it was the young man who kept

his hand shut, the struggle could go on almost indefinitely. I suppose

it led to many engagements and marriages.

When the young people were not walking up and down, or playfully

scuffling, they were reading novels; in fact, I do not imagine that

anywhere else in the world is there a half, or a tenth part, so much

fiction consumed as in the English summer resorts. It is probably of the

innutritious lightness of pop-corn; I had never the courage to look at

the volumes which I could so easily have overlooked; but I am sure it

was all out of the circulating library. As there were often several

young women to one man, most of the girls had to content themselves

with the flirtations in the books, where, I dare say, the heroines

were always prying the heroes’ hands open. On every seat one found them

poring upon the glowing page, and met them in every walk with a volume

under the arm, and another clasped to the heart. At places where the

hand played, and they were ostensibly listening to the music, they were

bowed upon their books, and the flutter of the turning leaves almost

silenced the blare of the horns. By what inspiration they knew when _God

Save the King_ was coming, and rose with a long sigh heaved in common,

I should not be able to say. Perhaps they always reached the end of a

story at the time the band came to that closing number, or perhaps they

felt its imminence in their nerves. The fiction was not confined to the

young girls, however. Both sexes and all ages partook of it; I saw as

many old girls as young girls reading novels, and mothers of families

were apparently as much addicted to the indulgence. I suppose they put

by their books when they took tea, which is the other most noticeable

dissipation in England. But I cannot enter upon that chapter; it is

too large a theme; I will say, merely, that as the saloons are on Sixth

Avenue, so the tearooms are in every part of the island.

[Illustration: LEADS A LIFE OF GAYETY ON THE SANDS]

Seven English Cities · 第 82 / 86 题