"The question of authority in the religious life, however, is more

specific than this, and is not to be met by an admission of the general

respect due to the human past and its choicer spirits, and our

dependence thereon for the fostering of instinctive impulses,

direction, and the confirmation of our experience. It is organized

religion that here makes its claim to fealty, as organized liberty,

organized justice do, in man's communal life. There is a joint and

general consent in the masses of men with similar experience united

into the Church, with respect to the religious way of life, similar to

that of such masses united into a government with respect to secular

things. The history of the Church with its embodied dogmas--the past of

Christendom--contains that consent; and the Church founds its claim to

veneration on this broad accumulation of experience, so gathered from

all ages and all conditions of men as to have lost all traces of

individuality and become the conviction of mankind to a degree that no

free constitution and no legal code can claim. To substitute the simple

faith of the young heart, however immediate, in the place of this hoary

and commanding tradition is a daring thing, and may seem both arrogance

and folly; to stand apart from it, though willing to be taught within

the free exercise of our own faculties, abashes us; and it is necessary,

for our own self-respect, to adopt some attitude toward the Church

definitely, not as a part of the common mass of race-tradition in a

diffused state like philosophy, but as an institution like the Throne or

the Parliament.

"But may it not be pleaded that, however slight by comparison personal

life may seem, yet if it be true, the Church must include this in its

own mighty sum; and that what the Church adds to define, expand, and

elevate, to guide and support, belongs to growth in spiritual things,

not to those beginnings which only are here spoken of? And in defence of

a private view and hesitancy, such as is also felt in the organized

social life elsewhere, may it not be suggested that the past of

Christendom, great as it is in mental force, moral ardour, and spiritual

insight, and illustrious with triumphs over evil in man and in society,

and shining always with the leading of a great light, is yet a human

past, an imperfect stage of progress at every era? Is its historic life,

with all its accumulation of creed and custom, not a process of

Christianization, in which much has been sloughed off at every new birth

of the world? In reading the Fathers we come on states of mind and forms

of emotion due to transitory influences and surroundings; and in the

history of the Church, we come upon dogmas, ceremonials, methods of work

and aims of effort, which were of contemporary validity only. Such are

no longer rational or possible; they have passed out of life, belonging

to that body of man which is forever dying, not to the spirit that is

forever growing; and, too, as all men and bodies of men share in

imperfection, we come, in the Fathers and in the Church, upon passions,

persecutions, wars, vices, degradation, and failure, necessarily to be

accounted as a portion of the admixture of sin and wrong, of evil, in

the whole of man's historic life. In view of these obvious facts, and

also of the great discrepancies of such organic bodies as are here

spoken of in their total mass as the Church, and of their emphasis upon

such particularities, is not an attitude of reserve justifiable in a

young and conscientious heart? It may seem to be partial scepticism,

especially as the necessity for rejection of some portion of this

embodied past becomes clearer in the growth of the mind's information

and the strengthening of moral judgment in a rightful independence. But

if much must be cast away, let it not disturb us; it must be the more

in proportion as the nature of man suffers redemption. Let us own, then,

and reverence the great tradition of the Church; but he has feebly

grasped the idea of Christ leavening the world, and has read little in

the records of pious ages even, who does not know that even in the

Church it is needful to sift truth from falsehood, dead from living

truth.

"If, however, a claim be advanced which forbids such a use of reason as

we make in regard to all other human institutions, viewing them

historically with reference to their constant service to mankind and

their particular adaptation to a changing social state; if, as was the

case with the doctrine of the Divine Right of Kings, the Church

proclaims a commission not subject to human control, by virtue of which

it would impose creed and ritual, and assumes those great offices,

reserved in Puritan thought to God only,--then does it not usurp the

function of the soul itself, suppress the personal revelation of the

divine by taking from the soul the seals of original sovereignty, remove

God to the first year of our era, relying on his mediate revelation in

time, and thus take from common man the evidence of religion and

therewith its certainty, and in general substitute faith in things for

the vital faith? If the voice of the Church is to find only its own echo

in the inner voice of life, if its evidences of religion involve more

than is near and present to every soul by virtue of its birth, if its

rites have any other reality than that of the heart which expresses

itself in them and so gives them life and significance, then its

authority is external wholly and has nothing in common with that

authority which free men erect over themselves because it is themselves

embodied in an outward principle. If personality has any place in the

soul, if the soul has any original office, then the authority that

religion as an organic social form may take on must lie within limits

that reserve to the soul its privacy with God, to truth an un-borrowed

radiance, and to all men its possession, simple or learned, lay or

cleric, through their common experience and ordinary faculties in the

normal course of life. Otherwise, it seems to me, personal experience

cannot be the beginning of Christian conviction, the true available test

of it, the underlying basis of it as we build the temple of God's

presence within us, and, as I have called it, the vitality of the whole

matter.

"Within these limits, then, imposed by the earlier argument, what, under

such reserves of the great principles of liberty, democracy, and justice

in which we are bred and which are forms of the cardinal fact of the

value of the personal soul in all men,--what to us is the office of the

Church? In theology it defines a philosophy which, though an

interpretation of divine truth, takes its place in the intellectual

scheme of theory like other human philosophies, and has a similar value,

differing only in the gravity of its subject-matter, which is the most

mysterious known to thought. In its specific rites it dignifies the

great moments of life--birth, marriage, and death--with its solemn

sanctions; and in its general ceremonies it affords appropriate forms in

which religious emotion finds noble and tender expression; especially it

enables masses of men to unite in one great act of the heart with the

impressiveness that belongs to the act of a community, and to make that

act, though emotional in a multitude of hearts, single and whole in

manifestation; and it does this habitually in the life of its least

groups by Sabbath observances, and in the life of nations by public

thanksgivings, and in the life of entire Christendom by its general

feasts of Christmas and Easter, and, though within narrower limits, by

its seasons of fasting and prayer. In its administration it facilitates

its daily work among men. The Church is thus a mighty organizer of

thought in theology, of the forms of emotion in its ritual, and of

practical action in its executive. Its doctrines, however conflicting in

various divisions of the whole vast body, are the result of profound,

conscientious, and long-continued thought among its successive synods,

which are the custodians of creeds as senates are of constitutions, and

whose affirmations and interpretations have a like weight in their own

speculative sphere as these possess in the province of political thought

age after age. Its counsels are ripe with a many-centuried knowledge of

human nature. Its joys and consolations are the most precious

inheritance of the heart of man. Its saints open our pathways, and go

before, following in the ways of the spirit. Its doors concentrate

within their shelter the general faith, and give it there a home. Its

table is spread for all men. I do not speak of the Church Invisible,

but mean to embrace with this catholicity of statement all

organizations, howsoever divided, which own Christ as their Head.

Temple, cathedral, and chapel have each their daily use to those who

gather there with Christian hearts; each is a living fountain to its own

fold. The village spire, wherever it rises on American or English

ground, bespeaks an association of families who find in this bond an

inward companionship and outward expression of it in a public habit

continuing from the fathers down, sanctified by the memories of

generations gone, and tender with the hope of the generation to come;

and this is of measureless good within such families for young and old

alike. It bespeaks also an instrument of charity, unobtrusive, friendly,

and searching, and growing more and more unconfined; it bespeaks a rock

of public morality deep-set in the foundations of the state.

"It is true that in uniting with such a Church, under the specific

conditions natural to both temperament and residence, a man yields

something of private right, and sacrifices in a greater or less degree

his personality; but this is the common condition of all social

cooperation, whether in party action or any union to a common end. The

compromise, involved in any platform of principles, tolerates essential

differences in important matters, but matters not then important in view

of what is to be gained in the main. The advantages of an organized

religious life are too plain to be ignored; it is reasonable to go to

the very verge in order to avail of them, both for a man's self and for

his efficiency in society, just as it is to unite with a general party

in the state, and serve it in local primaries, for the ends of

citizenship; such means of help and opportunities of accomplishment are

not to be lightly neglected. Happy is he who, christened at the font,

naturally accepts the duties devolved upon him, and stands in his

parents' place; and fortunate I count the youth who, without stress and

trouble, undertakes in his turn his father's part. But some there are,

born of that resolute manliness of the fathers, which is finer than

tempered steel, and of the conscience of the mothers which is more

sensitive than the bare nerve,--the very flower of the Puritan

tradition, and my heart goes out to them. And if there be a youth in

our days who feels hesitancy in such an early surrender into the bosom

of a Church, however broadly inclusive of firm consciences, strong

heads, and free hearts; if primitive Puritanism is bred in his bone and

blood and is there the large reserve of liberty natural to the American

heart; if the spirit is so living in him that he dispenses with the

form, which to those of less strenuous strain is rather a support; if

truth is so precious to him that he will not subscribe to more or less

than he believes, or tolerate in inclusive statements speculative and

uncertain elements, traditional error, and all that body of rejected

doctrine which, though he himself be free from it, must yet be slowly

uprooted from the general belief; if emotion is so sacred to him that

his native and habitual reticence becomes so sensitive in this most

private part of life as to make it here something between God and him

only; if his heart of charity and hand of friendship find out his

fellow-men with no intervention; if for these reasons, or any of them,

or if from that modesty of nature, which is so much more common in

American youth than is believed, he hesitates, out of pure awe of the

responsibility before God and man which he incurs, to think himself

worthy of such vows, such hopes, such duties,--if in any way, being of

noble nature, he keeps by himself,--let him not think he thereby

withdraws from the life of Christendom, nor that in the Church itself he

may not still take some portion of its great good. So far as its

authority is of the heart only, so far as it has organized the religious

life itself without regard to other ends and free from intellectual,

historical, and governmental entanglements that are supplementary at

most, he needs no formal act to be one with its spirit; and, however

much he may deny himself by his self-limitation, he remains a

Christian."

* * * * *

There was no doubt about it; we were lost. The faint tracks in the soil

had long ago disappeared, and we followed, as was natural, the draws

between the slopes; and now, for the last quarter-hour, the grass had

deepened till it was above the wheels and to the shoulders of the

ponies. They did not mind; they were born to it. What solitude there was

in it, as we pulled up and came to a stand! What wildness was there!

Only the great blue sky, with a westward dropping sun of lonely

splendour, and green horizons, broken and nigh, of the waving prairie,

whispering with the high wind,--and no life but ours shut in among the

group of low, close hills all about, in that grassy gulf! The earth

seemed near, waiting for us; in such places, just like this, men lost

had died and none knew it; half-unconsciously I found myself thinking of

Childe Roland's Tower,--

"those two hills on the right

Couched,"--

and the reality of crossing the prairie in old days came back on me.

That halt in the cup of the hills was our limit; it was a moment of

life, an arrival, an end.

The sun was too low for further adventuring. We struck due west on as

straight a course as the rugged country permitted, thinking to reach the

Looking-glass creek, along which lay the beaten road of travel back to

mankind. An hour or two passed, and we saw a house in the distance to

which we drove,--a humble house, sod-built, like that we had made our

nooning in. We drove to the door, and called; it was long before any

answer came; but at last a woman opened the door, her face and figure

the very expression of dulled toil, hard work, bodily despair. Alone on

that prairie, one would have thought she would have welcomed a human

countenance; but she looked on us as if she wished we would be gone, and

hardly answered to our question of the road. She was the type of the

abandonment of human life. I did not speak to her; but I see her now, as

I saw her then, with a kind of surprise that a woman could come to be,

by human life, like that. There was no one else in the house; and she

shut the door upon us after one sullen look and one scant sentence, as

if we, and any other, were naught, and went back to her silence in that

green waste, now gilded by the level sun, miles on miles. I have often

thought of her since, and what life was to her there, and found some

image of other solitudes--and men and women in them--as expansive, as

alienating as the wild prairie, where life hides itself, grows

dehumanized, and dies.

We drove on, with some word of this; and, eating what we had with us in

case of famine, made our supper from biscuit and flask; and, before

darkness fell, we struck the creek road, and turned southward,--a

splendour of late sunset gleaming over the untravelled western bank, and

dying out in red bloom and the purple of slow star-dawning overhead; and

on we drove, with a hard road under us, having far to go. At the first

farmhouse we watered the willing ponies, who had long succumbed to our

control, and who went as if they could not tire, steadily and evenly,

under the same strong hand and kindly voice they had felt day-long. It

was then I took the reins for an easy stretch, giving my friend a

change, and felt what so unobservably he had been doing all day with

wrist and eye, while he listened. So we drove down, and knew the moon

was up by the changed heavens, though yet unseen behind the bluffs of

the creek upon our left; and far away southward, in the evening light,

lay the long valley like a larger river. We still felt the upland,

however, as a loftier air; and always as, when night comes, nature

exercises some mysterious magic of the dark hour in strange places,

there, as all day long, we seemed to draw closer to earth--not earth as

it is in landscape, a thing of beauty and colour and human kinship, but

earth, the soil, the element, the globe.

This was in both our minds, and I had thought of it before he spoke

after a long pause over the briar pipes that had comraded our talk since

morning. "I can't talk of it now," he said; "it's gone into me in an

hour that you have been years in thinking; but that is what you are to

us." I say the things he said, for I cannot otherwise give his way, and

that trust of love in which these thoughts were born on my lips; all

those years, in many a distant place, I had thought for him almost as

much as for myself. "You knighted us," he said, "and we fight your

cause,"--not knowing that kingship, however great or humble, is but the

lowly knights made one in him who by God's grace can speak the word. "I

have no doubt it's true, what you say; but it is different. I expected

it would be; but we used to speak of nature more than the soul, and of

nature's being a guide. Poor Robin, I remember, began with that." "There

is a sonnet of Arnold's you know," I answered, "that tells another

tale. But I did not learn it from him. And, besides, what else he has to

say is not cheerful. Nothing is wise," I interjected, "that is not

cheerful."

But without repeating the wandering talk of reality with its changeful

tones,--and however serious the matter might be it was never far from a

touch of lightness shuttling in and out like sunshine,--I told him, as

we drove down the dark valley, my hand resting now on his shoulder near

me, how nature is antipodal to the soul; or, if not the antipodes, is

apart from us, and cares not for the virtues we have erected, for

authority and mercy, for justice, chastity, and sacrifice, for nothing

that is man's except the life of the body itself, the race-life, as if

man were a chemical element or a wave-motion of ether that are parts of

physics. "I convinced myself," I said, "that the soul is not a term in

the life of nature, but that nature is in it as a physical vigour and to

it an outward spectacle, whereby the soul acquires a preparation for

immortality, whether immortality come or not. And I have sometimes

thought," I continued, "that on the spiritual side an explanation of the

inequalities of human conditions, both past and present, may be

contained in the idea that for all alike, lowly and lofty, wretched and

fortunate, simple and learned, life remains in all its conditions an

opportunity to know God and exercise the soul in virtue, and is an

education of the soul in all its essential knowledge and faculties, at

least within Christian times, broadly speaking, and in more than one

pagan civilization. Material success, fame, wealth, and power--birth

even, with all it involves of opportunity and fate--are insignificant,

if the soul's life is thus secured. I do not mean that such a thought

clears the mystery of the different lots of mankind; but it suggests

another view of the apparent injustice of the world in its most rigid

forms. This, however, is a wandering thought. The great reversal of the

law of nature in the soul lies in the fact that whereas she proceeds by

the selfish will of the strongest trampling out the weak, spiritual law

requires the best to sacrifice itself for the least. Scientific ethics,

which would chloroform the feeble, can never succeed until the race

makes bold to amend what it now receives as the mysterious ways of

heaven, and identifies a degenerate body with a dead soul. Such a code

is at issue with true democracy, which requires that every soul, being

equal in value in view of its unknown future, shall receive the benefit

of every doubt in earthly life, and be left as a being in the hands of

the secret power that ordained its existence in the hour when nature was

constituted to be its mode of birth, consciousness, and death. And if

the choice must be made on the broad scale, it is our practical faith

that the service of the best, even to the point of death, is due to the

least in the hope of bettering the lot of man. Hence, as we are willing

that in communities the noblest should die for a cause, we consent to

the death of high civilizations, if they spread in some Hellenization of

a Roman, some Romanizing of a barbaric world; and to the extinction of

aristocracies, if their virtues thereby are disseminated and the social

goods they monopolized made common in a people; and to the falling of

the flower of man's spirit everywhere, if its seeds be sown on all the

winds of the future for the blessing of the world's fuller and more

populous life. Such has been the history of our civilization, and still

is, and must be till the whole earth's surface be conquered for

mankind, embodied in its highest ideals, personal and social. This is

not nature's way, who raises her trophy over the slain; our trophy is

man's laurel upon our grave. So, everywhere except in the physical

sphere of life, if you would find the soul's commands, reverse nature's

will. This superiority to nature, as it seems to me, this living in an

element plainly antithetical to her sphere, is a sign of 'an ampler

ether, a diviner air.'"

So I spoke, as the words came to me, while we were still driving down

the dark valley, in deeper shadows, under higher bluffs, looking out on

a levelled world westward, stretching off with low, white, wreathing

mists and moonlit distances of plains beyond the further bunk. We turned

a great shoulder of the hills, and the moon shone out bright and clear,

riding in heaven; and the southward reach unlocked, and gave itself for

miles to our eyes. At the instant, while the ponies came back upon their

haunches at the drop of the long descent ahead, we both cried out, "the

Looking-glass!" There it was, about a mile away before and below us, as

plain as a pikestaff,--a silvery reach, like a long narrow lake, smooth

as the floor of cloud seen from above among mountains, silent,

motionless,--for all the world like an immense, spectral looking-glass,

set there in the half-darkened waste. It was evidently what gave the

name to the creek, and I have since noticed the same name elsewhere in

the Western country, and I suppose the phenomenon is not uncommon. For

an hour or more it remained; we never seemed to get nearer to it; it was

an eerie thing--the earth-light of the moon on that side,--I saw it all

the time.

"The difference you spoke of," I began, with my eyes upon that spectral

pool, "is only that change which belongs to life, dissolving like

illusion, but not itself illusion. I am not aware of any break; it is

the old life in a higher form with clearer selfhood. Life, in the soul

especially, seems less a state of being than a thing of transformation,

whose successive shapes we wear; and so far as that change is

self-determined," I continued, making almost an effort to think, so

weird was that scene before us, "the soul proceeds by foreknowledge of

itself in the ideal, and wills the change by ideal living, which is not

a conflict with the actual but a process out of it, conditioned in

almost a Darwinian way on that brain-futuring which entered into the

struggle for animal existence even with such enormous modifying power.

In our old days, under the sway of new scientific knowledge, we

instinctively saw man in the perspective of nature, and then man seemed

almost an after-thought of nature; but having been produced, late in her

material history, and gifted with foresight that distinguished him from

all else in her scheme, his own evolution gathered thereby that speed

which is so perplexing a contrast to the inconceivable slowness of the

orbing of stars and the building of continents. He has used his powers

of prescience for his own ends; but, fanciful as the thought is, might

it happen that through his control of elemental forces and his

acquaintance with infinite space, he should reach the point of applying

prescience in nature's own material frame, and wield the world for the

better accomplishment of her apparent ends,--that, though unimaginable

now, would constitute the true polarity to her blind and half-chaotic

motions,--chaotic in intelligence, I mean, and to the moral reason.

Unreal as such a thought is, a glimpse of some such feeling toward

nature is discernible in the work of some impressionist landscape

painters, who present colour and atmosphere and space without human

intention, as a kind of artistry of science, having the same sort of

elemental substance and interest that scientific truth has as an object

of knowledge,--a curious form of the beauty of truth."

Heart of Man · 第 14 / 15 段