VI. PERSIA.

BIBLIOGRAPHY: We shall not attempt here to give a bibliography of the works

devoted to Mazdaism. We shall merely refer the reader to that of Lehmann in

Chantepie de la Saussaye, _Lehrbuch der Religionsgeschichte_, II, p. 150.

We should mention, in the first place, Darmesteter, _Le Zend Avesta_, 1892

ff., with introductions and commentary.--In my _Textes et monuments

relatifs aux mystères de Mithra_ (2 vols., 1894-1900), I, pp. xx ff., I

have furnished a list of the earlier works on this subject; the conclusions

of the book have been published separately without the notes, under the

title: _Les Mystères de Mithra_, (2d ed., Paris and Brussels, 1902; English

translation, Chicago, 1903). See also the article "Mithra" in the

_Dictionnaire des antiquités_ of Daremberg and Saglio, 1904.--General

outlines of certain phases of this religion have been since given by Grill,

_Die persische Mysterienreligion und das Christentum_, 1903; Roeses, _Ueber

Mithrasdienst_, Stralsund, 1905; G. Wolff, _Ueber Mithrasdienst und

Mithreen_, Frankfort, 1909; Reinach, _La morale du mithraïsme_ in _Cultes,

mythes_, II, 1906, pp. 220 ff.; Dill, _op. cit._, pp. 594-626; cf. also

Bigg, _op. cit._ [p. 321], 1905, p. 46 ff.; Harnack, _Ausbreitung des

Christent._, II, p. 270. Among the learned researches which we cannot

enumerate here, the most important is that of Albrecht Dieterich, _Eine

Mithrasliturgie_, 1903. He has endeavored with some ingenuity to show that

a mystical passage inserted in a magic papyrus preserved at Paris is in

reality a fragment of a Mithraic liturgy, but here I share the skepticism

of Reitzenstein (_Neue Jahrb. f. das class. Altertum_, 1904, p. 192) and I

have given my reasons in _Rev. de l'Instr. publ. en Belg._, XLVII, 1904,

pp. 1 ff. Dieterich answered briefly in _Archiv f. Religionswis._, VIII,

1905, p. 502, but without convincing me. The author of the passage in

question may have been more or less accurate in giving his god the external

appearance of Mithra, but he certainly did not know the eschatology of the

Persian mysteries. We know, for {261} instance, through positive testimony

that they taught the dogma of the passage of the soul through the seven

planetary spheres, and that Mithra acted as a guide to his votaries in

their ascension to the realm of the blessed. Neither the former nor the

latter doctrine, however, is found in the fantastic uranography of the

magician. The name of Mithra, as elsewhere that of the magi Zoroaster and

Hostanes, helped to circulate an Egyptian forgery., cf. Wendland, _Die

hellenistisch-römische Kultur_, 1907, p. 168, n. 1. See on this controversy

Wünsch's notes in the 2d ed. of the _Mithrasliturgie_, 1910, pp. 225 ff.--A

considerable number of new monuments have been published of late years (the

mithreum of Saalburg by Jacobi, etc.). The most important ones are those of

the temple of Sidon preserved in the collection of Clercq (De Ridder,

_Marbres de la collection de C._, 1906, pp. 52 ff.) and those of Stockstadt

published by Drexel (_Der obergerm. Limes_, XXXIII, Heidelberg, 1910). In

the following notes I shall only mention the works or texts which could not

be utilized in my earlier researches.

The Oriental Religions in Roman Paganism · 第 115 / 164 题