On The Essence Of

The Christian Religion.

First Meditation.

Natural Problems.

From the very origin of the human race, wherever man has existed,

or still exists, certain questions have peculiarly and

irresistibly fixed his attention, and they continue to do so at

the present hour.

{2}

This arises not alone from a feeling of natural curiosity, or the

ardent thirst for knowledge, but from a deeper and more powerful

motive: the destiny of man is intimately involved in these

questions; they contain the secret not only of all that he sees

around him, but of his own being; and when he aspires to solve

them, it is not merely because he desires to understand the

spectacle of which he is a beholder, but because he feels, and is

conscious of being himself an actor in the great drama of

existence, and because he seeks to ascertain his own part there,

and comprehend his own destiny. His present conduct and his

future lot are as much at issue as the satisfaction of his

thought. These great problems are, for man, not questions of

science, but questions of life: in considering them he feels

himself compelled to say, with Hamlet, "To be or not to be, that

is the question."

Whence does the world proceed, and whence does man appear in the

midst of it? What is the origin of each, and whither does each

tend? What are their beginning and their end? Laws there are

which govern them;--is there a legislator?

{3}

Under the empire of these laws, man feels and calls himself free:

is he so in reality? How is his liberty compatible with the laws

which govern him and the world? Is he a passive instrument of

fate, or a responsible agent? What are the ties and relations

which connect him with the Legislator of the world?

The world and man himself present a strange and painful

spectacle. Good and evil, both moral and physical, order and

disorder, joy and sorrow, are here intimately blended and yet in

continual antagonism. Whence come this commingling and this

strife? Is good or is evil the condition and the law of man and

of the world? If good, how then has evil found admission?

Wherefore suffering and death? Why this moral disorder?--the

calamities which so frequently befall the good, and the

prosperity, so abhorrent to our feelings, which attends the

wicked? Is this the normal and definitive state of man and of the

world?

{4}

Man is conscious that he is at the same time great and little,

strong and feeble, powerful and impotent. He finds in himself

matter for admiration and for love, and yet he suffices not to

himself in any respect; he seeks an aid, a support, beyond and

above himself: he asks, he invokes, he prays. What mean these

inward disquietudes,--these alternate impulses of pride and

weakness? Have they, or not, a meaning and an object? Why prayer?

Such are the natural problems, now dimly felt, now clearly

defined, which in all ages and among all nations, in every form

and in every degree of civilization, by instinct or by reflexion,

have arisen, and still arise, in the human mind. I indicate only

the greatest, the most apparent: I might recall many others which

are connected with them.

Not only are these problems natural to man; they appertain to him

alone; they are his peculiar privilege. Man alone, among all

creatures known to us, perceives and states them, and feels

himself imperiously called upon to solve them.

{5}

I borrow the following admirable observations from M. de

Châteaubriand:--"Why does not the ox as I do? It can lie down

upon the grass, raise its head toward heaven, and in its lowings

call upon that unknown Being who fills this immensity of space.

But no: content with the turf on which it tramples, it

interrogates not those suns in the firmament above, which are the

grand evidence of the existence of God. Animals are not troubled

with those hopes which fill the heart of man; the spot on which

they tread yields them all the happiness of which they are

susceptible; a little grass satisfies the sheep; a little blood

gluts the tiger. The only creature that looks beyond himself, and

is not all in all to himself, is man." [Footnote 2]

[Footnote 2: Genie du Christianisme, vol. i. p. 208, edit, of

1831.]

From these problems, natural and peculiar to man, all religions

have sprung. The object of them all is to satisfy man's thirst

for their solution. As these problems are the source of religion,

the solutions they receive are its substance and foundation.

{6}

There prevails in our days a very general tendency to regard

religion as consisting essentially--I might say wholly--in

religious sentiment, in those lofty and vague aspirations which

are termed the poetry of the soul, beyond and above the realities

of life. Through the religious sentiment, the soul enters into

relation with the Divine order of things; and this relation, of a

wholly personal and intimate character, independent of all

positive dogma, of any organized Church, is deemed to be

all-sufficient for man, the true and needful religion.

Unquestionably the religious sentiment, the intimate and personal

relation of the soul with the Divine order, is essential and

necessary to religion; but religion is more than this--much more.

The human soul is not to be divided and restricted to certain

faculties selected and exalted, whilst the rest are condemned to

slumber. Man is not a mere sensitive and poetic being, aspiring

to rise above the present and material world by love and

imagination: he not only feels, but he thinks; he requires to

know and believe as well as love; it is not enough that his soul

should be capable of emotion and aspiration; he requires that it

should be fixed, and rest upon convictions in harmony with his

emotions.

{7}

This it is that man seeks in religion; he requires something more

than a pure and noble rapture; he requires enlightenment, as well

as sympathy. But if the moral problems that beset his thought are

not solved, what he experiences may be poetry,--it is not

religion.

I cannot contemplate unmoved the troubles of men of lofty minds,

seeking in the religious sentiment alone a refuge against doubt

and impiety. It is well to preserve, in the shipwreck of faith

and the chaos of thought, the great instincts of our nature, and

not to lose sight of the sublime requirements which remain

unsatisfied. I know not to what extent, men of eminent minds may

thus compensate, by their sincerity and fervour of sentiment, for

the void in their belief; but let them not deceive themselves;

barren aspirations and specious doubts satisfy a man as little as

to his future spiritual interests as with respect to his

condition in the present life; the natural problems to which I

have alluded will ever be the great weight pressing upon the

soul, and religious sentiment will never alone suffice to be the

religion of mankind.

{8}

Besides this apotheosis of religious sentiment, some at the

present day have essayed a different, a more serious and more

daring theory. Far from sounding the natural problems to which

religions correspond, schools of philosophy, occupying a

prominent intellectual position,--the Pantheistic School, and the

so-called Positive School,--suppress and deny them altogether. In

their view, the world has existed, of itself, from all eternity,

as have the laws also by which it is sustained and developed. In

their elementary principles, and taken altogether, all things

have ever been what they now are, and what they will ever

continue to be. There is no mystery in this universe; there exist

only facts and laws, naturally and necessarily linked together;

and these furnish the field for human science, which, although

incomplete, is yet indefinitely progressive, in its power as well

as in its operations.

{9}

According to these views, Divine Providence and human liberty,

the origin of evil, the commingling and the strife of good and

evil in the world, and in man, the imperfection of the present

order of things, and the destiny of man, the prospect of the

re-establishment of order in the future--these are all mere

dreams, freaks of man's thought: no such questions indeed exist,

inasmuch as the world is eternal, it is in its actual state

complete, normal, and definitive, though at the same time

progressive. The remedy for the moral and physical evils which

afflict mankind, must then be sought, not in any power superior

to the world, but simply in the progress of the sciences and the

advance of human enlightenment.

{10}

I shall not here discuss this system; I do not even qualify it by

its true name; I merely recapitulate its tenets. But, at the

first and simple aspect, what contempt does it manifest of the

spontaneous and universal instincts of man! What heedlessness of

the facts which fill and never cease to characterize the

universal history of the human race!

Nevertheless to this we are come: not a solution, but the

negation of the natural problems, which irresistibly occupy the

human soul, is presented to man for his full satisfaction and

repose. Let him follow the mathematical or physical sciences; let

him be a mechanician, chemist, critic, novelist, or poet; but let

him not enter upon what is termed the sphere of religious and

theological inquiry: here are no real questions to solve, nought

to investigate, nothing to do,--nothing to expect,--absolutely

nothing.

{11}

Second Meditation.

Christian Dogmas.

The Christian religion knows man better, and treats man better:

it has other answers to his questions; and it is between the

absolute negation of the problems of religion and the Christian

solution of these problems that the discussion lies at the

present day.

Some words there are which we now regard with distrust and alarm:

we suspect their masking illegitimate pretensions and tyranny.

Such, in our days, has been the lot of the word _dogma_. To

many this word imparts an imperious necessity to believe, at once

offending and disquieting. Singular contrast! On all sides we

seek for principles, and we take alarm at dogmas.

{12}

This sentiment, however absurd in itself, is in no way strange;

Christian dogmas have served as motive and pretext for so much

iniquity, so many acts of oppression and cruelty, that their very

name has become tainted and suspected. The word bears the penalty

of the reminiscences which it awakens: and justly. All attacks

upon the liberty of conscience, all employment of force to

extirpate or to impose religious belief, is, and ever has been,

an iniquitous and tyrannical act. All powers, all parties, all

churches, have held such acts to be not only permissible, but

enjoined by the Divine Law: all have deemed it not merely their

right, but their duty, to prevent and to punish by law and human

force, error in matters of religion. They may all allege in

excuse, the sincerity of their belief in the legitimacy of this

usurpation. The usurpation is not the less enormous and fatal,

and perhaps indeed it is, of all human usurpations, the one which

has inflicted on men the most odious torments and the grossest

errors.

{13}

It will constitute the glory of our time to have discarded this

pretension: nevertheless it yet exists, with persistency, in

certain states, in certain laws, in certain recesses of the human

soul and of Christian society; and there is, and ever will be,

need to watch and to combat it, to render its banishment

unconditional and without appeal. Subdued, however, it is: civil

freedom in matters of faith and religious life has become a

fundamental principle of civilization and of law. These

questions, affecting the relations of man to God, are no longer

discussed or adjusted in the arena and by a recourse to the hand

of political and executive power; but they are transported to the

sphere of the intellect and left to the uncontrolled working of

the mind itself.

But again, in this sphere of the intellect, these questions still

start up and call loudly for their peculiar solution--that is,

for the fundamental facts and ideas, the principles in effect

which their nature requires. The Christian religion has its own

principles, which constitute the rational basis of the faith it

inculcates and the life which it enjoins. These are termed its

dogmas.

{14}

The

Christian dogmas are the principles of the Christian religion,

and the Christian solutions of the problems of natural religion.

Let men of a serious mind, who have not entirely rejected the

Christian religion, and who still admire it, whilst denying its

fundamental dogmas, beware of this: the flowers whose perfume

captivates them will quickly fade, the fruits they delight in

will soon cease to grow when the axe shall have been applied to

the roots of the tree that bears them.

For myself, arrived at the term of a long life, one of labour, of

reflection, and of trials,--of trials in thought as well as in

action,--I am convinced that, the Christian dogmas are the

legitimate and satisfactory solutions of those religious problems

which, as I have said, nature suggests and man carries in his own

breast, and from which he cannot escape.

{15}

I beg, at the outset, Theologians, whether Catholic or

Protestant, to pardon me. I have no design to cite or to explain,

or to maintain, all the various doctrinal points, all the

articles of faith, which have been included in the term of

Christian dogmas. During eighteen centuries, Christian theology

has very often ventured to advance out of and beyond the limits

of the Christian religion: man has confounded his own labours

with the work of God. It is the natural consequence of the union

of human activity and human imperfection. This same result may be

traced throughout the history of the world, especially in the

history of the society and religion upon which God has grafted

the Christian religion.

At the time when God raised up Jesus Christ among the Jews, the

faith and the law of the Jews were no longer solely and purely

the faith and law which God had given to them by Moses: the

Pharisees, the Sadducees, and many others, had essentially

modified, enlarged, and altered both. Christianity too has had

its Pharisees and its Sadducees; in its turn it has been made to

feel the workings of human thought and the influence of human

passions on its Divine revelation.

{16}

I cannot recognize, in all the uncertain fruits of these labours,

the claim to the title of Christian dogmas. Nevertheless I have

no intention here to specify particularly and to combat such

tenets in the Church and in Christian theology, as I can neither

accept nor defend. It is not for me--and I venture to say, it is

not for any Christian--to scan critically the interior of the

Edifice, at a moment when its foundations are ardently attacked.

Far rather I prefer to rally in a common defence all who abide

within its walls. I shall here allude only to the dogmas common

to them all, which I sum up in these terms:--The Creation,

Providence, Original Sin, the Incarnation, and the Redemption.

These constitute the essence of the Christian religion, and all

who believe in these dogmas I hold to be Christians.

One leading and common characteristic in these dogmas strikes me

at the outset: they deal frankly with the religious problems

natural to and inherent in man, and offer at once the solution.

{17}

The dogma of Creation attests the existence of God, as Creator

and Legislator, and it attests also the link which unites man

with God. The dogma of Providence explains and justifies prayer,

that instinctive recourse of man to the living God, to that

supreme Power which is ever present with him in life, and which

influences his destiny. The dogma of Original Sin accounts for

the presence of evil and disorder in mankind and in the world.

The dogmas of the Incarnation and of Redemption, rescue man from

the consequences of evil, and open to him a prospect in another

life of the re-establishment of order. Unquestionably, the system

is grand, complete, well connected, and forcible: it answers to

the requirements of the human soul, removes the burden which

oppresses it, imparts the strength which it needs, and the

satisfaction to which it aspires. Has it a rightful claim to all

this power? Is its influence legitimate, as well as efficacious?

{18}

In my own mind I have borne the burthen of the objections to the

Christian system, and to each of its essential dogmas; I have

experienced the anxieties of doubt: I shall state how I have

escaped from doubt, and the ground upon which my convictions have

been founded.

Meditations on the Essence of Christianity, and on the Religious Questions of the Day. · 第 13 / 42 题