CHAPTER III

THE MORAL AND MILITARY EFFECT

When, on August 4, King Albert read his speech to the joint meeting of

the Belgian Chamber and Senate, it might well have been thought that

the darkest hour had come in Belgium’s long and troubled history. But

the King spoke with unfaltering resolve. Come what might, the Belgian

people would maintain the freedom which was their birthright. In the

moment for action they would not shrink from sacrifices. “I have faith

in our destinies,” King Albert concluded. “A country which defends

itself wins respect, and cannot perish.”

The speech echoed the feelings of a united nation. In the face of

peril, party was no longer known. M. Emile Vandervelde, leader of the

Socialists, accepted a post in the Ministry. Without hesitation, the

two Houses voted the measures of emergency proposed by the Government.

The announcement by M. de Broqueville, the Prime Minister, that German

troops were already on Belgian soil caused deep emotion, but the

emotion was not born of fear. It was the realisation of how priceless

is the heritage of liberty.

On that stirring day in Brussels, which witnessed the departure of the

King to join his troops at the front, the sentiment uppermost was in

truth “faith in the nation’s destinies.” Great Britain had sent her

ultimatum to Berlin in defence of Belgian rights. Not merely reservists

called to the colours, but volunteers in multitudes were anxious to

take up arms. Crowds besieged the recruiting offices. The public

feeling in the Belgian capital reflected the public feeling everywhere.

The mobilisation of the defensive forces of the country had proceeded

smoothly and swiftly. Though it was common knowledge that in no part

of Europe had the espionage system worked from Berlin become more

elaborate, the national spirit was but intensified. Then came news of

the fighting, and of the dauntless resistance offered by the garrison

at Liége. Later came the first of many German prisoners of war.

Mistakes and miscalculations undoubtedly entered into the

German disaster at Liége, and above all the mistake of grossly

underestimating the quality and efficiency of the Belgian forces. That

mistake was persisted in during all the attempts to storm the fortress.

It cost thousands of German lives. Not certainly until this war is over

will the extent of the disaster be really known. But that it was a

disaster of the greatest magnitude is beyond any question.

From the merely military standpoint, the shattering of three army corps

is a huge price to pay even for victory. But the shattering of General

von Emmich’s army accomplished nothing. It had merely proved that to

hurl men in massed formation against positions defended by modern guns

and rifles is folly. Elementary common sense, however, would enforce

the same conclusion. As the assaults upon Liége showed, elementary

common sense is not a strong point of Prussian militarism. Because

massed formations were used with effect by Frederick the Great, massed

formations were the one idea of some of his would-be venerators.

The moral effect was greater than the military. It brought down in

three days all that edifice of prestige which Prussian diplomacy,

Prussian espionage, and Prussianised philosophy had been labouring for

a generation to build up. To say that Europe gasped with surprise is to

state the effect mildly. The peoples opposed to German ambitions woke

as from a spell. The aspect of the war had changed.

Here was an army, part of the great Fighting Machine in which war was

presumed to be practically embodied as an exact science, beginning

a campaign with the blunder of assuming that men fighting for their

country were no better than half-trained mercenaries. The resistance to

the passage of the Meuse; the resistance offered to the troops sent to

seize the country south of Liége was treated as negligible. A general

of resource and experience would have reckoned on that resistance as a

certainty.

Neither Prussian strategy then, nor Prussian tactics, were the

perfection they had been taken to be. Both had broken at the first

test. Nowhere was the gravity of the moral effect better appreciated

than at Berlin. Henceforward the effort of Berlin was to efface it. In

that fact will be found the key to all the succeeding “severities” in

Belgium.

That in Berlin, at all events in official and informed quarters, the

surprise was as profound as elsewhere is proved by the fact that on

August 9, through the neutral channel of the Dutch Minister of Foreign

Affairs, the German Government made a second offer. The offer was in

these terms:--

The fortress of Liége has been taken by assault after a

courageous defence. The German Government regrets that as

a consequence of the attitude of the Belgian Government

against Germany such bloody encounters should have occurred.

Germany does not want an enemy in Belgium. It is only by the

force of events that she has been forced, by reason of the

military measures of France, to take the grave determination

of entering Belgium and occupying Liége as a base for her

further military operations. Now that the Belgian army has, in

a heroic resistance against a great superiority, maintained

the honour of its arms in the most brilliant fashion, the

German Government prays his Majesty the King and the Belgian

Government to avert from Belgium the further horrors of war.

The German Government is ready for any agreement with Belgium

which could be reconciled in any conceivable way with its

conflict with France. Once more Germany offers her solemn

assurance that she has not been actuated by any intention to

appropriate Belgian territory, and that that intention is far

from her. Germany is always ready to evacuate Belgium as soon

as the state of war will permit her.

Of course, the fortress of Liége had not been taken by assault,

though perhaps the Government of Berlin had been led to believe it

had. Coming from such a quarter the tribute to Belgian valour is

significant. Germany had fallen into a pit, and her “solemn assurance”

was not good enough to lift her out of it. The reply of the Belgian

Government was, a second time, an unhesitating refusal. Berlin must

take the consequences, and those consequences were serious.

The first necessity was to clear up the mess, and if possible to

conceal it; above all to conceal it from the troops who had to pass

over this same route. They must hear of nothing but victories.

Necessity for clearing up and concealment had a greater result in

delaying the German advance than even the successful resistance of the

Liége garrison.

Why, it may be asked, was the garrison withdrawn from Liége, leaving

only a force sufficient to man the fortifications? For that step there

were imperative reasons. To begin with, the defence of the city,

as distinct from the defence of the forts, had served its purpose.

It had not only delayed the German advance; it had inflicted grave

disorganisation. It was certain, however, that at the earliest moment

heavy German reinforcements would be brought up, and the defence

outside the forts overpowered by sheer weight of numbers. In the

violent fighting the garrison holding the trenches had suffered severe

losses, though these were light in comparison with the crushing

punishment they had inflicted. They formed, nevertheless, a body of

excellent troops still more than 20,000 strong. To have risked the loss

of these troops meant a reduction of the Belgian army in the field

which must seriously cripple its effective. The need of the moment was

a concentration of forces. Though the defence of Liége to the last was

important, still more important was the purpose which the Belgian army

was intended to serve throughout the campaign, and most important of

all the successful defence of Antwerp. Upon the defence of Antwerp hung

the nation’s independence.

While, therefore, the way was still open for retreat, Generals Bertrand

and Vermeulen, who had rendered conspicuous services and had proved,

like General Leman, that the Military School at Brussels is a nursery

of able and distinguished men, withdrew their forces and rejoined the

main army.

This measure was carried out with so much promptitude and secrecy that

the enemy, well-served as he was by spies, and in close observation

of the movements of the garrison, was not able to interfere. General

Leman remained to continue the defence of the permanent works. These

had been provisioned for a siege of at least two months.

Before evacuating the city the troops blew up all save two of the many

bridges which within the circle of fortifications cross the Meuse, the

Ourthe, and the Vesdre. At Liége, the Meuse divides. A considerable

district of the city is built on the island between the branches of the

river. The bridges left intact were a concession to public necessity,

but were those least likely to be of service to the enemy.

Destruction of the bridges greatly reduced the value of a hostile

occupation. The importance of Liége to the Germans as part of their

line of communications lay in command of the railways. These, however,

were dominated by the forts. So long, then, as the latter held out,

Liége, in any real military sense, was to the Germans valueless. In

view of the position of the Belgians it was therefore a well-advised

step to concentrate the strength of the defence on the works.

On August 8 and 9, the Germans before Liége were apparently quiescent.

But this seeming respite covered an unceasing activity. Masses of

wreckage mingled with dead bodies floating down stream bore testimony

to the severity of the struggle for the passage of the Meuse. As

rapidly as possible German engineers threw across the waterway beyond

the range of the Liége forts five floating bridges. The passage

secured, the enemy covered the country to the north with a screen of

cavalry, obstructing observation by the Belgian outposts and guarding

their bridge works against a surprise in force.

Evidently they were not certain that the departure of troops from Liége

might not be a ruse. Their severe handling had taught them caution.

Small bodies of uhlans stole into the city from the east on August

9. These, as usual, were men who had specially volunteered for the

service. Though they might never return, the ambition for the Iron

Cross is strong. They found the city and the entrenchments evidently

evacuated. No hostilities were offered.

Reports to the German headquarters of this state of things led to a

second demand for surrender. To secure protection for the defenceless

population a deputation of seventeen leading citizens sought an

interview with the German general. The deputation were seized as

hostages.

On August 10, German troops marched in without resistance. The city was

put under martial law and a “fine” of £2,000,000 imposed upon it. But

the occupation was a hollow triumph. Liége, as a military possession,

was a husk from which the kernel had been carefully withdrawn.

The defence, followed by the continued resistance of the forts, had

created a formidable tangle of difficulties. As the forts, by the use

of reinforced concrete, had been adapted to resist modern artillery

the shells, even of the 5·9 howitzers, made no impression upon them.

It was necessary to bring up from Essen the 28 centimetre howitzers,

and even the still heavier guns, 42 centimetre, specially made for the

prospective siege of Paris.

Needless to say, with the strategical railways to Aix already working

at full pressure, the transport of these heavy pieces played havoc

with the cut and dried time-table. There was the necessity, too, not

calculated for at this stage, of sending wounded to the rear, and

of replacing by fresh troops the battalions broken in the attempted

assault. To hurry troops to the front, lest the Belgians should move in

force upon the Meuse, was urgent. The sending forward of supplies was,

in consequence, badly hung up. The commissariat became for the time

almost a chaos.

If we sum up their situation at the end of the first fortnight of

the war we find that the Germans had accomplished little or nothing.

They had expected by that time to be close upon Paris. All they had,

in fact, gained was a passage across the Meuse. It is impossible to

overrate the military importance of this delay. During that fortnight

the mobilisation of the French had been completed without interruption.

At the end of it the British Expeditionary Force had been landed at

Boulogne. The calculated advantages of secret preparation which had

inspired the ultimata launched from Berlin were nullified. The first

principle of German strategy had failed.

Important as a subsidiary means of communication, the floating bridges

across the Meuse were in no sense adequate for the supply of such a

force as it was intended to send through Belgium to defeat the armies

of France and Great Britain and to seize Paris. Command of the railways

was indispensable. But without a reduction of the forts at Liége that

was out of the question.

The forts at Liége held out until August 19. The larger works were each

triangular in formation, armed with both heavy and quick-firing guns

mounted in steel revolving turrets. Three of these turrets were of the

disappearing type. On the discharge of the guns a turret of this type

falls out of sight automatically. By means of telescopic and reflector

sights, the guns can be “laid” for the next shot while the turret is

hidden from outside view.

To storm the forts, as had been proved, was not practicable. They had

to be broken up by the shells of the huge ordnance brought along for

the purpose, and mounted on massive concrete beds.

One by one the forts were broken up. They offered, however, an

unyielding resistance. Their garrisons knew that they were called

upon to sell their lives for the Belgian fatherland. None deserted

their posts of duty. There have been many acts of heroism in this war.

The defenders of the forts at Liége deserve an honoured place in the

memories of an emancipated Europe.

General Leman, who had taken up his quarters in Fort Loncin, was in

the fort when it was blown up by a German shell, which had found its

way into the magazine. He was saved by a signal act of bravery. “That

I did not lose my life,” he wrote in that affecting letter sent later

from his place of confinement in Germany to the King of the Belgians,

“is due to my escort, who drew me from a stronghold while I was being

suffocated with gas from exploded powder. I was carried to a trench,

where I fell.”

Most of the garrison were buried under the ruins, but the few survivors

risked themselves in this act of devotion. No better evidence could be

offered of the spirit of Belgian defence.

A German captain found the intrepid commander helpless and after giving

him liquid refreshment carried him as a prisoner into the city. The

defence of Liége, however, had fulfilled its purpose.

Hacking Through Belgium · 第 3 / 10 章